Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby (Read 2011058 times)

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5190 on:** November 26, 2012, 11:54:34 PM »

Now that Ainslie has reactivated and renamed her YouTube account, using her "Rosemary Ainslie" alias instead of Maria Krebs... for obvious reasons..... I expect her to remove the famous video that "she did not post" at any time. She constantly claims... lately.... that it doesn't "represent" her claims but only "relates" to them..... whatever that means in Ainslie-speak. She will no doubt remove it since it clearly contains many lies, misrepresentations and the "smoking gun".... or perhaps I should say "smoking mosfet"... of the battery that wasn't there: the removal of one battery, leaving only 4 at a nominal 48 volts input, for the High Heat part of the demonstration. This was done, of course, to prevent having the Q1 mosfet fail in public. Yet Ainslie presents the scopeshot I reproduced above as an example: 72 volts input, 12 volts to the gate.... long on-times..... and ZERO CURRENT, proving the mosfet is blown.

Five different claimed schematics for the video: 1) the single mosfet schematic shown in the video; 2) the narrator saying that all five mosfets are in parallel; 3) and 4) the two different "published" schematics showing the mosfets switched left for right, making a MAJOR change in the circuit's heat and current handling capacity; and 5) the TRUE schematic derived from the video stills, showing the FG black lead in a different place than in the "official" published schematics 3 and 4.

So she'll probably be taking down that mendacious video which does more to prove her as a liar than it does to support her "thesis".

Nevertheless.... I have a copy.

http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5191 on:** November 27, 2012, 06:15:42 PM »

When is Ainslie going to address any of the many points I've made? The discrepancies in the data and the descriptions, the bad calculations, the crazy muddling of terms and quantities, the misrepresentations... the outright LIES like I've shown her committing time and time again as above?

Never, that's when. She cannot, without admitting that she has been wrong, entirely and utterly, for many years of her life, about her ridiculous obsession.

Still, you'd think that she would at least be too embarrassed to continue lying. But she isn't! The woman has no conscience at all. She blithely lies left and right, and when she's caught out.... like above.... she just carries on and never mentions it further, not to apologise, not to correct her lying statements..... but she WILL try to go back and edit them away if she can. Hence..... the screenshots, rather than simple quotations.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5192 on:** November 29, 2012, 12:51:45 AM »

http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #5193 on:** November 30, 2012, 05:53:55 AM »

Quote from: TinselKoala on November 26, 2012, 11:54:34 PM

Now that Ainslie has reactivated and renamed her YouTube account, using her "Rosemary Ainslie" alias instead of Maria Krebs... for obvious reasons..... I expect her to remove the famous video that "she did not post" at any time. She constantly claims... lately.... that it doesn't "represent" her claims but only "relates" to them..... whatever that means in Ainslie-speak. She will no doubt remove it since it clearly contains many lies, misrepresentations and the "smoking gun".... or perhaps I should say "smoking mosfet"... of the battery that wasn't there: the removal of one battery, leaving only 4 at a nominal 48 volts input, for the High Heat part of the demonstration. This was done, of course, to prevent having the Q1 mosfet fail in public. Yet Ainslie presents the scopeshot I reproduced above as an example: 72 volts input, 12 volts to the gate.... long on-times..... and ZERO CURRENT, proving the mosfet is blown.

Five different claimed schematics for the video: 1) the single mosfet schematic shown in the video; 2) the narrator saying that all five mosfets are in parallel; 3) and 4) the two different "published" schematics showing the mosfets switched left for right, making a MAJOR change in the circuit's heat and current handling capacity; and 5) the TRUE schematic derived from the video stills, showing the FG black lead in a different place than in the "official" published schematics 3 and 4.

So she'll probably be taking down that mendacious video which does more to prove her as a liar than it does to support her "thesis".

