Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory (Read 2179739 times)

chrisC · « **Reply #360 on:** September 29, 2007, 06:23:32 AM »

Quote from: HissyfitNihilism on September 29, 2007, 05:36:36 AM

Yes but what are those things sticking out of that CIA guy's head, Lawrence?

Oh, those things sticking out of that CIA agent's head are what actually causes Lawrence to hallucinate! When he's near the CIA guy that's when virtual reality becomes reality.... and we begin to hear all these Lead Out crap!

Time to lead out some reality check. Don't waste your time on Lawrence's BS.

Cheers
chrisC

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #361 on:** September 29, 2007, 06:35:01 AM »

Correct Entropy, here is the picture from the website.

I'll have my Chinese mate give him a call. At least that checks out.

Hans von Lieven

ltseung888 · « **Reply #362 on:** September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM »

The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

I took part in the Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment this afternoon. The results were extremely conclusive.

With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around 31 times
(2) With repulsion 25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

The videos is being edited by Ms. Forever Yuen. The exact size and type of magnets, string length, the arrangement etc. will be available on the video. The position of the bottom magnet can change the repulsive or attractive force. The above results were obtained when distance of bottom magnet and pendulum is approximately 10 cm.

These results conclusively confirm that the effective gravitational constant g can be changed. If we can Lead Out Energy from Gravity, we can also Lead Out Energy from Electron Motion (Magnetic field).

You are welcome to repeat the experiment. The results may vary somewhat with the type of magnets. However, the general trend should be the same. There is no fear of challenge of results as this experiment can be repeated thousands of times worldwide.

Lawrence Tseung
Forever Yuen experiment Leads Out confirmation of change of effective g. This will increase the happy heat beat (pulse).

ltseung888 · « **Reply #363 on:** September 29, 2007, 12:49:30 PM »

Phone call with Chan

Chan: "You put pictures and photos on the Internet to prove that you lectured at Tsing Hua University. Why is that your Lee-Tseung theory cannot convince the Forum Members?"

Tseung: "Forum Members are not professors from MIT. They tend to believe in authorities than in themselves. Many of them have little knowledge of physics. Physics concepts and mathematical proof would confuse them more."

Chan: "I better tell you the truth. I do not totally understand the Lee-Tseung theory also. If the top professors at Tsing Hua, MIT or Harvard Universitis are convinced, I shall be happy to accept the Lee-Tseung theory as scientific doctrine. If they keep quiet, I keep quiet. If they say no, I shall run away from you."

Lawrence Tseung
Academic authorities Lead Out support. They pulse out acceptance from the General Public.

tagor · « **Reply #364 on:** September 29, 2007, 01:38:59 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM

The exact size and type of magnets, string length, the arrangement etc. will be available on the video.

where is the video?

Mr.Entropy · « **Reply #365 on:** September 29, 2007, 05:42:36 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM

With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around 31 times
(2) With repulsion 25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

Yes, of course, but you should really mention that this has nothing to do with free energy, because you know that there are people in this forum who will assume otherwise.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

ltseung888 · « **Reply #366 on:** September 29, 2007, 09:04:45 PM »

Quote from: Mr.Entropy on September 29, 2007, 05:42:36 PM

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM
With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around 31 times
(2) With repulsion 25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

Yes, of course, but you should really mention that this has nothing to do with free energy, because you know that there are people in this forum who will assume otherwise.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

Dear Mr. Entropy,

Thank you for finding Professor Zhao in the Tsing Hua University website. That should settle the matter (Top academics in China know the Lee-Tseung patent and theory) forever.

I thought you might be one of the few who could really understand the significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen experiment.

Her experiment looks simple and innocent. However, it is the foundation of the Flying Saucer Patent from Ms. Wini Woo. It is also the link between Leading Out Energy from Gravity and Leading Out Energy from Electron Motion.

In other words, to understand Cosmic Energy Machines (or free energy), one must thoroughly understand the significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen experiment.

Should I stop here or repeat myself again on the detailed explanation???

@tagor,
I decided to hold off on the video and let someone else from this Forum confirm the result. Let them shine. We look for the doers to join the experimental team later. (Letting Hans confirm the Lee-Wang -Tseung Lecture at Tsing Hua University is much more fun and convincing than my writing about it a million times.)

Lawrence Tseung
The Ms. Forever Yuen experiment has no pulse to Lead Out the gravitational energy but it is the key to understanding the Lee-Tseung patents and the more advanced Flying Saucer technology.

tinu · « **Reply #367 on:** September 29, 2007, 11:49:59 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 09:04:45 PM

In other words, to understand Cosmic Energy Machines (or free energy), one must thoroughly understand the significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen experiment.

Should I stop here or repeat myself again on the detailed explanation???

There is no particular significance of Ms. Forever?s experiment. At least not for trained people. The significance of this very simple experiment is well known since Galileo (approx.1600), even before Newton.
Anyway, you are welcome to put a decent and throughout explanation regarding its ?new significance?, if you have such an explanation.

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 12:49:30 PM

Tseung: "Forum Members are not professors from MIT. They tend to believe in authorities than in themselves. Many of them have little knowledge of physics. Physics concepts and mathematical proof would confuse them more."

Don't bet much on any of the above.

Please rest assured, you and all the readers, that there are enough trained people inhere to follow your equations and explanations. Fell free to go all the way your scientific backgrounds allow you to do it. Many people addressed the same invitation but it never happened for you to properly reply.

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM

These results conclusively confirm that the effective gravitational constant g can be changed. If we can Lead Out Energy from Gravity, we can also Lead Out Energy from Electron Motion (Magnetic field).

Lawrence Tseung
Forever Yuen experiment Leads Out confirmation of change of effective g. This will increase the happy heat beat (pulse).

The ?effective gravitational constant? is denoted by G not by g in the mainstream science. Either you made a huge confusion/mistake about it due to lack of proper formal training or you deliberately throw around with various mixed physics notions as no one be able to follow those posts neither to criticize them. Either way, it is wrong, scientifically and/or ethically.

Regardless of the above, please define the ?effective gravitational constant? your way and post your full mathematical analysis. I?ll comment on it at that time.
At this point I?ll just say it loud and clear for everyone: no, you CAN NOT lead out Energy from Gravity. It never ever resulted you can!

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 12:49:30 PM

Chan: "I better tell you the truth. I do not totally understand the Lee-Tseung theory also. If the top professors at Tsing Hua, MIT or Harvard Universitis are convinced, I shall be happy to accept the Lee-Tseung theory as scientific doctrine. If they keep quiet, I keep quiet. If they say no, I shall run away from you."

Mr. Chan, you seem to be a very rationale person. My full respect to you!
And take good care.

Tinu

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #368 on:** September 30, 2007, 12:02:01 AM »

G'day Lawrence and all,

Is this the type of experiment Ms. Forever Yuen is doing. She could have spared herself a lot of trouble and instead purchased this rig from the overunity store where it is sold as a toy.

Hans von Lieven

Overunity Toy Leads Out massive Breakthrough in OU

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #369 on:** September 30, 2007, 01:04:02 AM »

Hans:

Those have been around since I was a kid...(long time ago ha ha) I remember playing around with one when my Father worked at Bell Labs in NJ. This is what he is talking about? The "big" break-through? I am going to have to go back and read all of the posts on this but, if this is really what it is........let China have this "advanced" technology.

Bill

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #370 on:** September 30, 2007, 01:09:37 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on September 29, 2007, 10:13:01 AM

The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

I took part in the Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment this afternoon. The results were extremely conclusive.

With a 25 cm magnetic pendulum, the number of oscillation per 30 second are:

(1) with no other magnetic material around 31 times
(2) With repulsion 25 times
(3) With attraction 41 times

The videos is being edited by Ms. Forever Yuen. The exact size and type of magnets, string length, the arrangement etc. will be available on the video. The position of the bottom magnet can change the repulsive or attractive force. The above results were obtained when distance of bottom magnet and pendulum is approximately 10 cm.

These results conclusively confirm that the effective gravitational constant g can be changed. If we can Lead Out Energy from Gravity, we can also Lead Out Energy from Electron Motion (Magnetic field).

You are welcome to repeat the experiment. The results may vary somewhat with the type of magnets. However, the general trend should be the same. There is no fear of challenge of results as this experiment can be repeated thousands of times worldwide.

Lawrence Tseung
Forever Yuen experiment Leads Out confirmation of change of effective g. This will increase the happy heat beat (pulse).

Yep, Sounds to me like this is what he is talking about :-)

Hans von Lieven

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #371 on:** September 30, 2007, 01:23:02 AM »

I recall hearing that if someone built a large enough version of this that the rotation of the earth would keep it moving forever. How large, I have no idea. My thoughts are that the wind would actually have more of an effect upon it than the rotation. I may order the "toy" from the website. I love to look at stuff like this and I think it stimulates my mind to working on more practicle devices. (In my opinion)

Bill

ltseung888 · « **Reply #372 on:** September 30, 2007, 01:28:30 AM »

Quote from: Pirate88179 on September 30, 2007, 01:04:02 AM

Hans:

Those have been around since I was a kid...(long time ago ha ha) I remember playing around with one when my Father worked at Bell Labs in NJ. This is what he is talking about? The "big" break-through? I am going to have to go back and read all of the posts on this but, if this is really what it is........let China have this "advanced" technology.

Bill

Dear Bill,

Now you have the incentive to reading the posts carefully. Please focus on just the following point for now:

(1) A pendulum with no pulse force can be analyzed with the simple law of conservation of energy. At any point in time, the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy are equal.

mgh + 1/2 * m *v *v = constant

(2) When a pulse force is applied, how should the analysis be done? Can we apply the Law of parallelogram of forces? Will this pulse force supply energy to the system? Will the tension of the string contribute to the resulting forces and the resulting energy?

I believe a good write-up from you is better than me repeating the same analysis a million times.

@hans,
Thank you for your information about the toy. I shall try to buy it (and improve it to illustrate Leading Energy out from Gravity as well as Leading Energy out from Electron Motion.)

Lawrence Tseung
Analyzing one Pulse at a time Leads Out easier understanding for the Forum Members.

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #373 on:** September 30, 2007, 03:16:07 AM »

Itseung888:

What the heck does that have to do with anything? The sum of potential energy and kinetic energy are always equal in any system...at least the ones we know about. I fail to see how this applies in any way to your theory. I will re-read all of the previous posts (almost done) and I mean no disrespect to you at all. If I have read this right thus far, the "energy" you are describing could easily be described by a bouncing ball, which will also come to rest eventually. It does not emit or give off or generate any additional energy even though it is "defying" gravity during half of it's cycles. Maybe I am just ignorant, which is always possible. I always try to maintain an open mind on such matters. I will research this phenomenon a little more. Thanks for your reply.

Bill

jeffc · « **Reply #374 on:** September 30, 2007, 08:50:19 AM »

Quote from: hansvonlieven on September 29, 2007, 03:59:55 AM

G'day jeffo and all,

I do not claim to have contacted everyone at Tsing Hua, all I have done is contact a few people myself and via a Chinese lecturer, who lectures here in Sydney, a man who speaks the language and also has a few contacts there. We have not been able to locate anyone who had knowledge of these matters.

What I am saying is NOT definitive, the absence of proof never is.

There may well be someone there who takes this thing seriously, I don't know. All I know is that this is a reputable institution who does not endorse things lightly without a lot of proof.

Let Lawrence come up with some contacts there and their status at Tsing Hua, in other words not the janitor.

Then we can verify his claims. Until then we are pissing in the wind.

Hans von Lieven

Hans,
Thank you for the clarifications, and for not making a definitive claim without supporting proof. You do, as always, raise valid points here which if answered with facts will take us closer to some sort of conclusion.

It had been my previous opinion that Lawrence must be relaying accurate information about his relationship with Tsing Hua, based on the assumption that it would surely not take long for someone to discover if faked. Your comments raised the suspicion, and I guess we'll have to await further information. I don't feel comfortable discrediting him, although obviously in the context of these forums, establishing credibility is the responsibility of the person making claims.

Regards,
jeffc

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory (Read 2179739 times)

chrisC

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

hansvonlieven

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

tagor

Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

Mr.Entropy

Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

ltseung888

Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

tinu

Re: The Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment

hansvonlieven

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Pirate88179

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

hansvonlieven

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Pirate88179

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Pirate88179

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

jeffc

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory