Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  (Read 10141734 times)

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23550 on: September 17, 2022, 08:16:29 PM »
Challenge it .
I truly wish you the best with all my heart. :)
Wesley


OK!



Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3654
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23551 on: September 17, 2022, 09:52:10 PM »
Wesley Nick does have a point here!

Velocity modulation by acceleration of the electron beam!

How was this achieved in the production of the flat screen TV’s?
As the TV electron beam has further to travel as the electron gun
Is closer to the centre of the screen as if not corrected produced ‘defocusing
and blurredness at the edges’.

This raises the idea that the electron beam can either be delayed of accelerated
Which could be the answered to Nicks question. Perhaps one that ED Gray might have solved.

Sil

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23552 on: September 17, 2022, 10:35:15 PM »
   AG:    I just have a different mentality about all this. But, Tesla's words ring true to my ears.   His ideas and concepts I understand. And, I've been trying to relay how free :) energy may possibly work, by explanation of the objective, as well as showing what that can look like on my circuits. This is not a done deal. Not for us

   NickZ
 P. S.  AG how the old TVs worked was one of the first amazing misteries. Beyond me.  I can build it, but can't design it. I don't invent things, just trying to get it to work, first.

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23553 on: September 17, 2022, 11:13:28 PM »
Last night
 Tesla society had some huge Tesla coil at wardenclyffe
Have a video which was sent also ,
Hopefully Jimboot can post ( sent it to him he is more savvy


Video is wild !




Online stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23554 on: September 18, 2022, 01:07:53 AM »
Wesley Nick does have a point here!
Velocity modulation by acceleration of the electron beam!
How was this achieved in the production of the flat screen TV’s?
As the TV electron beam has further to travel as the electron gun
Is closer to the centre of the screen as if not corrected produced ‘defocusing
and blurredness at the edges’.

This raises the idea that the electron beam can either be delayed of accelerated
Which could be the answered to Nicks question. Perhaps one that ED Gray might have solved.

Sil
Electron Beam Accelerators
CRT systems (scanned beams) :
https://www.ebeam.com/news-archive/archive/2017/electron-beam-accelerators
Electrons repel each other, so you have to make an effort to collimate and focus.
and this is done because of the energy from power supply delivered to focusing coils.
some more is here: a-beam-of-electrons-is-accelerated-

Cathode ray tube vs. flat screen displays in oscilloscopes:
There is no gun or vertical and horizontal displacement and scanning as in a CRT.
Overall the flat screen, using LCD technology, compared to the CRT.

Velocity modulation:
The electrons that pass through positive half cycles of the gap voltage undergo acceleration in velocity.
The electrons that pass through negative half cycles of the gap voltage undergo retardation in velocity.
(As a result of these the electrons get bunched together as they travelled through the drift space).
The variation in electron velocity in drift space is called velocity modulation.
velocity-modulation-in-klystron.

Electrostatic acceleration of a modulated electron beam :
electrostatic acceleration of a dynamically modulated electron beam leads to a
 slowdown of the electron-bunching process and therefore to a reduction in the electronic efficiency of the device.
The electrostatic acceleration of an amplitude-modulated beam, however, is free of this disadvantage.
In the case of amplitude modulation, a change in electron velocities does not lead to a change
in the form and spectrum of the current, and the growth of current power is not accompanied
by a reduction in electronic efficiency.   
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MVSFA..24...25A/abstract

______________________________________________
Self-modulation
of an electron beam in plasma:
When the beam longer than the plasma wavelength is used, self-modulation of the beam occurs.
The reason of this effect is the interaction between transverse electric fields in plasma with the beam.
Detection technique for self-modulation of long electron beams in plasmas
or:  self-modulation of an electron beam in plasma


Subject is very interesting, especially in regards plasma, but so far I don't see anything unusual.
in addition :
GLOBAL SURFACE WAVE RESONANCES OF THE EARTH S MAGNETOSPHERE  AND THEIR POSSIBLE MANIFESTATION   
Petko Nenovski University Center for Space Research and Technologies (UCSRT),   
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”  , Sofia, Bulgaria
Abstract
In this paper global surface wave (SW) modes supported by plasma discontinuities at both the magnetopause and the plasmapause are considered.
The ionosphere at the ends of the magnetic field lines of the outer magnetosphere is considered as reflecting boundaries of the SW
that propagate along the plasma. As a result a standing wave structure along the magnetic field fluxes
of the outer Earth’s magnetosphere (surface wave resonance (SWR)) can be formed.
Due to quantized wavenumbers along the magnetic field lines, the SWR possesses quantified frequencies
in a following way: f 1,2 (1, 2, 3,..)f 0,1(2), where f 0,1(2) is the frequency of the corresponding fundamental SWR
Unfortunately I cannot provide the link, you have to find it by yourself,
as the access to it may be restricted.

