OK it's not term it's fact.......but.
lets try another thing since the confusion is running wild (Thank you by the way citfta for not disagreeing)
a car is called a car no mater how many hundreds of variants there are even though some are diesel and some are gasoline but to avoid confusion lets call the Figuera device an Signal Amplifier.

SIGNAL AMPLIFIER for the easily confused.

and you are very correct about misuse of terms......everyone might be guilty of that present company included.
good to here from you.
Hanon ad one more on the intelligent list.
yes the sham wow's can be put away, tech support not needed.

 Hi,
 
Your complex design windings show that your device is not pure Figuera design. I am glad if you have had good results. But your design with concentric primaries and secundaries, multifilars windings resembles me more to the patent of Daniel McFarland Cook than two simple electromagnets with an intermediate coil patented by Figuera. I wouldn´t say that you are strictly following Figuera´s designs.
 

Hanon and all:

I apologize if any of my posts have caused any discomfort to any one.

oh by mistake many parts of the posts are deleted. My apologies.

Ramaswami device is an improvement over the Figuera device. Small single piece device. Not multiple ones.

The poles are open and a copper plate if placed will absorb the magnetic field coming out of the core and as the polarities are shifting North South always significant current is induced in the copper or Aluminium plate

The rule is that Electricity is induced in a conductor subjected to time varying magnetic field.

The current generated is directly proportional to

area of the conductor
thickness of the conductor
intensity of the magnetic field
area of the magnetic field and
mass of the magnetisable core

And

Inversely proportional to the resistance of the conductor.

This is how we get huge amperage in Homopolar Generators where only DC is used. So the Tesla Dynamo Electric machine patent rotates the copper disks. If we are use AC no need to rotate the disks and amperage without voltage will be developed.

If we wind the secondary wire on the core and connect to the two copper plates then significant amperage is developed in the secondary and secondary causes the core to saturate and this causes high voltage to be developed in the secondary again. You can test it if you want to check.

Primary does not need to provide high input. I have succeeded in providing very low inputs 33 watts to be precise and powering lamps for up to 2000 watts but the output was not 2000 watts. Output was able to power 2000 watts lamps.

You have to combine the Dynamo Electric machine and Figuera device or Ramaswami device. Any amount of power can be developed with a small input.

While this thread is focussed on making the Figuera device I see the purpose as providing an easy, simple to replicate, no moving parts no complexity device that can be made to work any where in the world. That also seems to be the over all purpose of the Forum.

Using the above principle it is possible to create 300 amps output easily. But core should be large enough to avoid saturation and heat.

I again apologize if I have caused discomfort to any one.
 

Hanon:

Thanks for the kind words..Unfortunately Figuera has added to the mystery by saying coils are wound properly and has not even disclosed the pole arrangement. The similarity that we have a secondary in the middle and two electromagnet primaries on both sides. It is only to that extent it is similar. IT is more similar to Buforn Patent last design is what we felt but we can be inaccurate. Yes Cook Patent uses thin primaries and thick secondaries but he places the primaries on the core and secondaries over the primaries and we have reversed it. So to that extent it is similar to Cook patent also. I have to agree on that.

well... for starters. Alternators and gen heads work. I don't see anybody coming up with a " figueras " that works. secondly everything in profit world has a life expectancy of a fortnight... I don't have a fixation on generators except that they work.

Tesla's patents on generators may or may not be over unity but they work. MagAmp has been around for awhile... I think the germans were using in it WWII on their V1 and V2s

maybe our differences are the verbiage.......... collectors and amplifiers

Hanon; i agree and hang in there, altruist to the bone.

well... for starters. Alternators and gen heads work. I don't see anybody coming up with a " figueras " that works. secondly everything in profit world has a life expectancy of a fortnight... I don't have a fixation on generators except that they work.

Liar i bet you have one on your night stand. ha, ha, ha.

