Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16594280 times)

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4365 on: October 28, 2010, 06:41:33 AM »
@core:
Call me an idiot if i'm wrong. Permanent magnet DOES NOT create transverse wave flux! It's longitudinal wave flux. Same as gravity is longitudinal.

Example when Frolov made this experiment (it's easy, even baby can do it, yet he did the experiment (none of us doing real testing!!!!) he see the effect. http://www.thelivingmoon.com/41pegasus/01archives/Electrogravitics.htm

It's about longitudinal dielectric filed and gravity field (which is the same flux field) canceling or adding together. Levitation is done this way.

Scientific community do it look so difficult. Forget old knowledge. Just go with Nassim Haramein, he brings it to the point. Haramein embarassed them so many times while they look like idiots while everything is so simple. Watch his videos with full heart to not miss any part.

So if you go with coils, using high amperes, you only waste energy in my opinion.We must go with capacitors, they do not need any ampere. That's why Tiger2007 use somehow plates to involve this field flux.

I was thinking a lot a few days back. And now you mentioned something similar. That's why i did write this reply. But instead going the wrong flux way, use the right longitudinal flux to imitate a permanent magnet movement inside a coil.

Why do you think that since your ampere-meter moves if you move a fix magnet in a coil, that transverse flux is the main cause from magnet ? Maybe it's longitudinal flux from magnet that goes TOGETHER and forces that transverse flux also to show up which in turn creates amperes ? And if we connect one end of coil to ground like TC did, we can have any large amount of amperage depending of our magnet movement imitation and it's flux change rate. Independently of our control circuit, which would eat very little energy.

Maybe Tariel do it the right way with voltage and he need no ferrite. Maybe SR and Cosmo used the ampere way, the unfavorable way with not much yield.

If i could do experiment, i will do integrate plates and try to flip flop voltage on capacitor. I would perhaps have 2 of such capacitors, one from middle to left and one from middle to right on the coil , to create a flip-flop flux, center GND. Same, using 2 transistors, when one is shut (OFF) other is active (ON). I would discharge the OFF cap when other is applied with high voltage and vice versa. Or the discharging itself and timing thereof could be managed with spark gaps.

@stivep:
All my problems come from 5-year old IQ in every person i met so far. Everybody go with the guy saying "i love you" by opening her legs, the low level love, and waste herself forever. They think this is love! LOL. I can not find a lady who also will open heart level love (open your arms and hug) or even the head level love (open your consciousness and understand reality and me and support me/us to 100 %). There are no lady with heart and head level love, only low life form wh*res. That's why the world population must go down, it's full with this and their counterpart man. Please nature, mother earth, take them down (or even the bad guys in power (with chemtrails, vaccines, viruses etc trying reducing population), Upps (did i speak wrong now ?!?!) :-) )!

This subject is related with free energy.

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4366 on: October 28, 2010, 07:29:30 AM »
Additional thoughts:

(a) Coil + ferrite
(b) Coil + magnet

(a) is different than (b).

(a) uses transverse flux to transform energy from one side of transformer to other
(b) creates current !

In category (a) we have simple transformers, the BIFF transformer, SR device etc. Yes we even hack the ferrite (finding right HF to make it resonate to get more flux lines).

In last post of me and in Core's we go to the idea to create a MAGNET and eliminate the mechanical movement by electrical means. And the idea is simple. The old known simple coil + magnet movement. I tried to point out that magnets have longitudinal flux. Everybody seems to confuse transformer/ferrite flux with magnet's flux.

One more claim from me. A magnet is a temperature hack! You align particles that are responsive to dielectric flux while they are embedded in fluid medium. Then you cool medium down to solid form and they're trapped! Thus you have permanent dielectric flux. It's real power that can be harnessed. If you bring back to fluid and then solid again, it's magnetic will be lost i'm sure.

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4367 on: October 28, 2010, 07:42:23 AM »
Two practical tests that i will perform if i can:

1) Take a neodymium magnet, place 2 flat conductor plates on N and S. Do not touch magnet (place paper in between). Measure voltage. Is there voltage measurable ?

2) Take 2 neodymium magnets and a cylindrical coil. Place each magnet on one end of coil. Like: NS-coil-NS. Flip magnets quickly by hand to this: SN-coil-SN. Do we measure any current movement in coil ?

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21

penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4369 on: October 28, 2010, 07:52:25 AM »
Guys,

On madsatbg youtube page, you will find in his favorites, in the second half of the video,
you are shown how to build the coil.

I have several questions -
1. Is the centre part metal or just a plastic core
2. Is this simply driven from a freq generator
3. Are the wires from the copper core simply soldered at the ends
4. and is it the same side or opposite of slit in copper.

I know our answer is in this video !

Regards, Penno

catalyst

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4370 on: October 28, 2010, 08:02:58 AM »
An idea, how the output coil could be wound:

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4371 on: October 28, 2010, 09:13:25 AM »
hey
maybe it's that simple : shake collapsing magnetic field
I feel that when you ring a bell bell response, but when you ring twice ambient response.Just an idea....

