Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 525458
  • *Total Topics: 15645
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 7
  • *Total: 7

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 1747769 times)

Offline chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #360 on: September 29, 2007, 06:23:32 AM »
Yes but what are those things sticking out of that CIA guy's head, Lawrence?

Oh, those things sticking out of that CIA agent's head are what actually causes Lawrence to hallucinate! When he's near the CIA guy that's when virtual reality becomes reality.... and we begin to hear all these Lead Out crap!

Time to lead out some reality check. Don't waste your time on Lawrence's BS.

Cheers
chrisC


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #360 on: September 29, 2007, 06:23:32 AM »

Offline hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #361 on: September 29, 2007, 06:35:01 AM »
Correct Entropy, here is the picture from the website.

I'll have my Chinese mate give him a call. At least that checks out.

Hans von Lieven

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #362 on: September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM »
The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

I took part in the Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment this afternoon.  The results were extremely conclusive. 

With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around   31 times
(2) With repulsion  25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

The videos is being edited by Ms. Forever Yuen.  The exact size and type of magnets, string length, the arrangement etc. will be available on the video.  The position of the bottom magnet can change the repulsive or attractive force.  The above results were obtained when distance of bottom magnet and pendulum is approximately 10 cm.

These results conclusively confirm  that the effective gravitational constant g can be changed.  If we can Lead Out Energy from Gravity, we can also Lead Out Energy from Electron Motion (Magnetic field).

You are welcome to repeat  the experiment.  The results may vary somewhat with the type of magnets.  However, the general trend should be the same.  There is no fear of challenge of results as this experiment can be repeated thousands of times worldwide.

Lawrence Tseung
Forever Yuen experiment Leads Out confirmation of change of effective g.  This will increase the happy heat beat (pulse).

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #362 on: September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #363 on: September 29, 2007, 12:49:30 PM »
Phone call with Chan

Chan: "You put pictures and photos on the Internet to prove that you lectured  at Tsing Hua University.  Why is that your Lee-Tseung theory cannot convince  the Forum Members?"

Tseung: "Forum Members are not professors from MIT.  They tend to believe in authorities than in themselves.  Many of them have little knowledge of physics.  Physics concepts and mathematical proof would confuse them more."

Chan: "I better tell you the truth.  I do not totally understand the Lee-Tseung theory also.  If the top professors at Tsing Hua, MIT or Harvard Universitis are convinced, I shall be happy to accept the Lee-Tseung theory as scientific doctrine.  If they keep quiet, I keep quiet.  If they say no, I shall run away from you."

Lawrence Tseung
Academic authorities Lead Out support.  They pulse out acceptance from the General Public.

Offline tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #364 on: September 29, 2007, 01:38:59 PM »
The exact size and type of magnets, string length, the arrangement etc. will be available on the video. 
where is the video?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #364 on: September 29, 2007, 01:38:59 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Mr.Entropy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #365 on: September 29, 2007, 05:42:36 PM »
With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around   31 times
(2) With repulsion  25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

Yes, of course, but you should really mention that this has nothing to do with free energy, because you know that there are people in this forum who will assume otherwise.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #366 on: September 29, 2007, 09:04:45 PM »
With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around   31 times
(2) With repulsion  25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

Yes, of course, but you should really mention that this has nothing to do with free energy, because you know that there are people in this forum who will assume otherwise.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

Dear Mr. Entropy,

Thank you for finding Professor Zhao in the Tsing Hua University website.  That should settle the matter (Top academics in China know the Lee-Tseung patent and theory) forever.

I thought you might be one of the few who could really understand the significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen experiment.

Her experiment looks simple and innocent.  However, it is the foundation of the Flying Saucer Patent  from Ms. Wini Woo.  It is also the link  between Leading Out Energy from Gravity and Leading Out Energy from Electron Motion.

In other words, to understand Cosmic Energy Machines (or free energy), one must thoroughly understand the significance  of the Ms. Forever Yuen experiment.

Should I stop here or repeat myself again on the detailed explanation???