Zenneck wave is simply a vertically polarized plane wave solution to Maxwell's equations in the presence of a planar boundary that separates free space from a half space with a finite conductivity.
 synthesized  quantized solution,
https://web.mit.edu/redingtn/www/netadv/zenneck.html


Here is exactly the same title but [Submitted on 19 Nov 2014]
having little different abstract:
Global surface wave resonances of the earth magnetosphere and their possible manifestation
Petko Nenovski- https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=Nenovski%2C+P
The ionosphere at the ends of the magnetic field lines of the earth outer magnetosphere is considered as
reflecting boundaries of the surface waves that propagate along the plasma boundaries.
As a result a standing wave structure along the magnetic field fluxes of the outer magnetosphere,
i.e. surface wave resonance structure can be formed.
Due to quantized wavenumbers along the magnetic field lines, the surface wave resonance possesses
quantified frequencies in a following way: f = nfres, where fres is frequency of the corresponding
fundamental surface wave resonance and n is an integer. Global Pc5 pulsations have been observed
and interpreted mostly as cavity modes of the earth magnetosphere. The global Pc5 pulsations
however could alternatively be interpreted as ultra low-frequency surface wave resonances of the earth
magnetosphere that do not necessarily involve the cavity mode-field aligned resonance transformation concept.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.5218

Wesley

Online Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23555 on: September 18, 2022, 01:42:29 AM »
Last night
 Tesla society had some huge Tesla coil at wardenclyffe
Have a video which was sent also ,
Hopefully Jimboot can post ( sent it to him he is more savvy


Video is wild !
hopefully it uploads.

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 993
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23556 on: September 18, 2022, 09:59:36 AM »

Cathode ray tube vs. flat screen displays in oscilloscopes:
There is no gun or vertical and horizontal displacement and scanning as in a CRT.
Overall the flat screen, using LCD technology, compared to the CRT.
We replace the movement of a real electron beam with a "virtual" one by switching pixel cells on the screen using electronic switches in LCD. As a result, we use less energy, and the result is the same.
The deflection system of a CRT TV  is one of the main consumers of energy, isn't it?
By the way, dear Wesley, how much energy is spent on shifting the beam, not counting the losses in the wires of the deflecting coils? I suspect it depends on the speed of that beam.
Do you see some analogy with the Holcomb machine, there is a virtual moving magnetic field, here is a "virtual electron beam". How do you like this idea?  :)

Online stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23557 on: September 18, 2022, 12:33:28 PM »
Do you see some analogy with the Holcomb machine, there is a virtual moving magnetic field, here is a "virtual electron beam". How do you like this idea?  :)
Holcomb doesn't use vacuum, the primary requirement for electron movement in CRT.
Your question is irrelevant.

The deflection system of a CRT TV  is one of the main consumers of energy, isn't it?
 //how much energy is spent on shifting the beam, not counting the losses in the wires of the deflecting coils?
I suspect it depends on the speed of that beam.

Energy  spent on shifting the beam depends from the application but  is "close to none." in comparison to energy of the beam by itself.
In a vacuum chamber a tungsten cathode filament is heated to between 2500 and 3000 °C
to emit electrons, which are focused by a magnetic or static lens system
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/electron-beam
Most smaller CRTs use electrostatic deflection,
https://nationalmaglab.org/education/magnet-academy/watch-play/interactive/electromagnetic-deflection-in-a-cathode-ray-tube-ii
The amount of vertical or horizontal deflection is directly proportional to the corresponding applied voltage.

In case of magnetic lens use:
-the amount of used energy for the deflection will be equal to the amount of energy used by your hand to move the magnet
used for that deflection.

Pushed by SolarLab experiments with Holcomb concept, so far looks like it depends on his mood,
-like a child or some young lady
He is learning, but not fast enough yet I assume.

"I do and then I don't, or I think I do, maybe"
"I give and then I don't, or I think I do, maybe"
"I talk and then I don't, "
"I move the subject elsewhere or move out, and then I come back."
"выехал из деревни, но деревня из тебя не выехала, "- sovok в нутри заклинил..
 возвращать к жизни  вашy бензоколонкy вы можете, но, (Sovok V0.1.)  вероятно, не будете   

note:opinion expressed is my own
Wesley

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 993
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23558 on: September 18, 2022, 04:26:55 PM »
Holcomb doesn't use vacuum, the primary requirement for electron movement in CRT.
Your question is irrelevant.

Of course no vacuum. I just wanted to say that instead of something material, the rotation of a real magnetic rotor or the sliding of an electron beam over a phosphor, in both cases they are replaced   a virtual wave is making by switching elements .

Quote
Energy  spent on shifting the beam depends from the application but  is "close to none." in comparison to energy of the beam by itself.
Didn't know this. Thank you. Definitely you have more knowledge. But appreciate the style of my thinking, damn it ...
I wonder if it is possible to make the sliding of an electron beam along the inner circle faster than the speed of light?
With a sufficient distance from the center of the circle.

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23559 on: September 18, 2022, 05:00:55 PM »
   Guys:   This talk about electron beams is very interesting, but, seam to have no relation to free energy devices, such as what this thread is about. This is NOT about sending electricity somewhere else, or comparing a Tv HV circuit to a free energy device.
Where is the free energy part??? Where is the proof that there is more out than in?
   It takes energy to "accelerate anything" how will this loss be covered, and converted to OU, or free energy, or a self running device? I see no proof of the acceleration of an "electron beam" as being responsible for anything that we are looking for, as yet. But, I am still looking for proof of that assumption.
   The idea that Kapanadze, and others have stated, is that the HV HF circuit (Kacher) or spark gap system, is use to temporally
stop the push pull signal, (such as when Tesla's generator switch was being turned off). And NOT to directly "accelerate" anything. But, to break (stop or quench) the push pull/yoke/grenade circuits magnetic pulse, at the right time and frequency, using the HV Kacher pulse, to achieve the needed signal, instead. Thereby, also pulsing the immediate surrounding medium (Aether), dark energy etc, to recover some "extra" or additional energy therefrom.
   So, please SHOW how conventional electron beams are responsible for the makings of a free energy device. Otherwise, I don't buy it.   

   NickZ

Online stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23560 on: September 18, 2022, 05:35:48 PM »
   Guys:   This talk about electron beams //seam to have no relation to free energy devices, such as what this thread is about.
how ironic,-  in a way contrary to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement
or funny because of being very different from what you would usually expect from researcher.
Rejecting general knowledge by illiterately blind, and by that not able to see, makes him limited, to see more if needed.
Our primate,Homo sapiens, born today while growing with iPods and computers would appreciate
at least use of modern toilet bowl I assume and definitely wouldn't reject the chance to learn more,
while entire modern humanity would make everything possible to enlighten him.

conclusion:
you never know what your idea can come from and what you can do
to yourself and others understanding 27 Slavic languages, talking  fluently 3 of them
some Hebrew, Idish and by that some German and English.
but you are not in this group!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you got me good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!in sensitive place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can translate the art of others you can't!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can communicate while dosing knowledge in particular language  you can't!!!!!!!!!!!
you can't even have any slight idea what of that art relates to free energy and whatnot !!!!!!!!!!!

______________________________________________________________

rotation of a real magnetic rotor or the sliding of an electron beam over a phosphor,  replaced   by a virtual wave //  switching elements .
I wonder if it is possible to make the sliding of an electron beam along the inner circle faster than the speed of light?
With a sufficient distance from the center of the circle.

speed of light limit is: 299,792 kilometres per second (186,282 miles per second) - fast enough to circle the entire Earth eight times every second.

These 4 Cosmic Phenomena Travel Faster Than The Speed of Light
https://www.sciencealert.com/4-cosmic-phenomena-that-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light-science
I'll write more just little later as I was trying, really trying to be as nice as possible
reading NickZ , comment... So I need some break now.

