ОК, I is stopped. Do not want to mislead people.

I'm tired of fighting with trolls

Most of the people here are learning from your work.
The majority doesn't want you to leave.

But IF you must leave, please answer my question below so I can continue with my replication:

A while ago someone posted these would work as well as the 805.Would these transistors work OK?MJE15028Ghttp://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/MJE15028G/MJE15028GOS-ND/919489
or

MJE15030Ghttp://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/MJE15030G/MJE15030GOS-ND/919491


Thank you!
DonL

@semenihin-77

If inventors and experimenters can have enough thick skin to try and go above and beyond accepted methods, as you are and others are trying, then this same thick skin should be sufficient to absorb some of criticisms going our way. This is part of the normal process.

About energy production measurements, if the device is battery driven, then the output can go through a HV diode to a tank capacitor of let's say 250 volts and 80uF, then from there you put a 14vdc zener diode going back to the 12vdc battery. Then just run the device and put your volt meter on the battery to see how the voltage drops or stays same or increases. If you have a tank capacitor with much higher uF this is better if you want to then add a load across the capacitor like a bulb or even a resistor. If the bulb is lit to whatever brightness does not matter if the battery voltage does not drop or even increases.

@wattsup
I am in your same situation: my Ventex HV generator (9030D-120)...died...after few hours of good operations that allowed me to run several optimization tests. It died even considering that I took every conceivable attention to not overload it Last good setup has been without the connection to center tap secondary. In that case the lamp's filament being incandescence. So now I do not know how to go on as I have TV flyback units...but I lack the old schematics hence not easy to locate the correct connections.
Roberto

@ronotte

I know it's not that easy. Sorry about your HV source. Again the FBT is the key but the key keeps on breaking in the lock. Here is how to find the right pins on the FBT.
http://lifters.online.fr/lifters/labhvps/tht.htm

The standard TV or monitor FBT was designed to provide HV to the picture tube. I do not think the picture tube is producing any feedback or return harmonics going back to the FBT. Also the frequencies of FBTs would not go higher then 90kHz. The problem I think is happening because all internal diodes will have the traditional diode specs including the reverse threshold (I think - lol). At a certain frequency higher then the 90kHz, I think the diode is permitting reverse induction that is colliding with the HV output trying to exit the FBT at the same time. Ultimately, I think we will eventually have to wind our own FBTs with some higher gauge wire then the thin wires in the standard FBT. We must remember that all standard components have gone through a design evolution that not only permits the required outputs but will also include lower production costs which is a "prime directive" due to economics. The thinner the wire, the lower the cost, the more profit. As long as the FBT works in its original intended usage, there is no other reason for these manufacturers to produce more robust FBTs. Hope fully I will receive my two bigger FBTs next week so I can start again. This weekend I will use the dissected FBT now that I have a new core for it. Maybe this will work out better.

@All present Yokers.

I suggest you go to http://www.freepatentsonline.com and register there and do some searches for "deflection yoke" and "CRT flyback". Reading up on some of those patents will open up some new avenues of perspective on the Yoke and the FBT. There are so many patents but any of them will have pertinent info and maybe newer ideas if you read between the lines.

Check this one - CRT Deflection Yoke With Ringing Suppression - Patent 5039922 here;
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/result.html?query_txt=5039922&sort=relevance&srch=top&search=

This gives you a good idea on the possible 15T to 50T effects.

@stivep

I am thinking of opening a new thread that I will maybe call "WNYg Flyback to Caduceus Coil or Deflection Yoke Trials" but I do not want to use the term "WNYg" without permission from you. Even though I coined the term, as far as I am concerned you're the boss of it. Or, if you have another title, please advise.

What I am planning is to make this new thread, but lock it until I can get the first 10 posts (or pages if possible) occupied with a history of recent events. This way newcomers can just go to the first 10 to get up to speed. Otherwise we will be stuck on this thread with WNYg relevant posts being spread apart by several pages. What do you think? Also, that new thread will be only for WNYg works and irrelevant posts would simply be removed, no questions asked.

@stefan

If @stivep gives me the OK, is it possible to get moderator rights. I think @baroutologos was also nominated as moderator, but of course this would be his choice. If anyone else wishes to participate as moderator, please say so. Also, if you want to keep things the way they are, again, you are the boss.

@potential moderators of new thread.

We will have to setup some guidelines for posts and also a procedure to remove a post, mainly the post can be removed but it has to be copied onto a companion thread entitled "WNYg Thread - Removed Posts" and that thread should remain locked. We should do this to protect ourselves from accusations of censorship. We don't want to censor anything. We just want to keep the thread lean and mean.

wattsup

In support


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7C86uORsmQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dEULZsLORc

It appears you set them to private before I had a chance to view them...  I find your approach to the kacher quite interesting, I wouldn't let a few naysayers discourage you.   Just ignore their posts and continue sharing your results, those that want to learn will - those who don't simply won't. 

I tend to be a bit analytical in the sense I want to know what the input and output is before I jump to any conclusions, I've been fooled before.   Don't take that as disbelief or that I'm trying to put down what your doing in any way - that is not my intention - I'm simply trying to prove, to myself, that what you have is real - proving your theory as best I can with the information you provided.   If I didn't believe I wouldn't have bothered attempting to build one.

To many people will become naysayers without even attempting to build a device, I've found over the years that even if you can't get it to work as the original inventor you always learn something from the build.    All to often there is much information left out of the description and you have to "guess" at what was done... maybe intentional maybe the inventor "assumes" a certain knowledge.   There are so many variables that it would be near impossible to replicate a device without clear and specific parameters of the original.   Sometimes it requires some previous experience of "how you got there", the experiments and devices that led you to the final version to truly understand what is going on.   The missing " Ah ha !  " moments of understanding what the original inventor saw keeps people clueless of what to expect or what their looking for.   


On the "homebrewed" HV caps I use the Pelican snow flite sleds for the dielectric.   I noticed they increased in price considerably since I purchased them - maybe because it's winter.   Still far cheaper than a store bought cap and if they do flash over you can repair them. http://www.amazon.com/Pelican-Snow-Flite-Roll-Plastic/dp/B002QZ2Q86 .   It would be nice to find this stuff on rolls - I make a lot of caps in various sizes for experimenting and purchasing caps of various sizes is simply to expensive for me.   

 Steve I'm glad you stuck around. Listen if anything we have found out that given the one way pulse it attracts a certain back flow or response of the medium that we send the pulse into. What if separating the pulse from the load is the answer. Pulse then divert the inrush through the load. Sort of a vacuum pump but in the electrical field spectrum. Tesla could have easily made an avramenko plug via tubes. This would allow the pulse to happen and broadcast the ping via antenna then the inrush would be directed into the load via the plug automatically. I think you should try this direction. Make sure you try shielding on anything up to the load to make sure the broadcast doesn't go off before you are ready to direct it to the antenna then the load. The antenna must be in the second part of the circuit and function like the in and out of the second part of the circuit.

P.S.
I resent very insolent behavior on the various forums, I'm tired to fight them. For example a person with the nickname freeenergyinfo.lt use my charts and videos without my permission, distorting and confusing information, motivated by the fact, once posted - so everyone can do with it what they want. At the same time he told me pishit personal messages, which requires to continue doing the show, or drink vodka and go to sleep .....
In the future, I'm not going to spread their own experience, or as expressed freeenergyinfo.lt - stupidity.


I want to express my appreciation to those people that write me letters of support, thank them!

My video for them will always be open, just give nicknames on YouTube.

Good luck to all in search of a safe and endless energy! ;)
Delamorto

TESLA PATENTS ...+ DELAMORTO.... = ??? ???
THANKS  ...
GOOD LUCK  DELAMORTO ...................................

delamorto fake FREE ENERGY video  history ....

www.realstrannik.ru/forum/19-svobodnaya-energiya/4167-ustanovka-delamorto-qperezagruzkaq.html?limit=18&start=1890

HISTORY ....

 DELETE DELAMORTO ,, FREE ENERGY ,,  VIDEO .....

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urdotg_CPJo

DELAMORTO ........................

www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/delamorto/

ANTANAS
LITHUANIA

 Is a mistake of connections?

I personally don't think Delamorto faked anything. When a person does post something that is actually working, it is hard enough to defend it. Why risk more ridicule faking something. It can be argued properly if the measurements, etc actually show overunity.

Hopefully I will have something to offer but don't look forward to the ridicule.

John


VIEV ENGLIS FORUM  HISTORY .....

www.translate.google.lt/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=lt&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.realstrannik.ru%2Fforum%2F19-svobodnaya-energiya%2F4167-ustanovka-delamorto-qperezagruzkaq.html%3Flimit%3D18%26start%3D1890

ANTANAS
LITHUANIA