Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2354342 times)

antijon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3015 on: January 24, 2016, 08:41:15 PM »
Glenn, there should be a modify button up at the top right of your post, next to the quote button. It may disappear after some time.

But from your experiment I'm going to guess that only the peak of the wave, when the opposite polarity has dropped to near zero, is producing induction. That kinda proves my idea that the fields are cancelling for the most part. I mean, high current plus little output shows low impedance on the input, but also low induction.

I'm going to say, it's possible that Figuera's design had a very small inductor on the secondary coil, and larger inductors on the primaries. This is almost evident in every patent. In this case, the small inductor would quickly be saturated, and the remaining fields could collide and travel at 90 degrees to the surface of the secondary coil, kinda like two perm. magnets opposing. But, I don't mean like flux-cutting. If his secondaries were pancake coils, the inductive effects should be just like we thought.

Or it's possible that he just left an air gap between his primaries, and also used pancake coils.

Either way, I'm going to say, maybe just try using two independent, matching transformers. Should be able to produce inductive effects without negative effects of primaries acting on each other.

Glenn_FR

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3016 on: January 24, 2016, 09:47:33 PM »
Glenn, there should be a modify button up at the top right of your post, next to the quote button. It may disappear after some time.
[...]
Either way, I'm going to say, maybe just try using two independent, matching transformers. Should be able to produce inductive effects without negative effects of primaries acting on each other.
Hi Antijon,
Yes, the 'modify' button disappears very quickly - and my mistakes are there for posterity  :)
I'm not sure I follow you about the transformers, though.  I had tried the idea of using a center-tapped transformer to create my 180° phased signal, and then I tried adding some DC bias to avoid returning to zero current and my (ancient) recollections of one BIG problem with transformers came back to me in a flash : they HATE DC currents because they cause saturation of the magnetic core.
Could you describe your idea more precisely, please ?

@Marathonman : thanks for the link for the iron supplier - but as I'm in France, Europe, it's not very practical.  I do have a pile of MOT laminations on the workshop floor, I'll see what they do in place of my steel cores.  It's not saturation causing the heating, though : I've used the coils without the cores (one advantage of my printed formers : the cores slide out easily) they heat just the same.  I wish to stay with about 12v primary supply for the moment.
Looks like I need to go bifilar to get more money for my volts.  I'm not sure how the wiring goes, though.  Do I wind equal lengths of wire side-by-side and then connect the end of one to the beginning of the other (like the Tesla flat coils) ?  I think it was you who talked about this the other day but I couldn't understand the way you described the connections.  Were talking about the electromagnet windings.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3017 on: January 25, 2016, 04:24:35 AM »
 Glenn_FR;
It seams you need to up the swg rating of your wire. wire has a maximum chassis rating that most people don't know about but you may have exceeded that. Mot's will work great (lucky you) and as for the wiring i wound multiple layers and connected the end of one to the start of the next beginning. it really is up to you but i have had great results from this style of wiring and that is with laminant. i can't wait for my real cores to be fired up...ie solid iron cores.
it only takes milliamp to control saturation Please read up on mag amp control  and you will think more clear.

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3018 on: January 25, 2016, 08:47:35 AM »
@antijohn
Quote
Either way, I'm going to say, maybe just try using two independent, matching
transformers. Should be able to produce inductive effects without negative
effects of primaries acting on each other.

You know... Albert Einstein may have been a world famous physicist however it was his experience as a simple patent clerk which made him a success as a physicist. He learned to see past the smoke and mirrors of perception, to see the kernel of truth in the patent which defined it and how this connected with all other patents. Now in the literature and patents of both Figuera and Buforn they state... the production of electricity without any transformation. So why is everyone here trying to build transformers when both inventors state catagorically that they are not transformers and there can be no transformation?.

It reminds me of the blonde who calls her boyfriend and tells him to come over because she is trying to make a tiger jigsaw puzzle however she cannot get it started and none of the pieces fit. Then when the boyfriend gets there he looks at the picture of the tiger on the box and say's -- it's okay honey let's just sit down and put all the frosted flakes back in the box.

If none of the pieces fit and we cannot see the big picture then the premise is probably flawed and we should rethink what were doing.

AC
 
 
 

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3019 on: January 25, 2016, 11:33:57 AM »
allcanadian;
Quote; "The principle where is based this theory, carries the unavoidable need for the movement of the induced circuit or the inductor circuit, and therefore these machines are taken as transformer of mechanical work into electricity."

so what he is referring to is that with the Figuera device their is no transformation of mechanical work into electricity because it is motionless so there is no loss associated with movement. it has absolutely nothing to do of what you said and on top of that the Figuera device is NOT a transformer it's a Magnetic amplifier so if anyone would actually read the patents this is what they would find out.

i really feel sorry for anyone that follows Albert Einstein because he has never designed anything, built anything or for that matter has spoke any rational thought in his life. he is an idiot that stole his equations from someone else, they are not even his. not only that this bumbling idiot clerk you call a success has been proven wrong about ten times plus.
 so please i would suggest that you keep your family stories to yourself and the next time come to the table with more than a straw full of peas.
but by all mean's keep up the good work but you might want to tweek your perception a little.
marathonman.

Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3020 on: January 25, 2016, 03:44:49 PM »
Damn! That"s why I cant get this puzzle to work! I was on the phone with an Indian at tech support all week end for nothing.Well not totally nothing I did get 4 sham wows and a set of rubber spoons.

antijon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3021 on: January 25, 2016, 04:02:10 PM »
Glenn, my reasoning is that, with two independent transformers, you can rule out the effects of the primaries working against each other.

If you look at the image, it shows a typical amp for driving a centertap. Notice how each transistor drives a half wave. But the difference is that one half drops to zero before the other starts. In Figuera's, this is quite different because the half waves cross, as their timing is only 90 degrees apart, instead of 180.

Now, if we look at the operation of a transformer in general, we know that they're designed to have a very high impedance. This is due to the very large inductance of the primary. The effect of Lenz's law in a transformer is that, when the magnetic field of the secondary opposes the magnetic field of the primary, it acts to directly cancel the inductance of the primary. Or you could think that it increases the reluctance of the core material.

Why I think this is important in Figuera's design, is that we see when two opposing fields are interacting, they must act against each other. If Figuera's used a solid core on which all three coils were placed, we can predict that when one field is increasing, and the other decreasing, the net induction performed on the output coil will be very low, as the two fields cancel. Just think that two magnetic fields cannot occupy the same space. A north field with a strength of 3, and a south field with a strength of 2, will produce a net north field with a strength of 1.

So I'm saying, it may be possible that Figuera used three separate inductors, or even a smaller core that the output coil was wrapped around. There's a need to produce independent fields, fields that don't directly cancel the net induction.

With two transformers, you can test your amp without the two primaries working against each other. Just pretend that you are driving a Figuera coil. If the two secondaries are wired in series, the total voltage should be the sum of the two secondaries. This will tell you if your amp is producing the proper phases. If it is, then you just need to work on the coil arrangement.

Frankly, I don't think anyone else has developed a complete driver circuit yet, so you're like the guinea pig when it comes to testing coil designs. But I just bought a 600W 2 channel audio amp to test, so hopefully I'll also have some results soon.

ahh, just wanted to say, two transformers are only for testing, it won't produce overunity. The difference is in the number of windings.

AC, what exactly are you proposing? The theory of Figuera's generator is simple. Induction. The easiest way to test inductive EMF generating devices is with a simple, cheap transformer. We already know a majority of the operating principles, so I don't think we need to go back to square one.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3022 on: January 25, 2016, 11:34:08 PM »
antijon;

 I have been studying your proposal and i think it would work only if it is always positive sine/cosine wave because their is a large gap if you look at what you are proposing. if you flip the negative parts of the regular sine/cosine wave to positive you may have something. but you end up with a signal that looks just like what i have proposed already sine/sine 180 always positive.
just saying.
thing's that make you go hummmm.
this might work on separate sine cosine signals ?

cliff33

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3023 on: January 26, 2016, 07:17:27 AM »
I can see why after over 200 pages, that no one has yet succeeded in a replication.
  People should not just read the patent,they should STUDY it, then
maybe it'll sink in.
  The only thing that makes this device work is a VARYING magnetic field.
Yes a transformer can produce such a field but the timing is all wrong.

The plus & minus ends of a xformer coil are 180 deg. out of phase so at any one
instant of time when the plus is positive creating a nice field,the negative pulse comes along in the next instance of time and cancels it. So that's why Figuera uses resistors. Both primary coils get pulsed in the same instant of time and not subject to the phase bull-shit!
  The coils get pulsed ONLY with a varying positive voltage.

NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3024 on: January 26, 2016, 07:48:51 AM »
Why No one has succeeded after 200 pages..

1. It is an enormously expensive device to construct in the way it is described. So a simple study will not do but practical hands on experimentation must be conducted and then the difficulties of doing this kind of experiement will be known. With his knowledge, reputation, skill and resources it took Figuera about 6 years to do this device.

Marathonman..It is very difficult to avoid heating up the core if you use a solid core. As you said, the saturation level of the solid core will come at around 2 Tesla depending on the material. If you have air gaps (which are considered to create an inefficient transformer) and a lot of them as I created the Higher Tesla ranges are possible but still in the secondary we had the problem of heating. I have not recommenced experimenting again but will do so probably from April.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3025 on: January 26, 2016, 10:02:30 AM »
cliff33;

SOME PEOPLE in this forum still think it acts as a regular transformer, i'm glad you have it after ONLY 2 post. now i see why people with a working device don't hardly post because i am sick trying to convince people the simplicity of it all as was passed to me. it's really simple it's a variable inductance magnetic amplifier that amplify's the incoming signal with two variable currant primaries opposite  from one another.
this forum needed another sane person (to many bone heads)

WOW ! really hard fellas.

NRamaswami a 5 kilowatt device was constructed with discarded material that people in America discard all the time. unfortunately there are to many scrappers where i live so not possible.

Thanks Doug, i spit coffee all over the carpet on that one.

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3026 on: January 26, 2016, 10:28:31 AM »
Marathon,


That why I decided to put up a dedicated website, in order to summarize into one site all the information that I think it has sense and it is valuable. This way newcomers at least have a place to read it without distracction. Here this forum is full of different theories. People appear, post something and later dissappear. The design posted by bajac in post #1 had made a great damage to the original Figuera design. That design is posted there and it is biassing people to think about a transformer. Figuera never told about a transformer type design, nor about air gaps. He just used electromagnets and coils. That why i think it is good to read the later Buforn patent especially the 1914 patent, because they offer some details which clarify the device arrangement.


I would like to see that 5 KW device at least in some pictures. Or even I just get satified if it is possible to know which method was used in the commutator (mechanical, electronic,...). For me the simpler, the better. No moving parts better that high precission calibration in a rotary commutator.


allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3027 on: January 26, 2016, 06:48:26 PM »
@marathonman
Quote
SOME PEOPLE in this forum still think it acts as a regular transformer, i'm glad you have it after ONLY 2 post. now i see why people with a working device don't hardly post because i am sick trying to convince people the simplicity of it all as was passed to me. it's really simple it's a variable inductance magnetic amplifier that amplify's the incoming signal with two variable currant primaries opposite  from one another.[/size]this forum needed another sane person (to many bone heads)


I'm not sure how these boneheads could possibly question your obviously superior intellect. I mean where do they get off questioning you?, I imagine you have working units scattered about like confetti. One for the house, one for the car and others laying about just because you can. I get really sick of these boneheads questioning you and I think you should smite them... I mean fire and brimstone shit. Uhm... you do have working units don't you?, well of course you do what in the hell was I thinking and I apologize for even thinking such obvious insanity. I can only hope you show tolerance towards us ignorant unskilled peon's and in the future show us the path to righteousness.




AC

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3028 on: January 26, 2016, 08:07:12 PM »
Well damn dud you people keep trying to treat Figuera's device as F-in transformer and IT"S NOT. every new person that comes along post some stupid SHIT that has absolutely nothing to do with the Figuera device. fuck it  you F-in hicks, i have a two section unit that has produced overunity but ill be GOD DAMN if i'm fucking going to post it. i wouldn't give you the fucking satisfaction ass hole. if you would pull your fucking stupid head out of your know it all ass you might get some where but NO YOUR STUCK ON STUPID thinking you know all about transformers. YOU DON"T KNOW SHIT MORON!

STICK THIS FORUM UP YOUR ASS !

Thanks Doug
Thanks Hanon
See ya around.

cliff33

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3029 on: January 26, 2016, 09:22:26 PM »
Why No one has succeeded after 200 pages..

1. It is an enormously expensive device to construct in the way it is described. So a simple study will not do but practical hands on experimentation must be conducted and then the difficulties of doing this kind of experiement will be known. With his knowledge, reputation, skill and resources it took Figuera about 6 years to do this device.

Yes but Figuera lived in a remote area far from the few electrical companies at the time. He had no access to the electrical resources we have today.
That's why he had to use  cumbersome switching in his device, where today we should be able to do it electronically.
It's an extremely simple device and only expensive if you don't want to scrounge around for used parts.
  I use the laminations from old tv or MOT xformers which can be gotten from yard sales,second-hand shops etc. I use my chop saw to cut off the
center of the "E" (10 at a time) that leaves me with a "C" for winding the coils.
   But yes, if you figure in your time it could be very expensive. Figuera has already done most of the work for us, so instead of 6 years we should
be able to have one going in 6 months.
  Back in the 80's tv satellite systems were selling for $10,000. I built a good working system for about 3 or 4 hundred dollars.
Had to make my own 12 ft. dish with feed horn & LNA, & put together a satellite receiver kit.
 The point of all this is to be more innovative by using your head.
We shouldn't be trying to built a 5000 watt system right from the start. Concentrate on a small cheaper system to prove the concept theory first
and then we can work on a system to power our house.

cheers