Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 893829
  • *Total Topics: 15704
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 17
  • *Total: 20

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1524783 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5220 on: December 05, 2012, 09:27:19 AM »
I had to check for myself. She really _DID_ post that nonsensical screed. And she expects people like Dansie to respect her, treat her like a human being with skills and knowledge? I am flabbergasted.

Preserved for posterity.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5220 on: December 05, 2012, 09:27:19 AM »

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5221 on: December 05, 2012, 11:01:33 AM »
Wilby, a long time ago when I first joined this forum you tricked me into giving you a mailing address by LYING TO ME, promising to send me a particular mosfet when YOU IN FACT NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION OF DOING SO. In other words, you deliberately scammed me and now you have information that you did not come by legitimately, by lying to me and taking deliberate advantage of my naivete at that point.

So none of your protestations mean anything to me, because YOU have pulled off the most egregious fraud against me by making me a promise, then lying to me, failing to fulfil the promise that you actually never intended to keep, obtaining information, then threatening to use it to harm me.
everytime you open your mouth stupid dribbles down your chin and all over your shirt... you should wipe that up. hey jibguy, grasping at strawmen and vomiting red herrings serves to demonstrate your stupidity... and your hypocrisy... ::)

since you cannot refute anything I say here.
i just did... bitch.  ::) you're the one who has problems with responding cogently... ::)

that's two mea culpas you owe me now...  ::)  but you're not man enough to offer them up. nor will you ever be. you are proof positive that you can only be young once but you can be immature forever.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5222 on: December 05, 2012, 03:19:27 PM »
I hear a little buzzing noise... but I hear no disputing of the FACTS of the lying scam that Wilby pulled on me those years ago. As far as I can determine, the only thing that is OWED is one mosfet, by him, to me. Other than that, the Wilby troll has squeaked to insignificance since he cannot even deny that lie and manipulation that he pulled.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5222 on: December 05, 2012, 03:19:27 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5223 on: December 06, 2012, 02:23:22 AM »
Maybe Wilbert can show that Roses circuit works as she says? :o ::)
Or is he defending the false claims on purpose? ;) :o :o


Why is that? ???

Mags

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5224 on: December 06, 2012, 02:28:16 AM »
Maybe Wilbert can show that Roses circuit works as she says? :o ::)
Or is he defending the false claims on purpose? ;) :o :o


Why is that? ???

Mags
what has any of what you said got to do with me explaining what i meant with the "hold your pickle" comment?  ::)

your logical fallacy emperor (who has no clothes) has taught you well magtard... ::)

and where EXACTLY have i 'defended her claims'?  i'll wait... ::) 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5224 on: December 06, 2012, 02:28:16 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5225 on: December 06, 2012, 02:29:27 AM »
I hear a little buzzing noise... but I hear no disputing of the FACTS of the lying scam that Wilby pulled on me those years ago. As far as I can determine, the only thing that is OWED is one mosfet, by him, to me. Other than that, the Wilby troll has squeaked to insignificance since he cannot even deny that lie and manipulation that he pulled.
i hear the thrashing, flopping sound of a red dead herring... ::)

how pathetic. ::) grasping at red herrings do nothing but serve to demonstrate your stupidity jibguy... when will you figure out what a cogent response is? never.

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5226 on: December 06, 2012, 02:52:44 AM »

and where EXACTLY have i 'defended her claims'?  i'll wait... ::)

Its here in this thread. You know, here. ;) Lets look before the latest battle of the pickles.  ;)

Why dont you hammer Rose for her lies and false presentations? Hmmm? ::)

Did have to wait long did ya?  ;)

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5226 on: December 06, 2012, 02:52:44 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5227 on: December 06, 2012, 02:57:15 AM »
Its here in this thread. You know, here. ;) Lets look before the latest battle of the pickles.  ;)

Why dont you hammer Rose for her lies and false presentations? Hmmm? ::)

Did have to wait long did ya?  ;)

Mags
then post a quote of 'it' you mendacious little godtarded troll... ::)

thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot and will not defend nor substantiate your asinine, fantastical claims... ::) i wouldn't expect anything more than a logically fallacious response from a godtard like you.

tu stultus es!

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5228 on: December 07, 2012, 03:02:49 AM »
then post a quote of 'it' you mendacious little godtarded troll... ::)

thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot and will not defend nor substantiate your asinine, fantastical claims... ::) i wouldn't expect anything more than a logically fallacious response from a godtard like you.

tu stultus es!

Thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you support someone who lies about their claims. :o ;)

Magzimus Leviticus  ;D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5228 on: December 07, 2012, 03:02:49 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5229 on: December 07, 2012, 03:11:00 AM »
Thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you support someone who lies about their claims. :o ;)

Magzimus Leviticus  ;D


I second demotion for ANOTHER tacit admission that cannot admit up to now  ;D . lol hahahahahhahahahahhahahaha

by the way thank you!!!;D

Titus Anus Britanicus  ;D

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5230 on: December 07, 2012, 03:48:02 AM »

I second demotion for ANOTHER tacit admission that cannot admit up to now  ;D . lol hahahahahhahahahahhahahaha

by the way thank you!!!;D

Titus Anus Britanicus  ;D

lol

Yes, he is  To stupidus onion dip

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5230 on: December 07, 2012, 03:48:02 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5231 on: December 07, 2012, 04:33:42 AM »
Hi TK,

If you don't mind I would find it very helpful if you could tell me how to build and calibrate an absolute DIY electronic pressure sensor.

If you do not want to post it here you have my email.

Again I would be very appreciative for this information.

Seriously? OK.
(But do you see what I have to put up with? You think my argument with Mister Wayne is rough, you should check out the history of Rosemary Ainslie.)

You do not say whether you want to measure gas or liquid pressure, but it doesn't really matter. If you look at my latest videos on my YT channel, you will see me developing a useful set of applications for an Arduino-based sensor-driven voltmeter. If you watch these from the first one on, and download the program sketches from the links, you will see that this might be the answer to your problem. I show the system reading and responding to several different kinds of sensors, like a thermistor, a photoresistor pair (in the TKtracker) and a photovoltaic cell. Using it with a pressure sensor would be a matter of plumbing it onto your apparatus, plugging it into the Arduino, and altering a few numbers in the program code.
Once you see the Arduino in action and see how easy it is to use and to program... even if you have no experience programming at all, it's easy because there are so many good tutorials..... then google "Arduino pressure sensor" and you will see that there are many other precise and accurate solutions for pressure measuring using the Arduino.
I don't have a pressure sensor available to me right now or I'd go ahead and make the video tutorial for it, but as you will find there are already plenty of them up.
My Arduino videos that apply start here, and go on for six or seven more and I'm working on some others.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x05tCmDiLs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6AF4azWCeA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Ddz2CDmEE

Pressure sensor Arduino links I liked:

http://www.practicalarduino.com/projects/water-tank-depth-sensor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiv1eBAGVok

Depending on where you shop, the basic Arduino costs 20-30 dollars, that 2-line LCD display another 30 or so (not really needed, you can display on your computer screen), and I don't know how much the pressure sensors cost but I'll bet they are cheap, and the programming IDE is free, of course, and runs on any computer system with USB port. You can set how often pressures are read and save them into a datafile for later analysis if you like.
A single Arduino should be able to handle 4 or five pressure sensors, you can switch the display between them or have the data all put into a file.

Thanks for asking. I'll be glad to help out if you decide to go this route. It's by far the easiest and most customizable way I can think of, and you'll be able to use the Arduino for tons of other stuff after.... well, after you know.
 ;)

Offline anomdeguerre

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5232 on: December 07, 2012, 09:43:01 AM »
Thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you support someone who lies about their claims. :o ;)

Magzimus Leviticus  ;D
::)

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5233 on: December 07, 2012, 12:28:37 PM »
Thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you support someone who lies about their claims. :o ;)

Magzimus Leviticus  ;D
you mendacious godtarded troll...  ::) post a quote of me doing what you claim or shut your sodding face.

god hates liars magtard... and yet you continue to lie thereby demonstrating you don't believe in nor fear your god.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5234 on: December 07, 2012, 02:32:03 PM »
Hi Mark Dansie

I see that Rosemary Ainslie has no compunctions at all about lying to you right out front. Whatever.... you will be sorry that you ever got involved with her, mark my words.

Meanwhile,  here is Tar Baby running on CAPACITORS ONLY, making the same "negative mean power product" that the mendacious Ainslie thinks is evidence for something unusual happening.

Perhaps you, Mark, can tell me how a circuit that is wired according to the "approved schematic", uses the same transistors and makes the same output waveforms...... is "not" a replication of Ainslie's circuit?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Awd8_Xro0


And Altoid, the pocket OU demonstrator.... also runs COMPLETELY WITHOUT BATTERIES on a capacitor alone, making the same negative mean power product, by the same means as the full size version, on demand any time anywhere, and can be carried in a shirt pocket.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNf12g8HPnI

Mark.....  Please examine ALL material available about Ainslie. You will find that the story she tells is far, far from the truth. And I am not the only one who will tell you that. Ask Ashtweth, Aaron, Harvey, FuzzyTomCat..... ask .99, MileHigh, PicoWatt...... there are a lot of people you can ask who I believe will tell you pretty much the same thing. Where are the people who agree with Ainslie?  Who are they? What are their qualifications?

At any rate.... it will be extremely interesting to see what you discover when you ask Ainslie to reproduce these scopeshots with functioning mosfets.

You should INSIST that she run with all six batteries, making the over 72 volts input as shown in the scopeshots, and you should insist that she use the long runtimes and duty cycles shown on the scopeshots, especially the one that appears as "Figure 3" in her manuscript. Under those conditions, the Q1 mosfet should be carrying 5 amps or more... until it fails, then it will make the scopeshots just as shown.

I have support and proof for every one of my contentions in the matter of Rosemary Ainslie. All this and much more, most of it in Ainslie's own words from forum posts and blog posts, is available in my comprehensive Ainslie database, here, in zipfiles of under 200 MB each, for a total of over 5 GB and growing, as I continue to upload my cached files:

http://www.mediafire.com/?b43c5te5tq5xx


 

OneLink