Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Joule Thief 101  (Read 944129 times)

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1620 on: April 09, 2016, 04:22:21 PM »

So in regards to my question on the schematic,where the secondary was open, and associated scope shot,TKs reply is correct.


Tinman,

Had you stated this a bit sooner, you might have spared us several pages of EMJ's "attitude"...

PW

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1621 on: April 09, 2016, 04:25:09 PM »

Bill, are you seeing this:


Tinman,

Had you stated this a bit sooner, you might have spared us several pages of EMJ's "attitude"...

PW


Hahahaha Pulling ya leg PW. How's about you drop the attitude please ;) Hahahaha still Pulling ya leg PW.

P.S: Its not anything to do with Tinman, its what TK stated and how it was said! Sorry but its true.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1622 on: April 09, 2016, 04:27:59 PM »

Bill, are you seeing this:



Hahahaha Pulling ya leg PW. How's about you drop the attitude please ;) Hahahaha still Pulling ya leg PW.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

case in point...

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1623 on: April 09, 2016, 04:31:15 PM »
case in point...


Hey Old Mate, seem to remember you having a bit of a stand for truth just recently also!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1624 on: April 09, 2016, 04:34:42 PM »

Hey Old Mate, seem to remember you having a bit of a stand for truth just recently also!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Curious...

So, will you be apologizing to TK for all that "attitude" you dished out?

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1625 on: April 09, 2016, 04:36:54 PM »
Curious...

So, will you be apologizing to TK for all that "attitude" you dished out?


Absolutely Not!!!

TK was wrong in what he said and did not correct himself in anyway. PW, you yourself know, Voltage to Current Phase Angle is nothing to do with EMF and Electromagnetic Induction! I am specifically referring to Tinman's Circuit and Mutual Coupling of general Transformer Tech, which I feel I shouldnt have to explain but I am anyway.

If TK corrects himself, then, yes I will appologise.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1626 on: April 09, 2016, 04:40:33 PM »
Tinman,

Had you stated this a bit sooner, you might have spared us several pages of EMJ's "attitude"...

PW

The reason i said nothing,was because i was waiting on minnie's reply/answer,as he is the one that stated i needed to learn more on induction. As it turned out,he did not answer at all.

I think everyone can show some attitude when two people start to disagree on things they firmly believe in.


Brad.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1627 on: April 09, 2016, 04:43:48 PM »

Absolutely Not!!!

TK was wrong in what he said and did not correct himself in anyway. PW, you yourself know, Voltage to Current Phase Angle is nothing to do with EMF and Electromagnetic Induction!

If TK corrects himself, then, yes I will appologise.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Well we should straighten this out.

Chris--what was it that TK said that was wrong,in regards to my posted question based around the supplied schematic,scope probe point's,and associated scope shot ?.


Brad

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1628 on: April 09, 2016, 04:53:54 PM »
Well we should straighten this out.

Chris--what was it that TK said that was wrong,in regards to my posted question based around the supplied schematic,scope probe point's,and associated scope shot ?.


Brad


Brad, this quote is wrong:


Brad, your scope shot shows the expected 90 degree phase difference as predicted by Faraday's Law:
 

Faradays Law predicts no such thing!!!

Again, E.M.F = -N dϕ/dt

The (-) sign is 180 Degrees, not 90 Degrees. He infered your Current and Voltage were the same.

See attached Image:

Mate, I am only standing for this because its wrong, its not right we let others learning, see these errors and believe them to be fact.

PW, Brad, others, I am sorry but its true, errors should be corrected!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1629 on: April 09, 2016, 05:14:21 PM »



Yup, you shouldnt have asked :) - You got me started again.

How about we move on now.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1630 on: April 09, 2016, 05:23:54 PM »
Hey good to see the same old NeoCIA spokespersons plugging away.

say Brad what is this other forum can someone link me?

good recently video re resonance by the way.

just keep experimenting (as you do )  when you are bored come chat with the NeoCIA guys.

(that's generally what i do, after all they are just doing their job )

Well, that completes the picture, sort of like a last-minute appearance of a kitchen sink.  It's a PTB/MIB inverse bogeyman here to make all the children scared and keep a light on when they go to sleep.

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1631 on: April 09, 2016, 05:52:03 PM »
The reason i said nothing,was because i was waiting on minnie's reply/answer,as he is the one that stated i needed to learn more on induction. As it turned out,he did not answer at all.

I think everyone can show some attitude when two people start to disagree on things they firmly believe in.


Brad.



MileHigh is remarkably silent on this subject also!!! Unusally so!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

digitalindustry

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1632 on: April 09, 2016, 06:14:18 PM »
Well, that completes the picture, sort of like a last-minute appearance of a kitchen sink.  It's a PTB/MIB inverse bogeyman here to make all the children scared and keep a light on when they go to sleep.

;' (

dry those tears.

: D

ever had 'Sleep paralysis' ? (speaking of lights )

if so, you need TM Joule thief circuit.. i just watch a video where reducing the base resistance was definite giving more light.


that will keep those dark men away !

wistiti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1633 on: April 09, 2016, 10:22:13 PM »
... Childish competition....

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1634 on: April 09, 2016, 10:41:13 PM »



 You've hit the nail on the head wistiti!
           John.