Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.  (Read 51399 times)

powerunlimited

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #75 on: July 11, 2010, 05:04:30 PM »
@Fatbird,I hope you don't believe that crap,he made everything up,the part about it blowing up is brilliant,SM is a spin master,a master of deception,he has a few idenities here,hes on here a few times a month to mislead and misdirect.My advice is don't believe
what SM says but try to look beyond what he says
he mixes truth and lies and its very hard to get at the truth.Anyone following what he says will simply go around in a circle and they have for years and will continue.As Jack Durban said SM is a fraud but the tpu is real.Also remember he sold the tpu rights before 911,in 1998
as far as the government is concerned its a crackpot device,if they thought it was real SM would be dead or locked up.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #76 on: July 11, 2010, 06:56:37 PM »
powerunlimited,  ditto what Chef asked and I'd also ask who you think on this forum is SM and how you would know this? 

 

powerunlimited

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #77 on: July 12, 2010, 07:08:26 AM »
How can you tell whos SM,you look at information on SM from people that knew him.
Jack Durban and Dave Doleshal,from Dave Doleshal, SM knows Tesla stuff backwards and forward,
Sm ,has tried in the past to do all kinds of things none worked,all of a sudden
 he comes up with something out of the blue.Jack Durban says that SM is greedy,and a liar
a kind of con man ,used to fake heart attacks and illness when an investor pressured him,
I agree with Jack Durban
,but very smart and conning,he thinks SM got a tpu built by someone else
and reversed engineered it,wrong ,I think its an accidental discovery.The person
thats SM here has been here since the original videos were posted,he knows tesla
as good as tesla himself,gives himself away by saying strange comments,that sound like
like Sm,I'm an observer I have watched these SM threads for  a while
I didn't think along these ways untill Jack Durban was here in 2008 And said this,
SM lies even when he doesn't need to.At that point I started to look at everything and everyone
closely
And everybody should too.I won't point out who SM is here, there are at least two idenities
maybe more,I don't believe the military is involved or he would be dead,or locked up
My point is don't believe everything that SM says or you will go around in a circle.
I believe that when SM sold the rights to the tpu, the company that bought
 the rights sold it to a company thats involved in energy, they saw this
 as a gigantic threat to them,no patients were taken out because ,its too easy to make and copy.
Everything would have been ok for SM except someone wanted to get back at SM and had copied
videos meant for investors and posted them,SM came to overunity to do damage control.
The video that Jack Durban got was a copy of an investor video he copied  when SM's boyfriend
left it in the lab where Jack Durban was at.I suspect that Jack Durban or SM's boyfriend
posted the original videos.I did a reverse speech on SM's videos in one video forward it says
something about dc voltage backwards it says ,"extremely easy to make".Reverse speech
can be used to see if a person is truthfull,
or has a hidden agenda.Everybody blurs out speech in reverse,its a tool,unfortunately
he didn't say anything on building a tpu.this video I believe is the last video before the tpu disappeared
around 1998,notice that he solved the heat problem with a heatksink,there never was a heat problem
also the orientation problem again no problem.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_jJExZ1mBE&feature=related

another clue that its an accidental discovery is this in 2008 SM told this to Jack Durban


"I don't know how it works only that it does".
If you want to add to the base of knowledge find a schematic of the tripp -lite inverter used in the video
and post it,SM had to modify the inverter to get it to work with the tpu,remember its hes word that its 5khz to 6khz
ac on dc output.The tripp-lite inverter in the video is from 1990 to 1998 this is a guess,it
was used for moble homes.Then work backwards how do you  modify an inverter to work on 120 to 170 volts,with a 5khz to 6khz ac hash
when its designed for 24 to 48 volt dc operation.The tpu could not handle a direct inductive load
that was one of its problems.SM worked alone
so nobody but him knows what was done to the inverter to get it to work with the tpu.


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #78 on: July 12, 2010, 09:07:16 AM »
Hello all,

@powerunlimited

sorry to say but what are you doing here? Why do you attac SM?? Sorry, I cant understand it. We are in a technical forum (I hope) and your posts are .....

For myself I can say that I dont care if SM is the devil in person (he is NOT) but he has something that I want:

                          a T P U

and only this counts for me.

And deeply in my heart I know that SM is not a bad guy. Somebody said that he is gay. So what!
That he is a excentric man. So what.
That he is a liar. So what.
That he has stolen the TPU. So what.
That he got millions. So what.
That he is here under another name ( welcome SM). So what if he is here?
That......

Enough of this crap.

Buj some wires and maybe wou will be able to figure out the TPU. If not, then stop to wright crap here or maybe somebody gives you money for your posts??

BUT NEVER FORGET: HE HAS THE TPU!! AND THE TPU IS REAL!!

Keep this always in your mind.

Otto




powerunlimited

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #79 on: July 12, 2010, 10:21:47 AM »
Well otto:
Your not in a technical forum,your in a hero worship forum,your hero is very smart,a super master of deception,a kind of con man,greedy,selfserving,hes gay not thats evil,you believe that he won't lie to you thats a big mistake.You must question everything,you must examine everything ,failure to do this makes a person a fool.
You must be like water, water takes the form of the container its in,its not set in a solid form. Oh, by the way you have talked to SM a few times,you just didn't know it was him,I monitor this forum all the time.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #80 on: July 12, 2010, 11:42:41 AM »
@powerunlimited

First I have to say that SM cant lie to me because my work is only mine and its a result of my little brain. and my 10 fingers.
But I dont see any logic: on one hand he wants that we build TPUs and on the other hand he would lie to us so we cant build TPUs.

Hmmmmm....no logic here.

I have started my work over 3 years ago and I knew that I have to learn, to build coils, TPUs and of course ask myself a lot of questions how and why....as Im really not a scientist a lot of times I cant explain myself whats goin on in my coils but that doesnt mean that I have to stop my work. So, if SM doent exactly know how his TPU works (I doubt) it doesnt matter. One day, when the TPU is finnished, others will figure out how the TPU exactly works. Hmmm....maybe.

Yes, I know and I supposed that I have talked to SM. What a honour for me!!!

Maybe one day SM is able to post his story, about himself and the TPU. If not, its not a disaster for me. I have accepted his "story" like Lindsay posted it and thats more then enough for me.

So, my advice to all people is that nobody should waste his time with wrighting a lot of stuff here about SM but try to build some coils and finally start to learn because its soooooo a nice "job".

Otto


teslaalset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #81 on: July 12, 2010, 12:25:39 PM »
Oh, by the way you have talked to SM a few times,you just didn't know it was him,I monitor this forum all the time.

What, in your opinion, is the purpose of SM to be be active here in this forum?

zapnic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #82 on: July 12, 2010, 12:37:27 PM »
okey i gonna say stupid things :P
gravity ???
oregon vortex will messup gravity why?
 
if object is heavier and lighter in nice rhythm so "washboard?"
and ed leedskaln was funny man?

powerunlimited

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #83 on: July 12, 2010, 01:21:46 PM »
@otto if building a tpu by your own hands makes you feel good thats fine,but if its not built
 exactly as SM's tpu
 there will be no overunity power generated.

@teslaalset SM's purpose here is to make sure no one ever
 figures out how to build a working tpu,to mislead and misdirect.The release of the investor tpu videos were
the thing that brought him here.

The reason is simple, money,he gets a monthly amount I believe,the deal he made ends the moment
someone builds a tpu.There is a small chance that hes under a death threat
if someone builds a tpu that works it maybe assumed by the powers that be,that
he told that person information how to build it
then he dies.A real free energy device that works and that is simple to build
would be impossible to stop,the oil market would be destroyed overnight.
The majority of  oil is used in transportation,
a tpu powering an electric car would make oil worthless,along with coal,natural gas
solar,windmills and nuclear, every energy market would go under.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #84 on: July 12, 2010, 01:27:17 PM »
    Sm said in the beginning it would replace all current battery technology and it was not a free energy device.  This indicates to me that it is a power storage device.  Or an accumulator.  If he was able to charge his tpu prior to any demonstrations then what we see demonstrated is a discharge.  The weight to power ratio appears to be in conformity with electrochemical accumulators and perhaps even higher.  We have no idea how long it will be before the unit has to be recharged. 

teslaalset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #85 on: July 12, 2010, 02:03:03 PM »
The reason is simple, money,he gets a monthly amount I believe,the deal he made ends the moment
someone builds a tpu.

