Hi jimboot

i tried first the experiment with the bulb of my first testing where i got only plasma flash as per my previous video.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocPYYEv37g&list=UUi3fFZN1pwHTyM8H_nSxerg&feature=plcp

And with the Delamorto arrangement this same bulb's filament  glows as per normal electricity.

And i changed the bulb only for sake of  simplicity as i got a better bulb adaptor

No doubt Jim , the delamorto works very well

and last update     i disconnected the second wire of the bulb from the negative lead of the input and connected it to an antenna (around 10 meters of wire outside of my shop and it works too. than i connected the antenna to the negative and it was always better.  ouuchh 

That is to say that we are working in open circuitery   and the " don't kill the dipole " rule and it works   youpla!!

let's replicate

and good night at all

Laurent

Hi Laurent, thanks for sharing the Kacker delamorto experiment and with the caduceus coil twist.


Did you already try out the original delamorto experiment?  Test results?


Cheers Mike

 Ok I had a chance to reread the bankruptcy notes from the court hearing. There is a section in this book that starts on page 64. http://books.google.com/books?id=KRg9HWakBmQC&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=tesla+gave+westinghouse+new+soft+iron+for+transformers&source=bl&ots=0SjD0CgTBB&sig=oZ-dIBnH9jnWaT_688Dtm0YWvso&hl=en&ei=upTTTszED6Xf0QGl3qxL&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&sqi=2&ved=0CFQQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=tesla%20gave%20westinghouse%20new%20soft%20iron%20for%20transformers&f=false


 The description of the device is exactly what the Exciter(alternator), Transformers*4((4 coils hooked in two pairs in series)4 Field coils around generator, two pairs in series). It seems in this configuration with commutating breaks right at the peeks of each transformer. This gave him a solid dc voltage to charge the caps to 44k volts! Ouch now thats a blaster!

This link is great stuff,  thanks Big!   I never knew these records were around.   AND, yes it does look like this is a similar circuit.   Do you have anything on what Tesla does to tune his devices??

 I started to think more about the one turn copper plate bent around the ferrite rod. If you hooked a wire to the upper left of the plate and the lower right of the plate you would get such a huge current rise that one side would be very high in current and the other would act like the ground. You should be able to run a very good amount of current that way because of the swirling flow of magnetic lines going into the copper towards the ferrite. Hmm is that the key?

Nice observance Big,  so perhaps we can use this to harvest the compressed field.  Imagine holding that compressed field in a magnetic path like the arc magnets do.  Then tap tap tap until we get the field spinning to a ultra high spin, similar to that yoke Youtube where the guy increases the C battery voltage from 1.5 volts to 400volts using only a "C" battery a yoke ferrite and a few neo magnets and copper wire.

http://molotok.ru/show_item.php?item=1995503750

Kacher put up for sale, anyone can buy at auction.

 @all. Very soon I will be joining you guys at trying to figure this stuff out. My experiments have not been started yet due to my frail health. But I am feeling much better now and I will be doing these experiments with you guys. Also my experiments with crystal batteries is just about completing the last of my ideas.


 I got way to many things going lol... My research which I have been doing for 10's of years now has allotted me to amass quite the databank in my head. Although I am finding it tough to remember exact details, I don't seem to have this issue with general ideas he presented. I have read So much about Tesla. Both official and unofficial. If anyone says he didn't use numbers and math to do general things in this have never really read something he wrote. He did use math. He also knew surfaces and geometry very very well. If one applies the static world and it's laws to our world it explains everything in the universe. Static laws transcend Millions of miles. This is how galaxies form and the solar systems ebbs and flows. Gravity is totally explainable when you understand the mass of this world. There is a flow. Surfaces(Alter that flow) and charges(heat, it binds it together,static portion).


 In fact Induction is that static portion. What did we learn about it? NOTHING. We threw it away...
It was merely a toy. But it was the secret of it all. When combined in the right way it is always present. Eternal. It is the part of electricity that gives it a possibility to have direction and alignment or order. It is the reason we are discussing this here. If the static portion was totally denied how could we truly understand it's relationship.


 Tesla found out that anyone, anywhere could create their own surface to harvest. The vortex is that surface. The funniest thing is this surface attracts magnetic lines. Once the lines are established all you would need to do is hold them. Why not hold them with an inductive barrier. A self filling electric bottle that can be squeezed.


 Look, take this setup and multiply it by 4. Join each ferrite into a circle. Hmmm... Isn't that the stevep device? We are just using 1/4 of the real Tesla device. It can never have a built up momentum. We need the circle of ferrite or iron. My bet is on Iron. I have a 10" split ring soft iron bar waiting to go. I got to get some Good copper for the unit. The exciter I have 4 24 pound pull neo's in ring fashion. Flat doughnut style. I figure I'll pair them up. I need the rotor/shaft section still and bearings. I have an induction motor recently made but I am thinking these need to be special motors and custom made. Tesla was very specific about that. Oh and I'll need to make an aluminum housing for this. It's gonna need a good heatsink. I guess the premise is that you only need to charge this field up and it will go for quite some time before coming to rest.
 My proof for the long time comes from Leedskalnins work. I hope I spelled that right. I think he had the mechanics right but it wasn't magnetic current, it was the Eletrostatic current. It has the same rules. His charging a coil around separated iron pathway was brilliant to say the least. He understood what Tesla knew. He was a book worm. But to get back to the point once you pump up the iron with lines all one needs is to impress a pattern in the pathway and set it in motion. How you extract the energy should be in a bifilar way. That way it does not effect the spin except for a very small amount, the resistance of the wire itself with no self induction. Coat that wire in Silver and man We might have a winner here.


 Our experiments are showing promise on a small scale. Lets multiply this and see if we can control this in a way that will rev this up and produce more current. Remember Wave guides and fluid flows when dealing with this stuff.

jibness
Quote:
 Coat that wire in Silver and man We might have a winner here.


----------------------
Why not gold??
I'll send you some in solution NC  [PM me]
Or any others here that want to try it??


From an Old "moon shaker" [those things were Huge!!]


Chet

Itsu
Quote:
 but it is hard to arrive to a firm wattage statement with these values.


-------------------------------------------------------


Make some tea..............


It was my Auction request  [post number 9791]