Wesley

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23561 on: September 18, 2022, 05:53:10 PM »
   Well, that is just wonderful Wesley, but, can you show us how to make a self running device?  No, you can't do that...   
   I can also post and paste till the cows come home, as well. But, I don't buy the electron beam acceleration bit, as being anything needed, here. So, please show proof, other than how great you are. And how many languages you know.  As so far, you have not personally shown anything that works, for you, nor can you even light the smallest led bulb, for free. Sorry to say...   I am looking for scientific verification, not pipe dreams... Something you can't seam to provide.   
    BTW: Wesley, can you save all your personal BS, for your own personal thread. As some of us are really here to learn about what this thread is about, and are not too impressed to hear about your toilet bowl ideas, or how great you are, all the time.

  NickZ

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23562 on: September 18, 2022, 06:07:38 PM »
 Serious QUESTIONAIRE:

1.  Please estimate how much time you have spent on the design, development and fabrication of the Akula/Ruslan, et. al. devices?

2. Please estimate how much you have invested in actual monetary expenses in fabricating your device(s)?

3.  How much would you be willing to spend on a Kit of parts and detailed instructions for:
 
    a. - A Ruslan type device of 2KW+ 120/240 VAC output functioning generator?

    b. - A Halcomb type "LinGen" type device of 1.5KW+ 120 VAC output functional generator?

4.  Would you be willing to participate in a BETA test of the above devices?

5. Would you be willing to pay for the parts cost of the Beta device in 4. above?

Thanks in advance,

SL
 


Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23563 on: September 18, 2022, 06:23:48 PM »
    Guys:    I go to some effort to bring you the best information about this topic, as well as my view on how to achieve results, and I get insulted, without the least feed back on what was just said. To me, that is an insult and a disruption of this thread.    In case you missed it, and are interested in actually building and having a self runner, the info that I posted previously (below), some of you may find important and relevant. OF course, some may not. That's fine, also.
   quote:   The idea that Kapanadze, and others have stated, is that the HV HF circuit (Kacher) or spark gap system, is use to temporally
STOP the push pull signal, (such as when Tesla's generator switch was being turned off). And NOT to directly "accelerate" anything. But, to break (stop or quench) the push pull/yoke/grenade circuits magnetic pulse, at the right time and frequency, using the HV Kacher pulse, to achieve the needed signal, instead. Thereby, also pulsing the immediate surrounding medium (Aether), dark energy etc, to recover some "extra" or additional energy therefrom. That's the idea, from the inventors of this type of OU or self running device. Not from those that think they know, but will never show it doing so.
 
   So, please SHOW how conventional electron beams are responsible for the makings of a true free energy device.
Otherwise, I don't buy it. 
         end quote.

   NickZ
   P.S.  Perhaps some of you would like to comment on the above, instead, of about Zenneck waves, or accelerating electron beams. As those ideas may need their own threads for those topics of discussions. Or this thread will easy get lost in the works.

Online stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY
« Reply #23564 on: September 18, 2022, 06:27:43 PM »
Well, that is just wonderful Wesley, but, can you show us how to make a self running device?  No, you can't do that...   
I can also post and paste till the cows come home, as well.
But, I don't buy the electron beam acceleration bit, as being anything needed, here.
So, please show proof, other than how great you are.   
I am looking for scientific verification, not pipe dreams... Something you can't seam to provide.   
 NickZ
Dear NickZ.
You can't even properly formulate a single question in regards
to wave phenomena described by me - a part of science
used by existing energy extraction, transfer technology
of today. e.g solar.

Unfortunately you're out of the bracket, limited by yourself
however Kapanadze didn't take the energy from nothing
to power his device.
I pointed at similarity of his technology in my topic.
I also pointed at source of the energy of his device.
- it wasn't you who ever explained  it.
_______________________________________________
Your request:
-to present to your eye proof of working concept is for me
like
-an approach of the stranger to a gentleman on the street wearing suit
with words: show me the money, what did you get them from, show me how you make this money,
and he happened to be IT professional in dozens of programming languages
you have no idea that they exist.
Even if this gentleman absolutely surprised with your request
is kind enough and tries to explain it to you
you are not prepared. you don't "speak"   "the language!!!!"

Unfortunately you're not at that level yet to keep a conversation at equal level
able to prove me right or wrong.
However I believe that after some reading - if you try you can, but you don't want.

Wesley