How2, what's up bro. Tesla switch... According to Tesla's ozone patent, the only purpose of the switch is to provide a high current pulse to the oscillator circuit. A simple make and break.

Figuera's is a make before break. Honestly, the other circuit powering a load with batteries in series, it would eventually stop, dissipating all its energy as heat in the batteries. Just my assumption. But it's funny that he commented some overcharge and some completely discharge... Yeah, that's kind of what happens when you overcharge a battery.

The wimhurst is interesting, but so are all other static generators. You should read up on a perfect current source, which is impossible, but still, as load resistance increases, voltage increases, and so does power out. All you need is a source of current with zero internal resistance. 

.

Some very quick post..I donot come here now..need to survive.

1. Marathonman..Saw your Curve on Magnetic Field Strength and Ampere turns. I donot know where you got that 2 Tesla figure. Probably valid for a solid core. For iron ords with Gaps the high magnetic field strength ought to be in the region of 2.9 Tesla to 3.7 Tesla. If you have a copy of the Awesome Life Force or Ultimate Reality by Joesph Cater you would come across this as a hint. I found a website with detailed figures and we calculated using Excel. Best one comes at 3.7 but the heating problem comes and so between 2.9 to 3.3 Tesla is ideal.

2. Hanon I saw you Bucking coil Diagram How do you say that the poles there are NN Current rotates in both primaries in the same direction as the input is given from the ends. The polarity there is NS-NS-NS.  Current would roatate in One in clockwise direction (in your picture on the left hand side it is clockwise and on the right hand side it is Counter clock wise). Check polarity. It is NS-NS-NS. If you look at the left hand side on top current rotates at the CW direction from the top. At the right hand side which will now be in bottom Current again rotates in the CW direction. Polarity is NS only here. The secondaries are placed between opposite poles.

3. Secondaries with the identical poles facing each other can be made to work to produce output. like SN-NS-SN. But not in a straight pole. For that to work the Geometrical shape of the device is totally different. And not the one indicated by Figuera or Buforn. But it is a different Geometical shape. We have successfully experimented on that as well but ignored it for lack of funds. Secondly it is much more expensive to build it.

4. A commutator on DC motors is sturdy enough to work for long time and a mechanical commutator can be so arranged to create any desired frequency. This is a well known fact. However We have only one city where this kind of DC commutators can be ordered and many have closed down. We have build a commutator personally and tested it and I posted the video of it long back. And I came to the conclusion that it is not necessary. There are many solutions to the same problem.

5. As it is interestingly indicated at one place Buforn says 100 watts input can lead to 20000 watts output and he indicates that the output is 300 Amperes. A wire that can carry 300 amperes in coils must be capable of carrying 600 amperes in stright line. Why no thought is being given to this. If the primary carried only 1 amp and secondary carried 300 amps then it goes without saying that the primary is a thinner wire and secondary is a thicker wire. Just as indicated by Daniel McFarland Cook.   

6. I had been told that if a Tesla coil spark is given to a copper plate and the copper plate is sent to earth through a thick coil of wire the wire will not only have high voltage but will also have high amperage. As high as 1000 amps. But for that it must have very thick insulation. Was unable to test these things. Where is the money?

Unfortunately due to funding shortages I had to stop all these interesting experiments. I will do it some time in future when I;m able to do it. May be after 8 to 10 months. 

Please go here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_rod See who is the inventor..For your information In India we have had Tall Temples that are over thousand year old. None has been hit by lightening. You know why? They had this inbuilt as per the Hindu Sastras which are 5000+ years old. If any one has got the opportunity to study Austrian Scientist Viktor Schauberger he would explain how water can be conserved in a place and ground water level can be maintained. That system is build in the Hindu Temple Water Ponds.

I believe Tesla did this self sustaining DC generator in 1885 and for commercial reasons kept quiet.

Regards,

Ramaswami

Marathonman:

1. It was taken from some University website and extrapolated to Excel by us. You can do some search and find the University values that tested iron up to 10-20 Teslas of various types of iron.

2. The Elephantine legs are gone. Turns out that apart from all this I was working for 20 hours a day and sitting before the computer in my chair has caused the body fluids to store in the legs. Not due to the device. No other person who experimented suffered this and only mine. They all kept moving and had no ill effects. I had to sleep for 10 to 12 hours a day, steam the legs and do a 30 minute walk in the beack a day without shoes on bare feet ( we can do it in our hot country in the beach) and well the elephantine legs are gone. Turns out that I need to do a lot of yoga exercises to tone up the entire body especially the legs as they have become weak.

