Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11840193 times)

stivep · « **Reply #23490 on:** September 12, 2022, 07:34:29 PM »

I have problem to understand your comment :

Quote from: maxolous on September 06, 2022, 10:36:33 PM

the inductive and the capacitive (electrostatic charges)

the electrostatic charge doesn't have reactive nature.
Electrostatic charge may depend on terms of charge retention and mechanisms of
electron transfer during the generation and dissipation of the charge.
electrostatic-charge

Wesley

stivep · « **Reply #23491 on:** September 12, 2022, 07:46:10 PM »

Quote from: maxolous on September 11, 2022, 12:28:31 PM

This is the only condition for standing wave; where one freq. is an exact sub or multiple of another as in transmission line.

Maxolous

"a standing wave in a transmission line is a wave in which the distribution of current, voltage, or field strength is formed by the superposition of two waves of the same frequency propagating in opposite directions."

if you dealing with sub harmonics:
1. sub-harmonic oscillation, occurs when the inductor ripple current does not return to its initial value by the start of next switching cycle. Sub-harmonic oscillation is normally characterized by observing alternating wide and narrow pulses at the switch node.
narrow%20pulses

2.https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/subharmonic-oscillation

3.general rules about harmonics and sub-harmonics https://electricalbaba.com/sub-harmonics/

4. Time-Harmonic Solutions for Transmission Lines http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~jstiles/723/handouts/Time%20Harmonic%20Solutions%20for%20Transmission%20Lines%20present.pdf

5.Harmonics in Transmission Lines( applies to all transmission lines)
https://www.tugraz.at/fileadmin/user_

6 . Radio Frequency Oscillations in Gyrotropic Nonlinear Transmission Lines
this one is pointing at ferromagnetic material. Very interesting

Quote

//partially filled with a magnetized
ferrite. The frequencies and amplitudes of the oscillations appearing under the impact of short
carrier-free electric pulses are determined by dispersive and non-linear properties of the line’s structure.//

https://www.bing.com
Wesley

maxolous · « **Reply #23492 on:** September 12, 2022, 09:14:59 PM »

Quote from: stivep on September 12, 2022, 07:46:10 PM

"a standing wave in a transmission line is a wave in which the distribution of current, voltage, or field strength is formed by the superposition of two waves of the same frequency propagating in opposite directions."

Standing wave do occur not only of waves of the same frequencies, it can also occur when one wave is an exact multiple of another. A very easy way to demonstrate this is to feed two signals into your scope from a dual channel signal generator. Let one be multiple of the other, without using the trig. menu, you will realize that both wave will stand especially when one is exact multiple of the other or sub as the case might be.

Quote from: stivep on September 12, 2022, 07:46:10 PM

if you dealing with sub harmonics:
1. sub-harmonic oscillation, occurs when the inductor ripple current does not return to its initial value by the start of next switching cycle. Sub-harmonic oscillation is normally characterized by observing alternating wide and narrow pulses at the switch node.
narrow%20pulses

2.https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/subharmonic-oscillation

3.general rules about harmonics and sub-harmonics https://electricalbaba.com/sub-harmonics/

4. Time-Harmonic Solutions for Transmission Lines http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~jstiles/723/handouts/Time%20Harmonic%20Solutions%20for%20Transmission%20Lines%20present.pdf

5.Harmonics in Transmission Lines( applies to all transmission lines)
https://www.tugraz.at/fileadmin/user_

6 . Radio Frequency Oscillations in Gyrotropic Nonlinear Transmission Lines
this one is pointing at ferromagnetic material. Very interestinghttps://www.bing.com
Wesley

I will take time to study that.

Maxolous

maxolous · « **Reply #23493 on:** September 13, 2022, 07:43:02 AM »

Quote from: stivep on September 12, 2022, 07:34:29 PM

I have problem to understand your comment :the electrostatic charge doesn't have reactive nature.
Electrostatic charge may depend on terms of charge retention and mechanisms of
electron transfer during the generation and dissipation of the charge.
electrostatic-charge

Wesley

Inductive cct and electrostatic charges.
I have removed the capacitive, hope it's fine now?

Maxolous

NickZ · « **Reply #23494 on:** September 13, 2022, 05:49:34 PM »

Quote from: maxolous on September 13, 2022, 07:43:02 AM

Inductive cct and electrostatic charges.
I have removed the capacitive, hope it's fine now?

Maxolous

Guys:
It may not be the same, to compare transmission line type radio waves with what we are looking for here, in free energy devices.
I don't know what a proper wave for these type of devices is supposed to look like. But, my push pull signal at the grenade is a sine wave, and the kacher wave signal, is also a sine wave. So, the idea here is to sync those two frequencies together, to produce an interference pulse which is supposed to account for an additional energy output. The problem is that, it doesn't.
However, the guys that have built the controlable Kacher have shown less total output, than what my simple Kacher /grenade device can produce. I am still waiting to be shown, differently, by those with a controlable Kacher circuits, and just what it can do. Perhaps Max will be the one.
Of course we can still discuss carrier waves, and such, but with the idea of an interuption process, over the push pull frequency. And not just one wave riding in another wave, but, one wave interupting the other wave at the proper frequencies, instead. Therefore I don't think that the analogy to carrier waves, or standing waves, etc, in radio or telecommunications, is the same thing, or has the same purpose, at all.

stivep · « **Reply #23495 on:** September 13, 2022, 07:38:46 PM »

Quote from: NickZ on September 13, 2022, 05:49:34 PM

So, the idea here is to sync those two frequencies together, to produce an interference pulse .

watch video at:
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/hs-physics/x215e29cb31244fa1:wave-properties/x215e29cb31244fa1:wave-interference/v/wave-interference-pulses

http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys283/lectures/pulse/pulse.html

Quote from: NickZ on September 13, 2022, 05:49:34 PM

which is supposed to account for an additional energy output. The problem is that, it doesn't.

There is no additional energy out.
energy can't be created nor destroyed - law
Energy can only be acquired, transferred into _{( from outside of the system)}and converted to represent the same form of energy.

here is a quote:

Quote

The principle of superposition may be applied to waves whenever two (or more) waves are traveling through the same medium at the same time. There are two conditions the waves must meet to produce interference patterns. Waves must be of the same kind. Obviously, a light wave cannot interfere with a sound wave as they are of different nature.

https://physics.icalculator.info/waves/interference-of-waves.html
Wesley

NickZ · « **Reply #23496 on:** September 13, 2022, 08:57:16 PM »

I am aware of what conventional science says about "interference waves". However, that does not explain how superpositioning of two waves can affect a substantial GAIN. Much, much higher than just their "additive" or constructive properties.
Destructive or constructive wave properties are not what these devices are about. Nor will science give a proper explanation, ever.As they don't even believe in such a thing as free energy. Or better said, energy from the surrounding ambient. Nor does Wesley believe in what Tesla called the source of all, the Aether. So, without tapping into that explanation of a supposed source, there is no gain. He's right there. So, Wesley keep looking for the guy with the hidden transmitter, across the way.
We have already heard Wesley telling us many times now about how energy can't be produced or destroyed, pretty boring, unless you're in third grade. But, that is not what we need to know, in order to find the answer to free energy.
We also know, and already have heard about "conversions" devices as well. So, repeating the same thing, does not help much now, any more than all the other previous times. We have already heard about all that, and so don't try to confuse the issue with, can't get more out than in. Without talking about a source. A source for those "conversions" devices.
Unless you believe in the Big Bang, as well as everything else that "science" has to say about free energy from electrical devices. Nor will you ever hear from current science about how the superposition of interuptive waves can create free energy, nor how. Tesla did have an explanation, and pointed to how when his electrical generator switch was turned off, the guy doing so, didn't fair too well, afterwards.

SolarLab · « **Reply #23497 on:** September 13, 2022, 11:22:40 PM »

Energy gain is NOT achieved by wave addition (interference waves) since each wave only adds it's original power to the coincident wave.
A reflected wave on a transmission line caused by a short or open at one, or both, ends will incrementally increase in value over many
reflections but will not yield excess energy.

Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron,
and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron.

As the speed of the electron mass increases, the kinetic energy of the electron increases by the square of it's velocity. The electron velocity
is set by the High Voltage used to propel it.

A higher voltage will increase the electron mass velocity, which in turn, increases the electron kinetic energy. Also, the dv/dt or di/dt
plays a role in the kinetic energy increase; with all things being equal, the faster you accelerate the electron (or any other mass) over an
equal time period, the more energy is gained. Think bullets or explosives or what ever.

And, the more often you do this (more occurances) the energy will build up more quickly; therefore, with a higher frequency of occurance,
the more kinetic energy will be put into the system over the same period of time. Think pressure washer versus 5/8" hose, both consume
5 gallons per minute but the pressure washer is more effective at removing dirt or drilling or cutting, it produces more kinetic energy.

