Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 893965
  • *Total Topics: 15710
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 18
  • *Total: 21

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1529146 times)

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5250 on: December 09, 2012, 11:37:40 AM »
Howdy All,

Just spent a few at Rosemary's personal forum/blog site and what a honeypot for her bonkers, brainsick, cracked, crazed, crazy, cuckoo, dellusional, demented, deranged, distraught, disturbed, fruity, insane, kooky, loco, loony, lunatic, mad, maniac, mentally ill, mindless, moonstruck, non compos mentis, nuts, nutsy, nutty, neurotic, paranoid, psycho, psychopathic, psychotic, sick, sick in the head, schizophrenic, stark raving mad, touched, unbalanced, unhinged, unsound, unstable, wacky commentary on that zipper head modified standard thesis model .... what ever the hell that is, no one but her understands it.  :P

PLUS .... The demanding again of any available overunity prize money based on a fraudulent COP>INFINITY device Rosemary Ainslie invented ( hahahaha ) in that YouTube video called  Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration 12 March 2011 she directed will soon be two (2) years old ..... LOOK AT ALL THE EXCITEMENT !!!!!   :o

If she stares at it any longer her mind will be burnt to a crisp ..... but I think it's waaaaaaay to late  :-X

FTC
 ::)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5250 on: December 09, 2012, 11:37:40 AM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5251 on: December 10, 2012, 09:42:08 AM »
You've heard of OU Crackpots, I'm sure..... but have you ever heard of an OU _Crockpot_?

The TK Sous Vide crockpot Arduino PID-based temperature control system, calibration testing:

(Yes, that is a mosfet, switching a resistive/inductive load, making "tiny bubbles" in a 1 liter crockpot....)
 ;D
 8)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5252 on: December 11, 2012, 01:38:35 PM »
Looks like Ainslie is severely decompensating. It won't be long now before her brain dissolves and begins to run out of her ears.

She lies when she claims that I don't want Dansie to examine her material. In fact I've made all of my archived Ainslie material available to him, and I encourage him to examine her claims FULLY and to publish his findings. I've warned him though as to what will happen when he discovers and reveals-- yet again -- that she has nothing..... she will turn against him as she has turned against everyone else who has ever tried to examine her claims in earnest.

She also lies... blatantly.... when she claims that Tar Baby has not successfully replicated ALL of her CONFIRMED claims. Tar Baby has even gone beyond that: Tar Baby runs on capacitors, as does Altoid: two devices that make Ainslie's Magic Waveforms, complete with "negative mean power", and do it using no batteries at all, just capacitors of appropriate size. This is something that Ainslie denies is even possible.
And I can prove it, anywhere anytime. If Ainslie claims any "prizes" she will have to compete with Altoid: the Shirt Pocket demonstrator of Negative Mean Power that does not need a battery to do it. Ainslie's device doesn't even meet the size requirements ! But Altoid is the size of... a box of Altoid mints, and can be hooked up to anyone's oscilloscope at all, and will make its negative mean power.... until its charge is depleted, just exactly like Ainslie's NERD device does.

And further.... she lies whenever she refers to me as "Little", or Bryan (or Brian) Little, or any other of her ridiculous kindergarten appellations. Persons who are utterly ignorant of the truth must not simply "fill in the blanks" from their own mad delusions and paranoid belief systems.

And again.... she lies with every day that passes, not having corrected the calculations like that one above, and not having retracted the bogus conclusions based on them.

Every day, with every post, sometimes with every sentence even.... Ainslie tells yet more lies.

She cannot refute a single point I've made in this entire thread.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5252 on: December 11, 2012, 01:38:35 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5253 on: December 12, 2012, 01:19:49 AM »
I'm shocked that Mark Dansie didn't mention Rose at all in his latest video update.  ???

;) ;)

Oh, and he hasn't signed off on the whole MrWayne debacle yet either.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5254 on: December 12, 2012, 04:42:07 AM »
So.. I made a transcript of Dansie's segment on Mister Wayne Travis. In case Stefan chooses not to post it in the Hydro locked thread, I'm putting it here:
From the Hendershot Smart Scarecrow interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_profilepage&v=uj8-7nOjRaQ

Quote
Dansie: I was down there, there's a project which we've been following for nearly eighteen months now, it was a buoyancy-gravty device- ah.. Wayne Travis, and ah.. It was something I had found that I wasn't sure either way, ah whether they could achieve what they are claiming, and that is a mechanical device, if you like, that could self-run and produce excess energy. And as you know in the history of Mankind, nobody's ever achieved that.  I saw enough evidence for me to be convinced that (shrug) yeah, it's worthwhile having a go at it. But it's dragged on a bit, but I have been impressed and encouraged by two things. It's TOTALLY (emphasis Dansie's) evolved into something else, there's no big tanks and all that now, it's nearly solid state, it's still moves but it's very simple, can (or can't? unsure here) be flat-packed, and they are very close.. to the point ...  where (hesitates) we we can actually.. where we can actually ah... where I think within the next month or two clearly define and test whether it is going to produce excess energy and self-run. Ah .. (Hendershot cuts him off for a commercial break....)

after break:
Dansie: The Wayne Travis buoyancy device...

(Hendershot asks, laughing,  "What's goin on in Oklahoma")

Dansie: Well... I'm still encouraged by what I've seen...ah However (emphasis) it's got down to the point now with the second device that... it's interesting he's got some very clever engineers and people, people flown from Greece and Switzerland and Canada to come and lend a hand, he's got some clever engineers, they've all predicted it will, ah, self-run and produce excess energy, but as you know the final proof (coughs) for me to see it self-run and produce excess energy. So they are very close for the latest prototype to be able to demonstrate that and that will bring it to conclusion one way or the other; I'm very encouraged, I still rank it highly, ah they are a very great group, a very honest group, ah However (emphasis) ah you know (come on? unclear) well half the scientists and engineers saying "hey this could really work", Half the scientists and engineers I know saying "pixie dust, this is a lot of BS" So, but they've done a great job, I can see why it had to evolve, I can see huge improvements where from manufacturing and logistics point, you could flat-pack this like an Ikea system, they've got a third one in the wings that would be the one you'd throw in the basement...But I expect within the next two months that this will be brought to a conclusion. I am speaking positively of it yet but I have NOT signed off on it. So that's about as far as I can take it at this stage.

(He next goes on to put down the Joule Thief OU claims totally. Presumably in reference to LTseung's recent plea.)

Please let me know if I've made any errors, so that I can fix them right away. It would simply be WRONG to allow errors to persist after they have been found and pointed out.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5254 on: December 12, 2012, 04:42:07 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5255 on: December 12, 2012, 10:34:26 AM »
@Stefan: Thank you for putting that into the Hydro thread.

There are several points to note: the "self running" and "energy producing" is always in the future tense.... not the present tense.

Quote
they are very close.. to the point ...  where (hesitates) we we can actually.. where we can actually ah... where I think within the next month or two clearly define and test whether it is going to produce excess energy and self-run.

Dansie's hesitation and body language here in this part are very revealing. But his words are even more so: He thinks.... that they are very close to the point..... where they can clearly define and test _whether_ (or not) it is going to produce excess energy and self run.

Which means that they  have not yet defined "excess energy" or "self running" to his satisfaction, nor have they tested or demonstrated either one. They are only very close to that point.... he thinks.

But I "thought".... because Travis told me so ( Didn't he? Like fishing for eels with a coarse net trying to get a straight answer from that fellow.) ..... that they had passed that point long ago and could demonstrate a self running, energy producing machine at any time that was desired. Because they did so in the past, right?

Jam yesterday, jam tomorrow.... but sorry, no jam today. Down the rabbit hole it goes......

