Flux cutting would require a high magnetic field density that protrudes from the iron and cuts the output coil.

Maybe for that reason Figuera placed the two electromagnets very close in the 1902 patent. To compress the flux lines. Also remember that thesum of the fields B1+B2 = constant, so ..the sum is always at maximun.

A very pertinent video: https://youtu.be/yvVbDQ-z66o

Even in a rotating generator the filed is kept up fairly high all the time fairly steady.Only the position changes as it moves the entire magnet. Without movement and without having the continuous stator core for the magnetic field to return though to complete the magnetic path it would need some changes. Second magnet with stator placed between them and a unique controller. The number of lines of flux penetrating the Y still remains the same in both types of generator. You could use the lift test to determine the amount of flux from a standard field magnet from a working generator with the field powered at its maximum. If your looking for 50 or 60 htz output your cyclic rate will have to be reasonable steady so you wont be able to increase the speed to increase the output unless you want to get more complicated more parts.
  Work your way backwards from Y making the Y the size you need for the output you want. Then build the magnets to drive Y based on what Y is in size. The idea that external power is what is always feeding the field magnet is wrong. It does not even work that way in a rotating generator.

  The field which has a measure of force needs to be kept steady it is the resultant amount of flux which is being shifted.It is the number of lines of flux which is cutting the induced. Even if it is slightly reduced in one to enable the shift of the center point where the two fields collide.With two magnets the number of lines in each are not able to mix so the numbers are not the same as one single rotating magnet. Each one is half as many lines as a single rotating magnet. Slightly higher actually but each inducer is less then what would power a single rotating magnet for same output as a single rotating magnet. No engine which rotates a magnet ever directly supplies any power to the magnetic field.The residual field left over after it stops is all it has to ever start up with to cause an output which is given back to the rotating field to make it stronger until it becomes full enough to operate with enough output to power the field and the external load. That is why you have to flash a virgin,there is nothing there for the engine to rotate.

Correct. There is enough output to power the field plus the shift if you chose to recharge the source then so be it. It is also a buffer to input power to the filed quicker then the output can supply to the field when large loads are fluctuated or turned off and on rapidly to help prevent a lag in the output voltage. Once running a steady load the source can be removed. The difference from a rotating field is the field is moving physically with the rotating magnet leaving the induced winding and approaching another with enough output to power the moving field and the load. here the magnet is not moving just the field, again with enough power to supply both the load and field from the two magnets and a small portion to run the controller. It would serve every ones best interest to stop calling it a commutator.It does not function as one and only slightly looks it could be made from one.Which it can not. Even I am guilty of wrongly calling it a commutator. You would'nt call a volume control on a stereo a commutator. Just call it the controller.

hanon
I don't need it, but you spotted correctly - that's how every patent is hiding the essence ....The secret is  slightly uncovered in single sentence in Buforn patent. I know you can find it easily.

I've read through your patents posted and all i can come up with in the end is a fancy name for a rotating magnetic field that can be powered by multiple type sources.

I find it very annoying that people post on this forum being so cryptic. one would have to be rather fucked up in the head in the first place acting like a spoiled rotten brat that knows something that you don't, this is in my book a serious character flaw.
i mean seriously why the fuck post shit that no one can decipher except with a Capitan Jack Cracker Jack Box Decoder ring. does it make you moron's feel like a big man like your holding shit over another man's head well sorry to spoil your fucking head fest but grown men don't play stupid KID GAMES.
Humanity will be extinct shortly and we will finally be rid of pimple ass pukes like this. if you can't post where people can understand it DON'T FUCKING POST IT. do us forum members that want to build a working Figuera device a favor and GO SOMEWHERE ELSE to play your decoder ring games.
I personally am building Figuera device because i have felt i have not done enough to help humanity. the human race is heading in the wrong direction because of Corporate/Government Corruption and Greed and the only way us nobodies are going to get anywhere is by helping each other not just ourselves, lead by example not by the Corporate/Government example.
 by having our own power supplies we could break the bond of control the Corporations and Governments have on us by growing our own food, lighting our own houses and working with nature not against it.
i for one when i have completely built this device and is working will put together design specs and send it around the world for others to build and enjoy whether some like it or not.
i'm sorry for cursing but i am just frustrated and have had my limit of stupidity and secrecy on this forum.

Hi again,
Well, I've wound some coils.  Couldn't find any soft iron so I've used some steel bar that I had in stock.  I want to play with the simplest setup for now : two electromagnets and one pickup coil in the middle.
My two electromagnet coils are identical and are wound a few hundred turns of 0.4mm (approx) magnet wire salvaged from a MOT secondary.  DC resistance around 5 ohms.  My pickup is overkill : all of the primary windings of the same MOT (240v version).

The driver circuit I'm using is like this (dual darlingtons) :

The transistor on the left, driven by a 1v peak signal from my sig-gen, is split into two signals 180° apart.  The two signals are fed through decoupling capacitors to two identical darlington drivers.  My coils are represented by the inductors L1 and L2.

With component values shown, the current in the two coils looks like this (dual darlinton plot) :

Quite high current ( the coils get warm after a few minutes use), and a fairly strong magnet effect.  If I place the coils (with the pickup in the middle) with like poles facing each other I get some current in the pickup (but much less that I would have thought).  If I place the magnets with opposing poles facing, I get even less current.

I haven't yet included voltmeters and ammeters : that's the next step.  Note that by varing resistors R7/R5 by 1K or so you control the amplitude of the output signal; by varying R8/R6 (by a maximum of perhaps 10k either way) you can vary the DC quiescent current which allows you to let the coil current drop down to 0amps or not.

Marathon,

I agree with last post. Many people love speaking in high encrypted code. In my case as I am a simple person I just may say everything clear and straight.

Please look this link and do not forget to have a look into the signature:

http://cacharreo.com.es/foro/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1059&start=990#p7320

It is a pity that this forum does not accept to include a signature.

Glen, beautiful setup! Trying a decent amp was the next thing on my list. Just wanted to say, looks like your current is a little high during the "off" time. Have you tried increasing the value of R8/R6 and seeing if that helps?

Thanks for the link to the Wordpress site, Hanon