Author Topic: New invention of motion less generation of electric power (Read 350976 times)

winsonali · « **Reply #405 on:** November 22, 2009, 09:44:21 PM »

gyluasun:

in my experiments i have got these results
2 magnets in series means single magnet of the same strength as single one just the length is increased
adding 2 batteries of 6 volts and 12 volts you are right we need to protect the low voltage battery from over charging

in new devices various channels are operating producing different voltages we need to collect all spikes and produce collective energy.

forest · « **Reply #406 on:** November 22, 2009, 10:11:06 PM »

seems that if on primary side we do not use all energy which is there then when secondary is loaded that hidden energy contradicts power on secondary - Lenz law
when we use all energy available in primary - both electric and magnetic part converting to one kind then on clever made secondary we can multiply primary power many times

i'm not sure about that but it seems quite possible that electric power has both magnetic and electric components and both are equal and opposite exactly like Don Smith states
the key is to move both components from primary to secondary and secondary becomes a disruption of ambient field which respond to equal power all around which can be collected in multiply

gyulasun · « **Reply #407 on:** November 22, 2009, 11:01:52 PM »

Quote from: winsonali on November 22, 2009, 09:44:21 PM

gyluasun:

in my experiments i have got these results
2 magnets in series means single magnet of the same strength as single one just the length is increased
adding 2 batteries of 6 volts and 12 volts you are right we need to protect the low voltage battery from over charging

in new devices various channels are operating producing different voltages we need to collect all spikes and produce collective energy.

Ok on your series magnets, I can accept that because personally I have not tested it (only the parallel case), sorry for this, and I answered what I read on different forums, probably those writing the double flux for the series case did not test it correctly before or were mistaken.
I can imagine though that the flux of two seriesly joined magnets may become a little more concentrated at the ends but this multiplier cannot be the double value of one magnet but a value between 1 to 1.4 maybe.

rgds, Gyula

winsonali · « **Reply #408 on:** November 22, 2009, 11:16:45 PM »

FOREST:

Quote

'm not sure about that but it seems quite possible that electric power has both magnetic and electric components and both are equal and opposite exactly like Don Smith states

you are right electric power have both component magnetic properties and electrical but they are not opposite to each other

copper is not attracted towards magnet, make a coil and supply power to it without any core inside coil ,you will see it will show magnetic property by attracting iron pcs
on the other hand take a magnet pure and check with you multi meter you will find high resistance in magnet although it is made up of iron.

magnetic and electric charges are not opposite to each other
please check the voltages produce when you move a magnet over the coil you will find they start as magnet move towards the coil and finishes as magnet go away from coil, if they were opposite they should behave vice versa

jan.kolar · « **Reply #409 on:** November 23, 2009, 09:25:19 AM »

I see that this thread is leading nowhere. Ali, how can you talk about magnetic charges? No one has ever seen magnetic monopole and according to classic electrodynamical theory they dont exist. If you discovered magnetic monopole then you deserve Nobel prize. But more probable you dont know what you are talking about. Have you ever seen Maxwell equations?

winsonali · « **Reply #410 on:** November 23, 2009, 03:21:47 PM »

i have no idea about monopole and how it could be useful
more light on this subject will be an addition in my knowledge base

winsonali · « **Reply #411 on:** November 23, 2009, 04:41:47 PM »

The cavity magnetron is a high-powered vacuum tube that generates microwaves using the interaction of a stream of electrons with a magnetic field.
The magnetron is a fairly efficient device. once they are released in passive environment its up to us how many multiple channels we create to receive energy, just like in a radio station number of receiver are not limited they follow I^2 R formula for there intensity
i have already developed method for collection of energy from spikes of short intervals.

No body thinks out of the box everybody is going toward conventional method this is the new method i have developed and will shortly show the video, these postings are my proof of this method invented by me
we are courageous enough that we are doing some thing beside lip service and we are doing at our cost if its a failure is mine but success every one will enjoy.

forest · « **Reply #412 on:** November 23, 2009, 06:01:20 PM »

Tesla invented a method to convert flyback kicks into continuous current of high frequency in 1895.
Looks like you have something similar to what Steven Mark found investigating Tesla method. Acceleration of electrons.

winsonali · « **Reply #413 on:** November 23, 2009, 07:49:53 PM »

Tesla did show energy transfer, his highest achievement was understanding frequency and methods of resonance

Tesla did his work and showed transfer of energy, last bit to collect and reuse energy is still missing, may be deliberately and his lab was put at fire,

i am developing methods to harness energy from spikes in channels of one to many format(1 source many collectors), here we need to understand passive mediums and active mediums

analogy and example of my method if a radio walkie talkie transmit signal at 5 watt in vhf band it can be received in an area of 1km
now its intensity is limited by area not number of receivers you can have 100s of receivers in that area and everyone will receive equal signal

this example is not good for heating system coz heat does not travel on electromagnetic waves.

winsonali · « **Reply #414 on:** November 23, 2009, 08:41:18 PM »

forest:

i have just gone through Steven Mark TPU for the first time after you mention his name in your post
i couldn't go in details coz its a very long thread but by looking at the circuit diagram i want to give my opinion may be i am wrong

this is high frequency air core transformer with feed back and trying to collect BEMF directly through termination points.
this method will blow MOSFETs and will not give you stable results. this kind of circuit were usually used in transformer coupling radio amplifiers in valve ACDC radios.
in this method all activities are taking place in active zone i really don't know how well it have performed
with my experience you need controlled isolated passive zone for parallel processing of energy collectors.

forest · « **Reply #415 on:** November 23, 2009, 10:29:44 PM »

Quote from: winsonali on November 23, 2009, 08:41:18 PM

forest:

i have just gone through Steven Mark TPU for the first time after you mention his name in your post
i couldn't go in details coz its a very long thread but by looking at the circuit diagram i want to give my opinion may be i am wrong

this is high frequency air core transformer with feed back and trying to collect BEMF directly through termination points.
this method will blow MOSFETs and will not give you stable results. this kind of circuit were usually used in transformer coupling radio amplifiers in valve ACDC radios.
in this method all activities are taking place in active zone i really don't know how well it have performed
with my experience you need controlled isolated passive zone for parallel processing of energy collectors.

I think TPU is rather 1 to 3 active transmitters collecting and converting kicks into continuous current (Tesla method) and 1 to 3 passive receivers - curious transformers which really accelerate small DC bias enlarging current . The same for Hubbard coil , the same for Kapanadze device , the same for Don Smith one of devices, the same for Hendershot and many others. You are mislead thinking that Tesla didn't perfected the output conversion stage - he did it but never said plainly about it. His magnifying transmitter patent proves this.From here , extra coil become antenna but he was not sending EM waves but pure conduction current. Yet your comparison still apply - one transmitter many receivers.

winsonali · « **Reply #416 on:** November 23, 2009, 10:53:23 PM »

Forest:

thanks for explanation its very good this is why we say knowledge comes by discussion i was not knowing these things and devices of don smith or steven mark.....some times you stuck in some issues and going through the experiences of others you get good ideas

my method is totally different i am just writing firm ware for the final procedures
Tesla is my mentor.

gravityblock · « **Reply #417 on:** November 23, 2009, 11:50:03 PM »

Quote from: jan.kolar on November 23, 2009, 09:25:19 AM

I see that this thread is leading nowhere. Ali, how can you talk about magnetic charges? No one has ever seen magnetic monopole and according to classic electrodynamical theory they dont exist. If you discovered magnetic monopole then you deserve Nobel prize.

Magnetic monopoles detected in a real magnet for the first time, http://www.physorg.com/news171209923.html Also, according to the article they interact in the same way as electric charges.

There are several theories that predict the existence of monopoles. You must be holding to the classic electrodynamical theory of being correct and the other theories are wrong. How closed minded is this? LOL

In this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-dbGUcnFaI&feature=channel , you can see the magnetic monopoles when the lines of flux are disconnected from each other.

When the field lines are connected to each other then there is a return path which creates a dipole because it's connecting two poles. When they're not connected, then there is no return path for the flux, which is a monopole because it's only connected to a single pole. Without monopoles, you can't have a dipole. Monopoles carry the magnetic fields which creates a dipole. In the video you can see how the monopoles carry the magnetic fields. These monopoles are the "virtual photons" that physicists theorize about.

Read the article and study the video, then you will realize the article and video fit perfectly together.

GB

winsonali · « **Reply #418 on:** November 24, 2009, 02:43:16 AM »

gravityblock:
nice video and very informative article

in my experience when you move magnet over a coil its the speed of your movement that determine the voltage and current induced
in the coil Higher speed doesn't effect in any way the magnetic filed (nor it increase nor it decreases).
to get mechanical accuracy above 10,000RPM (150HZ) is pretty scary for a machine in continuous operation
the success is in solid state power generation

for this purpose EE must be released from its active zone to passive zone where it can move freely and then recaptured in active zones on multiple channels this will give us extra power generation then input

a very interesting behavior in SMPS we increase the switching frequency from 10 Khz to 300 Khz we get very good current rating and good supply but its not overunity coz it remains in active zone when we increase load on output secondary coil of transformer induce higher FLUX then primary coil at this moment primary coil start consuming more current to balance the power level this is an active zone
now if we lit a bulb of 100 watts the power remains same no matter how many things receive the light this is a passive zone
when a radio starts transmission at 5 watt its power doesn't change no matter how many receiver starts receiving the signal.

gravityblock · « **Reply #419 on:** November 24, 2009, 03:51:48 AM »

@ali:

I'm impressed how you don't let baseless or uninformed statements such as jan.kolar to re-direct your thoughts on what your observing in your experiments. Keep up the good work.

GB

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: New invention of motion less generation of electric power (Read 350976 times)

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

forest

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

gyulasun

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

jan.kolar

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

forest

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

forest

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

gravityblock

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

winsonali

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power

gravityblock

Re: New invention of motion less generation of electric power