Shokac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4372 on: October 28, 2010, 10:24:56 AM »
I tested the following setup and got a surprising result.

I made the scheme as proposed by Cosmo. I combined the ammeter to extract DC voltage that powers the circuit. When you hit the right frequency of LV and HV to get the electricity supply LV halving a light load 50% more. Spark gap is quiet and weak.

Embedded power on HV side is half the size of the one I took at the source of the LV.
Load glows stronger force before a combination of frequencies affected.

If the HV is connected via large coils (as in garden Kapanadze set), source current LV almost gone .?????

As someone has already said on the forum (think Cosmo): Unable to get out more than it invests, but the HV can get the source current vanishes

HV is used as a current source, but without the required input voltage can not even get to the exit.

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4373 on: October 28, 2010, 12:16:04 PM »
This is from my previous experiment when i had the power supply disconnected and the bulb still glowed , after i tried different things, and one interresting thing was that i had twisted the cable on the output lamp, and there was a switch on and off, and even when i switched the lamp off, the cap discharged in some interresting pulsing way, i could feel the twisted wire gave off a ticking sound and i could feel it. this only happened in one stable frequency again, you can either explain it away or investigate it further, i have my logic pattern to follow i will follow it to the end and then publish the working device.
this is the simple experiment i did:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_hGQr6DGstUQ/TMlKAUWpJdI/AAAAAAAAAso/880f8yYJMiA/s1600/G.bmp

penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4374 on: October 28, 2010, 12:33:37 PM »
Hi Energia,

May I ask what voltage was the square wave pulse and what was the lamp volts/watts ?

Kind Regards, Penno

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4375 on: October 28, 2010, 12:51:32 PM »
Hi Energia,

May I ask what voltage was the square wave pulse and what was the lamp volts/watts ?

Kind Regards, Penno

square wave pulse 10 volt this time, 150 volts at secondary,  lamp is 25 watts, power in capacitor= far enough to kill a man, it loads to thousand times more than the input, that is when you wait about 5 seconds  to charge up then discharge it through the 25 watt lamp, and it will be lit once in a micro sec,
the lamp were off when the twisted wire did something which i cant explain.

zen_guru

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4376 on: October 28, 2010, 01:01:51 PM »
@energia9:
do you have a ferrite core in that coil?
can you tell the setup of the coil? turns, gauge?
what is your bulb rated voltage? 110 or 220?

thanks!

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4377 on: October 28, 2010, 01:13:31 PM »
@energia9:
do you have a ferrite core in that coil?
can you tell the setup of the coil? turns, gauge?
what is your bulb rated voltage? 110 or 220?

thanks!

Iron will dim the aparatus, the setup of the coil i allready posted see the above picture from my post, Bulb voltage 220-240 volts,   i have not counted turns and i have dissasembled the primary and secondary all i have in solid now is my ground coil with many turns, it is necessary in these experiments,   the gauge i cannot tell either, i have my wires dissasembled from a microwave oven transformer, and the prim and secondary are stranded mains wire,    one thing is very important in this setup that the Grounding coil has to have a very high inductance and resistance, by this you can place your primary and secondar coils as far away as you want it, even works better farer,  Without iron.

energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4378 on: October 28, 2010, 01:21:57 PM »
something about iron and ferrites,  they are not good in high frequencies, only if you have a higher permeability cores, otherwise they will dim the light of the bulb,  Do you think Nikola tesla Had high permeability cores?? (i donno)  you can possibly achieve nice effects with high permeability cores and ferrites, but i dont know, iron might not be needed for the tesla energy effect, dont take my word, do your own experiments, we might find that we dont need iron and we might find that we do, 50-50 if we dont know how it works.

Anyway read the eric dollard book, he done his experiments which are 100%real, its good that he dont just theorize, he have tried many things


tesla: Remember, now, that the water is incompressible, that the bag is perfectly elastic, that there are no hysteretic losses in the bag due to these expansions and contractions; and remember also, that there is a vacuum, in infinite space, so that the energy cannot be lost in waves of sound.  Then, if I put at a distant point another little pump, and tune it to the rhythmical pulses of the pump at the central plant, I will excite strong vibrations and will recover power from them, sufficient to operate a receiver.  But, if I have no pump there to receive these oscillations, if there is nowhere a place where this elastic energy is transferred into frictional energy (we always use in our devices frictional energy -- everything is lost through friction), then there is no loss, and if I have a plant of 1,000 horsepower and I operate it to full capacity, that plant does not take power, it runs idle, exactly as the plant at Niagara.  If I do not put any motors or any lamps on the circuit, the plant runs idle.  There is a 5,000 horsepower turbine going, but no power is supplied to the turbine except such power as is necessary to overcome the frictional losses.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2010, 04:44:50 PM by energia9 »

Shokac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #4379 on: October 28, 2010, 05:25:47 PM »
new picture from madsatbg