Lol i've seen $100,000 instruments propped up on a dirty concrete floor in front of a power cabinet. In the real world they are just tools to do your job, not something to revere like a jade idol.

Power Factor in a pulse DC circuit? Regarding spikes charging a battery and generating heat in a resistor? Interesting. Would like to see how that matters a tinker's damn.

If this circuit efficiently heats up the resistive element as reported, i don't think anyone will give a hoot if some here disapprove of the "improper" use of inductive spikes

General interest in this circuit is growing, along with replication attempts... Despite the ad hominem nonsense and irrational, premature negativity we have so often seen here in this thread. 

Lol i've seen $100,000 instruments propped up on a dirty concrete floor in front of a power cabinet. In the real world they are just tools to do your job, not something to revere like a jade idol.

I have worked as an embedded software engineer in the "real world" for over 10 years, I have seen quite a few dropkicks who do not appreciate equipment, but then I have seen many more engineers who realise that equipment is as important as ones eyes and as such they keep it accurate and usually on a bench. Of course in field situations sometimes you have to put a scope on asphalt, grass or dirt. It´s just quite telling about a persons priorities with regard to measurement when in a domestic situation the scope is on the floor, no ad hominen intended, it´s just something I wouldn´t do, I´m sorry if I upset you with my metrological fascism. Love and light

Power Factor in a pulse DC circuit? Regarding spikes charging a battery and generating heat in a resistor? Interesting. Would like to see how that matters a tinker's damn.

Rosemarie always talks of aperiodic hartley oscillation, any oscillatory component will have power factor in it.

A pulsed load that has an inductive element will interacts with the capacitance inside of itself and the rest of the circuit, this results in oscillation (termed ringdown), unless of course you´ve got your magic hartley oscillation which might be far more magnificent and then you can ignore the ringdown and just concentrate on that primarily.

Every oscillation, in case your not aware, has to be analysed taking PF into account, best way would be a really low ohm purelely resistive element in series with the load, observing across the load and the R using a scope. But don´t worry, simply calorimetry will expose any OU characteristics using nice and simple methods, so no need to worry over such matters to prove Rosemaries concept should it be valid. Of course deep digging engineers would cover PF ground just to get a better undertstanding of any anomoly should it arise.

If this circuit efficiently heats up the resistive element as reported, i don't think anyone will give a hoot if some here disapprove of the "improper" use of inductive spikes

"If" being a very axiomatic point.

General interest in this circuit is growing, along with replication attempts... Despite the ad hominem nonsense and irrational, premature negativity we have so often seen here in this thread.

Yes, it´s all good carry on.

I have nothing against drilling deep into the analysis of pulsed DC systems, and I´m not saying there may not be some magical stuff to see when you do drill deep, but it irks me when people talk beyond the data and prop up a folly they have gathered around for god knows what reason.

One thing I will say is this, I consider myself a fairly impartial observer and have read every post in this thread as well as energetic forum thread. It is absurdly clear to me where any ad hom started. It seems that any question that threatens the "status quo" is met with an overly defensive response, one has to wonder why?

Also If I ever thought TK to be in gross error I would not hesitate to voice my opinion and if I was (through logical discourse i.e. debate) correct then I´m certain TK would not hesitate to acknowledge his error without too much drama, as would I, that´s one thing about being an engineer; leave your ego at the door and only "worship" real data.

Follow the one thing we might all share in common, the truth discovered by real observation, or follow whatever else you wan´t, I´m not to bothered either way.

It continues......

Lol chet, so it does 

" when people talk beyond the data and prop up a folly they have gathered around for god knows what reason"


There seems to be a lot of that going on lately...I see a lot of that occurring when important truths are revealed.

Regards...

I can see why you say that Cap-Z-ro, your posts often touch on objective observation of political goings on and they are often met with kneejerk responses by some trying to uphold their fragile card house worldview, the blueprint for which being mainstream media, or more correctly; propoganda. You try and have logical discourse and it is met with exaggerated defense mechanisms.

I would like to take this opportunity to say most all of your observations hold water in my opinion. Though I stopped being outwardly political many moons ago, I still know and embrace ojectivity and introspection despite any ego reducing effects it may bring.

I just got tired of talking to a wall with regard to political matters in the public domain, I admire your vigour that you soldier on (as I do TK in the matter of this thread).

Having said that, to those nearest and dearest to me I am still politically passionate and thank god my nearest and dearest still listen to logic, lest my world would shrink.

Best regards back at you.

Oh my my ??

Thanks for your supportive words yucca.

It helps stoke my passion for truth and enlightenment...and my small efforts to expose and thwart those who try to impede and suppress those ideals.

By simply following the path to truth it naturally becomes very easy to discard all previous theories of belief when the truth dictates otherwise.

Something that comes out in your postings also.

Your assessment of the discourse involving TK confirms to me that my sense was right...as too much of the technical jargon was beyond me due to my lack of knowledge of the instrumentation.

To be honest, my 'troll radar' went off early on in this thread...it was clear that TK was not being engaged directly in a forthright manner.

I just hope the energy sappers don't wear down his resolve, as he is a key member in this movement we are all a part of.

Regards...

Aaron said
 self oscillation
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAMSET View Post
Plus, since the mosfet isn't turning fully on before you turn it off and start the ringing, the current draw goes down and the batt voltage goes up.

Now turn the gate up or the duty cycle longer. The mosfet turns on fully so the current goes up and the batt voltage goes down. And the scope's trigger sees a cleaner rising portion of the wave and locks it in.
Ramset,

Is TK willing to show what his shunt shows during the "false triggering" or not?

TK is claiming in the "false triggering" mode that the mosfet can't turn on completely because it is being turned off too fast.

What kind of analysis is this?

If what TK says is true, then the mosfet can't conduct. If the mosfet can't conduct, then no current can leave the battery. If no current leaves the battery, there can be no waveform on the shunt.

Ramset, I think this needs to be posted at ou.com on the thread to
debunk the disinformation. Ramset, why not post the below picture into
the heater thread at ou?

Please ask him to do the same test.

NOTE PICTURE WON"T POST GO TO ENERGETIC

For everyone else, this should give you confidence that when the noise is
on the scope, the battery is delivering exactly what it is predicted to do.
It is delivering high frequency pulses.
__________________
With Gratitude, Aaron