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5256 on: December 12, 2012, 10:35:39 AM »
I'm shocked that Mark Dansie didn't mention Rose at all in his latest video update.  ???

;) ;)

Oh, and he hasn't signed off on the whole MrWayne debacle yet either.


It is more shocking (but not surprising) that she thinks correcting her current measurement errors due to CSR inductance while NOT correcting the voltage measurement errors due to lead/battery inductance somehow fully addresses the points you raised long ago in your lengthy analysis/write up regarding the negative mean power measurement.

Last I checked, it takes an accurate current measurement AND an accurate voltage measurement to calculate an accurate wattage.       

But, at least, it seems she now believes that "such an animal" (inductance) does indeed exist.  That is some progress.

I truly hope Mark Dansie is able to evaluate her set up.  She doesn't seem to consider that his opinion is a double edged sword that can cut either way.

I also hope he has a chance to read your analysis pdf regarding the negative mean power measurement.     

If Mark visits, maybe she will also demo a functioning N channel FET connected as per Q1 in her schematic with +12 Vgs that does not turn on.  Now THAT would be something ... 


PW

   



 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5256 on: December 12, 2012, 10:35:39 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5257 on: December 12, 2012, 02:47:54 PM »
Indeed PW,

Rose has certainly overlooked the gist of my detailed analysis.

The erroneous measurement is the BATTERY VOLTAGE, and she has been informed as to how to mitigate this artifact (right at the battery itself) in order to make an accurate measurement.

As I mentioned before, Dansie won't be visiting Rose, especially if he did indeed pass on her silly thesis to some of his engineer colleagues.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5258 on: December 13, 2012, 01:56:44 AM »
Ainslie continues "writing a blue streak" :

Quote
Dear Mark,
In as much as Tinsel Koala denies these claims of ours - one must assume that he is NOT able to replicate them.  He also denies any enhanced efficiencies in his own replications.  Therefore it is of paramount importance that you do NOT rely on his presentations of our circuit as his replications are - self-evidently - flawed.  Thank you for your undertaking to evaluate our own experimental evidence related to this in preference to his own.


False again. Ainslie "ASSUMES" a lot, none of which she can support with facts and data. In FACT,  I have replicated ALL of Ainslie's claims FOR WHICH THERE IS EVIDENCE. I have reproduced the faulty "negative mean power" measurements and understand why they are obtained and how to CORRECT them. Ainslie herself has not been able to show that her batteries do not discharge, as she previously claimed. So she lies still more, and in such a manner that is EASILY REFUTED, by anyone who wants to do side-by-side testing of Tar Baby and her NERD circuit. They will perform identically in every significant way. This challenge has stood for many months now and the ability of TB to reproduce Ainslie's claims is not in doubt by ANYONE WHO WATCHES (and understands) MY VIDEOS. "In as much" that excludes the ignorant mendacious AINSLIE herself, who is so arrogant and ignorant that she won't even look at real evidence.
Quote
Regarding your request that we duplicate this effect with the use of capacitors.  We have referenced this in our paper.  The point is that we identify the requirement for a continual imbalanced voltage supply.  A capacitor is not able to retain this imbalance. Therefore it does not contribute to enhanced efficiencies. We do, however, have proposals that we believe would manage this more efficiently than a battery supply.  But the thesis needs to be proven and the apparatus constructed.  This is beyond our own expertise and we are rather hoping that you and your team will explore these principles further.

