Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3564904 times)

leonelogb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7545 on: December 26, 2016, 05:04:37 AM »
Quote

Everything is possible if it was done right, right?  :)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcZunkK2cs8


basically we only need something flow to make energy then transfer it, and we must only know which way is flowing right?, right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjRoHBq8sQU&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICP3DkD8l-k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8cchDzahmE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H9DI3EeqGY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDOsPexvB8E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h68AulpGNUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp6htqjPb0Q
https://www.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://cdn.pesn.com/wiki/g60sdhrztd76ztux7kn0plxdwibxf53l.gif&imgrefurl=http://peswiki.com/os:chris-browns-kml-coils&h=591&w=790&tbnid=5ZgeOntsYq_jYM:&vet=1&tbnh=157&tbnw=211&docid=NUtmsCipDWt3OM&usg=__4IO9XNTd-czgycRflkJd-usu5Jo=&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjN8aHFzpDRAhVImpQKHRTPAoAQ9QEIHDAA
https://www.google.com.ph/search?q=kml+wire&biw=1366&bih=662&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjN8aHFzpDRAhVImpQKHRTPAoAQ_AUIBigB&dpr=1#q=kml+wire&tbm=isch&tbs=rimg:Ca3jzHIGBvoxIjjjL_1xx5EWutow8wEcRnjoKQfimV5chjCAcGlbSMc-1dpzHr7Lho3uVnKbIn80BEmxYDNPrl1BUDyoSCeMv_1HHkRa62ETOsyFEyHqoqKhIJjDzARxGeOgoRkvnWAXzevaMqEglB-KZXlyGMIBGNiAvOXPFutSoSCRwaVtIxz7V2EQHhuxRk6BJuKhIJnMevsuGje5UR3-7M9eQlTAEqEgmcpsifzQESbBHX4I3xPSCpQioSCVgM0-uXUFQPEcjPyyr3BBvT&imgrc=8syE1JWUhP9mcM%3A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALGnS3eAOCg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niBAyyyr_wU
http://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/11816/is-it-possible-to-fire-a-spark-plug-from-batteries
Merry Christmass everyone!!! ;)

Thank you so much Master, I have already download and save every video and Page. Now to study.

And Remember all Christ is the true Christmas. Amen.

Merry Christmas everyone. :);D 8)

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7546 on: December 26, 2016, 12:35:21 PM »
Yes, what freq do you expect to resonate 1uh coils?

Mags
Sorry the components are not to spec.


In your opinion does the pos and neg biased fields make sense, would it account for the coil ring.


Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7547 on: December 26, 2016, 01:16:17 PM »
Will the theory give us some insight as to how we design circuits.
Separate and collect



Example




Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7548 on: December 26, 2016, 01:45:20 PM »
If we look at how the planets magnetic field works we can gain some insight.
The magnetic field acts as a shield channeling the radioactive particles from the sun away from the surface, but how. The particles must be attracted to the field or they would pass right through it.
If we ionize a field then let it collapse we pull more energy in.


If we look at how an air purifier works we gain more insight, its about pos an neg charge and the separation of those charges.
The ether remains in a neutral state most of the time it seeks neutrality, pos and neg combined is neutrality.
We have to stress it, separate the charge then collect.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7549 on: December 26, 2016, 03:13:04 PM »
Entertaining ideas


Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7550 on: December 26, 2016, 03:21:22 PM »
Try that again  ;D


Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7551 on: December 26, 2016, 06:01:18 PM »
If someone can offer a rational explanation in layman's terms as to what makes a coil ring i would like to hear it.


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7552 on: December 26, 2016, 06:13:30 PM »
Sorry the components are not to spec.


In your opinion does the pos and neg biased fields make sense, would it account for the coil ring.

Not sure what you are getting at.  In the simple circuit all seems to be operating DC and or pulsed DC, and a freewheeling DC. Not sure where an AC oscillation would occur.  In the sim, Falstad seems to have instilled some capacitance in the inductor programing as there are times that an inductor can be seen oscillating at very high freq when there is no where for the collapse currents to go. In sim its sorta an ideal environment when it comes to a switch turning on and off where there is no spark across the switch contacts when it opens, so that gives the collapse currents in certain circuit configs no where to go.

