Couldn't you cut one of these in half to replicate his C magnet?

http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=40075&cat=1,42363,42348&ap=2

ramset;
I disagree.

Spinner is more like a true Skeptic.

However forums and internet gave rise to thousands of synical Psycho Skeptics.

You cant argue the facts I presented. Skeptics by nature dont look close enough at evidenence supporting the theory.

They are supposed to. But in reality, most Skeptics dont look for supporting evidence, only evidence to debunk the claim.

As well as a skeptic will only choose to critisize a theory, based on his belief of it not being real.

You dont see unbiased skeptics, looking at both sides of the evidence, indifferently.

You see the exact opposite, a quick reflax action quickly pointing out the first obvious flaws or good counter claims.

This is entirely wrong way to find Any evidence, Pro or Con.

That is why skeptics will always have the Lower hand.

Note: Some True, Open Minded, Unbiased (Qualified) Skeptics, ther are reports that after investing a claim they did not believe, afterwords they believed in it due to the amount of supporting evidence they uncovered.

That is how a real skeptic works.

Unfortunetly, the theories and belief patterns of real Scientists have been shrunk into biased to unconventional theories. Accordingly, wanabe scientist skeptics also learn these techniques and add ther own "logic" to the equation and you have a fumbled solution.

It just doesnt, wont, and will never work, skeptism is only counter-productive.

This does not mean to blindly believe, or be unbiased unfairly to the Pro side of the Theory. Neutral, both sides. So naturally the majority of believers and open minded people, lack this first obstacle of unbiased opinion.

Because a believer doesnt exscusivly believe, they are open to being wrong.

Where a skeptic on the most part, exsclusivly doesnt believe in it, because that is a definition of a skeptic. And more then often, gets defensive when there claim is challenged, they refuse to be wrong, and also dislike being wrong, as well as ther "Job" of being a skeptic means, when they prove a theory wrong, they won a prize.

They won the theoretical debate. Ther smarter because they debunked this "hoax". Thus the skeptic has another disadvantage and ther is a winning and reward factor when a skeptic succesfully "debunks" a theory.

On the other hand, the believer, experimentor, or True Skeptic, does not really care if they prove or disprove the theory. Because to them, proving the theory wrong, is the same reward as proven it right

Probably they should not be neos but some weaker mags to avoid cooperative effects other than the first neighbors. Maybe that's why this 3-clustering works. Pairs of 3-clusters, rather. The role of that lone 4-cluster is even more unclear.

From: "skylinetomfox2118"
To: <HJ_Motor@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: MYLOW's Mangetic Motor

mylows magnet motor is the real thing guys, if any mag motor is gonna work,
this will, i tryed it on a plastic disk with some bar magnets taped to it
and put a horse shoe magnet inside, it started rotating on its own magnetic
field.   free energy is out there, we just have to harness it.
Thanks


MY REPLY:

From: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com>
To: "skylinetomfox2118"
Cc: "Mylow Howard Johnson Motor egroup" <mylow_magmo@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 8:19 PM
Subject: skylinetomfox's replication of MYLOW's Mangetic Motor


Congrats!

I've posted your comment over at http://MylowMagnetMotor.com (PESWiki), both
under "Replications" and on the Discussion page.

Thanks for this report.  Could you please provide more info?

- did you get 360+ rotation?
- continuous?
- accelerating?
- photos?
- video?
- list of materials (specs, size, shape, source)

Sterling

BTW, it does not matter if the slow degaussing effect is on the stator and/or rotor PM's-- same results.

PL

G'day all,

I think we all agree that there has been no threat against Mylow or his family in this thread.

As to E-mail and PM I ask how that could be possible. I have checked this thread again and I cannot find a post originated by Mylow, nor do I see an E-mail address for him.

So how could anyone here have contacted him apart from the people who speak for him here and are evidently in contact with him.

It pisses me off when these unfounded wild allegations are being made without evidence. If true, it would have been a simple matter to quote the offending post.

Which begs the question: What is really going on here?

Just something to think about

Hans von Lieven

Hans,

You may be correct that 'mylow'  has never posted or left an e-mail address to back track him on this forum.  But there definitely is one on his "Youtube" account!

Also may I add that the sound of a motor has been mentioned being heard as he starts the rotor. One member here believes it to be a powered wheel hidden behind a wall. If I were to believe in this theory I like Eric's version at minato wheel better, he believes its possibly a fan sitting just out of camera range blowing air across the rotor magnets.

Ralph Lortie

Ralph

From: "skylinetomfox2118"
To: <HJ_Motor@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: MYLOW's Mangetic Motor

mylows magnet motor is the real thing guys, if any mag motor is gonna work,
this will, i tryed it on a plastic disk with some bar magnets taped to it
and put a horse shoe magnet inside, it started rotating on its own magnetic
field.   free energy is out there, we just have to harness it.
Thanks

It is quite well known that you can get Howard Johnson's "Stonehenge Motor" to rotate with a handheld magnet, similar to a Hamel spinner. This experiment was in the 1980's performed by Johnson in front of USPTO assessors and was instrumental in him obtaining his patents.

I remember reading about it at the time.

What Howard never managed though, in spite of over 20 years of well funded experimentation, was to build a proper motor that ran unaided by the vibrations of the human hand.

If Mylow has managed to crack this he is to be congratulated, but please don't blame us for a degree of skepticism in regards to that device.

I wish him luck, but frankly I need a little bit more convincing than a video on You-tube.

Hans von Lieven