Those are your personal fictions.
The level of knowledge of some people in this forum should not be underestimated. If SM is threatened by powerful organizations they better hire professional people to disturb discussions here with at least EE level knowledge, not by threatening SM himself. So, in my opinion the so-called anti-SM posting can be from anybody but SM as well.

Introducing all kinds of conspiracy theories is a waste of effort.
They may be right, they may be wrong.
It will not stop enthusiasts from investigating. It's the best way to move forward, otherwise we would still live in caves. ;)

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #86 on: July 13, 2010, 11:19:20 AM »
Hi,

I hope this is not offtopic.

I read the pdf from otto&roberto on their TPU==ECD experiments.

Thats very nice - but their story how the mosfet emitts whatever is pretty mindboggling.

What really happens (and I´ve seen this on my bench quite often) is a power matching caused by thermal increase of the mosfet output resistance.

This mosfet is driving somewhat lc oscillator circuit (c is parasitic coil capacitance).
If the mosfet temperature rises (because connected L has quite low resistance) the output resistance of the mosfet increases (which even accelerates) the heating up.

As we know from rf - the optimum power transfer happens if the source impedance matches the load impedance.
As long as the mosfet is cold and the output impedance is low - it dampens the connected lc load.
On heating up the output resistance finally matches the load impedance - so what we see is thermal biasing.
Now the connected lc circuit gets pumped - and its even possible that the mosfet can cool down now - if it drops in an parallel resonance. This would even explain why the mosfet is in the end less cold than the attached cooler  - because warming up is only necessary to start this.



penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #87 on: July 13, 2010, 11:48:41 AM »
@all

Actually already posted in BLOCH WALL thread but thought I would post here as well.


I was searching youtube for TPU replications and came across this comment posted
to this video -

TPU V1.0 Experiments (Part 1)


"
JackDurban
2 years ago I worked with Steven Mark. The magnet was a ruse. It closed a reed switch in the primary. Steven thought it would throw off analysis of snooping eyes during demos. He was the most paranoid person I ever met. By the way, if you want a little hint as to the device's basic make up and why it acted like a gyro in its resistance to motion pull Tesla's patent 381,970 circa 1888. Study the quadrature nature of the coils and disregard the rest. From there ask yourself why the specific resonant freq.
JackDurban 2 years ago see all
Video Responses"


Regards, Penno

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #88 on: July 15, 2010, 07:43:45 AM »
@fritz
   In the end is the mosfet cooler than the heat sink?  I was checking out rf currents in a fluresecent bulb trying to get a standing wave in the bulb to see if it would light it up.  I was getting some moderate success but the transmitter was overheating with reflected signal.  I terminated the antennae with a glass of water that I figured would add capacitance to the antennae and sure enough the lamp lit really well and transmitter cooled down like it wasnt even keyed.  The bulb was lit way above the 4watt expectations and the antennae was putting out enough so that the modulation was busting into my kids guitar amp upstairs.  I dont know if it was overunity or not but it was a great way to light a bulb not using any filament.  I figured the bulb would run until the transistors wore out.   It produced signal also.  You could see yourself talk with intensity changes in the bulb.  I was thinking this would be great for deaf people.  They could see other people talk without lip reading.

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #89 on: July 15, 2010, 01:13:45 PM »
@fritz
   In the end is the mosfet cooler than the heat sink?
in the end - well - is there an end ?
If there is an "end" means power dissipation of mosfet constant, temperatures constant, environment constant in the "end" - mosfet temperature and heatsink temperature should be identical.
I just speculated that there is thermal event or even thermal oscillation - which could cause different, variable heat.