Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83399
  • *Latest: SciAnt

  • *Total Posts: 509999
  • *Total Topics: 15198
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 19

Author Topic: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??  (Read 48052 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #120 on: November 01, 2010, 11:29:50 PM »
Oh Good God.  You have NO IDEA what you've done Glen.  Not only intellectual suicide but some sad hope that it was somehow aborted.  Your name is on a paper.  One does not publish a paper if you do not wholly and entirely uphold the facts in that paper.  It's meant to be a testament to the truth.  Not something that you dance around forever after.  And that paper details a slew of links to blocked files??   That means you no longer support the information in that paper.  YET you keep that paper on your Scribd file.  Which of these two facts are a LIE?  Because they can't BOTH be true.  Your questions and denials and mutterings of the results on that circuit - your denial of my rights to association of the experiment, the paper, the thesis - your propagandising to Tektronix - your sad little contributions here - your tireless efforts to get me banned - your objections to the inclusion of the thesis.  ALL THIS - are testament to your TOTAL INABILITY TO ACT HONOURABLY OR TO KEEP YOUR WORD. 

THAT IS THE ISSUE.  You can have links all over the world - in your name or in anyone else's - the fact is that you even deny the source of this your knowledge and instead of showing the SLIGHTEST acknowledgement you CHARGE through thread after thread, forum after forum, trying to blacken my name.  Are you entirely unaware of the fact that grown men, decent men, honourable men DO NOT BEHAVE LIKE THIS?  Do you really think you're doing yourself any favour - or me any real damage?  You're so hopelessly misguided.  The worst of it is that I assumed as Harvey was supporting all this that you were acting under his advisement.  But it appears you can do all this damage to yourself, all by yourself.

Edited.  Added commas.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 11:50:44 PM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #121 on: November 01, 2010, 11:48:41 PM »
And while I'm at it Glen.  Just think for a bit - in the quiet lonely hours of the early morning - what If?  What IF you had controlled this appalling greedy need for SOLE DISCOVERY AND REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORITY - IF you had found enough generosity in that bedevilled character that is your soul - to acknowledge the NEED for the promotion of that thesis - IF you had supported, wholeheartedly, the evidence in those miles and miles of data - then INDEED we would, today, NOT be debating these results and the ENTIRE WORLD would have been made cogniscant of these facts.  You single handedly,  actually let me correct that - you and Harvey, together, managed to ABORT that event - and THAT was my mission in those long, long, long hours of hard work that I invested in that exercise.  I've said it before.  You have damaged yourself - which is irrelevant.  You have definitely attempted to DAMAGE some vital technology.  Go read my Scridb tribute to the super troll again.  It's all there.

R

Offline scotty1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
    • leedskalnin.com
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #122 on: November 01, 2010, 11:53:08 PM »
Hey Rosemary, what a mess!
Certainly shows alot about people.

If you are really interested to know about Ed's work, then I will show you, but it takes time, and so far nobody has taken the time to learn.
I've spent alot of time reading your magnet theory.
--------------
It seems to me that progress has become second to personal ego in many forms.
Maybe everyone needs some philosophy along with their experiments.
I hope it all pans out for the best.
Meanwhile....I'll be in my shed...working.

Scotty.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #122 on: November 01, 2010, 11:53:08 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #123 on: November 02, 2010, 12:07:53 AM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

@ Rosemary ...... please read again

Oh Good God.  You have NO IDEA what you've done Glen.  Not only intellectual suicide but some sad hope that it was somehow aborted.  Your name is on a paper.  One does not publish a paper if you do not wholly and entirely uphold the facts in that paper.  It's meant to be a testament to the truth.  Not something that you dance around forever after.  And that paper details a slew of links to blocked files??   That means you no longer support the information in that paper.  YET you keep that paper on your Scribd file.  Which of these two facts are a LIE?  Because they can't BOTH be true.  Your questions and denials and mutterings of the results on that circuit - your denial of my rights to association of the experiment the paper the thesis - your propagandising to Tektronix - your sad little contributions here - your tireless efforts to get me banned - your objections to the inclusion of the thesis.  ALL THIS - are testament to your TOTAL INABILITY TO ACT HONOURABLY OR TO KEEP YOUR WORD. 

THAT IS THE ISSUE.  You can have links all over the world - in your name or in anyone else's - the fact is that you even deny the source of this your knowledge and instead of showing the SLIGHTEST acknowledgement you CHARGE through thread after thread, forum after forum, trying to blacken my name.  Are you entirely unaware of the fact that grown men, decent men, honourable men DO NOT BEHAVE LIKE THIS?  Do you really think you're doing yourself any favour - or me any real damage?  You're so hopelessly misguided.  The worst of it is that I assumed as Harvey was supporting all this that you were acting under his advisement.  But it appears you can do all this damage to yourself, all by yourself.


http://www.energeticforum.com/93746-post74.html   POST #74



Quote
Originally Posted by Harvey  View Post
Thanks Glen,

As always I am impressed by your work

I was trying to do some basic calculations on how long your two batteries can sustain a 5.5 watt load. I come up with about 104 hours, does that sound right? They are each 12Ah batteries so there is 24Ah of charge in them. A basic DC breakdown is 5.5W / 24V = 0.229A. 24Ah / 0.229A = 104 hours.

So all we need to do now is run for more than 104 hours on those batteries and we have pretty good proof that we have extra energy coming from somewhere else And that's not even counting the lost energy in MOSFET or CSR to heat. Good Stuff!

ETA: Oh, I almost forgot - if we conclude that those Gel-Cell (edit: wait, those or Liquid Acid?) batteries are discharged when they reach 10V each, then that would be a drop of 4V over the 104 hours. That would give us a 0.0385V (38.5mV) drop per hour. So for the 5 hours we would have expected a minimum of 193mV drop not counting the energy spent on the MOSFET and CSR. Our results show only 110mV drop in that time frame, 83mV short of the linear projection. So you can see why we think we are getting energy from somewhere. Either that, or our battery discharge is not linear And BTW, it only gets better for us if we conclude the battery voltage should be lower than 10V when discharged (of course we all know that the battery voltage needs to be measured under specific load conditions)
Quote

Hey Harvey,

I'm sorry it took so long to do a detailed overview of the "LIVE" broadcast I did in the "Open Source Research and Development" channel on the January 9, 2010 5 Hour non stop video recording.

This video as you are aware is one of the best ever recorded representation of the preferred mode of operation but only in a non stop 5 Hour video. I'm sure that many members and guests don't realize the difficulty in capturing this effect for the purpose of recording the data properly and if given the time looking at the recorded video everyone can see the problems that we face in getting accurate data.

The constant 24 volt battery bank voltage fluctuations going up and down the Mosfet "drain" spike oscillating from 500 to 900 volts, battery voltage down the Mosfet spikes, battery voltage up the Mosfet voltage to normal operating range, back and forth over and over.

I have tried to get as close to this mode of operation in   Test #13    which was used in the IEEE submittal Open Source Evaluation of Power Transients Generated to Improve Performance Coefficient of Resistive Heating Systems the team including yourself did, and in   Test #22 but never being able to record the data scientifically correct because of the circuits complex oscillating waveforms. I don't think everyone, members and guests understands that the Test #13 was done with a Tektronix TDS 3054C which has a maximum resolution of 10K of data spread over a 10 x 10 grid or divisions so each one has 1k of data samples separately for each of the 4 channels. The data collected in Test #22 was with a Tektronix DPO 3054 which has a maximum resolution of 5M of data, but I used the 100K which is spread over the same 10 x 10 grid or divisions so each one has 10k of data samples separately for each of the 4 channels ..... ten ( 10 ) times the data of the TDS 3054C used in Test #13.

The problem being we need to find a method of capturing the data continuously in real time, there's nothing wrong with Tektronix TDS 3054C or the DPO 3054 these are the finest instruments I've ever used and are extremely accurate, but if you push the acquire button at the wrong time you can appear to get conflicting or skewed data, not the case .... were you before the spike, during the spike or after the spike when the data was collected. I had a allotted dedicated set time to record the data, It was the time frame I used with the 6 minutes or as fast as the data could be physically collected with the finest equipment I had at my disposal.

I am in total agreement with you that something "good" is happening in the Mosfet Heating Circuit and can be plainly seen in the recorded videos, we just need to somehow get a streaming real time data recording. Maybe by somehow obtaining a   Real-Time Spectrum Analyzers from Tektronix or some other method to verify the data findings as you suggested, the equipment I previously used as good as it is, just isn't enough to totally capture what is occurring during the preferred mode of operation.

Best Regards,
Glen
:)

NO DENIAL OF SOME KIND OF "COP" OPERATION .......... UN-CONCLUSIVE TESTS DUE TO BETTER EQUIPMENT USED IN TESTS #17 through TEST #22 ( Tektronix DPO 3054 )

I am in total agreement with you that something "good" is happening in the Mosfet Heating Circuit and can be plainly seen in the recorded videos, we just need to somehow get a streaming real time data recording. Maybe by somehow obtaining a   Real-Time Spectrum Analyzers  from Tektronix or some other method to verify the data findings as you suggested, the equipment I previously used as good as it is, just isn't enough to totally capture what is occurring during the preferred mode of operation.

WHAT HIDDEN AND DELETED FILES ??

Panacea-BOCAF On-Line University - (complete file)
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Rosemary%20Ainslie%20COP17%20Heater%20Technology.pdf  ( non-stop ongoing 290 page - 15.47MB PDF file )

Energetic Forum - "Mosfet Heating Circuits" (complete file)
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html   ( February 06,2010 )

Open Source Reasearch and Development "LIVE" 24/7 web broadcasting (with video library)
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment

PREFERRED MODE OF OPERATION - 5-Hour "NON STOP" video recordings of live broadcasts
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_6d255c76-9e9a-42ae-a565-fbc698e0b6df  (Tektronix TDS 3054C - January 9, 2010)
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_b2e705b9-bf90-4bee-8009-2b323d8bc7ae (Tektronix 2445A - January 24,2010)
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_12671fda-04e2-403e-8560-ab593683a646 (Tektronix DPO 3054 - January 31, 2010)

Microsoft SkyDrive Public - ** FILE REPOSITORY ** Mosfet Heating Circuit (complete photo, image and data gallery)
http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

Microsoft SkyDrive Public - ** FILE REPOSITORY ** Rosemary Ainslie (complete Quantum article data, patent applications information)
http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Ainslie


.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #124 on: November 02, 2010, 12:08:27 AM »
Hello Scotty.  Always nice to see you around.   ;D

Ed's up there with my heros Scotty.  I'm always happy to learn more.  And I'll think of you beavering away in your shed.  For my part I'm wasting way too much time - yet again - trying to HALT the damage that Glen and Harvey are busy trying to manage.

Take good care there
Kindest regards,
Rosie.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #124 on: November 02, 2010, 12:08:27 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #125 on: November 02, 2010, 12:10:11 AM »
Since you see fit to repeat your own posts, let me also re-iterate mine.  And mine requires an answer.  Yours certainly does not.

And while I'm at it Glen.  Just think for a bit - in the quiet lonely hours of the early morning - what If?  What IF you had controlled this appalling greedy need for SOLE DISCOVERY AND REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORITY - IF you had found enough generosity in that bedevilled character that is your soul - to acknowledge the NEED for the promotion of that thesis - IF you had supported, wholeheartedly, the evidence in those miles and miles of data - then INDEED we would, today, NOT be debating these results and the ENTIRE WORLD would have been made cogniscant of these facts.  You single handedly,  actually let me correct that - you and Harvey, together, managed to ABORT that event - and THAT was my mission in those long, long, long hours of hard work that I invested in that exercise.  I've said it before.  You have damaged yourself - which is irrelevant.  You have definitely attempted to DAMAGE some vital technology.  Go read my Scridb tribute to the super troll again.  It's all there.

R


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #126 on: November 02, 2010, 12:12:54 AM »
Apologies. I should have reposted this one first.

Oh Good God.  You have NO IDEA what you've done Glen.  Not only intellectual suicide but some sad hope that it was somehow aborted.  Your name is on a paper.  One does not publish a paper if you do not wholly and entirely uphold the facts in that paper.  It's meant to be a testament to the truth.  Not something that you dance around forever after.  And that paper details a slew of links to blocked files??   That means you no longer support the information in that paper.  YET you keep that paper on your Scribd file.  Which of these two facts are a LIE?  Because they can't BOTH be true.  Your questions and denials and mutterings of the results on that circuit - your denial of my rights to association of the experiment, the paper, the thesis - your propagandising to Tektronix - your sad little contributions here - your tireless efforts to get me banned - your objections to the inclusion of the thesis.  ALL THIS - are testament to your TOTAL INABILITY TO ACT HONOURABLY OR TO KEEP YOUR WORD. 

THAT IS THE ISSUE.  You can have links all over the world - in your name or in anyone else's - the fact is that you even deny the source of this your knowledge and instead of showing the SLIGHTEST acknowledgement you CHARGE through thread after thread, forum after forum, trying to blacken my name.  Are you entirely unaware of the fact that grown men, decent men, honourable men DO NOT BEHAVE LIKE THIS?  Do you really think you're doing yourself any favour - or me any real damage?  You're so hopelessly misguided.  The worst of it is that I assumed as Harvey was supporting all this that you were acting under his advisement.  But it appears you can do all this damage to yourself, all by yourself.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #126 on: November 02, 2010, 12:12:54 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #127 on: November 02, 2010, 12:27:39 AM »


Since you see fit to repeat your own posts, let me also re-iterate mine.  And mine requires an answer.  Yours certainly does not.



http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9898.msg262593#msg262593 ( Reply #112 on: November 01, 2010)

Howdy reading members and guests,

Rosemary's comments or claims all outlined in my publicly posted claim above and thought readers would be able to find the quoted words but it appears not, there's to many posts 1000's to sift through ..... I have no pleasure repeating them again, but really need too now.

The word Rosemary uses loosely always concerning the rejected IEEE paper submittal of "WE", is not in my word's and at best misleading, I can speak for myself on my Tests.

Items 1 through 5 will be referenced one at a time to avoid the hundreds of pages and thousands of responses in the thread, many will be from Rosemary Ainslie in a attempt to bury the evidence in pages of nonsense postings hiding the truth from the members and reading guests.


ITEM NUMBER 1 has been covered now in POST #91 http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9898.msg262460#msg262460 and POST #106 http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9898.msg262544#msg262544 on Rosemary Ainslie withholding a "Complete WORKING "QUANTUM" COP>17 EXPERIMENTAL DEVICES" knowing and willfully has hidden it from the Open Source Community after July, 13 2009

This is without a response of any kind a quick attack, misrepresentation or allegation somehow defending her "HER OWN QUOTED WORDS" from a Energetic Forum post #551 http://www.energeticforum.com/60279-post511.html  on July 13, 2009

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITEM NUMBER 2

WORKING COMPONENTS OF A "QUANTUM" COP>17 EXPERIMENTAL DEVICES WITHHELD FROM OPEN SOURCE

http://www.energeticforum.com/59541-post322.html    POST #322  07-07-2009


I will also, subject to my son's return - try and get some video information our on our own circuit. It is the same as the box that was sent to ABB for their replication purposes. Some years after their tests, they contacted me and asked what they were to do with that box.

Why were the October 2002 Quantum COP>17 experimental components knowing and willfully hidden from the Open Source Community after July 07, 2009 ??

    1) It's not a COP>17 device
    2) It's being hidden because of "errors" in the Quantum article electronic diagram, electrical calculations and recorded data
    3) It's being hidden because of Intellectual Property Rights of Rosemary Ainslie, Investors or others involved in South Africa
    4) It's being hidden because of a requirement for a 100% "Independent" verification of any experimental device close to the self authored October 2002 Quantum article context or content for a self serving Academic thesis paper
    5) Secret hidden alternative motives
    6) ??

    TAKE YOUR PICK - 1 through 6 ( or all )

Again, some would try to lead you in belief of destroying, dismantling or even loosing a incredible device components that has a COP>17 ..... who in their right mind would do something as stupid as this,  especially anytime "AFTER" the date of July 07, 2009 of the Open Source posting ....


.


And mine requires an answer.  Yours certainly does not.

.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #128 on: November 02, 2010, 12:35:23 AM »
Guys,

This is where I beg out.  What's now being attempted is done in the forlorn hope that so much repetition will force my unhappy insights off the thread - and into oblivion.  LOL.  Anyway guys.  I'll spare you all another repetition of my own.  He's still asking those same questions which answers he's now trying to hide from the page.

LOL
Rosemary.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #128 on: November 02, 2010, 12:35:23 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #129 on: November 02, 2010, 02:37:52 AM »

Regarding #4 Has anyone found a difference between Her Thesis and Ed's Thesis?

(http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7929.msg262502#msg262502)

 ::)
Truthbeknown
J.

Sit down with a cuppy and see what you think.....

J.


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #130 on: November 02, 2010, 08:04:08 AM »
Sit down with a cuppy and see what you think.....

J.

LOL.  I have NEVER heard of a cuppy?  Tried looking it up and apparently it's definition is 'shaped like a cup'.  Perhaps J. who is edging ever nearer to the truth of this identity  :o  - I think?  is also rather confused with idiomatic English.  I believe the term you are looking for is 'cuppa'.  And only you would recommend that our readers here sit down with a cup of tea or even a double gin and tonic - to consider anything as facile and vacuuous as your 'self quoted' nonsense.  But again.  Dear readers - if there are any at all who follow this appalling thread - I am delighted, flattered beyond belief, intrigued, happy to be associated with Leedskalnins work in any context at all.  And I must thank Truthbeknown for this constant association.

It seems there is some benefit after all in his inabiity to vary either his posts or his confusions.  LOL. 

Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #130 on: November 02, 2010, 08:04:08 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Harvey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #131 on: November 02, 2010, 08:18:30 AM »
Hi All,

My prior posts in this thread have dealt primarily with the truthful and accurate historical events related to Glen's work and Rosemary's attempts at attaching her flavor of Leedskalnin's thesis to that work in post during the writing of the defunct and rejected paper she now passes off as "For Peer Review" illegally on Scribd by including the IEEE logo and watermark without written permission from IEEE and all authors as required.

However, this thread is a NEWS thread, not a history thread. Therefore an ALL CALL for data is issued for any and all OPEN SOURCE replicators working on this circuit to post their results and make them available for us all to benefit from, as Glen has.

I openly request that Rosemary and her team fall in line here and post their data and results along with all supporting documentation. To date, we have nothing from them even though their testing has been ongoing from before Glen's and continues after Glen's. The original claimed accreditation appears to be bogus with no substantiating documentation and my private contact with ABB said he he has worked there over 20 years in the department responsible for such testing and never heard of Rosemary Ainslie. So I don't know what to think. How can she continue to boast OPEN SOURCE when she withholds EVERYTHING? Even her original Quantum stuff was full of errors. The resistor was wrong, the circuit was wrong, the capacitors in the circuit were wrong etc. And the data collection was done by her with crude equipment and was not even charted correctly - the time frames in her chart are incorrect and it went to print that way. CLEARLY, we need NEW data and information from her team if she intends to keep boasting open source.

To that end, as of right now, the only person I am aware of that is currently active in testing this circuit is Gad. And as a point of current NEWS he has posted his preliminary results in comparing the energy of his batteries to the heat dissipated in the calorimeter. Here is the link:

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits-5.html#post114690

I know Rosemary keeps letting her ego and her thesis get in the way of making progress here, but we need to set those two things aside and move forward toward trying to prove the COP>17 claim. Without that proof, the thesis is defunct. With that proof, the thesis is at best a consideration of ONE of the possible explanations for the energy, if it truly exists as claimed. I have been one of the few most intimately associated with the workings of this circuit and as of yet I still await definitive proof of anything over unity.

I don't harbor any malice toward Rosemary even in the face of all her abuse and unsubstantiated attacks. I've simply learned to accept that she is who she is and I have learned to ignore her in that regard as I would any other Super-Troll. She has one goal in this thread and that is to bury Glens requests for answers under pages of rhetoric. She certainly has mastered that art as can be seen in all of her threads. So if you see a flurry of posts from her, simply go back to the beginning of the flurry and see what's she's trying to bury there and ask yourself why.

===============

Gad, if your reading here too - keep up the good work. We are hopeful that the increased voltage will get us into the same result range that Glen has shown.

Respectfully,

Harvey

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #132 on: November 02, 2010, 10:02:47 AM »
There seems to be some confusion here.  Apparently there is now a call for NEWS - where I rather think the two of you were obsessively centred on HISTORY and, in truth - a re-write of history. 

If you want news then you must solicit that from the members here.  I have NO intention of posting any of our results on this thread - EVER.  Alternatively you will need to show us some of your own tests.  LOL.  It all seems to have come to a grinding halt.  We, on the other hand are forging ahead - delayed for these last few weeks because of Student exams.  What exactly are either you or Glen doing here?  Apart from giving Gad the BAD advice that proliferates on your own thread at EF.Com?

And Harvey - it was you and Truthbeknown aka 'J'  who lapsed into that absurd treatise on the thesis and your own particular account of the 'effects' based as they are on POSITRONS.  LOL.  And I think it was and is Glen who not only initiated this thread but has monopolised it with his tediously long list of unsubstantiated allegations in blocked links - lest the truth in fact be known.  So.  To try, retrospectively to assert another theme on this parody is somewhat unilateral and entirely off topic. Certainly it was and is NOTHING to do with NEWS.  Indeed.  It's all 'old hat' and is boring us all with its repetition.

Rosemary

BTW here is that LINK
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

I am looking forward to your denial of your claims and involvement in this paper - that I can prove you the liar that you are.  I believe, if you look at this text - there was NEVER ANY QUESTION AS TO THE EFFICACY OF THE TECHNOLOGY NOR THE RESULTS THAT YOU YOURSELF DETERMINED.  There is nothing you can do that will effectively rewrite this history nor alter these results - albeit that they rather conflict with your current agenda.  Your hope, like Glen's was that Scribd would believe your claims that Glen held SOLE COPYRIGHT.  What a joke.

ADDED
« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 10:24:12 AM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #133 on: November 02, 2010, 12:09:08 PM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

As you all can see in every one of Rosemary's reply's the immediate responses to other members postings, 99% of the time quick attacks or misrepresentations and allegations of everyone else's imagined wrong doing.

Rosemary's "OWN QUOTED WORDS" from a Energetic Forum post #551 http://www.energeticforum.com/60279-post511.html  on July 13, 2009

Quote
witsend
Senior Member
        
Joit - is your waveform proving TinselKoala's point? Is that 555 switch wrongly presented? To me it looks like it is. In which case, I must apologise to all concerned. Clearly the Quantum article was wrong.

So, to all concerned - to everyone who built the circuit as presented in that article, and if, indeed, it is wrong, my abject apologies. I had a shrewd idea it may have been wrong because, thinking back, a university professor kindly edited the quantum paper prior to presenting it to the IET. And his first recommendation was that we omitted a detailed circuit of the 555 switch as being irrelevant to the claim. Which is why I was reluctant to endorse the Quantum article as being a correct presentation. I just wish, in retrospect, that he had pointed out the error if he had seen such. In any event, it seems that I have been entirely at fault. My own objection to it was due to the lack of the feedback diode - which was the entire subject of the exercise. I knew it was in the apparatus. It certainly was not in diagram.

I would point out though, that my reluctance to admit this prior to ascertaining the fact was due to the person who presented that diagram and assisted me in that first article. He is a good friend and he, like all of us, was 'giving' his time. I was not keen therefore to expose the problem unless I also knew it was a problem. So, if you're reading this, don't even worry. In any event, the blame was not his. I should, at least, have had the circuit vetted - considering my own inability to read such.

So. Many apologies, even to TinselKoala and anyone in the entire world who duplicated that circuit. It is wrongly presented. I am sincerely sorry that I have wasted so much of your time. And Joit - you've put the question to bed. I would be very glad to refund you for your time and trouble - if required - and if I can get the money to you with our exchange control. Just send me an account on the PM system. You've done a very good thing here.

What I do assure you all is this. The switch may have been wrongly drawn. Our own duty cycle application is NOT. I have the experimental apparatus available and it has been checked by EE's even at universities. We have also, over the years, built many different 555 switches and by different people. And there are replicated experiments by others using nothing but a functions generator. And all this prior to publication. More to the point is that the battery duration is consistent with measurements based on the duty cycle. But, in point of fact, after publication I never experimented again for a period of 7 years and I certainly never even looked at the article again. The only reason I could scan a copy for the blog when I eventually did this, was because my children kept a copy of the original publication. I was just so dejected at the entire lack of interest it seemed to generate. I had no idea that the test would really ever be duplicated.

Therefore, please take this admission as a sincere apology to all those who have tried to build the switch according to the quantum article. I see that the Quantum article was the primary reference point as the IET paper was only posted to the blog after July. It seems that Ramset and TinselKoala started their thread on OU.COM in mid June. Unfortunate. But there you are. Sorry guys - It's all I can say.

Rosemary Ainslie has been withholding "EVERYTHING" knowing and willfully has hidden it from the Open Source Community


I also will add as per Rosemary Ainslie's Quote .... it has been checked by EE's   even at universities http://www.energeticforum.com/60279-post511.html   ( July, 13 2009 ) ....


And why after fourteen days or two weeks of possession of the new oscilloscope not one scope wave form image or test data file has been publicly released yet of "anything" related to the experimental device "nothing" at all ??


and it has been checked by EE's .....Why is the Testing and evaluation being done by "STUDENTS and not EE's  ??  , or at least someone experienced in data collection and where is the testing and evaluation documentation all the EE's did ??


even at universities ....... which Universities ?? and where is there testing and evaluation documentation of the experimental device from these Universities ??


Why is the new testing and evaluation being done with a inferior "LECROY" 300 series oscilloscope and not something better than the Tektronix TDS 3054C used in Tests #1 through Test #16 and the Tektronix DPO 3054 used on Tests #17 through Tests #22 in my tests. The unit you propose to use has half the accuracy and data capturing ability's.


ANY ALLEGATIONS FROM ROSEMARY AINSLIE MUST HAVE "PROOF" FROM PM's, E-MAILS OR OPEN SOURCE FORUM POSTING "LINKS" - IF SHE DOESN'T HAVE "PROOF" THERE LIES AND FABRICATIONS AND WILL NOT BE ANSWERED

.

« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 12:31:24 PM by fuzzytomcat »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #134 on: November 02, 2010, 06:07:58 PM »
Guys,

This is my last post on this thread.  It is utterly distasteful to even read here - let alone comment.

For any who need to be reminded - bear in mind that Glen has a paper published on Scribd that attests - unequivocally - to a COP>7. And Harvey, who actively tried to sabotage that paper - was personally responsible for writing two entire sections of it's total of 7 - I think it is.  Under normal circumstances one does not collaborate in the submission of a paper without first being fully conversant with the facts in that paper.  One is expected, at the very least, to stand up in support of the experimental findings and their conclusions.  That Harvey assumes the right to deny his earlier attestations - is because Harvey has absolutely no accreditation.  If he were more familiar with academic protocol he would have known this.  And, without this knowledge, he has NO IDEA of the damage that he's done to his scientific credibility - amongst those many academics and experts who are fully aware of this half-witted vacillation.  It's the ultimate scientific 'no no'.  A kind of scientific heresy.  Just MUST NOT BE DONE.  One does not, as a rule, submit a paper and then deny the context of that paper.  It's tantamount to a public declaration of deceit.

Not only did he submit the paper - thereby attesting to the accuracy of those experimental results,  but he did so 'posing' as 'first author'.  This drew the immediate attention of those editorial staff whose concerns are ALWAYS that first author submit or appoint the submission's author.  And no-one had appointed Harvey.  Therefore did they refer it back to me.   Yet more evidence of how little he understands about the protocols related to the submission of papers.  Any such efforts are seen as FRAUDULENT and, indeed, Harvey here committed fraud.

But here's the point.  There is NO WAY that those experimental results can retrospectively be denied unless the method of extrapolating the data was deliberately and fraudulently managed.  In as much as you CANNOT fake the data from that Tektronix - then you may all rest happy that the results were EXACTLY as that data showed.  The evidence that they howl for is available.  It's just no longer easily referenced due to Glen's interventions.

Niether Harvey nor Glen seem to know how to conduct themselves professionally.  And I have been advised that by even commenting on this thread I am doing myself and my good name no good at all.  The time has therefore come when I must entirely divorce myself from this sad initiative.  Let them both do their damndest.   So.  I'm out of here.  If their nonsense becomes too patently nonsense then I'll refute it on my own thread.  That, at least, is still being followed by people of discernment. 

I only ask that you keep the knowledge of that COP>7 near and close to your hearts. Just know that the EVIDENCE of breaching those unity barriers has been conclusively achieved however loudly or sadly they retrospectively deny this.  And whatever they have to say in their attempts at damaging my good name - it's irrelevant.  Only those test results matter.  Do NOT let them convince you that they are faulted.  I assure you that it is entirely due to those results that we have been able to get access to campus to develop this technology further.  For that I have Glen's efforts to thank.  But that's precisely where my thanks begin and end.  It is my considered opinion that he is a scoundrel second only to Harvey in lack of principle, manners, good taste, moderation or honesty.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary   

And just as a final reminder - you may want to read here - my faithful account of my association with a troll - or, in fact, a super troll.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33937867/IF-I-WAS-A-TROLL
« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 07:08:48 PM by Rosemary Ainslie »

 

OneLink