Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !  (Read 2230703 times)

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2580 on: February 08, 2015, 09:28:49 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFpnsMTHgRM

Heres another legendary video for you to observe.

Imagine whatever, a magnet, a motor from beneath and pulley.

This is just the groundwork, for a superior mechanical system.


Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2581 on: February 08, 2015, 03:12:14 PM »
Why do I prefer to advise Governments and not Individual Companies or VCs?
Governments can print money...
Governments are scared of doing this - illogical but true.

When talking to a government, you need to wonder what their oil tax revenues are.

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2582 on: February 08, 2015, 03:13:56 PM »
Presentation file as of Feb 8, 2015

The focus is now on the Unbalanced Cylinder as guided by the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier.

All this is fine but what we really want to know is Power In and Power Out. (Not scope shots).

noonespecial

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2583 on: February 08, 2015, 06:34:31 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFpnsMTHgRM

Heres another legendary video for you to observe.

Imagine whatever, a magnet, a motor from beneath and pulley.

This is just the groundwork, for a superior mechanical system.

You should max out the smoothing setting so you can see the results better.

Here's your idea in reality:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wGWB2K49So

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2584 on: February 08, 2015, 06:59:56 PM »
Glad to see somebody got inspired by my videos.

Lol thx whos this guy hes been following along hasnt he.

A bit Russian quality tho with those small springs, probably due to lack of funds LOL.

I would do it different is possible, but he is adding his own twist to the concept, wish to see more of that.

Interresting to see, that the centrifugal motion causes secondary motion, and vice-versa, and will time naturally in a half-driven mode.

noonespecial

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2585 on: February 08, 2015, 07:13:54 PM »
He has a whole series of different approaches to this utilizing sympathetic oscillation. And yes, he is clearly to be applauded for his efforts in spite of the machine's less polished look.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2586 on: February 08, 2015, 07:38:53 PM »
He will never get any power tho, from that force alone.

Its an assistance, an appetizer and desert. To be combined with other methods.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2587 on: February 08, 2015, 07:59:37 PM »
In this experiment, we will apply the load to the second unbalance and measure the power consumption of the motor (which drives the first unbalance). Experience has shown that the increased load on the engine when creating soprativlenie rotation of the second unbalance, so we know that maintaining the rotational vibration, it's just a transfer rotation without belts and gears, and no more, the Council of Europe in this form is not !!! (I also did resistance (second unbalance shaft) in which a spring is mounted on the platform itself koleblescheysya, i.e. spring (resistance) were in the same system with CO unbalance created and braking its rotation, the load on the engine and in this case, too, increased) what does this mean - if we are on the bottom of the bucket will fix a small generator that is installed on the shaft unbalance, and then begin to sway this bucket in a circular motion in space (so that the unbalance began to rotate relative to the generator), as soon as we give the load on the generator, bucket in our hands will oppose our muscular strength, that is, as it were, to cling to the space !!! something like a paradox.


So did it work or not?

Anyways he discovered things, and is going in another rotation that my sim, but in my sims both sides are driven.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2588 on: February 08, 2015, 09:18:29 PM »
Undriven sure works.

Simulation confirms reality :P

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XU9D6sf43k&feature=youtu.be

Charlie, your youtube is almost as cool as mine now :P

To set the record straight, I had 2 motors on my videos.

My idea was always reciprocal, from the center.
 

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2589 on: February 09, 2015, 01:15:51 AM »
How are you so certain that it is indeed an series unbalanced cylinder and simply belt driven and daisy chained.

Where are the better pictures?

I cant see how you can interpret that picture.

I shall try to recall what happened in 2006 when we were at Tsinghua University.

1.   Participants included Lee Cheung Kin (Scientist who first suggested that the pulsed pendulum would lead-out energy. Wang Shen He who developed the all Magnet Motor (Wang Motor) and myself.
2.   Andrew Wong and Chinese Partner.  They funded the 225 HP Pulse Motor Development.
3.   Four Engineers from USA who helped to develop the 225 HP Pulse Motor,
4.   Prof. Zhao and 3 research students.
5.   A person from the Military.
6.   Head of Physics Department and a Member of the Chinese Science Academy (later).