Nevertheless.... I have a copy.

http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont

Hey TK,

Don't forget the top billed clan member Evan Robinson who's name appears on both document transcripts that the tribe leader Rosemary submitted for peer review to possibly be published in accredited journals or magazines on her experimental device with a operating claim of COP>INFINITY. I also highlighted the attached image with the magic mosfets IRFPG50 "in parallel" which also shows the incorrect wiring diagram that was used in the demonstration video "Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration 12 March 2011" and later several additional connection diagrams all now under question.

As you also noted "NOTHING" that was published by Rosemary Ainslie and her NERD RAT team, has been revised or removed because from the total lack of accuracy on any and all the subject matter that was shown for this magical COP>INFINITY device.

http://mygeni.org/view/weblink.mygeni?wid=1590&back=view%2Fuser.mygeni%3Fid%3D2%26ig%3D923

http://mygeni.org/view/video.mygeni?vid=407&back=view%2Fuser.mygeni%3Fid%3D2%26ig%3D923

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5194 on:** November 30, 2012, 11:40:45 AM »

Once again Ainslie proves her mendacity with her own words. I can only shake my head in amazement. How can one person be so very stupid? She has enough stupidity for three or four normal people.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall when Ainslie tries to explain this scopeshot to Mark Dansie. Ainslie is so ignorant of her topic that she can't even see or understand what is wrong with this shot, much less explain it.... or reproduce it, with intact mosfets and the claimed schematic.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5195 on:** November 30, 2012, 11:43:44 AM »

@Fuzzy: Yep, that Evan Robinson. What a stickler for the truth, what a great website designer he is. Here's the front page from his website, taken on August 13. I haven't checked lately... maybe he's gotten caught up. But somehow I doubt it.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5196 on:** November 30, 2012, 11:58:26 AM »

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on November 30, 2012, 11:13:35 AM

Guys, and Poynty Point,

I also need to put this on record. When Mark Dansie finally accredits our results - which is due for January of next year - then I will be claiming prizes from OU.COM and Overunity research.com. So. Poynty, Stefan and Prof Jones - be warned. I'll be calling on you to pay up. And since we don't want anything to do with that money - I'll be proposing that the prize money go to lasersaber or some such to be nominated by the members of your forums. ACTUALLY - on second thoughts - I think we should give this to Greg. He can then buy himself a decent oscilloscope. Sorry to press home this fact. And I'm fully aware of the fact that my being banned from your respective forums was intended to prevent this eventuality. They'll likely be grossly disappointed and somewhat impoverished. As will you be, Poynty Point. Sorry about that...

Meanwhile - and as it relates to our sweet little Pickle - or Bryan Little - I'd STRONGLY recommend that he try and IGNORE my challenges to his absurdly irrelevant posts - and just let his thread DIE. That's assuming that Stefan Hartman doesn't first go to the trouble of 'locking' it in some hopes of hiding his rather gross collusion in this exercise. For those of you who don't know this, Stefan rather desperately TRIED to prevent the emergence of our unassailable proof to the unity barrier breach through the simple expediency of banning me and allowing the trolls free reign in their multiple abuses of 'free speech'. Alternatively they'll all need to work very hard on Mark Dansie to persuade him NOT to see our evidence. But so far their best efforts have just not 'cut it'. Not as far as I can tell.

I see that our ickle chicken licken - asa that rather combative and opinionated little 'pickle' - has already started on this path. He no longer makes selective reference to my posts. Golly. Hopefully you know who will come to its rescue. It would be outrageously unjust if we were not given this opportunity to vindicate ourselves. Sadly this will FINALLY prove which of the two of us has been 'duping' those poor members at OU.com. WHAT will our little Pickle do thereafter? To keep himself busy - and more importantly - EARN HIS LIVELIHOOD? Who knows? But actually it's not my problem.

And Poynty Point - you'll need to clarify that argument of yours that you're trying hard not to reference. If you have no explanation for the continual evidence of a negative wattage - THEN OWN UP. Your simulation of 'offended dignity' doesn't cut it as an excuse not to address the issue. If you don't want to argue it here - then why not post on your own forum? That would be a welcome change. Otherwise I take it that you've 'thrown in the towel?' In which case - let me know how I make application for that monetary award.

Kindest and ever
Rosie

I have preserved this idiotic and inane libel for posterity.

Note the lie upon lie, compounded by lie after lie. Particularly egregious is the accusation against Stefan.... when she was given chance after chance here, WE EVEN TRIED TO PREVENT HER FROM BEING BANNED, but she blew it, deliberately by her actions and words. Perhaps she forgets, like the senile old biddy she is.... it is all recorded here in this very thread, the history of how we fought AGAINST her banning, knowing that she would turn it into some kind of claim of suppression.... just as she has now done.

Note once again the intent to claim monetary prizes: it is this that moves Ainslie beyond simple pseudoscientific misconduct, into the realm of genuine fraud. Fortunately none of the people offering the prizes she has already fraudulently claimed, is stupid enough to fall for Ainslie's line of verbiage and logorrhea.

Not only that... but I have two different devices right here that do EVERYTHING Ainslie claims as "evidence" for her claim, can do it at any time on demand, are ready to travel RIGHT NOW, and one of them fits in a shirt pocket and doesn't even need batteries... it runs on a capacitor.
I have repeatedly offered Tar Baby for side-by-side comparison with Ainslie's breadboard of wires, and will gladly allow Mark Dansie to do the comparison testing at any time. If Ainslie intends to pursue any prizes based on her "measured negative wattage" she will be competing with ME, and she can't compete because my devices are better, are proven, are smaller, don't blow mosfets, run on capacitors, and DO EVERY THING THAT AINSLIE CLAIMS IS EVIDENCE FOR OVERUNITY PERFORMANCE. And I've proved it already and I can prove it again at any time.

I've made my entire Ainslie database available to Mark should he want it, in stark contrast to Ainslie's lying claim that we somehow don't want him to know the full story. The TRUTH, as usual, is just the opposite of what AINSLIE claims. I want Mark to be completely fully informed about Ainslie and her history and her data and all the rest of it, because when he sees the sum total he cannot but come to the same conclusion that _everyone_ else has, who is both rational and in possession of the data. This database of mine contains ALL of the posted DATA from Ainslie, in one place, something she fought against and still fights against. It contains many forum posts in her own words demonstrating her ignorance, arrogance and mendacity. It contains much critical analysis, it contains documentation from LeCroy, Tektronix, Agilent and others explaining the operation of the apparatus which Ainslie does not understand; it contains many examples of the ridiculous scratching she calls "math" and it contains many of the different contradictory versions of her daft manuscripts. It even contains the video "that she did not post" and also many of my own videos refuting Ainslie's ridiculous claims like "a function generator cannot pass current from a battery to a load". All of this and more.... over seven Gigabytes worth.... is available to whomever asks for it. Including Mark Dansie. We here have NEVER sought to hide or cover up any of Ainslie's data or claims or any of it, and she lies most assuredly when she makes that claim. We demand the retraction of the papers and the claims and we've listed many reasons why they are invalid... and Ainslie cannot refute a single point we've made with data, facts, or demonstrations of her own. All she can do is insult, write bad doggerel, and spit on the floor in her impotent wheedling anger.

The mendacity of this person Ainslie is literally... beyond belief. She cannot make a post without lying about something, and often, every sentence in her posts contains yet another Ains-lie.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5197 on:** November 30, 2012, 02:50:19 PM »

Quote from: Yousaidwhat on November 30, 2012, 01:26:20 PM

Also this one...

ANOTHER LOVE LETTER FOR BRYAN LITTLE

My sweet little 'ickle pickle',

That link you provided to 'teach' us how to 'harvest IP addresses' is just NOT going to work. It only teaches all and sundry how to 'hide' their internet identities. Unless I'm just not reading it right. But my eyes have never been that good. You need to give me a 'step by step' explanation. Then only is there any chance that I can understand you. As it is - I'm almost inclined to think that you're trying your hardest to dissuade anyone from linking to our forum. God forbid. I'm sure that you would NEVER be so devious. But our hit rate is on the up and up. So those efforts of yours are hardly likely to help.