High Voltage Electron Acceleration is used in older CRT Televisions and Oscilloscopes. Magnetic fields will deflect the electron path but will
not accelerate the electron (mass), as seen in the CRT deflection yoke. When you adjust the brightness control, you are increasing the
high voltage (either directly or by manipulating a grid).

One method of transfering the electron kinetic energy is to velocity modulate (bunching) another adjacent signal or wave. This transfer
mechanism is used in Travelling Wave Tubes and a similar energy transfer mechanizsm is used in Ruslan/Kapanadze type generators.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA

In turn, Resonance will NOT provide excess energy but can be used to greatly increase the efficiency of a system. Inductors with, or without,
ferromagnetic (iron) cores can be made to achieve excess energy by varying their inductance during operation. This is seen in a similar
way when considering the inductor B-H Curve, however the gain is a result of the inductor characteristics.

AlienGrey · « **Reply #23498 on:** September 14, 2022, 12:58:43 PM »

Max your circuit with a 74hc132 shmit good idea doing it that way but the feed back needs a 2 trimmers in my test set up (component spread different manufacturing perhaps ) it needs apparently zero crossing sync at start and finish 50% sqr wave other wise its not sqr, some thing like the gigagram bellow.

See scope shot after mod on my setup, chears

Sil

NickZ · « **Reply #23499 on:** September 14, 2022, 03:24:31 PM »

SL: You mentioned: "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron." end quote
So, SL do you have any proof of the above. As you know, electrons don't have mass, so not sure about what "electron mass" has to do with free energy. Electrons are not material or physical particles, either. It sounds like it takes the harvesting of "mass", to obtain energy. That is what science thinks, but that is not correct, concerning free energy harvesting. I didn't know that it takes electron mass to obtain free energy. I have learned that it takes energy to have mass. If there is no energy, and no energy fields in space, there would be no material mass, anywhere. As "everything is energy", according to Tesla, as well as his ideas on the Cosmic Soup, and it's source.

I also have my doubts about the "speed of electrons". Or if there is any thing to "movement" of electrons, at all. How about waves? Do waves actually move from one place A to another place B??? Does light actually move? Such as the speed of light?
What is moving? These are not just details, in my book. And can aid in the understanding of a medium which we can't see.

BTW: Guys, I am very disgusted by what I see still going on at OUR.com. It's sick, what is allowed to happen with the Troll there. No use posting anything there, as this guy will just regurgitate another one of his paid for replies, about how free energy does not exist, and that never has existed. And how dumb we all are for even trying. Yet he is in a free energy forum to disrupt it, and will never have anything to do with what the forum is about. No matter what proof is shown. HE is no ones friend, nor is he there to help. As his free time is not free, but paid for, and explains how it seams that he has so much free time. Don't be fooled, like the admin there, and Ramset are. They may disagree with my judgements, but this will continue on for a few more years. Or until his paycheck runs out. I am not the only one that thinks so, several other member there have voiced there complaints, yet nothing is being done about it. I know what I would do with him... and it would be the 4th or 5t forum he gets banned from for trying to ruin their work and research. I guess that the admin does not care, too busy, or ... But, I won't post there, nor will a few others.
He was known by a different name here, F2.... but "he won't post here" now. Guess why...

NickZ

bistander · « **Reply #23500 on:** September 14, 2022, 05:50:30 PM »

Quote from: NickZ on September 14, 2022, 03:24:31 PM

SL: You mentioned: "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron." end quote
So, SL do you have any proof of the above.
<<<snip>>>>
BTW: I am very disgusted by what I see still going on at OUR.com. It's sick, what is allowed to happen with the Troll there....
He was known by a different name here, F2.... but "he won't post here" now. Guess why...
NickZ

Hi NickZ,
You ask for proof. Same as F6. Yet you are disgusted when he does what you have just done.
bi

maxolous · « **Reply #23501 on:** September 14, 2022, 06:02:22 PM »

Quote from: AlienGrey on September 14, 2022, 12:58:43 PM

Max your circuit with a 74hc132 shmit good idea doing it that way but the feed back needs a 2 trimmers and 2 diodes so it's possible to do a 50% sqr wave other wise its not sqr, some thing lthe gigram bellow.

AG,

Thanks for bringing that up, the output is squarewave. If there is need to add a cct for varying duty cycle I think I know what to do by adding more NAND gate cct.