I had some tough arguments with Zeropoint132 years ago on diodes. He had shown me 2 circuits with bridged rectifiers, on showing the input going pos swing and the other circuit with the input going neg swing. He seemed to believe that one circuit was a bridge rectifier and the other not, but they were both exactly the same, except for showing one as a pos swing input and the other a neg input swing.

Id play with the sim and the code I gave.  When the switch opens, the inductor in series with the load collapses, the diode leg inductor blocks current flow, from what I see, pretty much completely. So the charge built in the load inductor ends up being wasted and just disipates. Worked a lot with this stuff back in the day in this thread.

Mags


SkyWatcher123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7553 on: December 26, 2016, 08:10:50 PM »
Hi dave, the magnetic pulse in the wire causes a mechanical movement of the wire and the frequency is based on the material and how secure it is from movement.
Can sound be caused by a wire with a magnetic pulse, even if no detectable movement of wire is present, probably.
peace love light

Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7554 on: December 26, 2016, 08:35:56 PM »
If someone can offer a rational explanation in layman's terms as to what makes a coil ring i would like to hear it.
Dave,
Thanks for your posts as of late. I have come to the same basic understanding of this setup, and recall that you were proposing this a few years ago. I just couldn't grasp it at the time.
I don't really know the answer to your question with absolute certainty, but I'll take a stab...


We normally see the ringing effect with an L-C setup.
If we look to Don Smith's work, he says that the dielectric provides the energy that exits a pulsed capacitor.
If we have a coil (without a cap) ringing, I'm assuming that this may be possible because of the coil's own capacitance, and if this is the case, I'd borrow DS's reasoning and say that the dielectric or ambient is providing the second half of the coil's ring.
From this perspective, a coil (like a capacitor) can be understood as an open system, and really, there are really no closed systems, though efforts are made to keep the ambient from interacting with circuits.


What intrigues me about this whole setup is the role that Lenz' law plays, responding to the positive kick - making it possible to have the push-pull kind of effect that we see in the boost-buck circuits you've been posting.
Bob

tysb3

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7555 on: December 28, 2016, 05:58:50 AM »

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7556 on: December 28, 2016, 03:16:42 PM »
@ Bob Smith
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mi1nBNokrU
See the open coils might they be ionizing the field  ;)

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7557 on: December 28, 2016, 03:18:43 PM »
Pos and Neg

Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7558 on: December 28, 2016, 03:27:27 PM »
Tito

Don't you think you have kept people guessing long enough? Your first working device was based on these patents wasn't it.

Carlos Benitez Patents
17811
14311
5591
121561
   
Calculations per patent 121561
Desired Output Current (amps)                           20
Frequency of AC supply                              500
Watts furnished to the supply transformer                     100
Efficiency rating of supply transformer (%)                     80
Impedance of oscillating circuit (ohms)                        10
   
Watts delivered by secondary of supply transformer               80
Supply transformer secondary, volts needed to charge condenser         400
Current delivered by secondary of supply transformer (amps)         0.2
Coulombs delivered to condenser by secondary of supply transformer      0.0002
Condenser capacity required (microfarads)                     0.5
Inductance of oscillating circuit (millihenrys)                     0.028125
Convert mh to cm                                 28125
Oscillations per second                              42441.9825696732
Oscillations per spark                                 42.4419825697
Current discharged by condenser (amps)                     19.9999945661   

Cheers
Cadman

Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #7559 on: December 29, 2016, 01:24:53 AM »
See the open coils might they be ionizing the field  ;)
Yes, about 7 minutes into the video, that is what struck me as well. I don't speak Russian, but "resonancia" keeps being mentioned, and so balance between coils to allow for sympathetic resonance must be important.


I noticed a few other things about this setup:
- that the off time for the square wave pulse in the duty cycle was much longer than the on time.
- that when the square wave pulse went off, the negative energy began to show up.
- that the system seemed to be load driven - more bulbs lit, more amperage drawn, wider negative on the sine wave following the square wave impulse.


Tito has mentioned a number of times the importance of a unidirectional pulse, which I take to be a positive pulse. I would see the square wave impulse as proof of concept in this.
The other thing that seems evident to me in this is the push-pull factor is important. I think the scope shows that this in fact is happening, and I believe it also demonstrates with the two open coils in the primary what Dave has been saying.


For me, the two open coils produce their ionizing effect by widening the window of potential difference between them. I would see that in this way, they can draw in greater amounts of charge from the ambient electrostatic medium.


Bob