 Another bunch of "spin" and misdirection and outright lies. She does not understand what capacitors are or how they work or how they are used, nor how to calculate the energy in a capacitor. She mocked my ONE-THIRD FARAD (0.33 F) capacitor bank with which I tested Tar Baby, and couldn't even tell the difference between "one eighth" and "0.8" and even laughed about this ignorance.... not even realizing that SHE was talking about 800 microFarads and thinking that was nearly One Farad. Yes, it is true, Ainslie has no idea of powers of ten or their abbreviations.  Perhaps she has learned something by now.... but I doubt it, she has not got the prerequisites for learning this material.
IN ADDITION, and much more importantly, Tar Baby performed IDENTICALLY using the big capacitor bank as it does on batteries... just for a shorter time. This is illustrated in my videos. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE IN THE WAVEFORMS PRODUCED AT ALL until the voltage on the caps declines appreciably. With an appropriately sized bank.... something Ainslie neither appreciates, nor can calculate.... it will be IMPOSSIBLE TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE in the scope traces for many minutes after the switch to caps is made. In fact I defy even AINSLIE HERSELF to discriminate between traces made with CAPS ONLY and traces made with batteries, ON HER OWN DEVICE, and I suggest that Mark Dansie...... should he somehow actually deign to descend to Cape Town to look at her kludge..... bring a capacitor bank of at least 2 Farads at 60 VDC, and test Ainslie's circuit using them. The same negative mean power calculations will result from her flawed measurements whether batteries or capacitors OF APPROPRIATE SIZE are used to power her circuit. Again, I offer Tar Baby, ready to travel wherever required, for a side-by-side comparison with Ainslie's device. There will be no differences found.
This nonsense of hers about running, or not running, on capacitors is another EASILY TESTED and easily refuted argument from her. She has never tested her device with a large capacitor bank, and in fact, at her level of "skill" she could easily damage equipment, just as she did at least once before, when two batteries "caught fire" due to her careless mishandling of connections.

She does make one true statement: "This is beyond our own expertise ."

Quote
I trust that covers the most of what we've discussed.  I added a fuller account of the extent of our claim in my previous email to you to eliminate any ambiguities in our references.  But this is NOT the full extent of our claim.  It only relates the the claims that we have, thus far, put in the public domain.

Kindest regards
Rosemary

Oh... there are still more claims, that Ainslie has not "put in the public domain".... Yet she intends to compete for a Free Energy OPEN SOURCE prize?

I laugh and laugh at this arrogant fool, who has nothing but her overweening personality disorder, and who thinks that her "nine hundred hits" per day are coming from people instead of spambots probing for victims.

Mark, if you are reading here, I remind you once again that I have all of Ainslie's publicly posted data, over several years, collected in one place, along with critical analyses by me and by several others like .99 (he has an entire folder for his material in my database). All her scopeshots which she has posted in various places are there, as well as all the conflicting versions of her daft manuscripts which are still extant, along with ample proof of her mendacity and prevarication. Even the "I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO" video of her demonstration, which she posted to her YT account and announced publicly on this forum and in her blog... is included, along with analysis that shows the FIVE DIFFERENT SCHEMATICS claimed or used for the single circuit displayed in that video. Is the " official" approved final schematic the actual one used, even? No, it is not: the FG's Black Lead is clearly on the "wrong" side of the CVR in the video, and it  has been moved to the "right" place in the "official" schematic..... which was drawn AFTER the earlier, incorrect location in the video was "poynted" out.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5258 on: December 13, 2012, 01:56:44 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5259 on: December 13, 2012, 02:16:49 AM »
Shame on you, Poynty Poynt. You are talking about Ainslie on a forum where she cannot respond. What an absolute SIN that is. How NAUGHTY.

Quote
And Poynty Point - it's rather bad form to talk about me disparagingly - on a forum where I am not able to defend myself.  I thought you were capable of better.  I am that WRONG?  Are you actually lacking decency and decorum - like those other trolls?  TUT TUT Poynty.  That's naughty.

Of course..... Ainslie herself is above such naughtiness, isn't she.

We can add "utter hypocrite" to the PROVEN TRUE descriptions of ROSEMARY AINSLIE.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5260 on: December 14, 2012, 12:52:35 PM »
The utter hypocrite Ainslie is still very confused about the nature of reality and the identity of the person whom she tries to insult so much. But her venom is weakening, she must be tired of beating her silly old head against a wall of TRUTH and now she's just flailing about, grasping at straws.  I laugh at the miserable old woman she is.
Her silly blog/forum is a perfect Idiot Filter.... it lets only the idiots through, and they can have their own little insular society without fear of any contradictions from reality.
She continues to lie and to defame, with every post she makes. Someday she will be held to account for her prevarication and mendacity. Meanwhile she still cannot:
-refute any of the points we have made here concerning her daft experiments and the manuscripts full of lies and misrepresentations;
-reproduce those particular scopeshots... which she does not even understand --- with functioning mosfets wired as claimed;
-demonstrate any unusual effects at all from her circuit;
-perform proper measurements with understanding and truth;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named "Brian" or "Bryan", or "Little" or any of it;
-correct her many egregious calculation errors AND THE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THEM;
-ever qualify for any of the various overunity prizes and awards that are offered in various places on the internet.

All she can do is sweat and swelter. She can't even boil water !!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5260 on: December 14, 2012, 12:52:35 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5261 on: December 14, 2012, 01:46:01 PM »
my favorite 'blast from the past'...
top comment @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zQdplnCA8
Quote from: TinselKoala
Rosemary, I strongly recommend that you drop this silly story and move on with your life. I have.

has he now? it's over THREE YEARS LATER... ::)

preserved for posterity... ::) i love the gratuitous plug for his crappy little tesla coil too. he tries to pimp that little kludge wherever and whenever he can.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5262 on: December 14, 2012, 01:55:20 PM »
I see you are a great student of my work, sailor. Why have I retaken up the cause against Ainslie's perpetual lie machine? Because AINSLIE TRIED TO GAIN THREE MONETARY AWARDS at the start of the current nonsense, and spoke disparagingly of me and my work.... In other words, she lied and libelled me.  When I was given a stack of her correspondence to review by a person whose name you would recognize.... yes, it began again for me. What is it to you, troll? I'll spend my time as I like, and if I choose to come back onto some project, or leave it, I will do so at my own pleasure and nothing TROLLS can do will stop me.

Why don't you take a long walk off a short pier, you are all wet already.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5263 on: December 14, 2012, 01:57:39 PM »
I see you are a great student of my work, sailor. Why have I retaken up the cause against Ainslie's perpetual lie machine? Because AINSLIE TRIED TO GAIN THREE MONETARY AWARDS at the start of the current nonsense, and spoke disparagingly of me and my work.... In other words, she lied and libelled me.  When I was given a stack of her correspondence to review by a person whose name you would recognize.... yes, it began again for me. What is it to you, troll? I'll spend my time as I like, and if I choose to come back onto some project, or leave it, I will do so at my own pleasure and nothing TROLLS can do will stop me.

Why don't you take a long walk off a short pier, you are all wet already.
keep demonstrating your AMAZING lack of integrity... ::)   and by the way, nice "tiny bubbles" in that video... hypocrite.  ::) that's almost as rich as the condensation on the glass lid of your 'sous vide'.

as an aside, i'm not a "student of your work", i just have a good memory... and you've given so much ammo over the years with your monstrous hypocrisy. how DID you get be such a big hypocrite brian lyttle?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5264 on: December 14, 2012, 02:33:27 PM »
Kind of gets to you, doesn't it Steve, when people call you by some name that you don't want them to think is your own.

Don't forget, because I won't: YOU LIED TO ME, deliberately tricked me, by saying you would send me a mosfet when you had no intention of doing so. And in my naivete, I actually believed and trusted you. But you were only trolling, and you caught me that time, like a hapless billfish on your hook. You have no credibility here, you aren't helpful and you are exceedingly obnoxious. You probably wear socks with sandals, you are so soggy. Dogs want to sniff your fingers!

So go troll in some other waters, where your colors aren't quite so well known. Maybe you'll catch some other sucker to try to torture with your extra special halitosis-laden logorrhea. I'm surprised you can even type, since you are all thumbs.

 

OneLink