Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 894070
  • *Total Topics: 15714
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 14
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1529567 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5205 on: December 01, 2012, 11:01:53 PM »
The PICKLE thing is particularly hilarious. I have shown where this reference originated.

NEVER have I brought it up initially myself...... it is ROSEMARY AINSLIE who repeatedly references some PICKLE out of her own perverted insane fantasies about the size of my...or rather Cheeseburger's.... sexual organs, and the only time that I "refer" to any PICKLES is when the idiot troll pervert AINSLIE makes some insane sexual slur as she has done above.

EVERY TIME she refers to a "Pickle" she is referring not to anything I said, ever, but to the post in the image below. EVERY TIME she refers to a "Pickle" she sticks her foot further down her own throat.

EVERY TIME she refers to me as "Brian (or Bryan) Little" she makes a bigger fool of herself. She can't even check her own "facts" and get the DATE OF THE SUMMER SOLSTICE right, much less her identification of me as Mr. Little. He is really going to be amazed when he finds out what the lying idiot troll Rosemary Ainslie has said about him, in her deluded insane lying fantasy that I am he.

Don't you realize, AINSLIE and SOCK PUPPET, that all of this is going into a public database, which will be made available to ANY and EVERYONE who has an interest in AINSLIE or her idiotic fooling around with electronic components?

Ainslie has not a shred of evidence or support for her accusations and claims. But I have proof of everything I say, in my Rosemary Ainslie database, almost 10 GB at this point, and growing daily. I am still in the process of uploading it to my filesharing site, but much of it is there already, as a series of zipfiles.

http://www.mediafire.com/?b43c5te5tq5xx

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5205 on: December 01, 2012, 11:01:53 PM »

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5206 on: December 02, 2012, 02:20:06 AM »
@Mrsean

 :D

"Guys,

I see that Magsy the munificent - that member at OU.com who is excessively endowed with copious quantities of mediocrity - is concerned that anyone at all is laughing at our 'ickle pickle' and any such references.  I see his point.  Most UNFAIR of me.  I need to revise my standards.

Here's my best effort.

My dear sweet little 'ickle Pickle' or TinselKoala - Bryan Little - whichever you prefer,

I am so, SO sorry that you've got this insatiable fixation on your average pickled gherkin. I'm not actually a botanist - but I'm reasonably certain that the most of your genetic makeup is NOT based on plant life.  And if you're a mutation - of sorts - then FEEL PROUD.  There's always merit in individuality. 

And I'm MORE than happy to pretend that you're big.  ACTUALLY.  1560 pickles squared is CERTAINLY bigger than the 72 squared - that you claimed previously.  So.  Take comfort in that thought.

Rosie Pose

Added the 'square'.  Gross oversight - and resulting in GROSS UNDERSTATEMENT.  But I've corrected it."

::)
Maybe you should use that as your cover letter for your 'papers'. ;)   

Im sure that everyone that you present your papers and claims to will become much more interested in your papers and claims using this as a cover.. ;)

Use it to show your maturity and professionalism. ;)

It would be good to show them this side of you. ;)

Always just be yourself.  ;)

So they know what to expect later on if they get involved with you. ::)


Magsy
« Last Edit: December 02, 2012, 06:53:03 AM by Magluvin »

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5207 on: December 03, 2012, 07:10:49 AM »
 :o ;D ;)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5207 on: December 03, 2012, 07:10:49 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5208 on: December 03, 2012, 04:11:29 PM »
For your amusement: The Great Nebula in Orion, imaged in early November from my backyard observatory.

Telescope: Celestron EdgeHD 9.25" on CGEM mount, guided with Orion SSAG/Stark Labs PhD. Imager: imaged through Meade RGBL filters with the Orion Parsec 8300M monochrome CCD imager. Software: acquired and processed in Stark Labs Nebulosity, further processed in PixInsight LE.  Exposure: about an hour in each of the RGB and L subframes for around 4 hours total, not including the necessary dark frames. This is a small .png of the original .tiff file.

This is a star formation zone where the new stars have blown away the surrounding dust and gas. Shock waves from ionized hydrogen emit the reds, doubly-ionized Oxygen fluoresces green from the UV emitted by the new stars, and the rest of the colors emerge from the interplay of the emission from the ions and the stars themselves, and the reflections from the cold dust and gas.
This nebula is the slightly fuzzy "star" that is the middle point of light in the "sword" dangling from the Belt of the great hunter Orion.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5209 on: December 03, 2012, 04:54:16 PM »
Here's a wide-angle context shot showing all three "stars" in the Sword. The "running man" nebula, the Great Nebula, and the beautiful multiple system Nair al-Saif.

Same imaging system and processing, different telescope: the Megrez 90 apochromatic refractor.



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5209 on: December 03, 2012, 04:54:16 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5210 on: December 03, 2012, 05:20:16 PM »
Wow! :o

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5211 on: December 04, 2012, 08:33:16 AM »
Another post full of lies from Ainslie and her sock puppet.

In the first place, I have made my entire, nearly 10 GB database available not only to Mark Dansie, but to anyone else who is interested in this topic. It contains all versions I could find of the Ainslie daft manuscripts, hundreds of her forum and blog postings, all of the screenshots she's posted, her crazy math, her wildly insulting rhetoric, her bad poetry, her videos, and her continuing series of lies and their refutations and much more, like my entire Tar Baby replication.  This entire thread is archived in there as is much of the old "locked' thread, along with my videos which point by point refute the mendacious claims of Rosemary Ainslie. I also include some of my more critical analyses, along with reference material on battery capacity measurement, scope coupling, function generator offset usage and function, power measurement, pulse power measurement and more, from scope and FG manufacturers and IEEE and ASTM and other reliable sources. Much of the refutation of Ainslie's claims comes, in fact, from her own words at various times, and it's all preserved in my database. .99 has a section all to himself with .pdf files and more, showing how Ainslie is mistaken in her claims of overunity performance.
Due to the limitations of my filesharing site I have had to break it up into zipfiles of under 200 MB each and some of them I have not yet uploaded.... but they are and will be here for anyone to see and examine.

http://www.mediafire.com/?b43c5te5tq5xx

The conclusions to be drawn from all of this data are clear and inevitable: Ainslie is a fraud, and a mendacious, vindictive one to boot. Anyone who gets entangled with her does so at their peril... as history has shown. One may simply locate and ask ANY of her "collaborators" like FuzzyTomCat, Harvey, Ashtweth and Aaron, .99 and many others. One may NOT, however, locate any of the co-authors, any of the "vetting" alphabet agencies or their personnel.... because they either refuse to talk about Ainslie or they simply do not exist.

Quote
Dear ******,

I had NOT seen that thread.  Have now gone through it in its entirety.  MOST interested in TK's presentations.  My suspicions are that he's rooting through these forums to come up with a viable technology that he, personally, can exploit.  But that's merely a suspicion.  I keep saying it.  WHY would a grown man spend every waking hour over a period of nearly 8 months - on a thread dedicated to trashing my name and our work - if there was any sincere effort in exploring anything at all.  Surely?  If there's nothing in my empty claims - then?  … Move on.

 
Because you are engaging in a continuing fraud, that is why. You are attempting to gain monetary prizes for your compendium of lies and bad math. Your miserable tactics and fake research gives a bad name to the whole FE community and you should be ashamed of yourself... but you have neither shame nor conscience nor respect for truth or accuracy. The FIVE different schematics presented for your demonstration device are a case in point, as is your deliberate attempt to cover up the true circuit used, and that is just one single event of many in your history, Ainslie. You are a scourge and you should be severely chastened for it.

Quote
  Why would he also take the trouble to intervene and PREVENT Mark Dansie from looking at our work?  Surely the trick would be to encourage engagement?  That way Mark would be able to see our claims for the nonsense that TK proposes?



Again, you lie through your toothless mouth. I have NEVER ATTEMPTED TO PREVENT ANYONE FROM EXAMINING ALL YOUR DATA, least of all Mark Dansie.... I've sent him the link to all of your scopeshots, for example... Have YOU? No, of course not because you know what they reveal.... I want everyone who is interested to see ALL of your data, all of the various versions of your daft lying manuscripts, all of your video demo and the protestations that you "did not upload that video"... because when they do it becomes plain to anyone what a lying fool you are, just as you are showing here and now.

Quote
WHY does he ALWAYS and EVER recommend that his OWN presentations are taken in preference to ours?  Unless it's to ensure that he's in the fore running of a new technology.  Why does he propose to advance ALL work under his guidance? Except that he's harvesting new ideas. And WHEN has there been any evidence of his promoting any kind of ou anywhere at all?  His posts speak for themselves.  There is NO EVIDENCE ANYWHERE of his own contributions.  Just 'hints' at best.