Meanwhile - I trust you're getting to grips with that long argument of yours rooted in your obsession about your size. Just as a word of advice. If and when you're feeling particularly vertically challenged - just STOP thinking in terms of 'pickles'. They're not the best standard for measurement. Think rather in terms of Plank's constant. Against that even YOU'd possibly seem quite big. It may help relieve you of your anxiety. Did I tell you I'm 5ft.10 inches tall - less a smudge? But don't be jealous. My GRE is nowhere near the 72 pickles squared that yours measures. It's far, far bigger. That MIGHT make you feel better? Or possibly not. I know how fragile is your self esteem. With good reason... I might add.

Rosie Pose

Preserved for posterity. The idiot Ainslie just cannot stop being insulting and arrogant... and nonsensical. And it's PLANCK, you idiot.

Hey, Mark.... do you see what you are up against? The arrogant idiot thinks my real name is Bryan (or Brian) Little, and she has been doing this kind of idiotic childish whining for months now. Every post in which she mentions Little, "Little TK", a pickle, or any of the rest of it simply continues to show what an utter and abject fool that woman is.

KEEP IT UP, AINSLIE. You have no credibility at all and you continue to show it. YOU CANNOT PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER TO SUPPORT YOUR IDIOTIC CLAIM THAT I AM SOMEONE NAMED BRIAN or BRYAN LITTLE but I'd love to see you try. You don't know how much you are being laughed at, by the people who do know my name, you fool.

And here's your pickle, once again, you deviant. This is what you really want, you know... that is why you keep bringing it up.

The "GRE" to which you refer, ignorant fool, is the Graduate Record Examination. Something that you have NEVER experienced, so you have no business claiming that yours is "bigger" than mine.... .because you HAVE NONE. Once again you lie, you express your ignorance, and your overweening arrogance all in the same sentence. Look up what a GRE of 1560 means. You cannot compete with me in any academic sense at all. You cannot even add two numbers together and get the right answer using a calculator. But you do like your pickle, don't you.

poynt99 · « **Reply #5198 on:** November 30, 2012, 02:53:45 PM »

"Rosie Rose", "Poynty Point" here;

I have never avoided referencing my argument as to the cause of your erroneous "negative wattage".

Here it is again in great detail:

The trouble you're having is understanding it.

You seriously think that Mark Dansie is going to pay you a visit? I highly doubt that.

Magluvin · « **Reply #5199 on:** December 01, 2012, 02:16:34 AM »

Quote from: Yousaidwhat on November 30, 2012, 01:26:20 PM

Also this one...

ANOTHER LOVE LETTER FOR BRYAN LITTLE

My sweet little 'ickle pickle',

That link you provided to 'teach' us how to 'harvest IP addresses' is just NOT going to work. It only teaches all and sundry how to 'hide' their internet identities. Unless I'm just not reading it right. But my eyes have never been that good. You need to give me a 'step by step' explanation. Then only is there any chance that I can understand you. As it is - I'm almost inclined to think that you're trying your hardest to dissuade anyone from linking to our forum. God forbid. I'm sure that you would NEVER be so devious. But our hit rate is on the up and up. So those efforts of yours are hardly likely to help.

Meanwhile - I trust you're getting to grips with that long argument of yours rooted in your obsession about your size. Just as a word of advice. If and when you're feeling particularly vertically challenged - just STOP thinking in terms of 'pickles'. They're not the best standard for measurement. Think rather in terms of Plank's constant. Against that even YOU'd possibly seem quite big. It may help relieve you of your anxiety. Did I tell you I'm 5ft.10 inches tall - less a smudge? But don't be jealous. My GRE is nowhere near the 72 pickles squared that yours measures. It's far, far bigger. That MIGHT make you feel better? Or possibly not. I know how fragile is your self esteem. With good reason... I might add.

Rosie Pose

If you would have posted all this 'pickle' dialog a while back, instead of what I thought were real arguments on your claims, I would have been gone back then.

You should clean up your act missy. It aint pretty. Get a grip.

From what I see, you spend most of your time writing garbage. None of it does any good, for you!! But I guess you think so.

The only way to show that TK, Poynt, etc, are wrong about your claims is to DO IT!! PROVE IT!! Not this crap. Cant you see that? It all really makes it look like you are dodging. Keep it up, and you will be knowing 'these days' for a long time sweety.

Magsy

Magluvin · « **Reply #5200 on:** December 01, 2012, 05:22:10 AM »

Quote from: Yousaidwhat on December 01, 2012, 05:11:09 AM

@magluvin

Rose writes about many things. You just cant understand it. For instance.

I just cant understand it? I never read it. So how would you know if I cant understand it?

I was refering to the Pickle talk and such. Do you think people are laughing at TK because of what you write?
That, is something you just cant understand.

Mags

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5201 on:** December 01, 2012, 09:00:42 AM »

More spam, off topic trolling, and "colored crayons"? What's the matter, sock puppet.... have you discovered that your member database is full of worms and spammers?

[

Quote

(snip)

My dear sweet little 'ickle Pickle' or TinselKoala - Bryan Little - whichever you prefer,

I am so, SO sorry that you've got this insatiable fixation on your average pickled gherkin. I'm not actually a botanist - but I'm reasonably certain that the most of your genetic makeup is NOT based on plant life. And if you're a mutation - of sorts - then FEEL PROUD. There's always merit in individuality.

And I'm MORE than happy to pretend that you're big. ACTUALLY. 1560 pickles squared is CERTAINLY bigger than the 72 squared - that you claimed previously. So. Take comfort in that thought.

Rosie Pose

Added the 'square'. Gross oversight - and resulting in GROSS UNDERSTATEMENT. But I've corrected it.

You've corrected nothing, lying arrogant idiot Ainslie. You have not corrected your absurd misidentification of me. The "72" figure to which you refer is my height in inches... :Vertical dimension: as we referred to it at the time it was posted. Nobody except YOU has CLAIMED OTHERWISE and where did this "squared" come from? From your sick deluded remnant of a mind, that is where. Once again you make lying, and insulting, claims without a shred of support.
The Graduate Record Examination (GRE) is one of three standardized admission tests for graduate schools in the USA, the other two being the MCAT and the LSAT. At the time I sat for the test the maximum score for the combined mathematical and verbal portions was 800 each, or 1600 total. My score was 1560. That is very good indeed and was good enough for me to gain admission invitations from many graduate schools in the USA, some of whose names even YOU might recognize. When you mock my very real achievement on the GRE with your ignorant nonsense..... college dropout, undeducated waitress, idiot Ainslie..... you denigrate both me and the teachers who taught me and enabled me to learn what I needed to learn. You are indeed beneath contempt even, lower than a snake, a fool.... and you are wrong.

mrsean2k · « **Reply #5202 on:** December 01, 2012, 02:53:32 PM »

Leaving your fraud and lies to one side, Ainslie, you really are the most colossal fucking bore.

Whatever thin humour your observations / naming convention may have had months ago has been utterly drained by mindless repetition.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #5203 on:** December 01, 2012, 09:16:22 PM »

Do you see?

The idiot troll Rosemary Ainslie and her stinking dirty sock puppet YouSaidShite DO NOT EVEN BOTHER TO READ, they simply post spam, lies and bloviation OVER AND OVER again.

Doing it once makes you look really stupid. Doing it twice, AINSLIE..... makes you an insane bloviating fool. And you don't even care who knows it!

mrsean2k · « **Reply #5204 on:** December 01, 2012, 09:24:05 PM »

Its as if her lies need to be carefully documented and publicised somewhere neither she nor any of her sock-puppets can drown them in the usual diversionary cack.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby (Read 2011058 times)

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

fuzzytomcat

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

poynt99

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

Magluvin

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

Magluvin

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

mrsean2k

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

TinselKoala

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby

mrsean2k

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby