Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor  (Read 575791 times)

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
hotspringstrading,

This is not a criticism, but I must say that I can not understand much of what is in your posts. Probably my defect. So having said that, I can not argue with you, because I do not understand your position.

So I'll just say that those who believe inductors de-energize in a positive direction....don't just say they do, show me!

I can show you 3 different replicators' (that's 3 different people) scope shots that clearly show the cemf spikes in the NEGATIVE direction, and my model confirms this as well.

I strongly suggest that before anyone jumps to such unfounded conclusions....do some homework and/or experimentation of your own.

I realize that many here have little electronics experience, and most likely little practise with a scope, so confusion does happen occassionaly.

Stating that Mike's scope shots are correct as presented (i.e. not inverted) is only doing a dis-service to this project, especially to those with little experience.

Darren

hotspringstrading

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Easy to confuse with scope stuff. Most folks do confuse current flow as voltage. Unless you use a current probe, it is the conversion of current to voltage you see on the scope.

Part of the problem with this item.

 The scope shot in question is invalad any way.

 The question in this sytem is how he charges the cap so fast.

 The law does come into play during the gen cycle. No way around it even with centrifical force.

 The only place the cap can be charged that fast is on the flyback cycle. Even worse to do so it must go with the ringing that can be made to happen by the switching curcit going on more than the extra time.

 Problem is it can not be powered by the main capacitor, so how did Mike do such.

 Well after looking over diferent curcits for them solid state relays, there is anoughter capacitor that can be used.

 Sollid state relay was placed between positive and collecter of PNP. This is a normal closed switch, meaning it will open (turn off) with the hall IC. Has that other thing going for it there of reducing the loss over the PNP.

 The rectifyer was only conected to the third (generator) coil.

 The extra diode goes across the Main capacitor of corse so it will not short it. It also alowed the capacitor in the switch to feed current in the proper direction during the motor curcit turn on that will use that capacitor charge instead of the main one.
 It is still a ballance I am working on. But it does give the main an extra boost, instead of loss that will be used to drive the motor.


 The problem mike has is that when he got his new switch ;the curcitry was changed in them: It most likly will not do what Mikes original switch did. What was in the original is simply a capacitor and resistor posibly a diode ( some split the ac input) so that the switch in off position is an open.

 The new one uses two capacitors and a transient surge protecter. Whole diferent game.  With out putting a capacitor resistor in the curcit his motor never ran itself again.

 If it was not for these fact I would easly say it was faked. 

 The hall or switch will not even kick in untill about 4.5 volts. The switch would have to be in the open position until voltage is reached or the cap would never charge enough to run the thing.

 That this thing will run itself  is even still in question; if the ballance can be achived . From Mikes vidio it should.

 Folks have to remeber that those solid state relays are not a switch. in the normal terms. In this case it is an unknown box of electronic parts.

 


 

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Quote
The problem mike has is that when he got his new switch ;the curcitry was changed in them: It most likly will not do what Mikes original switch did. ......The new one uses two capacitors and a transient surge protecter. Whole diferent game.  With out putting a capacitor resistor in the curcit his motor never ran itself again.

I believe if you go back and read Mike's posts, he did in fact get the motor working again with the new Crouzet relay! So that theory is irrelevant.

Quote
The hall or switch will not even kick in untill about 4.5 volts. The switch would have to be in the open position until voltage is reached or the cap would never charge enough to run the thing.

This is a good observation. So this means the cap initially charges only due to generator action from L3 (and possibly L2 if the circuit is as Peter traced it from the video), and possibly from L2's bemf?

It seems that if the cap could charge that quickly without the ou mechanism (i.e. S1 & Hall) to 4.5 Volts, why would the ou part even be required for it to self-run?

Darren


hotspringstrading

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
http://home.valornet.com/hotspringstradingie/cmkie.jpg

 if you folks are using the replacment ssr it will not work due to the snuber curcit has been changed. This can be replicated.  The diode is for feedback to cause the triger coil to turn on the curcit.

 Mike just left out the positive conecton to were the diode is.

Added "he did in fact get the motor working again with the new Crouzet relay!'

Nope: Mike never said self runing did he?

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
http://home.valornet.com/hotspringstradingie/cmkie.jpg

 if you folks are using the replacment ssr it will not work due to the snuber curcit has been changed. This can be replicated.  The diode is for feedback to cause the triger coil to turn on the curcit.

 Mike just left out the positive conecton to were the diode is.

Added "he did in fact get the motor working again with the new Crouzet relay!'

Nope: Mike never said self runing did he?

No Mike didn't say later that it was self-running. Mike never said it was self-running, he said that it ran with only a capacitor. It was working.

Later he had a few bad components, and it was not working anymore. Then with his new Hall, cap, and SSR, he said it was working again. Since everyone was congratulating him on getting it working again, we have to assume that it was working as before, because he did not say anything to the contrary, right?

Quote
The diode is for feedback to cause the triger coil to turn on the curcit.

This is incorrect. The diode you pointed out in the diagram does not cause Q1 to turn ON, magnetic induction to L1 does.

btw, these SSR's are normally open, not closed.

Darren

hotspringstrading

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
LOL
 Now we get to the strange stuff. Leave out the diode in the posting. Look at were I put the cap.

 Flyback current will drain both sides of it to a positive state.

 Not excactly what I excpected and will have to give an electron vacume some time to sink in to see if it could be causing something in this curcit to aid capacitor charge.

 To make sure folks understand the electrons are pulled out of both sides of a  capacitor. Both plate will attract free electrons creating curent twords both plates.

 Z_P_E are you replicating or experminting with the curcit?  Yea I might confuse some folks. Reality is that whole vidio, Mikes scematic etc is confusing.  Know of any one that has got it to work yet?   The junction stuff on the fly back easly will confuse most folks.  The energy has to come from some were, and the charge rate shown in the vidio with out a battery is almost unbelivable. Something has to cause that.

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Z_P_E are you replicating or experminting with the curcit?  Yea I might confuse some folks. Reality is that whole vidio, Mikes scematic etc is confusing.  Know of any one that has got it to work yet?   The junction stuff on the fly back easly will confuse most folks.  The energy has to come from some were, and the charge rate shown in the vidio with out a battery is almost unbelivable. Something has to cause that.

Yes, I've been working with a simulation model thus far. I have ordered #28 wire as I only have #30 at the moment.

Several people have got the window motor to work on a battery, and even a short period on a capacitor. Is that what you mean by "working"? If not, then I don't believe anyone has a self-runner yet, no.

I agree with you, the charge rate seems phenomenal. In my tests, it is roughly equivalent to charging the cap directly from a 6V battery through a 600 Ohm resistor or so.

Maybe his cap is/was bad? But he indicated that with his new cap it is also working, so the bad cap theory may not wash either.

John has hinted that maybe Mike's capacitor is "conditioned". Well, I wonder if that would involve hitting the cap repeatedly with 100+V spikes? Someone should ask John if this would do anything strange to these caps; he has a lot of experience in charging caps with bemf.

Darren

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
 ::)

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Some food for thought.

A 47000uF cap being charged with a 7V supply through a 500 Ohm resistor, in comparison to the voltage vs. time plot taken right from the video.

Darren

Peterae

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Hi Darren
thats interesting, thats 14ma to charge the cap,so with my motor drawing about 20ma + supplying 14ma to charge the cap, thats 70% more energy than is being used by the motor, so once this excess energy charges the cap to 7 volts where does the excess go after that?
Or does it mean that his machine is OU only below and upto 7volts where it then neutralizes any excess energy, also does this mean it is more OU at 6 volts than at 7 volts.
Your charge graph from the film, appears to show the lower the voltage is steeper , so therefore i may be correct that it appears more OU at 4 volts than at 7.

Food for thought.
Peter

hotspringstrading

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Interesting on the charge rate with out any discharge. So again it has to be higher.

The dischare is compensated a bit by part of the start up being back feed to the cap through rectifyer.

 Now comes the fun part. Calculate the discharge rate on the discharge. Being this is a capacitor it will not be the same as battery.

This is why I am looking at were the ringing can be made in the curcit during that part of the cycle, such would if self driven from flyback off of something in the switch cause an extream diferance in the charge rate.  The time off the flyback to discharge rate would be fast, but the devices in those switches are fast.

 It is the one window that can cause a change in the charge rate to discharge of capcitor.

 I might be wrong and he was just bypassing the trasistor for reduction.

This is a normal on switch that is removed during flyback to let the trasistors do there flyback thing.   LOL it still does it with the hall disconected.

 So why does a switch that when opened seems not to do anything have to do with this I ask?

 
Added the normal closed versions of these relay will not close unless a ceartain curent is reached.

dingbat

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Quote
Your charge graph from the film, appears to show the lower the voltage is steeper , so therefore i may be correct that it appears more OU at 4 volts than at 7.

A capacitor charging to a particular voltage always forms a curve that looks like that.

It appears that the time constant of Mike's curve is right at 5 seconds, compared to 23.5 seconds for the 500 ohms, 47000 uf.

This means his circuit charges as though a voltage is applied through a resistance of about 100 ohms, or about 60ma charging current at the start of the charging.

hotspringstrading

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Well after reading a lot of results on sites I see a trend. with a capacitor in the curcuit, after letting get to speed, disconecting the capacitor, the motor will run for a longer than no voltage sorce conected.

 Even mikes had to build up a charge to get the thing going. eventualy peaks. Would have been interesting to see what happened to mikes at peak.
So from here I see two thing could be posible. One is that the curcit is cut out to let the device gen and then kick in to get it back up. Kinda like a clock. If set up right it could run a long time. Strangly enough it may have been what Mike did. A current cut off to free wheel untill current reaches drive currents again.

Two he would have have to have a window that is causing current to charge that chapacitor we do not see yet.  I have already mentioned were this can be done if the sytem is set up with a capacitor across the switch and the curcit at the flyback becomes a ring.

Time will tell us wich he used I suspect. 

slncspkr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
c'mon guys let this treat not die.
   I'm shure a lot of people still testing this motor trying to make work even if it seems it was a fake but who cares anyways? what's important it is the union of all brains as a whole so lets keeep trying we can do it.

slncspkr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
here is some pics of my motor: