Author Topic: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ?? (Read 67128 times)

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #60 on:** October 28, 2010, 06:57:35 AM »

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 28, 2010, 06:24:09 AM

so what? so what does everything at energetic church being moved have to do with images hosted @ photobucket.com? are you trying to tell me that when reverend aaron or whatever admin moved all the posts @ energetic church that somehow it moved things from photobucket.com? get effing serious man, do you know what an absolute href is versus a relative href? the links for your deleted images i posted above are ABSOLUTE hrefs!! that means the 'path' is not relative to where your post is or where your post gets moved to... to say it another way, your photobucket images will NOT be deleted, moved or relocated just because your post was. so glen a lettenmaier, since aaron didn't remove those images from your photobucket account, who did? harvey? who?
where is this image?
http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/RA_COP_11-26-09.jpg
or this one?
http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/RA_COP_Components_01_11-26-09.jpg
that are missing from this post:
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5250-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-part-2-a.html#post82355
why would you delete them from photobucket glen? it costs you no bandwidth, nor does it cost energetic church bandwidth when your pictures are hosted @ photobucket.com. the bandwidth used is photobucket.com's

Wrong again the standard PhotoBucket free membership allows you 500 MB of storage with a 10 GB storage bandwidth .... anything over these amounts you need a "PRO" account or have your photos unable to be seen if you go over the bandwidth until the end of the month account reset.

So all the Mosfet Heater Circuit information is stored at Microsoft SkyDrive with a 25GB storage - http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

This SkyDrive account is the second one being used for this device with a better filing system for my other projects data.

WilbyInebriated · « **Reply #61 on:** October 28, 2010, 07:04:44 AM »

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on October 28, 2010, 06:57:35 AM

Wrong again the standard PhotoBucket free membership allows you 500 MB of storage with a 10 GB storage bandwidth .... anything over these amounts you need a "PRO" account or have your photos unable to be seen if you go over the bandwidth until the end of the month account reset.

So all the Mosfet Heater Circuit information is stored at Microsoft SkyDrive with a 25GB storage - http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

This SkyDrive account is the second one being used for this device with a better filing system for my other projects data.

wrong again? you mental midget, i said "it costs you no bandwidth, nor does it cost energetic church bandwidth when your pictures are hosted @ photobucket.com. the bandwidth used is photobucket.com's" and you replied with "Wrong again the standard PhotoBucket free membership allows you 500 MB of storage with a 10 GB storage bandwidth". now, when that picture, that is hosted @ photobucket, is requested by a web browser, the bandwidth used is not yours, nor is it energetic's... it is photobucket's bandwidth unless you have some unique deal with photobucket where you host your own photobucket account on your personal computer...

but you're not over the allotted bandwith at this current point in time and those images have been missing for months!... anyone can see this is clearly evident by simply going to your photobucket home page...

http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/
your attempted obfuscation is pathetic glen, have you been studying under harvey gramm?

you made the post under question on 01-24-2010, 06:36 PM are you trying to get me to believe that your 10 GIG photobucket account bandwidth is being used up each and every month for the past 10 months? please...

ANSWER THE QUESTION INSTEAD OF AVOIDING IT REPEATEDLY.
who removed those two images from your photobucket account glen a. lettenmaier?

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #62 on:** October 28, 2010, 08:09:50 AM »

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 28, 2010, 07:04:44 AM

wrong again? you mental midget, i said "it costs you no bandwidth, nor does it cost energetic church bandwidth when your pictures are hosted @ photobucket.com. the bandwidth used is photobucket.com's" and you replied with "Wrong again the standard PhotoBucket free membership allows you 500 MB of storage with a 10 GB storage bandwidth". now, when that picture, that is hosted @ photobucket, is requested by a web browser, the bandwidth used is not yours, nor is it energetic's... it is photobucket's bandwidth unless you have some unique deal with photobucket where you host your own photobucket account on your personal computer...

but you're not over the allotted bandwith at this current point in time and those images have been missing for months!... anyone can see this is clearly evident by simply going to your photobucket home page...
http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/
your attempted obfuscation is pathetic glen, have you been studying under harvey gramm?

you made the post under question on 01-24-2010, 06:36 PM are you trying to get me to believe that your 10 GIG photobucket account bandwidth is being used up each and every month for the past 10 months? please...

ANSWER THE QUESTION INSTEAD OF AVOIDING IT REPEATEDLY.
who removed those two images from your photobucket account glen a. lettenmaier?

wow .... don't get it huh ....

Well at the time all the images and photos were placed in a Skydrive file account so I could delete all of them at PhotoBucket ( with [img] codes ) for the new SkyDrive file links ( with no [img] codes) , my PhotoBucket bandwidth at the time after Test #16 was around 8 to 9GB per month and using over 400MB of storage, I was getting warnings for several months before this on the GB usage at PhotoBucket. The reference and availability of the experimental device test images and any other image that has a deleted message always were available seamlessly, maybe not to your or Rosemary's liking but 100% available with references posted there location's in a form of a "link" some other images not related to the testing of the experimental device may not be available for various reasons.

I'm at around 60 MB of storage and my bandwidth is at 2 to 3 GB a month now at PhotoBucket and 1GB at SkyDrive with 24GB left.

I used up all my Energetic Forum membership file space posting images in the "Tesla's wireless electricity transmission" thread http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/showthread.php?t=3573 long ago .....

So this is the last response to this nonsense, keep it on topic, and quit burying the posts like this one http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9898.msg262086#msg262086 unless you would like to comment on the *HIGHLIGTED* red items

WilbyInebriated · « **Reply #63 on:** October 28, 2010, 08:12:49 AM »

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on October 28, 2010, 08:09:50 AM

wow .... don't get it huh ....

Well at the time all the images and photos were placed in a Skydrive file account so I could delete all of them at PhotoBucket ( with [img] codes ) for the new SkyDrive file links ( with no [img] codes) , my PhotoBucket bandwidth at the time after Test #16 was around 8 to 9GB per month and using over 400MB of storage, I was getting warnings for several months before this on the GB usage at PhotoBucket. The reference and availability of the experimental device test images and any other image that has a deleted message always were available seamlessly, maybe not to your or Rosemary's liking but 100% available with references posted there location's in a form of a "link" some other images not related to the testing of the experimental device may not be available for various reasons.

I'm at around 60 MB of storage and my bandwidth is at 2 to 3 GB a month now at PhotoBucket and 1GB at SkyDrive with 24GB left.

I used up all my Energetic Forum membership file space posting images in the "Tesla's wireless electricity transmission" thread http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/showthread.php?t=3573 long ago .....

So this is the last response to this nonsense, keep it on topic, and quit burying the posts like this one http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9898.msg262086#msg262086 unless you would like to comment on the *HIGHLIGTED* red items

no, i get it... glen, i just downloaded all pictures from your photobucket account, just for posterity.

27 pages worth of images... over a dozen pages with photos relative to the ainslie circuit, 20 images per page. are those the ones you were going to delete from photobucket? so after 10 months you still haven't deleted them all from photobucket... just specific ones.

and if you had set up this skydrive to 'seamlessly' take over from photobucket why delete them from photobucket without providing a reference to where the new images were in your post, i'm sure reverend aaron would have edited it for you...
you know when i go to energetic and read that post with deleted images it really doesn't seem that seamless.

burying posts? you really aren't all there... i quoted that very post.

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #64 on:** October 28, 2010, 08:34:13 AM »

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 28, 2010, 08:12:49 AM

glen i just downloaded all pictures from your photobucket account, just for posterity. 27 pages worth of images... over a dozen pages with photos relative to the ainslie circuit, 20 images per page. are those the ones you were going to delete from photobucket?

and if you had set up this skydrive to 'seamlessly' take over from photobucket why delete them from photobucket without providing a reference to where the new images were in your post, i'm sure reverend aaron would have edited it for you...
you know when i go to energetic and read that post with deleted images it really doesn't seem that seamless.

Those images are from Test #17 through Test #22 using a Tektronix DPO 3054 these files were very large (.bmp) .... for example the zip file for Test #22, for the images and data is 34.9MB just for that test http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Test%20%5EN22%5E_02-05-10.zip

The images that were effected at PhotoBucket was the earlier Tektronix TDS 3054C (.png) oscilloscope Tests #1 through Test #16

WilbyInebriated · « **Reply #65 on:** October 28, 2010, 09:05:31 AM »

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on October 28, 2010, 08:34:13 AM

Those images are from Test #17 through Test #22 using a Tektronix DPO 3054 these files were very large (.bmp) .... for example the zip file for Test #22, for the images and data is 34.9MB just for that test http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Test%20%5EN22%5E_02-05-10.zip

The images that were effected at PhotoBucket was the earlier Tektronix TDS 3054C (.png) oscilloscope Tests #1 through Test #16

all the ainslie images that i just downloaded from your photobucket account were .jpg... and the two images you deleted from your photobucket that i have been referring to for these last few replies were .jpg also. one can tell by looking at the img src url. the images under question are from 11-26-2009 which also in the img src url. strangely enough i found some images with that exact date that were not deleted from your photobucket account, i've included a link and attached the actual image.
third row, third column: http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/?start=120

funny thing, these 522 images from your photobucket account average about 150kb each. let's see now, 10 gigs divided by 150kb...

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #66 on:** October 28, 2010, 09:28:31 AM »

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 28, 2010, 09:05:31 AM

all the ainslie images that i just downloaded from your photobucket account were .jpg... and the two images you deleted from your photobucket that i have been referring to for these last few replies were .jpg also. one can tell by looking at the img src url. the images under question are from 11-26-2009 which also in the img src url. strangely enough i found some images with that exact date that were not deleted from your photobucket account, i've included a link and attached the actual image.
third row, third column: http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/?start=120

funny thing, these 522 images from your photobucket account average about 150kb each. let's see now, 10 gigs divided by 150kb...

ya so what ... I have 1000's and 1000's of photos, I collect them, some are at photobucket where you can pick and choose what you want there, I add and delete all the time ...... .jpg, .gif, .png, .tif type files you know this, not all of my files are one kind or file type or SIZE ..... and lots of views on them all.

Give it up .... where's Rosemary's photos and images of any or all of her tests ?? Go to her thread and ask her .... she wont delete your posting ......

Rosemary Ainslie · « **Reply #67 on:** October 28, 2010, 09:52:11 AM »

I see we're falling off the page again. Glen rather relies on this to hide those more embarrassing
posts. I'm amending so that this can be read. There were only two tests that I wanted in full
record. Test 3 and test 13. The rest are largely irrelevant. I've just looked through the link
download Wilby. Thanks for that.

Ok. I've paged through them all and see - as day follows night - that the sample range number that
has been 'kept' or 'recorded' are ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT. There are a certain number of samples that
are required to give a 'fair' reflection of the actual test results. I can't remember the exact number
but it was about 100 or thereby. Any more or less than these multiple samples and Tektronix DO
NOT GUARANTEE the results. What Glen has RETAINED are those tests that either give more or
less samples. So. He may indeed not have deleted them all. He's only deleted those that are
referenced - or relevant. I see too that he's been using my old Fluke. LOL. Aaron must have
weakened and sent it through.

Wilby. Can I ask you a favour. Obviously only when you have time. Can you try and open those
links on Fuzzy's other info. And then see if you can access tests 3 and 13. I want to find out which
samples he actually retained here too. I wonder if he's actually just made the irrelevant samples
available for public view and buried the significant test results elsewhere. Thank GOD I've still got
the raw data of these early tests. But even here I'll have to get someone to find them to down load
it for me. And meanwhile I also have those test results from our paper.

Indeed. There's an agenda here guys. It's very disturbing.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
BTW WILBY You may want to reformat your own posts. It would be nice to read them more easily.
Also of interest is that Glen appears to have snaffled my fluke scopemeter which I donated to the
cause to promote FULL VIEW of all the data. It cost me about R20 000.00 THEN. Not sure of its value today.
Seems rather tough on me that I should have ended up providing the instrument that
Glen now uses to HIDE the data that I keep asking for. Like I said. Glen does NOT occupy the moral
high ground. EVER. LOL

WilbyInebriated · « **Reply #68 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:04:59 AM »

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on October 28, 2010, 09:28:31 AM

ya so what ... I have 1000's and 1000's of photos, I collect them, some are at photobucket where you can pick and choose what you want there, I add and delete all the time ...... .jpg, .gif, .png, .tif type files you know this, not all of my files are one kind or file type or SIZE ..... and lots of views on them all.

so why did you delete the just the one's that are linked to in the RA thread at energetic and none of the other 200+ ainslie images?
interesting stats by the way, shows us that your illusion images are your biggest draw for this last week, not your ainslie images...

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on October 28, 2010, 09:28:31 AM

Give it up .... where's Rosemary's photos and images of any or all of her tests ?? Go to her thread and ask her .... she wont delete your posting ......

denied. logical fallacy, red herring.

exnihiloest · « **Reply #69 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:21:50 AM »

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie

...
You are determined to HIDE from easy public access
...
REALLY? Then why the need to zip those files?
...

Zip archives would be made to hidden files ?!!!

Is Rosemary Ainslie unaware of the interest of zip files (gain in storage and download time)?
One can't believe it. Most of her posts are shamefully biased and misleading.

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #70 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:22:12 AM »

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on October 28, 2010, 09:52:11 AM

I see we're falling off the page again. I'm amending so that this can be read. There were only two
tests that I wanted in full record. Test 3 and test 13. The rest are largely irrelevant. I've just
looked through the link download Wilby. Thanks for that.

Ok. I've paged through them all and see - as day follows night - that the sample range number that
has been 'kept' or 'recorded' are ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT. There are a certain number of samples that
are required to give a 'fair' reflection of the actual test results. I can't remember the exact number
but it was about 100 or thereby. Any more or less than these multiple samples and Tektronix DO
NOT GUARANTEE the results. What Glen has RETAINED are those tests that either give more or
less samples. So. He may indeed not have deleted them all. He's only deleted those that are
referenced - or relevant. I see too that he's been using my old Fluke. LOL. Aaron must have
weakened and sent it through.

Wilby. Can I ask you a favour. Obviously only when you have time. Can you try and open those
links on Fuzzy's other info. And then see if you can access tests 3 and 13. I want to find out which
samples he actually retained here too. I wonder if he's actually just made the irrelevant samples
available for public view and buried the significant test results elsewhere. Thank GOD I've still got
the raw data of these early tests. But even here I'll have to get someone to find them to down load
it for me. And meanwhile I also have those test results from our paper.

Indeed. There's an agenda here guys. It's very disturbing.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

This is crazy ..... you can't even post once without something that's so false makes me wonder what kind of drugs your maid is slipping you .....

AGAIN - The link you deleted in your thread ..... one that has been posted numerous times in many forums is -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

Everthing in existance on my work with the experimental device is there ...... "EVERYTHING", nothing is missing or retained ...... what nonsense is this .....

Place the little mouse pointer over the file and click on it ...... how hard can this be, do you really need Wilby for this task ??

Fluke meter what are you talking about .... the only Fluke scope I know of Aaron has and used it once over a year ago, that's it . Your confusing the test equipment you used I think it was in the Quantum October 2002 article a Fluke 199 some low quality LED unit, nothing like the Tektronix TDS 3054c or the Tektronix DPO 3054 I used to collect data with.

Harvey · « **Reply #71 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:25:24 AM »

With Regards to ZIP files.

Skydrive has a 50MB upload limit for any single file. Some of my spreadsheets of the tests exceeded this limit and therefore needed to be compressed to allow upload.

ZIP technology is an industry standard that has been around since the early days of DOS and it is expected that this is well understood by all persons qualified to evaluate these analyses. However, if there are any who are having problems with unzipping these files and would like assistance in doing so feel free to PM me and I will step you through the extremely simple high school steps of doing so.

Additionally, the high resolution data (100,000 samples per 10 divisions) will not fit in Excel versions prior to 2007. Therefore, I took the time to create an Access Program for those with older versions of Microsoft Office that allows them to peer into this data at high resolution with zoom charts and see the many instances of high amplitude pulses that are simply missing in the much lower resolution data of 10,000 samples per screen.

All of this has been available 100% of the time with absolutely no reservations from the time of publicizing the results. Any attempts to infer otherwise should be considered subterfuge and an attempt to besmirch Glen's good name and therefore should be summarily dismissed as the rhetoric it is.

Furthermore, Glens tests and all of the data associated with Glens tests remain his property. He has graciously shared those tests and their results with the world to benefit us all in any way it can. I wish I could say the same for the South African tests. ALL of the test data from the listed testing agencies is missing, withheld, or never even happened. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the South African group to at the very least match Glen's tests and public display of data if they wish to continue boasting "OPEN SOURCE".

Otherwise the Entire OPEN SOURCE community has no choice but conclude they are protecting their Intellectual Property and the all of the claims otherwise are nothing but a ruse for publicity.

Harvey

Rosemary Ainslie · « **Reply #72 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:31:22 AM »

DON'T PRESUME TO CLAIM THAT I AM CRAZY WHEN YOU KNOW FULL WELL THAT I DO NOT HAVE
THE EYES TO NAVIGATE THESE COMPLEX SYSTEMS. WHY DID YOU EVER EVER EVER DELETE THOSE
FILES. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF OPEN SOURCE DISCIPLINES AND FLIES IN THE FACE OF OPEN
SOURCE INTERESTS. I DEVOTED ENDLESS HOURS IN HELPING YOU GET THE DESIRED EFFECT. I
FEEL I SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO ACCESS THE FILES EASILY AND I WOULD PREFER IT THAT OUR
READING PUBLIC CAN ALSO DO SO. YOU HAVE AN AGENDA AND IT'S OBVIOUS.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #73 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:40:28 AM »

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on October 28, 2010, 10:31:22 AM

DON'T PRESUME TO CLAIM THAT I AM CRAZY WHEN YOU KNOW FULL WELL THAT I DO NOT HAVE
THE EYES TO NAVIGATE THESE COMPLEX SYSTEMS. WHY DID YOU EVER EVER EVER DELETE THOSE
FILES. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF OPEN SOURCE DISCIPLINES AND FLIES IN THE FACE OF OPEN
SOURCE INTERESTS. I DEVOTED ENDLESS HOURS IN HELPING YOU GET THE DESIRED EFFECT. I
FEEL I SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO ACCESS THE FILES EASILY AND I WOULD PREFER IT THAT OUR
READING PUBLIC CAN ALSO DO SO. YOU HAVE AN AGENDA AND IT'S OBVIOUS.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

AND KINDLY REFORMAT THIS PAGE. YOU'RE STILL TRYING TO HIDE TEXT.

wow .... I thought I was seeing things, had to print it three times ..... I'm still hiding text ..... where on this page ??

WHAT ??

Rosemary Ainslie · « **Reply #74 on:** October 28, 2010, 10:46:21 AM »

Tell me where you got this photograph? Is it yours? And if so - what is it's relevance to the ainslie tests? To me it looks like the oscillation of the waveform across the shunt taken on a typical
resonating test. And unless I'm wildly mistaken that looks like a FLUKE? HOW DID THIS GET INTO
YOUR PHOTOBUCKET? is the question.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ?? (Read 67128 times)

fuzzytomcat

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

WilbyInebriated

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

fuzzytomcat

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

WilbyInebriated

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

fuzzytomcat

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

WilbyInebriated

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

fuzzytomcat

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

Rosemary Ainslie

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

WilbyInebriated

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

exnihiloest

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

fuzzytomcat

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

Harvey

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

Rosemary Ainslie

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

fuzzytomcat

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??

Rosemary Ainslie

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??