Dave, I still don't think it's about the schematics, but more about the winding.  You've probably posted several working schematics without knowing the operating principle.



  Something to ponder about winding techniques.  In several systems (TK/Kapagen, Floyd Sweet VTA, TPU) there is much focus on cancelling/nullifying magnetic fields in a coil.

Attached are 2 examples of this.

  On the surface, they would appear identical.  Both nullify inductance.  The difference is that in figure A, the electric and magnetic fields cancel, whereas in figure B, only the magnetic component is cancelled.  The result is a standing electric field that is positive on one end and negative on the other.  This field is like the electric field in a unipolar generator.


  It explains why so many devices use a mix of CW and CCW winding techniques, it's the only way to keep the dipoles separate while still cancelling the magnetic field.

Neat pic, where's the link from?  An EH antenna design perhaps?

Using 2 opposed coils would result in the same effect, but would not as efficient since less of the magnetic field would cancel.  Then again, you'd need a magnetic component to actually utilize a standing electric wave, so perhaps it serves a dual-purpose.

.

Hey Reiyuki
 I dont remember the link but yes I believe I was looking into the EH antenna at the time, I save most diagrams I run across.
Magnetic cancelling may be the answer we'r looking for I have a few idea's Im working on as time permits.

 
Hi body, i don't want to make quarrel to anyone anymore ok? i just want to give some points to brother aking.


That is not the actual word he said, i just read that he notice a slight increase.  




try to read the colorado spring, if i'm not mistaken.


or try to consult our best reader QWERT for this ok.

I understand Tito, cos some people are rude. Why not pm me?

Quick Note:

That chart is a misprint.  If you do the Pp and Ps calculations yourself  (I didn't do the detailed math, but it is obvious enough...)  you will see that the actual values are far closer than what is shown, and the Pp IS greater than the Ps.

Nice find, however.  Good to see that people are actually reading these charts and info.  If you had any idea of how many education texts have such errors, including in the Theory sections, you would be amazed.

I'd wager that this one is a "Typo".  If it weren't, I "Think" the author might have mentioned the "OU" produced...

Hi,
i presume that you have found hundreds errors in education texts books.

thats not so interesting anymore since it was probably typo/misprint ( sorry mag ), but, i still wonder, if Rs is zero then Pp may be infinite, so in your opinion, is the Pp  consume infinite power spontaneously or not ?.

and what about this http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/indmut.html#c1 it describe induction, Faraday and lenz law, are you agree in every words written in the "Coupled Inductors" section ?.

the third question is most important for me, it's ok  if you decide to refuse answering my two first question,(if you know) how many "coil" and "capacitor"  or (if exist )"diode" or secret component are in Steven Mark TPU?

Dave, I have explained to you before that anywhere you connect a transistor switch to an inductor, you need to provide a safe path for the inductor current to continue through when you turn the first switch off.  When you wire up these serpentine circuits you need to keep that in mind.

Sometimes I have to sleep on it but I saw the error of my ways 
Now it will work, it will cycle the current and the electrons.