Hi Teets
Interesting comment about the Americium.  Not absolutely necessary, but as an ionizing agent, I think it would help with the antenna portion. Then the rest is about collection, step up, step down and storage. But this is only one way, as I see it.
Hope you are well.
Bob

Yes, you are correct.
actually we can also use it in a simple circuit scheme, just make a spot for it to be use as a simple current source.

and i'm currently very well buddy, thank you, i have currently beaten my asthma, glory to Jesus


God bless you


mr.  T - 2   

Nelsonrochaa!
I respect what you're doing
It is important for energy-efficient equipment development.
It's a good goal !!
But it is impossible to go over 100%.
who says he's lying.

Hi , idegen,
Energy is not destroyed is transformed ,  and energy is abundant. power is another thing.
What you maybe try to say is in the actual model of working of electricity, is impossible achieve even the COP1 because the power is dissipated or "lost" in another form of energy in load. Yes its right ! you can not put 1 unit of energy and output 5 of energy.
But you can input 1 unity of energy and output 2 units of power or even more . It will depend how how you convert the energy in power .
We have lots of commercial ways of convert energy in power , like solar panels, dynamos , batteries and so on , and you will agree with me that there are Converters more effective than others. price vs power production.
 I'm not here trying to convince anyone of anything.
Current laws were created by the work and effort over the years, and can not be neglected.
We can not jeopardize people's knowledge and his work, however many of these rules prevail from the time it was formulated, and agree with me that will be safe to say that over the years some of these rules have been revised due to new discoveries .
It is also important to note that science is evolutionary, and "barriers" and doubt during this search process knowledge is supposed to exist.
I understand that the logical it may seem illogical at times, but we must not therefore to stop questioning us when something is atypical.
What I see most often are not critical, but certainties almost insurmountable for people who look like walking encyclopedias.
You think that helps most visitors and curious that research in this area? Or is this just for an elite minority?
When people think they already know everything and has nothing more to learn, they are in a bad way ......
 
 

By transmutation from cristalin to amorph metal ?
Catching the energy from Valenz-electrons as thermo(phonon)-/photo(n)-electric converter do ?

wamr
        OCWL

Hi , LancaIV

Well seems good theme to discuss , but clearly is not a subject to everyone and you now that
But i now what you try "scratch" .  Yes the ionic process is not considered in actual rules  when we talk in electricity , only electrons lol Valenz-electrons as thermo(phonon)-/photo(n)-electric = "free" induction

   

it doesn't matter power or energy ! if there is external energy or external force field and it is used properly then energy or power is multiplied - no difference like Don Smith said - it's all the same except various definitions created
at least however if you look at power there is no law of conservation of power , so you can do whatever you wish to

                      Synthizising the natural partly universal process in an artificial manner !?

                                 How fast is an atomic spin ? RPM
                                 From which viewpoint ? Core/Nucleus or outside ?

                     A "solar" commercial mono-cristalin cell from the 80' transformed +/- 6%
                     from incident unfocussed natural light energy per sqm ! bandgap !
                                                      Right ?

                    Heat wave light is mostly in the near IR-range  !
                    This is an unvisible (for humans) radiation !
                     
                   Which temperature( heat= Brownian movement/fluctuation/oszillation effect)
                                                     has this light ?
                                          http://www.astrofoil.net/
                 http://www.astrofoil.net/astrofoil.insulation.r-values.html

                Citation: " All objects emit ? ? ?  by an object ." an actio/reactio-process description

                             basic search: the collider principle

I can not tell you anything about the Kapanadze invention cause I did not follow his development !

But what I think is that this kind of converter will be the common energy capture process

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941018&CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A

but then as printable Nano-dot ink. Nano-transistors -array

40 years before:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=4004210A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19770118&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

The linewidth of the conductors for the module circuits using electron beam microfabrication may typically be of the order of 10@-@4 to 10@-@6 cm. Micro circuit manufacturing techniques may be used in the fabrication of the modules which can range in size according to the power output requirements. The maximum power requirements can be achieved using module size larger than the physical limit on circuit miniaturization given in a paper by R. W. Keyes in the May 1975 issue of the Proceedings of the IEEE (pp. 740-767). In this paper, the applicable limit on circuit miniaturization is the electromigration damage to conductors and this limit allows conductors carrying the maximum current requirements of this device to be smaller than 10@-@6 cm in diameter. Using larger conductors and increasing the area of modules 7 and 8 in the plane of layers 1 and 3 of FIGS. 1a and 2 up to 10@-@6 square centimeters gives a power output capability of the layers 1 and 3 of the order of 10 KW per square meter in the plane of layers 1 and 3 in FIGS. 1a and 2.

 A review of microcircuit manufacturing techniques is given in a paper by H. I. Smith in the October 1974 issue of the Proceedings of the IEEE (pp. 1361-1388), and also in a paper by A. N. Broers and R. H. Dennard in Semiconductor Silicon 1973 (pp. 830-841). Other techniques in addition to electron beam microfabrication are feasible for the microfabrication of the circuits of this invention. Among these techniques, X-ray lithography using sensitive polymers as electron resist material may be utilized for simplicity and low cost. The manufacture of micro circuit components for the instant invention can be accomplished using the micro circuit technology described by H. Sobel in the August 1971 issue of the Proceedings of the IEEE (pp. 1200-1211) and by M. Coulton in the October 1971 issue of the Proceedings of the IEEE. Diodes 9, 12, and 24 may typically be classical Schottky barrier diodes or quantum or tunnel diodes. The Schottky diodes may be of the type described by Fetterman et al in Applied Physics Letters, Jan. 15, 1974, page 70. The tunnel diodes may be of the type described by Twu et al in Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 15, 1974 or by Javan in the IEEE Spectrum, October, 1971, page 91. For the rectifying diodes 12 and 24, increasing the nonlinearity increases the efficiency of the device. As shown in the paper by J. C. Yater in the October 1974 issue of the Physical Review A (pp. 1361-1369), the non-linearity obtainable from classical diodes enables the Carnot cycle efficiencies to be obtained. For quantum effect or tunnel diodes the degree of non-linearity of tunnel diodes can be different from that of classical diodes. It can be shown using a similar method of analysis to that given in the above listed paper in the Physical Review by J. C. Yater that the efficiency of rectification is increased using tunnel diodes as the heated diodes 9 when the non-linearity is less than that for classical diodes and as the cooled diodes 12 and 24 when the non-linearity is larger than that of the classical diodes.

"Target",a collider expression:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20080828&CC=WO&NR=2008103987A2&KC=A2

How fast is the THz-movement ,Senhor Rocha ? Do you know Patrick Pinheiro Nan-/Rectenna work ?
                      Femto-sec diod converter is his last solution barrier !
                          For the decelerating from THz to grid fequency !

                                For what are "Di-oden" used ?
                                  Also limiting inrush current !

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=ken&IN=kazumi+masaki&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

                              But when do we want pulsed inrush current ?'
                                                   Dirac surges !               

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19920714&CC=US&NR=5130608A&KC=A
                                       also citing documents : NICO
          (look also for Kanarev: applied Pulse Power description ,the maths )

  For power savings of light energy consumer but also motors !

 
And as focus : up to 20000x sun look for Roland Winston, Universitas of California

              Parabol-concav/convex-energy receiver and converter technology

This is all practical knowledge,Senhor Rocha,
                         energy to matter and matter to energy understanding

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=6&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19931118&CC=DE&NR=4215818A1&KC=A1

                                                             artificial :
                                                            "fiat lux"
 http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=DE&NR=3706385A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19880908&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

Boa sorte e adeus
                             OCWL