The first meeting was between 1, 4 and 5.  Lee and I gave a presentation of the Lead-out Energy Theory.  Wang talked about his Motor.  Prof. Zhao and students immediately did the 4 legged stool experiment and confirmed that we could “unconsciously” lead-out centrifugal force.

The second meeting was in late afternoon between 1, 4 and 5.  Prof. Zhao and students said that they reviewed the mathematics.  The approach was simplified but scientifically sound.  The pulsed pendulum could indeed be interpreted as leading-out some gravitational energy.  Prof. Zhao then mentioned about the eighty year old inventor who used an Energy Multiplier to get Output 30 times Input.  We got the pictures and Video at that time.  Lee and I said that we would think about it.

The third meeting was with parties 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.  The USA team made their presentation.  They frankly admitted that they produced the 225 HP Pulse Motor without understanding why.  Since Lee could not speak English, I was the one to present the Lead-out Energy Theory.  I talked about leading-out gravitational energy and how it could be extended to magnetic and electromagnetic energy. The USA team immediately called USA and told their colleagues that they found the solution.

The fourth meeting was with 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.  I applied the lead-out energy theory to the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier.  I said that an unbalanced wheel could replace the pendulum.  The focus then turned to the implementation of the 225 HP Pulse Motor in Beijing.

Lee, Wang and I then gave a recorded lecture to the Students.  We were introduced as Guest Lecturers.

The fifth meeting was with 1 and 6 in the Hotel room.  As soon as we showed the slide on why lead-out energy devices would not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy, the meeting was stopped.  Apparently, the Head of Physics Department and team had thoroughly studied our presentations.  He was aware of the Liang Car and the Energy Multiplier.

I was absolutely convinced that the lead-out energy theory was correct.  The Liang, Wang, 225 HP Pulse Motor and Tsinghua Energy Multiplier were no hoax.  They all had sound theoretical support.  I did not realize they were "state secrets".

The episode turned political.  I was suspected as an USA spy...

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2590 on: February 09, 2015, 10:54:03 PM »
Rotating Unbalanced Cylinder will lead-out gravitational energy. Amen.

Focus on large diameter, large mass and most importantly - higher rotational speed.

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2591 on: February 10, 2015, 03:11:58 AM »
Rotating Unbalanced Cylinder will lead-out gravitational energy. Amen.

Focus on large diameter, large mass and most importantly - higher rotational speed.

An extremely daring thought:

1. If an Unbalanced Wheel or Cylinder can lead-out gravitational energy, every bicycle rider will be able to help in the validation of the Lead-out Energy Theory.

2. A Rider can attach a lead weight at the rim of his back bicycle wheel.  Gravitational energy will be brought-in to help him.  Theoretically, he will be able to spend less energy to cover the same journey.

3. I, a 70 year old weak person, can no long ride the bicycle to verify the theory.  Will any of the young inventors out there do it?  Amen.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2592 on: February 10, 2015, 05:44:29 AM »
Nothing is that easy, lets be honest.

And daisy chaining wont work either, how would that be different than a normal flywheel.

Lets be real, if it was that easy it would be done by now.

Theres something about oscillating shock input, I agree, but now we must investigate methods of actually achieving that.

Methods to achieve the goal, not the goal itself.

mdlarouche

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2593 on: February 10, 2015, 04:09:06 PM »
Consider inelastic collisions as the closest to your description to

"Theres something about oscillating shock input, I agree, but now we must investigate methods of actually achieving that."

Inelastic collisions represent This same effect but at an atomic level.  When atoms reach the maximum travel within their space they bounce. There's no spring and no direct contact that we can see (contact could be represented by impact force)

Try looking at my comparison and make some analogies to real world scenarios.
467

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #2594 on: February 10, 2015, 04:16:27 PM »

2. A Rider can attach a lead weight at the rim of his back bicycle wheel.  Gravitational energy will be brought-in to help him.  Theoretically, he will be able to spend less energy to cover the same journey.

3. I, a 70 year old weak person, can no long ride the bicycle to verify the theory.  Will any of the young inventors out there do it? 
I am around the same age and cycle regularly. I am sure, Lawrence, that your doctor would say that it is wise to take it easy, but cycling would be good for your cardio vascular health. Subject to his/her advice, you try it.