Meaning i don't have what it takes to think this through and i want to take the easy Corporate way out and screw my neighbor.

you seam like you are an alright guy but how chicken shit can you be. that is the most gutless statement i have ever heard.
contrary to you absence their are people out there that have a working device and with that guidance i have achieved over unity with a two section unit. yes this is a real deal and no bull shit. not everything that takes place in this forum is hillbilly bull shit.

Randy we are about the same age and i am not pulling your chain. PM me and i will fill you in with what i have.

If you can handle it.
PS. yes the Germans "perfected" an American design to no end. you have no idea unless you researched.

marathonman.

Well, you guys really know how to frighten away newbies...    Between personal attacks and cryptic comments it's a real welcome cocktail.
I innocently (read naively) thought that those who "know" were here to help or guide those who want to learn.  Even after wading through over 200 pages - and trying to sort what's good to keep and what's not worth lingering over - there's not much to go on.  The Figuera patents are very vague.  Some of you have come-up with some good interpretations and a few have, apparently made something work.  I say apparently because there's never anything tangible posted : no photos, no data.

Many thanks to Hanon who has taken time and much effort to document his interpretations.  I'm still uncertain about the 'crashing fields' theory, though.  In my mind - and based on experimental results - what I see working is much simpler :
When one coil is energised 100% and the other is near 0%, the energised coil presents, say, it's N pole to the pickup (induced, secondary, whatever) coil.  If that coil has a core, it will take on the opposite magnetic polarity and so you'll have a S facing our electromagnet's N.  When you inverse the situation, the powerful N pole is now facing the other end of the pickup core : so the pickup core will reverse it's S-N poles.  Induced AC current.  Simple.

As I've said in previous posts I'm looking to see if the system can be driven from a 12v battery to make a portable device.  Driving coils efficiently with uni-directional 'sine' pulses is not as straightforward as it looks.

If I'm allowed I'll continue posting my experiments and results.

Hey Glenn,

When one coil is energised 100% and the other is near 0%, the energised coil presents, say, it's N pole to the pickup (induced, secondary, whatever) coil.  If that coil has a core, it will take on the opposite magnetic polarity and so you'll have a S facing our electromagnet's N.  When you inverse the situation, the powerful N pole is now facing the other end of the pickup core : so the pickup core will reverse it's S-N poles.  Induced AC current.  Simple.

I agree. It's a very simple concept. Unfortunately, I've tried to prove to others here that this is the same action as a simple transformer and generator, or any other generating device, but most here can't understand that, as they don't understand EMF or ampere turns, or Watts, or why a generator has a single B field of one strength but links two circuits of very different Wattages.

I Found out over a year ago that multiple primaries, positioned PARALLEL to each other physically, multiply the EMF on an output coil. This is essentially a solid state generator, because if we view a generator in operation, we see that it has a changing B field, but also a changing area, or inductive path. As an armature rotates toward it's exciter, the B field increases along with, or due to, the increasing area coupling the two coils.

An exact replica of a generator would be a single generating coil with many exciter coils arranged on it's pole face. If the exciter coils were turned on sequentially from one side to the other, or from a min to max number of coils, it would be literally a solid state generator. But in reality, all that's required is to have the exciters powered by AC, the total B field will be the sum of all, the total inductance will be the sum of all.

So in my opinion, which is unwelcome here, Figuera relied on many parallel primaries to increase the Ampere turns on his secondaries. I have yet to experiment with multiple secondaries, but what the hell, it probably works. But one single secondary definitely works, and this is what I'm basing my plans on.

This is all due to my independent experiments, ignored in this thread except by Randy who encouraged me a year ago. I don't have any data, but if you, or anyone, would like more info on this concept, please let me know. I can even make videos to demonstrate it with real devices... at least, to demonstrate the increase in EMF and plausibility of OU. Again, I have not made a documented OU transformer, but it's plausible.

Everyone else, yes I said transformer.  Marathonman, congrats on the working model. Looking forward to some videos in action. ahh, funny thing happened yesterday, lightning struck and it started raining bacon... I guess pigs are flying.