 
What a LIAR you are! It's unbelievable that you can be so very mendacious. My very real contributions are all around you and you refuse to see them. You wouldn't understand them anyway, but you could at least DO SOME RESEARCH before you accuse me of your libels. There is plenty of evidence of my very real and solid contributions. Just trying to teach YOU how to read your own oscilloscope has helped many people, both in their own work and to understand what a sheer idiot you are. Function generators not passing current! AC vs DC offset ! You are astounding in your ignorance and your mendacity. Had I never encountered you and someone described you to me, I would not have believed that anyone could be so blithely ignorant, overweeningly arrogant and mendacious all at the same time. You take the cake, truly. You deserve an award all right... .and I know that you will eventually get exactly what you deserve.

Quote
Yet he DEMANDS that everyone play their cards so openly?  For his personal edification and inspection?  And his 'ruling' on that device is then to be regarded as ABSOLUTE?   It's laughable.  Absurd.


You are absurd indeed. Yes, I demand that people who claim excess energy play their cards openly, especially when they try to claim prize money or pretend to publish papers. You get no apology from me for that, for sure. For my personal edification and inspection? How about for that of the community instead. And I think you are now confusing me with the Pope of Skeptics, Mark Dansie, who apparently is the only person on Earth who can read a multimeter and give an ABSOLUTE ruling on your absurd "device".

Quote
He CLAIMS to be a consultant to some well funded companies looking into eccentric claims. 


Would you care to refute that "CLAIM" with some facts of your own? Of course not, you cannot.
 
Quote
He then talks about how 'WE' funded … this and that - implying that he's got significant clout.  The guy is a windbag of pure pretension.  He has a tenuous grasp on particle physics - NO idea of chemistry - and he hides his identity from everyone so that he can continue with that DEVIOUS intention to steal ideas and then claim it ALL as his own work.  Unscrupulous is still too tame as a description.


 Lie after lie after lie along with continuing libels.  Ainslie, you have no idea of my influence or lack of it, but I can tell you this much: I have been directly responsible for saving my various employers a _lot_ of money that they otherwise might have disbursed to fraudulent claimants. You can believe that or not as you wish... but you cannot disprove it.
I will put my knowledge of chemistry and particle physics up against Ainslie's any day of the week. She dare not engage in a discussion of either of those topics with me because she has neither the education nor the experience nor the WIT to hold her own and cannot even follow the simplest bit of mathematics. She adds 80 + 22 and arrives at 104 !! And the rest of that accusation is libel plain and simple and I sincerely hope that her lawyers will check the database for more egregious acts of libel from this mendacious, overweeningly arrogant Rosemary Ainslie.
Quote

In any event.  I've said it before.  It takes courage to 'dance with the devil'.  Was greatly amused at this statement…

First, never NEVER take your working prototype apart for any reason whatsoever.
Second, once you have a working prototype that you think is capable of making free energy or consistent OU performance, _immediately_ construct another identical one, make sure it works, and lock it away somewhere.
Then make a _third_ one and send it to me. If it still works when it gets to me and I take it out of the box, I'll refund your shipping costs.
You don't think that's good advice? You take that statement completely out of context and then you say the following lie:
Quote
My personal experience of this Little ploy - is that he then modifies the circuit and then CLAIMS THAT IT IS UNIQUELY HIS OWN.
YOU ARE A LIAR. You cannot provide any evidence for that lying and libellous claim, and not only that but you have no "experience" at all from which to speak.
Quote
Just how PREDICTABLE is that?  Hopefully others will be alert.  And this is the BEST.  He dismisses theory in preference to 'saussages'?  Golly.  The guy is either calling for hamburgers, pickles or saussages.  Does he ever think or talk SCIENCE?  EVIDENTLY NOT.

YOU ARE A BOLDFACED, COLORED CRAYON LIAR, AINSLIE, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. YOU KNOW NOTHING OF SCIENCE AND EVEN LESS OF THE TRUTH. YOU CANNOT SUPPORT ANY OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ME WITH REFERENCES AND FACTS. And you do not grasp the reference to "sausages" at all... because you have not done your homework AGAIN, little lady. What are we to do with you. Maybe a special school.... (sound familiar Ainslie? I know more about you than you think I do.)

Quote

He's playing you all for fools.  I have NEVER come across a person so entirely bereft of courtesy, decency or integrity.  You will notice that he NOWHERE undertakes to evaluate anything fairly. 


You dirty filthy liar. Over and over again you persist in the same tired and easily refuted lies, and you cannot EVER provide any evidence for those libels against me. Give some evidence for my lack of "fairness". You cannot. You have had plenty of completely fair chances to prove your claims, for instance... and you have failed outright and refused further testing.


 
Quote
Just a ruling according to 'our ickle pickle'.  And you must remember that the ONLY viable technology on OU that is currently being researched is LENR.  Ask him - sometime - what exactly is being done about advancing this subject on overunity.com?  He ACTIVELY engaged to close down that thread as well. 


Lies again, more lies from the liar Ainslie. There is no evidence ANYWHERE of me trying in any way to close down ANY THREAD. In fact I am against such activity because it is censorship. Once again AINSLIE LIES and she cannot provide any support for her lying allegations. "Ickle Pickle"? Once again the incredible troll mentions "Pickles" .... when she clearly knows that the origin of that little meme was in reference to Cheeseburger's male sexual apparatus. Her pornographic delusions continue unabated.

Quote
You really need to read between the lines.  His last victim was MrWayne.  There will be many more.  And he seems to think he deserves some kind of approbation for his efforts.  God help us all.

Anyway - enough on such a tedious subject.   I got an apology from Mark as he 'overslept'.  I can understand it.  The guy seems to travel 24.7 - and I expect that takes it toll.  Hopefully I'll hear from him tonight...   

Kindest as ever
Rosie

 Victim? Look close, lying Ainslie troll. Mister Wayne _won_ that little battle: it was HIS REQUEST that the thread be closed, and he did it because he could not answer my questions and challenges honestly. Unlike YOU, Ainslie, he seems unable to lie straight out, he just is the master of prevarication and dissimulation. YOU however have no compunctions at all... you simply make stuff up out of whole cloth and trumpet it about as if nobody knew any better. But they do.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5211 on: December 04, 2012, 08:33:16 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5212 on: December 04, 2012, 08:51:33 AM »
@TK
Here is the latest just to get back on topic

"Guys,

I've still not heard back from Mark.  Here's my last email to him...

Mark - this is getting a little bit repetitive.  I've now spent the best part of Sunday as well the most of Monday anticipating a call.  If you do intend reaching me - then let me know.

Here's what we can show you
A variety of different switching circuits that measure COP >1 and COP INFINITY - depending on small circuit variations
That can dissipate varying and/or fixed levels of wattage as required
That results in a battery that outperforms its watt hour rating by upwards of a factor of 6

Here's what we want to discuss with you
The thesis that predicted this result
Which is consistent with the Standard Model
Subject to the eccentric inclusion of a material property in a magnetic field
Some proposed alternatives to the use of a battery supply
Which, in turn would involve research and development and the funding for this
Some development for anti gravitational technologies that are begged in terms of that thesis
That we propose goes some way to explaining LENR an other over unity effects.

Here's what it will cost you
NOTHING
except that development costs will be to your account
And because some of this technology is probably still patentable - the attendant patent costs
But you can probably then enjoy the exclusive benefit of any financial rewards IF you bring this to the market first

In return for
Public acknowledgement and accreditation of our results relating to the switched circuit apparatus and tests
As well as the accreditation of the applied measurement protocols
That relate EXCLUSIVELY to those tests that have already been put in the public domain
Which is required for the accreditation of our papers that open source can further this thesis
And the promising technologies that we contend will result from that increased understanding

Here's what we guarantee
That the measurements will be consistent with tests recorded in ALL our papers
That they are more dependable as our current sensing resistors are now non-inductive and calibrated
That more stringent thermodynamic tests support these claims

Failing which we will REFUND YOU YOUR TRAVEL EXPENSES.

We trust that you have NOT been duped by that absurd thread by your colleague who prefers, for reasons best understood by himself - to be known as Tinsel Koala.  He relies on the poor and comically unscholarly presentation of a series of replications, which he contends discounts these claims of ours - on rather thin and embarrassingly inadequate evidence.  And he seems to have duped the most of those poor members into believing that there is NO significance to any of these claims - notwithstanding his clumsy attempts at replication.

Our measurement protocols have been APPROVED by a number of HIGHLY PROFICIENT ACADEMICS.  We will disclose their identities privately - subject to agreement that they are never to have this association with our tests made public -  except if and when and as they, themselves, require.  On that basis I suspect that you will be able to refer to their expertise.

Surely this is all reason enough to contact me?
Rosemary"


You are libelling me in that letter, if you actually sent it at all. There will be consequences for you, Ainslie. You cannot provide any support for your lying allegations against me, and I will happily present my material to anyone and I can discuss it and demonstrate just exactly where and how you are completely and utterly WRONG in your claims about your "work" as well as in your claims about my analysis of it.
Mark is completely welcome to test and examine my Tar Baby apparatus to see whether or not it duplicates your measurements; he is free to examine all those video presentations of mine WHICH YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN but somehow feel qualified to comment on; and I am ready and able to defend my points in public whenever called upon BY LEGITIMATE INTERESTS to do so. I can't wait to see YOU try to explain the scope shots in your papers to Dansie, or to anyone who knows how to read a scope. You are going to fall flat on your mendacious wrinkled old face.

Witness below: three scopeshots showing a blown mosfet. One of these figures appears in Ainslie's manuscript as "evidence" for her claim. In fact, a mosfet getting +12 volts to its gate either TURNS ON AND PASSES CURRENT.... or it is defective or missing or miswired. Yet we here have three scopeshots (and there are more) that show NO CURRENT in the CVR when the Q1 mosfet is getting  +12 volts to the gate. Ainslie has never explained these shots, she has promised to duplicate them MONTHS AGO as her very first video demonstration of her new testing.... and she has not deigned to do so... because she simply cannot, not with functioning and properly wired mosfets.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5213 on: December 04, 2012, 09:07:17 AM »
Here is what a current trace DOES look like when the mosfet is functioning and turned on by a gate signal. Ironically... and stupidly... Ainslie claims that shots like this show no power coming from the battery .... when in fact they clearly do show current being supplied by the battery to the circuit.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5213 on: December 04, 2012, 09:07:17 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5214 on: December 04, 2012, 09:11:08 AM »
the origin of that little meme was in reference to Cheeseburger's male sexual apparatus.
wrong. that was not my intent whatsoever. but go on with your bad ass self and assume whatever you wish... ::)

and i wonder why cheesy never answered my question...

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5215 on: December 04, 2012, 09:20:35 AM »
Care to explain, then, what you REALLY meant? Here's the post, if you can't recall. You might have been talking about his "probes" but are you really going to tell me that this exchange ISN'T meant to refer to a male sexual organ and its size?  Sure. Sometimes a pickle is just a pickle, right. Why then does Ainslie continue to bring it up in such an insulting manner, first talking about how big "my" pickle is, then how small it is? Especially when it isn't even my pickle at all. 

Grasping at straw men again, are you, jibguy?


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5215 on: December 04, 2012, 09:20:35 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5216 on: December 04, 2012, 09:36:31 AM »
Care to explain, then, what you REALLY meant? Here's the post, if you can't recall. You might have been talking about his "probes" but are you really going to tell me that this exchange ISN'T meant to refer to a male sexual organ and its size?  Sure. Sometimes a pickle is just a pickle, right. Why then does Ainslie continue to bring it up in such an insulting manner, first talking about how big "my" pickle is, then how small it is? Especially when it isn't even my pickle at all. 

Grasping at straw men again, are you, jibguy?
sure i'll explain... since you're so perverted and retarded as to not be able to grasp that your despicable thoughts are not the only possibility. no need to spam post the image AGAIN, i can recall just fine... far better than your debilitated mind can. ::) how many times have you posted that image in the last month? your obsessive mental problems are showing.

go review the prior posts by cheesy... where he signs off with 'extra fries' please, and something about tomatoes, etc...  SO... are fries to be taken as a phallic symbol now?  ::)

have you ever heard the expression 'hold your horses'? and... do you remember the old burgerking jingle 'hold the pickles, hold the lettuce... special order don't forget us'?

so now with those things before you, you should be able to see it was a play on words... CHEESY'S words and i simply decided to combine an old saying with part of an old commercial jingle.  it wasn't me that implied any sexual innuendo WHATSOEVER.

i'll accept your mea culpa now... you mendacious fraud.  ::)


eta: you wouldn't know a strawman even if it bent you over and treated you like an altar boy... ::)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5217 on: December 04, 2012, 06:20:54 PM »
Wilby, a long time ago when I first joined this forum you tricked me into giving you a mailing address by LYING TO ME, promising to send me a particular mosfet when YOU IN FACT NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION OF DOING SO. In other words, you deliberately scammed me and now you have information that you did not come by legitimately, by lying to me and taking deliberate advantage of my naivete at that point.

So none of your protestations mean anything to me, because YOU have pulled off the most egregious fraud against me by making me a promise, then lying to me, failing to fulfil the promise that you actually never intended to keep, obtaining information, then threatening to use it to harm me.

So go stick your French Fries into your lying troll mouth, since you cannot refute anything I say here. Nobody reading that post and the comedy that results from it will deny that it is funny only _because_ it is a sexual innuendo and slur. It would be utterly meaningless otherwise.
Continue flailing about, WILBY, you are insignificant, meaningless, and possibly the most universally ignored troll on this forum. NOBODY has lied to me the way you have, NOBODY has tricked me and attempted to use the information against me like you have. You taught me a real lesson all right, troll. Why you are allowed to persist here I have no idea, but you certainly have no credibility with me.

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5218 on: December 05, 2012, 07:00:49 AM »
 ::)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5219 on: December 05, 2012, 09:20:22 AM »
Another mess of lies from that utterly PROFESSIONAL troll Rosemary Ainslie and her impotent sock puppet WhoSaidShite.
Quote
For Bryan Little
You bloody idiot. You still have NO IDEA to whom you are talking. Continue, you are making a fool of yourself with EVERY WORD.
Quote
Golly little TK.  I see an obsessive requirement to uncover the 'source' of your nickname 'Ickle Pickle'.  I'm not sure of your own understandings on the issue.  Mine are based on a rather 'reckless' claim you made that you were 72 pickles long.


That is another BALDFACED LIE. Your gash of a lying mouth should heal up from uttering such mendacities. You accused me of being "little" and I responded by saying that I was 72 inches tall, or of "linear dimension". The rest of your nonsense garbage follows from that. Care to refute me with support for your baldfaced lie, with a link to where I ever claimed I was "72 pickles long"? Of course you cannot, you lying troll.

Quote
You don't seem to realise that a 'pickle' is not USUALLY considered as a unit of length.  It can be arbitrary.  It could be as long as a small pumpkin and as short as the smallest curve on my little finger when I wave it at you.  You see the problem?  It's an ARBITRARY unit of length.  In science one needs to use standardised references.  You're basing your ENTIRE identity on a number that - in strictly scientific terms - is IRRELEVANT.

I realize how ridiculous you are making yourself look, in front of everyone who reads both of these forums, that's for sure. Do you? Apparently not. You really had better lay off the sherry before noon.
Quote
So.  Let's look at this again.  IF you are indeed 72 pickles long - then are those pickles 'long' or 'short'?  Are they young or old?  Are they green and turgid - or grey and flaccid?  Are they stacked up one on top of the other?  Or have you laid them down flat and then used a ruler? Again?  WHAT reference are you using?  Are they measured when you're standing on a ladder?  Or are you in high heels?  Are you looking 'down' at that column of gherkins?  Or are you holding it up and WAVING it - as you claimed?  Have you got your pickles 'crossed' in the way that people 'cross their fingers' when they're hoping to dupe God or their public?  And MOST importantly.  Do you suffer from vertigo when you climb up SO HIGH to gauge the LENGTH of those pickles?  Any sense of 'dizziness'?  A weakness at the knees?  Anything at ALL that could substantiate - justify - that physical reaction? 
Can you BELIEVE this? I am astounded. This is the most utterly absurd thing I have read, even from Ainslie the mistress of absurdity herself.
Let her hang herself by her own petard. I will be putting this little bit of verbal diarrhoea at the very head of my database.... which has already begun being _downloaded_ by various interested parties.

Quote

We ALL need clarification.  But for the record.  I personally ADMIRE your insistence on being identified with pickles.  It shows a remarkable strength of purpose.  More than ANYTHING it shows that you are WELL able to fight your corner - stand on your merits - HOLD YOUR OWN.  God knows.  It's HUGELY important.  Far more so than any idle claims that any old women may be making.  So.  It's a good thing that you do - in monopolising your thread with a discussion on your size.  We're MORE than happy - ALL OF US - to allow you to ramble on about this.  It's a subject that you clearly hold near and dear to your heart. 

By the way - DOES YOUR PICKLE SPORT A MOUSTACHE?  I've long considered this option.  And I suspect that IF it does - it probably is confusing that size even further.  SHAVE IT OFF and then MAKE A MEASUREMENT.  But use GRE as a standard - which stands for Grandiose and Ridiculous Exaggeration.  THAT is a measure that we KNOW you to REQUIRE.

With much love and in the forlorn hopes that you'll heed my advices

Rosie Pose

Ainslie certainly speaks for herself, doesn't she. There is nothing that can be said that is sufficiently descriptive of her lack of all personal dignity, conscience, sense of propriety or shame. "Idiot" isn't nearly strong enough. I am just shaking my head in amazement. I've never ever encountered anything like this. She is utterly flmping NUTSO!


       


 

OneLink