@tagor,
I decided to hold off on the video and let someone else from this Forum confirm the result. Let them shine.  We look for the doers to join the experimental team later.  (Letting Hans confirm the Lee-Wang -Tseung Lecture at Tsing Hua University is much more fun and convincing than my writing about it a million times.)

Lawrence Tseung
The Ms. Forever Yuen experiment has no pulse  to Lead Out  the gravitational energy but it is the key to understanding the Lee-Tseung patents and the more advanced Flying Saucer technology.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2007, 09:28:56 PM by ltseung888 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #366 on: September 29, 2007, 09:04:45 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment
« Reply #367 on: September 29, 2007, 11:49:59 PM »
In other words, to understand Cosmic Energy Machines (or free energy), one must thoroughly understand the significance  of the Ms. Forever Yuen experiment.

Should I stop here or repeat myself again on the detailed explanation???

There is no particular significance of Ms. Forever?s experiment. At least not for trained people. The significance of this very simple experiment is well known since Galileo (approx.1600), even before Newton.
Anyway, you are welcome to put a decent and throughout explanation regarding its ?new significance?, if you have such an explanation.

Tseung: "Forum Members are not professors from MIT.  They tend to believe in authorities than in themselves.  Many of them have little knowledge of physics.  Physics concepts and mathematical proof would confuse them more."

Don't bet much on any of the above.  ;D
Please rest assured, you and all the readers, that there are enough trained people inhere to follow your equations and explanations. Fell free to go all the way your scientific backgrounds allow you to do it. Many people addressed the same invitation but it never happened for you to properly reply.

These results conclusively confirm  that the effective gravitational constant g can be changed.  If we can Lead Out Energy from Gravity, we can also Lead Out Energy from Electron Motion (Magnetic field).

Lawrence Tseung
Forever Yuen experiment Leads Out confirmation of change of effective g.  This will increase the happy heat beat (pulse).

The ?effective gravitational constant? is denoted by G not by g in the mainstream science. Either you made a huge confusion/mistake about it due to lack of proper formal training or you deliberately throw around with various mixed physics notions as no one be able to follow those posts neither to criticize them. Either way, it is wrong, scientifically and/or ethically.

Regardless of the above, please define the ?effective gravitational constant? your way and post your full mathematical analysis. I?ll comment on it at that time.
At this point I?ll just say it loud and clear for everyone: no, you CAN NOT lead out Energy from Gravity. It never ever resulted you can!

Chan: "I better tell you the truth.  I do not totally understand the Lee-Tseung theory also.  If the top professors at Tsing Hua, MIT or Harvard Universitis are convinced, I shall be happy to accept the Lee-Tseung theory as scientific doctrine.  If they keep quiet, I keep quiet.  If they say no, I shall run away from you."

Mr. Chan, you seem to be a very rationale person. My full respect to you!
And take good care.  ;)

Tinu

Offline hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #368 on: September 30, 2007, 12:02:01 AM »
G'day Lawrence and all,

Is this the type of experiment Ms. Forever Yuen is doing. She could have spared herself a lot of trouble and instead purchased this rig from the overunity store where it is sold as a toy.

Hans von Lieven

Overunity Toy Leads Out massive Breakthrough in OU


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #368 on: September 30, 2007, 12:02:01 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #369 on: September 30, 2007, 01:04:02 AM »
Hans:

Those have been around since I was a kid...(long time ago ha ha) I remember playing around with one when my Father worked at Bell Labs in NJ.  This is what he is talking about?  The "big" break-through? I am going to have to go back and read all of the posts on this but, if this is really what it is........let China have this "advanced" technology.

Bill

Offline hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #370 on: September 30, 2007, 01:09:37 AM »
The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

I took part in the Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment this afternoon.  The results were extremely conclusive. 

With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around   31 times
(2) With repulsion  25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

The videos is being edited by Ms. Forever Yuen.  The exact size and type of magnets, string length, the arrangement etc. will be available on the video.  The position of the bottom magnet can change the repulsive or attractive force.  The above results were obtained when distance of bottom magnet and pendulum is approximately 10 cm.

These results conclusively confirm  that the effective gravitational constant g can be changed.  If we can Lead Out Energy from Gravity, we can also Lead Out Energy from Electron Motion (Magnetic field).

You are welcome to repeat  the experiment.  The results may vary somewhat with the type of magnets.  However, the general trend should be the same.  There is no fear of challenge of results as this experiment can be repeated thousands of times worldwide.

Lawrence Tseung
Forever Yuen experiment Leads Out confirmation of change of effective g.  This will increase the happy heat beat (pulse).

Yep, Sounds to me like this is what he is talking about :-)

Hans von Lieven

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #370 on: September 30, 2007, 01:09:37 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #371 on: September 30, 2007, 01:23:02 AM »
I recall hearing that if someone built a large enough version of this that the rotation of the earth would keep it moving forever. How large, I have no idea.  My thoughts are that the wind would actually have more of an effect upon it than the rotation. I may order the "toy" from the website.  I love to look at stuff like this and I think it stimulates my mind to working on more practicle devices. (In my opinion)

Bill

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #372 on: September 30, 2007, 01:28:30 AM »
Hans:

Those have been around since I was a kid...(long time ago ha ha) I remember playing around with one when my Father worked at Bell Labs in NJ.  This is what he is talking about?  The "big" break-through? I am going to have to go back and read all of the posts  on this but, if this is really what it is........let China have this "advanced" technology.

Bill

Dear Bill,

Now you have the incentive to reading the posts carefully.  Please focus on just the following point for now:

(1)   A pendulum with no pulse force  can be analyzed with the simple law of conservation of energy.  At any point in time, the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy are equal.

  mgh + 1/2 * m *v *v = constant

(2)   When a pulse force is applied, how should the analysis be done?  Can we apply the Law of parallelogram of forces?  Will this pulse force supply energy to the system?  Will the tension of the string contribute to the resulting forces and the resulting energy?

I believe a good write-up from you is better than me repeating the same analysis a million times.

@hans,
Thank you for your information about the toy.  I shall try to buy it (and improve it to illustrate Leading Energy out from Gravity as well as Leading Energy out from Electron Motion.)

Lawrence Tseung
Analyzing one Pulse at a time  Leads Out  easier understanding for the Forum Members.

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #373 on: September 30, 2007, 03:16:07 AM »
Itseung888:

What the heck does that have to do with anything?  The sum of potential energy and kinetic energy are always equal in any system...at least the ones we know about.  I fail to see how this applies in any way to your theory. I will re-read all of the previous posts (almost done) and I mean no disrespect to you at all. If I have read this right thus far, the "energy" you are describing could easily be described by a bouncing ball, which will also come to rest eventually.  It does not emit or give off or generate any additional energy even though it is "defying" gravity during half of it's cycles.  Maybe I am just ignorant, which is always possible. I always try to maintain an open mind on such matters.  I will research this phenomenon a little more.  Thanks for your reply.

Bill

Offline jeffc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #374 on: September 30, 2007, 08:50:19 AM »
G'day jeffo and all,

I do not claim to have contacted everyone at Tsing Hua, all I have done is contact a few people myself and via a Chinese lecturer, who lectures  here in Sydney, a man who speaks the language and also has a few contacts there. We have not been able to locate anyone who had knowledge of these matters.

What I am saying is NOT definitive, the absence of proof never is.

There may well be someone there who takes this thing seriously, I don't know. All I know is that this is a reputable institution who does not endorse things lightly without a lot of proof.

Let Lawrence come up with some contacts there and their status at Tsing Hua, in other words not the janitor.

Then we can verify his claims. Until then we are pissing in the wind.

Hans von Lieven

Hans,
Thank you for the clarifications, and for not making a definitive claim without supporting proof.  You do, as always, raise valid points here which if answered with facts will take us closer to some sort of conclusion. 

It had been my previous opinion that Lawrence must be relaying accurate information about his relationship with Tsing Hua, based on the assumption that it would surely not take long for someone to discover if faked.  Your comments raised the suspicion, and I guess we'll have to await further information.  I don't feel comfortable discrediting him, although obviously in the context of these forums, establishing credibility is the responsibility of the person making claims.

Regards,
jeffc

 

OneLink