Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3569723 times)

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6075 on: July 09, 2014, 07:26:02 AM »
Electric bell

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6076 on: July 09, 2014, 07:27:08 AM »
Another view

Jeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1532
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6077 on: July 09, 2014, 10:37:20 AM »
Don't be the dog and fooled by misinterpretations of Tesla words...think by yourself  ;) there is only one small secret Tesla was never willing to clearly say, but whoever dismissed Tesla letter written to his friend may be foooled by so called "experts"....

Thanks Forest for one more great source for reading!

Bob, can you please make a screenshot of page 62 of Tesla's interview on High Frequency high currents?

Tesla: ''... the damped wave is of advantage because it gives you with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2, 3, 4 or 5 kilowatts.....'' If this is not a clear statement of OU what is it???

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6078 on: July 09, 2014, 10:55:10 AM »
Here is the problem Tito mentioned many times.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detonation

The magic is in method of controlling it. Without control you got only pufffff. Think how much amps in impulse you got from capacitor discharge

Qwert

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6079 on: July 09, 2014, 04:35:19 PM »
The usual power nowadays is 60 volts AC.


To my knowledge, "60" stands for frequency; voltage is somewhat different.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6080 on: July 09, 2014, 05:25:26 PM »
                     3,6 KWh = drei komma sechs Kilo(=1000)Watt/Stunde


=             3600 Wh = 3600 X 1Wh = 3600 X 3600 Ws = 12.960.000 W/s
         
 in words :  twelfe millions nine hundred sixty thousand Wattseconds
                                                                                                              compressed energy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       from  upper     " direct=gleich Strom/stream/current/flow/Fluß " per second  conditioning
                                                              to :




                      pulsed     direct=gleich Strom/stream/current/flow/Fluß


             Crisis/Kreis          Frequenz,     Hertz,Swing/Wave        Impulse per


            What is expressed exactly with Hertz?


Hertz is the physical unit of frequency. The European electricity grid is an AC power with a frequency of 50Hz. This means that the current one hundred times per second, changes its direction. The daily flow which brings up and running such as a lamp to light or a motor, has 50 Hz ln Europe are matched all electrical equipment on this frequency. If the actual frequency deviates too much from 50 Hz devices do not function properly or no longer after all. This can happen when the demand for energy is higher than the amount of electricity that is provided by the power plants. TenneT ensures that a balance between the consumption of energy by the end consumer (electricity demand) and the supply of energy by the power plants (electricity supply). Thus, the frequency of about 50 Hz remains constant and the equipment is functioning properly.



                                                         50 Hz                     100 pulses 

                                           
                                                         60 Hz                     120 p.


           
                                                                     better,clearer :


                                                         50Hz/s                   100 pulses/s


                                                         60Hz/s                   120 pulses/s 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ergo:                                       Dirac surges as 1 actio pulse (Europes 50Hz) :       




   3,6KWh = 12.960.000 Ws linear DC =


   12.960.000 Ws/(100 pulses/s)
                 translatory(wechselnder/alternating/changing) DC


12.960.000 Ws/(100 pulses/s)   
                 rotatory [kreisen(der)/cruisin(g)/drehen(der)/rotating/circulatin(g)] DC


                                                  or AC


    DC/DC       DC/AC     AC/AC   AC/DC              trans-/tele- formation




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                    the Coloumb load/Ladung capacity of 100 pulses / s(ec) =50 Hz
                 
                                              compressed in one Hz  = 0 or O  kreis(linien)Welle
                                              + EMP                 -EMP
   
                                     obere                    untere               Kreis Halbwelle

                                     upper                    down                 circle half wave
                                   +(pos) amplus         amplus-(neg.)   circle half wave   

                                                                             mit dem  Zirkel sollte man umgehen koennen !


                                                ::) :)  physical designing  ;)  Bye-Bye B'B'

Sincerely
              OCWL


                                                 http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=DE&NR=8711619U1&KC=U1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19871119
« Last Edit: July 10, 2014, 12:18:11 AM by lancaIV »

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6081 on: July 09, 2014, 06:55:13 PM »
To my knowledge, "60" stands for frequency; voltage is somewhat different.


I was referring to the British Telecom telephone wiring voltage. The info was given to me by a retired BT engineer. I don't know the HZ but I'll ask him.

Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6082 on: July 09, 2014, 08:10:06 PM »
Thanks Forest for one more great source for reading!

Bob, can you please make a screenshot of page 62 of Tesla's interview on High Frequency high currents?

Tesla: ''... the damped wave is of advantage because it gives you with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2, 3, 4 or 5 kilowatts.....'' If this is not a clear statement of OU what is it???
Jeg,
Great page selected! 
Quote
62 Work With Alternating Currents
Counsel Speaking of your not having perfectly undamped waves at that time, you were referring to that character of circuit?
Tesla Yea, but with another kind of circuit I could, of course. The advantage of this apparatus was the delivering of energy at short intervals whereby one could increase activity, and with this scheme I was able to perform all of those wonderful experiments which have been reprinted from time to time in the technical papers. I would take energy out of a circuit at rates of hundreds or thousands of horsepower. In Colorado, I reached 18 million horsepower activities, but that was always by this device: Energy stored in the condenser and discharged in an inconceivably small interval of time. You could not produce that activity with an undamped wave. The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilo-watts/ whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilo-watt and nothing more. That as the reason why the system with a quenched gap has become popular.
   
I have refined this so that I have been able to take energy out of engines by drawing on their momentum. For in-stance, if the engine as of 200 horsepower, I take the energy out for a minute interval of time, at a rate of 5,000 or 6,000 horsepower, then I store (it) in a condenser and discharge the same at the rate of several millions of horsepower. That is how these wonderful effects are produced. The condenser is the most wonderful instrument, as I have stated in ny writ-ings, because it enables us to attain greater activities than are practical with explosives. There is no limit to the energy which you can develop with a condenser. There is a limit to the energy which you can develop with an explosive.
   
A common experiment, for instance, in my laboratory on Houston Street, was to pass through a coil energy at a rate of several thousand horsepower, put a piece of thick tinfoil on a stick, and approach it to that coil. The tinfoil would melt, and would not only melt, but while it was still in that form, it would be evaporated and the whole process took place in so small an interval of time that it was like a cannon shot. Instantly I put it there, there was an explosion. That was a striking experiment. It simply showed the power of the condenser, and at that time I was so reckless that in order to demonstrate to my visitors that my theories were correct, I would stick my head into that coil and I was not hurt: but, I would not do it now.
I couldn't post a screen shot, but got an OCR conversion of it and quoted it above.  Here's the URL to the book:  http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Aetherforce_Libary/Aether%20Mage/Nikola%20Tesla%20-%20On%20His%20Work%20With%20Alternating%20Currents%20and%20Their%20Application%20to%20Wireless%20Telgraphy,%20Telephony,%20and%20Transmission%20of%20Power%20(Leland%20I.%20Anderson).pdf
 
I wonder if the secret in this page is simply pulsing a number of parallel wires which dump into the same cap. As Tito said, "the manyer, the better."  Any thoughts?
Bob

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6083 on: July 10, 2014, 02:31:01 AM »
[quote ]
I wonder if the secret in this page is simply pulsing a number of parallel wires which dump into the same cap. As Tito said, "the manyer, the better."  Any thoughts?
Bob
[/quote]


I think you've got a point here.
I'm currently charging nine batteries with one spike generator hmmmmm.

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6084 on: July 10, 2014, 02:33:50 AM »
Jeg,
Great page selected!  I couldn't post a screen shot, but got an OCR conversion of it and quoted it above.  Here's the URL to the book:  http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Aetherforce_Libary/Aether%20Mage/Nikola%20Tesla%20-%20On%20His%20Work%20With%20Alternating%20Currents%20and%20Their%20Application%20to%20Wireless%20Telgraphy,%20Telephony,%20and%20Transmission%20of%20Power%20(Leland%20I.%20Anderson).pdf
 
I wonder if the secret in this page is simply pulsing a number of parallel wires which dump into the same cap. As Tito said, "the manyer, the better."  Any thoughts?
Bob


 ;)   :) :o    ??? 

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6085 on: July 10, 2014, 02:41:46 AM »
Good evening Tito:  It's 1.30 am in the UK. lol
Geofusion on the Dally thread has also got it. He also states that thicker wires are important.


hmmmmm.

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6086 on: July 10, 2014, 02:51:02 AM »
Good evening Tito:  It's 1.30 am in the UK. lol
Geofusion on the Dally thread has also got it. He also states that thicker wires are important.


hmmmmm.


Well, that's good. :)


Thicker wires are important if you want a bigger capacity.


but i discover that  using an exact wires or 25% greater for a single appliances as its own power supply is the best. :) [size=78%] [/size]
lots of advantage promise.  8)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6087 on: July 10, 2014, 02:51:13 AM »
www.epo.org


Dr.Pavel Imris


Patent application 2014


Description : input and output !


Google translator:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20140203&CC=DE&NR=202013011233U1&KC=U1

Cascading,close cycling et cetera....       
                                                        https://www.google.de/?gws_rd=ssl#q=yul+brynner+etcetera


Sincerely
               OCWL


                                                   In memoriam   
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTMtu4Z5T-U     
                                                             et
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOmSV8Vj5qE
                                                         cetera
            the right side listened movies from the sixtiees and seventies  and eightees


                                   "Convoy" with Rubber Duck et.........
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convoy_(1978_film)#mediaviewer/File:Convoy_film_poster.jpg

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6088 on: July 10, 2014, 02:58:21 AM »

Well, that's good. :)


Thicker wires are important if you want a bigger capacity.


but i discover that  using an exact wires or 25% greater for a single appliances as its own power supply is the best. :) [size=78%] [/size]
lots of advantage promise.  8)


Do you mean that you wind your own coils and have a 1:1 or 1:4 ratio in the wires?


Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #6089 on: July 10, 2014, 03:08:09 AM »

Do you mean that you wind your own coils and have a 1:1 or 1:4 ratio in the wires?


No. my driving coil is in the middle of the two other coil, its like three coil, but they are all connected.  ;)
The two other coils are just waiter to do some task. they are the power supporter.  8)
sorry, next time buddy.  ;)


ok , To be specific this is my design for my mix ac and dc amplification.  :)


Now if you want very big application, it is better to use the tesla style.
and the advantage of the tesla style is you don't need an inverter cause you can get any hertz you desired and that's big!  :o


and if you want a small application, then the dc amplification is the best cause its stable and small in size. :)


bye.  :)   ;D 


surely some great guy is reading.  ;D  [size=78%]joke[/size]