3. I have no comments to make on NN or NS. I have made both of them to work and I'm aware that for SN-NS-SN kind of thing to work you need a different geometry and the straight line does not permit it. If you go back to the earlier pages there are people admitting that identical poles produce zero volts.

4. I have done experiments and no theories. Cater is reported to have built a device in 1971 and applied for patent and was prohibited under National Security laws and then he kind of became a rebel. His information to the most part is inaccurate and misleading but he provides hints as to how certain things can be done. If we expect these people to disclose fully what they have done and how they have done and try to replicate it we will end up with failures. If we understand the principles we can succeed.

5. I do not know any thing about Tom Beardon but he uses a permanent magnet in the middle of the MEG if I'm correct to increase the magnetic field strength and prevents the collapsing of the magnetic field strength to zero. I look at the principles and try to understand them and not try to copy to the dot. I have to agree that most information given is misleading and inaccurate if taken accurately.

6. I would agree with you on the need to use a lower amperage output but we need to see what is given in the patent. If the patent says 100 volts and 1 amp input and it is acceptable to you, then why the 300 amp output is not acceptable is not clear to me. Back in the 1900s DC was the most used one and high amp DC required thick wires and the wires that were available were only like that intended to carry DC to short distances at considerable lossses.

Any way I'm not able to continue to post here as frequently as I used to. And I'm sorry about it.

Adding a magnet to the outside of a PM motor has been known to several of us on the Energetic Forum for at least the last couple of years.  I just recently discovered that it also works with a universal type motor if that motor is run on DC.  What was also interesting is that a large ceramic magnet worked much better than a small neo magnet.  I don't have a way to prove this but I think the neo magnet may be over saturating the laminations of the motor.  Please don't tell Milehigh about this as he is convinced magnets can't do work so therefore what we have seen must not be possible.

3. I have no comments to make on NN or NS. I have made both of them to work and I'm aware that for SN-NS-SN kind of thing to work you need a different geometry and the straight line does not permit it. If you go back to the earlier pages there are people admitting that identical poles produce zero volts.

Ramaswami, sorry man, but it does work, and quite well. Even in a simulator.

Guys, you should try this sometime if you're bored. The resistor is variable, so it can be adjusted on the fly. It's just crazy watching the currents. And I still have no clue exactly how to replicate it (solid-state), but that's the schematic in a nutshell.

How2, yeah, I removed those simulator shots because they were nothing out of the ordinary. No OU, just me misreading the scopes.

What rotates the  rotating-switch-unit,  I cannot see a motor mentioned in the device,  or even any permanent-magnets  to cause a homopolar-motor  effect .

A motor rotates his commutator. Buforn stated in his patent that the output AC is rectified by a switch. The resulting DC powers the commutator motor and also provides the DC for the exciter magnets.

Tesla's switch was like a spark gap, intended to produce high frequency oscillations. This is quite different, it's more like a controlled magnetic field.

could those winding's be considered a load because they are not yet the temporary-magnet that the electrical-current turns them into.

I see where you're going man, but windings draw current based on their resistance. They only reason they draw less than this is due to reactance, or a change in their inductance.

Hi all,
Not had much time to work on this stuff the last few evenings.  But I can answer the question about "SN-(coil)-NS" : using proper 180° phased NON-ZERO-CROSSING sinewaves : yes, there is output.  I can't yet say how much because my coils overheat before I can get to take proper measurements.  What I do know is that I'm seeing a full reversal AC output current : if I place two white LEDs mounted back to back ( anode to cathode) across the coil they both light up.

Have tried using proper PWM with the conventional comparator that compares a high frequency ramp signal and my input sinewave, but the HF part of the signal is causing induced currents in the pickup coil that disturb the 'real' signal - so I'm not convinced that it's a good path.

More news soon.  I will also try two identical pickups wired as in the diagrams posted the other day : "[SN]-(SN)(NS)-[NS]"
() = electromagnet; [] = pickup coil

I will also try two identical pickups wired as in the diagrams posted the other day : "[SN]-(SN)(NS)-[NS]"
() = electromagnet; [] = pickup coil

Yes, thankyou Marathonman, I meant : [] = electromagnet; () = pickup coil.   Too late at night 

I'm printing a second set of pickup coil formers at this very moment.

P.S. I'm puzzled : I can't find any way to correct my original post.  Why can't I edit my own posts ?