Maxolous

ramset · « **Reply #23502 on:** September 14, 2022, 06:17:49 PM »

Nick
This is wrong place for this ( not even Stefan’s forum)

Please do this in your rant room or ?
And as already mentioned
Defamatory statements are against terms of service ( in all forums actually)

His handle is his call sign and like an international identification!

Zero tolerance here for such liabilities!

And yes I am also concerned with stifling effect on “what if’s” at that forum
And I am more concerned he has discouraged Smudge
Will be calling Smudge just to be certain!

That being said I have been taking poll from membership there .
All who actually have builds are more tolerant ( yes it’s toooo much attention at times to some
Newer build discussions

Quote from: NickZ on September 14, 2022, 03:24:31 PM

BTW: Guys, I am very disgusted by what I see still going on at OUR.com. It's sick, what is allowed to happen with the Troll there. No use posting anything there, as this guy will just regurgitate another one of his paid for replies, about how free energy does not exist, and that never has existed. And how dumb we all are for even trying. Yet he is in a free energy forum to disrupt it, and will never have anything to do with what the forum is about. No matter what proof is shown. HE is no ones friend, nor is he there to help. As his free time is not free, but paid for, and explains how it seams that he has so much free time. Don't be fooled, like the admin there, and Ramset are. They may disagree with my judgements, but this will continue on for a few more years. Or until his paycheck runs out. I am not the only one that thinks so, several other member there have voiced there complaints, yet nothing is being done about it. I know what I would do with him... and it would be the 4th or 5t forum he gets banned from for trying to ruin their work and research. I guess that the admin does not care, too busy, or ... But, I won't post there, nor will a few others.
He was known by a different name here, F2.... but "he won't post here" now. Guess why...

NickZ

Please move this to rant
It does need discussion!
Within terms of service agreement!

Or ?
It’s up to you as I am doing the discussion behind the scenes ATM

Respectfully
Chet K
PS
As already mentioned
Our host here has made self moderated sections for builders
Just to eliminate these type liability issues

And as already mentioned
He was ready to close forum over flamewars and also liabilities (His liability as owner)
attached to comments here !
For clarity it was just temporary ( few months)
Until he could sort other upgrades which would allow him easier ability to manage the forum!

Please let’s not make that happen here !!
Terms of service are important
And there was already a feature installed to limit this activity ( self moderated builders boards here )

SolarLab · « **Reply #23503 on:** September 14, 2022, 07:46:38 PM »

Quote from: NickZ on September 14, 2022, 03:24:31 PM

SL: You mentioned: "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron." end quote
So, SL do you have any proof of the above. As you know, electrons don't have mass, so not sure about what "electron mass" has to do with free energy. Electrons are not material or physical particles, either. It sounds like it takes the harvesting of "mass", to obtain energy. That is what science thinks, but that is not correct, concerning free energy harvesting. I didn't know that it takes electron mass to obtain free energy. I have learned that it takes energy to have mass. If there is no energy, and no energy fields in space, there would be no material mass, anywhere. As "everything is energy", according to Tesla, as well as his ideas on the Cosmic Soup, and it's source.

I also have my doubts about the "speed of electrons". Or if there is any thing to "movement" of electrons, at all. How about waves? Do waves actually move from one place A to another place B??? Does light actually move? Such as the speed of light?
What is moving? These are not just details, in my book. And can aid in the understanding of a medium which we can't see.

NickZ

NickZ,
Yes I have proof of the "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the
energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron."

Don't have the time nor the space here to go through the entire physics course, plus it was a long time ago, but this MIT video sums
it all up quite well in less than 38 minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA

Statements like "electrons don't have mass, and so forth" tell me further discussion on the subject would be fruitless. However the
proof is there, and shown experimentally, if one cares to look more closely into it.

Regards,

SL

NickZ · « **Reply #23504 on:** September 14, 2022, 10:30:16 PM »

SL:
Well, I have looked at this closer. But, I am not here to learn that it takes mass to harvest energy from the surrounding space. Like I said not sure that is the solution to free energy. BTW. Asking for some proof is a bad thing now? I think that the whole point of this thread is all about proof, replication, and verification. I am not calling any one dumb, for providing what they can provide. Even if it's a video, as that is all we have at this time.
Ramset: You can move or remove my posts.
I said what I needed to say.

NickZ

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11840193 times)

stivep

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

stivep

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

maxolous

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

maxolous

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

stivep

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

SolarLab

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

AlienGrey

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

bistander

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

maxolous

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

ramset

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

SolarLab

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY