Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16593921 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4381 on: October 28, 2010, 06:15:31 PM »
new picture from madsatbg

and what do madsatbg claim with this picture? if tariel drawed the green box then that is otherwise thats not the "green box",   there could be anything in the box,  even an ime (iron mutation effect generator)  anything is possible,

Coruscant

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4382 on: October 28, 2010, 06:26:37 PM »
Some things don't change I guess.   :)  Good luck.

Gene

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4383 on: October 28, 2010, 11:52:07 PM »
okay i have found from my own experiments which i could not replicate anymore, but i found that there is a frequency doubling effect i get, i introduce for example  200 khz to one coil and the outcome from the other coil is 400 khz, and i have found that the most important thing is achieving frequency stability, im not talking into the nowhere and this is not a theory as i have seen it with my own eyes when i disconnected my leads and put them away from my coils,  I know which way to head now.  the frequency stabilizer is a very important part of the circuit.

this might be of interrest
www.tetcor.com/Ping%20ICST_2005.pdf
read it all, dont just go through it, be patient

core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4384 on: October 30, 2010, 03:44:04 AM »
I was hoping, and praying, to find a quote from Tesla saying the below. To me this is 'the most important' thing to do.

Tesla
Quote
This is a form of break which I developed in working with alternators.  I recognized that it was of tremendous advantage to break at the peak of the wave.  If I used just an ordinary break, it would make and break the current at low as well as high points of the wave.  Of this apparatus I had two forms; one in which I drove the break right from the shaft of the dynamo and the other in which I drove it with an isochronous motor.  Then, by a movement of these knobs (K K), I would make the adjustments so that the makes would occur exactly at the top of the wave.  That is a form of break which is embodied in hundreds of patents and used now extensively.

Tesla did not allow the magnetic field to manifest itself. So at 90 Deg. the mechanical break was opened. Closed again at 270 Deg. The electric field was used to charge condensers and then a spark gap was used to inject the power.

What can be taken from the above quote. A 'break' of some kind must be used. This break has to be timed to prevent the magnetic field from being created. Spark gap is used to 'discharge' energy accumulated in the condenser from electric field.

Not doing the above is simply not Tesla.

Respectfully,

Core

dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4385 on: October 30, 2010, 05:16:02 AM »
I was hoping, and praying, to find a quote from Tesla saying the below. To me this is 'the most important' thing to do.

Tesla
Tesla did not allow the magnetic field to manifest itself. So at 90 Deg. the mechanical break was opened. Closed again at 270 Deg. The electric field was used to charge condensers and then a spark gap was used to inject the power.

What can be taken from the above quote. A 'break' of some kind must be used. This break has to be timed to prevent the magnetic field from being created. Spark gap is used to 'discharge' energy accumulated in the condenser from electric field.

Not doing the above is simply not Tesla.

Respectfully,

Core

Awesome find!!

Thank you
DonL

core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4386 on: October 30, 2010, 05:35:49 AM »
I was hoping, and praying, to find a quote from Tesla saying the below. To me this is 'the most important' thing to do.

Tesla
Tesla did not allow the magnetic field to manifest itself. So at 90 Deg. the mechanical break was opened. Closed again at 270 Deg. The electric field was used to charge condensers and then a spark gap was used to inject the power.

What can be taken from the above quote. A 'break' of some kind must be used. This break has to be timed to prevent the magnetic field from being created. Spark gap is used to 'discharge' energy accumulated in the condenser from electric field.

Not doing the above is simply not Tesla.

Respectfully,

Core


The following link is the patent to the above device.

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-568,180-producing-high-frequency-currents

Respectfully,

Core

penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4387 on: October 30, 2010, 08:45:37 AM »
Hi,

Do you reckon Kooler has nailed it ?

Have a look in the SQM - VTA thread.

Penno

Pathfinder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4388 on: October 30, 2010, 11:43:53 AM »
Some more for Tesla

Pinoy_Tech

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4389 on: October 30, 2010, 03:57:15 PM »
I tested the following setup and got a surprising result.

I made the scheme as proposed by Cosmo. I combined the ammeter to extract DC voltage that powers the circuit. When you hit the right frequency of LV and HV to get the electricity supply LV halving a light load 50% more. Spark gap is quiet and weak.

Embedded power on HV side is half the size of the one I took at the source of the LV.
Load glows stronger force before a combination of frequencies affected.

If the HV is connected via large coils (as in garden Kapanadze set), source current LV almost gone .?????

As someone has already said on the forum (think Cosmo): Unable to get out more than it invests, but the HV can get the source current vanishes

HV is used as a current source, but without the required input voltage can not even get to the exit.

Hi,
     I'm curious about your HV, are you using a push-pull driver ckt, totem pole or a single stage drive? May we have your schematic if okay with you? Or any link or any info as to whether what kind of contruction you have made on your hv? Is that DC or AC output? I'm designing a push-pull HV drive circuit, preferably a double contour as described by our fellow friend Cosmo. HOT tv flyback can also possible to modify, we can remove the trippler diode inside if we want, but there must be a special tool and chemical to use for soaking.

Thanks,
jronel 

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4390 on: October 30, 2010, 10:02:35 PM »
Some more for Tesla

i have had experiments using this concept long ago, and actually when you connect the ground side to a metal plate lying on ground the bulb will shine twice as much as with ground. at specific frequencies the bulb lights up even more but also dependent on you iinductance of your coils, i found that i could raise inductance twice as large with a magnet stacked to this kind of transformer. the output was twice as much.  you reminded me of something about this too, so great thanks to you friend

cosmoLV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4391 on: October 30, 2010, 10:24:46 PM »
Some more for Tesla

This concept are "Totally wrong" represents a Don Smith device concept who are not and newer works!
internet are full of garbage of these concepts! Think for yourself and think who are placing free energy device on Network - you are right, no one!

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4392 on: October 30, 2010, 10:43:47 PM »
This concept are "Totally wrong" represents a Don Smith device concept who are not and newer works!
internet are full of garbage of these concepts! Think for yourself and think who are placing free energy device on Network - you are right, no one!

I think the same, beacuse the apparatus is not as simple as this, but simple if you understand it, and those who understand it are not likely to post anything because they observe things from different angles.  i have actually gained rememberence from this picture that he posted but it is completely different,  but cosmolv we might talking about two or several more devices here which are related to eachother in some way but they work on totally different principles,     i think that by magnetizing a piece of iron and raising the inductance of a wire can let more electrons flow through it and this is a more efficient way to transmit current, if you have seen my picture of my logic pattern and my previous experiments then you know where im up to.

desa

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4393 on: October 31, 2010, 01:13:22 AM »

My friends experimenters.
If you permit me I would like to introduce one of my experiments that is absolutely stunning. I mean it in most explicit term. This experiment is absolutely deadly so pay attention where your fingers are if you decide to replicate. I am at it for some time and need some assistance to get my reed switch replaced with the solid state ASP. The first time I started the apparatus I used regular reed switch and it lasted two firings. I got some more from EBay and it was destroyed in a pif. Finally I got some strong one that can handle 10.000V and with it worked perfectly .  The parts used are of the shelf nothing special. Coils are disassembled solenoid, magnets are from old microway Magnetron unit taken apart. The ferrite coils are power supply filters and Lincoln rods are from local welding supplier. Most fascinating thing is as you can see from the videos that as I pas the magnet over reed switch the output is generated only upon taking the magnet away not in introducing it to the switch. Power generated is in exes of the thousand volts and probably more because touching it you are destined to kiss the ground. I say probably more because it is impossible to use DMM it flies like nuts and is useless. In couple of passes I charge caps banks and light regular 40W neon power saver perfectly. Four footer Neon lights easily. In conclusion all I can say I played long enough with this little thing to know what it can do. I am certain power out exceeds input. I know what you are going to say here we go again. Well all can say in my defense, ask yourself what voltage is necessary to bridge such a gap and spark and you have it all. Experiment and try before asking questions or condemning it. Look at the bright side it is all in front of you. Do what you want. I have been on the boards long enough and spent countless hours in mu shop working and experimenting. To be so simple is a slap in the face. So one more who cares. From me to you.
Respectfully David.   



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM27VekKO08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wG7ud711d_Q

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4394 on: October 31, 2010, 04:11:11 AM »

Thanks a lot for your presentation.