Author Topic: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim (Read 1185600 times)

PaulLowrance · « **Reply #240 on:** March 21, 2009, 03:54:51 PM »

We'll never know for certain ... well until humanity invents the time camera, but I still have my firm opinion about mylow, and you know what it is.

Anyhow, just to be certain mylow wasn't bumped off, maybe someone who has spare time and $ can replicate his design and/or Howard Johnson's. If by chance the Howard Johnson design is legit, then IMO it will take a lot of trial and error to get it just right.

PL

pinestone · « **Reply #241 on:** March 21, 2009, 04:11:42 PM »

Quote from: PaulLowrance on March 21, 2009, 03:54:51 PM

We'll never know for certain ... well until humanity invents the time camera, but I still have my firm opinion about mylow, and you know what it is.

Anyhow, just to be certain mylow wasn't bumped off, maybe someone who has spare time and $ can replicate his design and/or Howard Johnson's. If by chance the Howard Johnson design is legit, then IMO it will take a lot of trial and error to get it just right.

PL

Well, his design is quite simple and easily replicated (providing the rotor mags aren't in some random magnetic configuration). I'm currently involved with a project that is my primary focus, but be assured- when I get a break from it, mylow's motor will be my next project. I have enough screen shots and measurements to re-create it.
I'll find out for myself if it has any merit.

His 90 degree offset between the stator and rotor mags allow for the fields to be 'on edge', so-to-speak. Of which I find an unusual configuration.

Reiyuki · « **Reply #242 on:** March 21, 2009, 04:16:14 PM »

I'm mirroring all of Mylow's old videos here for all those interested:

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=reiyuki&view=videos

should be up within an hour

Paul-R · « **Reply #243 on:** March 21, 2009, 04:26:57 PM »

Quote from: sterlinga on March 20, 2009, 05:30:10 AM

[also posted to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mylow_magmo and linked from the "latest developments section at http://peswiki.com/energy/MYLOW ]
They also told him (paraphrasing), "We can't keep remagnetizing your magnet for you. It costs us
a lot of money to run that machine and to maintain the hydrogen....
Sterling

This is very intriguing.

How does one re-magnetise the magnet? Can anyone cast light on this? If there is a way to
magnetise, demagnetise, and remagnetise (possibly with the poles reversed) quickly without the
expenditure of much energy, this would, obviously, open many doors.
Paul.

PaulLowrance · « **Reply #244 on:** March 21, 2009, 04:28:19 PM »

pinestone,

true, his design is simple, but simulating realistic magnetic designs for years in ferrosim there's zero doubt that spacing and perhaps more importantly ***timing*** can be extremely critical. Spin it too fast, and the material does have sufficient time to recover. Most people have no idea the world of effects that occur inside magnetic material. I've shown real experiments of how magnetic material has *long term* magnetic viscosity, as in from seconds to days. People often refer to this as the "sweet spot." Hopefully there's enough resolution in mylow's videos. You'll need to know if mylow somehow removed some of the material on the PM's for a possible slight slope, the spacing, etc.

Best wishes,
PL

PaulLowrance · « **Reply #245 on:** March 21, 2009, 04:34:23 PM »

Quote from: Paul-R on March 21, 2009, 04:26:57 PM

How does one re-magnetise the magnet? Can anyone cast light on this? If there is a way to
magnetise, demagnetise, and remagnetise (possibly with the poles reversed) quickly without the
expenditure of much energy, this would, obviously, open many doors.
Paul.

In this thread I've already detailed how to magnetize alnico and hard iron PM's. You can use two NdFeB PM's. That's all! As stated in the prior post, I found it very unusual for mylow to say he spends money to magnetize those types of PM's. Heck, you could almost breath on them to magnetize such weak PM's.

PL

Thaelin · « **Reply #246 on:** March 21, 2009, 05:03:30 PM »

Good work guys, looks like he pulled all his vids.

thay

Omnibus · « **Reply #247 on:** March 21, 2009, 05:07:56 PM »

Not only looks like he pulled all his vids but he actually did pull all his videos.

lostcauses10x · « **Reply #248 on:** March 21, 2009, 05:31:23 PM »

Omnibus
I know who I am.
As for you stating scientific method, I wounder if you even understand such.
As for your paranoid delusions??? They are there in your posts, plain, simple, easy to see.
As for Al, well you don't like him it seems as is your right. Yet again your posts about him show your anger to delusions.
Hell even bringing him into this thread about some one (not Al) shows the bias you really have for all of these ideas. Are you the one sending threats to the person who pulled the videos?? Such would not be beyond realistic reasoning with what you show in your posts.

Ever heard of dyslexia and other learning, reading and speaking disability?? There is a good excuse for some of what folks saw and heard in the videos.

Hell dude you do not even begin to understand the pressure all of this crap place on a person. You simply do not have the empathy, or simply refuse to do so. I find that part of your posts the most telling thing about you. Are you or have you been diagnosed as Asperger??
Have folks told you you do not under stand others emotions and situations??

Apply some of the scientific method at your self dude.

capthook · « **Reply #249 on:** March 21, 2009, 05:45:59 PM »

For those that missed it-

New file posted in downloads:
Howard Johnson: Secret World of Magnets

I uploaded a 45 page .pdf by Howard Johnson (2.5 MB)
It discusses magnetic gates, vortices within a magnet, details of his 'banana' curved/cupped magnets etc.
Some different and interesting magnet theory is presented and worth the read.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item251

See the attached screenshots of a couple of items of interest.

- -
Whether the device was real or not, it does present/revisited some interesting ideas not usually considered.
(and all things considered, especially the lack of knowledge on his part of the pole arrangements reduces the probability further)

Quote from: pinestone on March 21, 2009, 04:11:42 PM

His 90 degree offset between the stator and rotor mags allow for the fields to be 'on edge', so-to-speak. Of which I find an unusual configuration.

This is an interesting point. The stator mag has a 'wide/flat' field while the rotor mags have a 'narrow/tall' field. And when the two intersect in the middle, you will have zero(or close to zero) interacting fields - no 'sticky spot'.
And the u-shaped stator is a different approach than usual. This might result in the approaching rotor mag 'riding' the spin of the stator on the way in, neutral at dead center, then repulsing 'riding' the stator spin on the way out.

Reiyuki · « **Reply #250 on:** March 21, 2009, 05:50:52 PM »

There's a small but nonzero chance that he didn't want the attention and needed to pull them till things die down a bit. I'm mirroring the site so people can still view them, and at least that way he doesn't get all the correspondence from before. If it's fake, then the damage was already done and putting them up won't hurt.

http://www.youtube.com/user/reiyuki

lostcauses10x · « **Reply #251 on:** March 21, 2009, 05:52:18 PM »

Now back to the subject of all of this;
It has been my experience that such claims are based on simple misunderstanding of what is going on. It was easily shown in this one by the compass video and how he thought it worked. Two different things it seems.

Even this information is still not showing the possible whys of it running.

In my experiences with this stuff, about 40 percent are true fakes, and the other 59 percent are misunderstanding of what is going on in were the energy comes from, and or what is really happening in a system.

Mistakes seem to be more common than out right fake. Most outright fakes are easy to spot.

pinestone · « **Reply #252 on:** March 21, 2009, 07:16:51 PM »

Quote

capthook: This is an interesting point. The stator mag has a 'wide/flat' field while the rotor mags have a 'narrow/tall' field. And when the two intersect in the middle, you will have zero(or close to zero) interacting fields - no 'sticky spot'.
And the u-shaped stator is a different approach than usual. This might result in the approaching rotor mag 'riding' the spin of the stator on the way in, neutral at dead center, then repulsing 'riding' the stator spin on the way out.

That's what I was talking about earlier in this thread. His magnets were oriented 90 degrees offset from stator to rotor.
Which means the fields are intersecting each other in the East-West plane, not North-South.
The East-West plane is the null, or zero. I refer to it as the 'edge' of the field.

Another item: For those of you who followed the Steorn stuff years ago, remember Sean talking about 'bad' magnets?
In my own experiments, I've re-polarized ferrite-magnets (bad) with a Neos (good) quite easily. The ferrite will return to it's original polarization once the Neo is removed.
Don't believe me? Try it.

Omnibus · « **Reply #253 on:** March 21, 2009, 07:24:01 PM »

@X00013,

What's going on? Trying to send you a mp but youtube says your account has been closed. Is youtube closing accounts left and right? Wonder why I still have one?

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #254 on:** March 21, 2009, 07:24:30 PM »

Ever heard of Stephen Walker?

Seems he played the same game as Mylow is doing now with Sterling D. Allan in , wait for it, 2002 !!!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4113.150;topicseen

The only difference, the 2009 version comes with You-tube videos.

Hans von Lieven

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim (Read 1185600 times)

PaulLowrance

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

pinestone

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Reiyuki

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Paul-R

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

PaulLowrance

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

PaulLowrance

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Thaelin

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Omnibus

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

lostcauses10x

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

capthook

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Reiyuki

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

lostcauses10x

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

pinestone

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Omnibus

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

hansvonlieven

Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim