Why CO2?

Beside the obvious petroleum lobby behing this false witch hunt, the "People of the stars" those who can predict the cataclism time by looking at the planets alignment (Venus), those who survived previous God jugments by hidding in the mountains, Who stole all the richness, technologies and the gold of the previous ages.

Those elites knows and the bible tells us that all the volcans will all errupt at the same time, ash and darkness will cover everything for weeks, know imagine the amount of CO2 that will be spout on earth, it will take years and decades for the vegetation to absorbs the concentration of CO2. Humans cannot survive at high level of CO2 concentration, Plants can.

Even if, by God will, we, good people, survive the cataclism, we probably will die by lack of oxygen.

But the pedophiles elites in their Bunker under the 2012 (Zion) London Olympic infrastructure will use the CO2 capturing and processing technologies to accelerate the elimination of the deadly CO2 concentration.

So the CO2 scam economy and technologies is for them after the "claimed UFO" cataclysm

You are already dead, what are you gonna do about it?

The fact the Noah ark wend up on the top of a mountain, helped the survivers to breathe higher level of O2.

When massive front of volcanic CO2 is coming down on you there is little you can do, Mamouth were found in siberia frozen with undigested food in their stomach, victim of asphexia.

CO2 is an heavy gas who will alway come down at ground level and push the Oxigen up.

Noah was high enaugh that his O2 level was enaugh to sustain life.

Anything below will be have to deal with deadly Volcanic CO2 level.

%60 of volcanic product is CO2, the only way Earth found to get rid of it is photosyntesis but it takes SUN and time

The stories told by the Sumerians ar far older than the young bible, telling us about the cycle of the Nibiru system
passing Earth every 2148 years and creating a cataclysm every other time.

Last Flood was 4296 years ago, and now it may be time again for the great Flood, as so many times before.

So it may not be your illusion of the son of god standing in front of you, but the great Annunaki, our real Creators with their elongated skulls grinning down at you.

Time will tell.

The tilt of the axis remains constant at 23.444475 degrees, but the direction in which the axis points changes by 50.2619^o annually.   This change in the direction of the axis causes the Earth to loose one sidereal day every 70.401 years, or in other words 1,223.898 seconds every year. Furthermore, it can be calculated from this that one sidereal year is lost every 25,784.93 years.

The change of 50.2619^o in the direction of the tilt of the Earth's axis corresponds to 1,223 seconds of time, and this is precisely the difference between the sidereal and tropical years (Sidereal year = 31,558,149 seconds and a Tropical year = 31,556,926 seconds)

With this data we can now ascertain the true orbit of the Earth.  At the time of the summer solstice the Sun climbs at zenith to 23^o 26^o 494^o, but at the time of the winter solstice it climbs to 23^o 26^o 498^o in the southern hemisphere; a difference of 0.4^o. This figure then is the difference in the elevation of the Sun every time the direction of the tilt varies by 50.2619^o.

A difference of 0.4^o in the Sun's position would amount to 0.8^o at a point on the opposite side of the Earth's orbit, since the Sun lies at the centre of the orbit.  From this we can see that the relationship between the variation in the axial rotation and the orbital revolution of the Earth is, 50.2619^o divided by 0.8^o = 62.82737.  This means the Earth's revolution is 62.82737 times greater than its axial rotation.

The Earth makes up for the precession that is brought about by the 50.2619^o variation in the direction of axial tilt in 1,223 seconds.  This is the same amount of time that its revolution in orbit takes to balance out the 0.4" variation in the Sun's elevation, which in turn amounts to 0.8" across the whole diameter of the orbit. So 50.2619 is the figure relative to axial rotation and 0.8 to orbital revolution, which means there are over sixty-two periods of rotation for every one of revolution.

Strictly speaking there is no such thing as a precession of 1,223 seconds. It is an effect that can be explained when one knows more about it. The Earth, in common with the whole of the solar system, takes a spiral course through space. This is a retrograde spiral movement, with the Sun at its centre. The Earth revolving in one direction makes a spiral in the opposite direction.  I'm attaching an illustration of this.  Now this whole retrograde spiral itself moves in a circle through space, and at the end of every year it cuts across the circumference of this circle slightly earlier than in the preceding year, to be exact 1,223 seconds prior to the completion of the sidereal year.

As the Equator of the Earth lies at an angle of 23 degrees to the Sun, the retrograde movement of the Earth will cause the light of the Sun to reach the Equator 1,223 seconds before the Earth itself crosses this circumference. The annual rate of precession is 50.2619^o on this spiral, means it takes the Earth 25,784.93 years to complete a whole cycle.  The imaginary line that the spiral movement describes in space lies at right angles to the inclination. Since it contains the greater land mass, the North Pole is thrown slightly off balance by the resultant centrifugal force and moves to the outside of the spiral track, whereas the South Pole, with the lesser land mass, moves to the inside of the track.

So the annual precession is not strictly speaking a displacement, but rather the direction the spiral follows, or a tendency of the poles to move under the unbalanced action of the differing centrifugal force at the two poles. This tendency throws one pole to the outside of the spiral track and pulls the other to the inside of it, this in turn causes the Equator to alter its position in relation to the Sun, without any alteration in the angle of the axial inclination itself.

At the moment there is not an actual variation in the axial inclination, but it could happen, and that would be a catastrophe, the like of which we have never witnessed in modern times.  It has happened in the course of the Earth's history, and many lands vanished to the bottom of the oceans.

Behold the wisdom of God, who protects the planets close to the Sun by giving them a cloak of dense atmosphere and ether, and gives those distant ones, whose speed of revolution is low, a thin covering.

GB

Be that as it "may".....the facts are: the moon is north of it's former limit, we have perplexing tides, increasing rogue waves, rougher seas, tsunami and earthquakes...and the sun now rises and sets MUCH further north in summer and south in winter and at angles far shallower than in years before the Great Tsunami of 2004.  A change in earth's orbtial plane would account for some of these observations.  There is no shortage of Chemtrail spraying to obfuscate some of these events.  Alot of spraying on the horizon at sunup and sundown in recent years.  The rise and descent angles, and apparent traversing arcs of sun and moon have changed considerably.

http://axischange.wordpress.com/2007/08/09/earth%e2%80%99s-axis-has-changed-%e2%80%ba-create-new-post-%e2%80%94-wordpress/

http://sites.google.com/site/2012thebigwobble/nasa-spheres-updated

To those honest with themselves and studious enough to personally confirm these things, it is obvious that there is a virtual multimedia wide blackout of these things, as well as reports that meteorologists and other "professionals" must sign non-disclosure agreements regarding these truths, or be summarily dismissed.

Considering all the sources of information I have shared at this site and others, I am content that I have met my burden of proof that Luke 21:25-28 are undergoing fulfillment at this time.

Blessings in Yeshua, Jesus Christ

By having an unbalance in the melting of the ice-caps will cause a reduction in the mass at one pole and will affect the amount of centrifugal force developed, thus altering the inclination of the Earth's axis.  When this happens land will emerge from the Pacific Ocean, and from the North and South Atlantic.

The emergence of these new land masses will change the level of the oceans, causing flooding in the low-lying countries. The present course of ocean currents will also be changed, giving rise to very different conditions to those now prevailing.
                                                 
One change brings a number of others in its wake; even the biological conditions of life can be affected. The change in the mass at the North Pole will cause a reduction in the angle of inclination of the Earth's axis. It is the Earth's rotation that creates the centrifugal force that forms the continents. The present angle of 23 degree is responsible for the existence of the land masses in the northern hemisphere; if the angle of inclination is altered, then land masses will appear in other places, until the proper balance is restored. Some continents will re-appear the north of Russia, Greenland and the north of Canada will disappear.  Have you seen this happen yet?  NO!

The process would be slow until the North Pole reaches a high enough temperature to cause a widespread thaw, then it could happen in a night.  It will be brought home to us by a tremendous earthquake that will shake the Earth to its foundations. Cities will fall in ruins and great cracks will appear in the surface of the Earth. The effects will be catastrophic. By balancing off the radioactivity at the poles, so that there is an equal thaw at both the South and the North Poles will prevent any undue unbalance in the mass, and the Earth's spiral movement will remain unaffected. 

GB

With all due respect, none of what you have said here is "well proven".  Only wild speculation which is fine as far as it goes.

The moon is still in perfect alignment in my part of the world, for what that is worth.

If you truly believe this why are you here?  If you believe we only have days to live why not spend them with your loved ones and not on some forum?

Bill

The only disinfo agents are you guys saying the world ends tomorrow.  Again, if you believe this, why are you here?  hard science has the facts and the real numbers.  You guys are just making this up for who knows what reasons.

If it were true, you should be kissing your asses goodbye but no, you are here on your computer spouting this bs instead.  What a waste of your last days on earth.

If this were true, God would have told me.  But he didn't, so it isn't.  If your God told you this is true, he is just messing with you for fun.

Bill

Dont blame your ignorance and you blind faith on us, all the mythologies and ancient religion talks about what is going on today.
They were all paranoid with their solar clock and the postion of the sun at the equinoxes and the soltices, because it is writting everywhere that when it is no more "constant" the Earth will experiment a major cataclism.

Immanuel Velikovsky wrote extensively about it (in is book World in collision)and blame Venus and Mars previous cycle of destruction.
We could debate if it is the fact that the elypse is moved to enter too close to Venus or Mars or its because we are getting to close to the Sun that will generate the massive volcanic eruptions and the Earth rotation stop described in EVERY mythologies.

For my part I believe it is the next Venus Transit who will block us totaly from the Solar Wind, but we have to agree that this is the TIME and they know it since 3000bc when the first Venus observation was calculated.

Moses knew when to get out on solid rock, how did he knew??

Magic, no it was an alien for planet jhvjfnk

PS What hard science fact do you have? They are repeating Kepler 1650's mathematic formulas...anything more recent?