Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3553656 times)

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3810 on: December 07, 2013, 01:48:58 AM »
Lets see a collapsing magnetic field causes bemf but if bemf is captured in a capacitor then all we have is a low negative potential, so if a collapsing magnetic field is not a back flow of particles but just a low negative potential then we dont need the cap at all.
Or am I missing something  ;)

But on the other hand if we take the positive energy from a collapsing magnetic field and run it through a coil the collapsing field from that coil should be a negative potential.

In high voltage air purifiers the pos electrode accumulates a neg ion cloud and the neg electrode accumulates a pos ion cloud.

Well if nothing else Iv given a different view and stimulated thought.
 :) dave
 

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3811 on: December 07, 2013, 02:13:39 AM »
Hmm I see, thats the classic conventional view, positive is only a very low negative potential.
So bemf is a deficient of negative electrons and not a positive flow of positrons.
 ;)
Oh I forgot the best one so I had to come back, voltage is pressure and current is flow ::)
doesn't matter. the flow is the same direction if it's pointed from positive to negative or negative to postiive... it doesn't for from + to - to +.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3812 on: December 07, 2013, 02:17:18 AM »
doesn't matter. the flow is the same direction if it's pointed from positive to negative or negative to postiive... it doesn't for from + to - to +.
Cant be, - to + cant be the same as + to - have to be different particles

d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3813 on: December 07, 2013, 03:10:32 AM »
Cant be, - to + cant be the same as + to - have to be different particles
didn't say anything about particles...


whatever your paradigm.... + and - interact.  If you consider it's positrons (+ to -) or electrons (- to +) ... but in either case both currents go the same direction relative to themselves from one side to the other....










Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3814 on: December 07, 2013, 04:10:38 AM »
Well, if we consider a picture tube from a television set, we know that electrons move from the cathode in the gun of the tube, to the positive screen in the front of the tube. Its fact.  But I havnt read or heard anything about any particles coming off of the + screen in the front of the picture tube and all aligned by the deflection coils and focus them on the electron gun - cathode.  ;)

Mags

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3815 on: December 07, 2013, 12:28:56 PM »
hi everyone :)


I would like to congratulate everyone whatever knowledge you've got from what i am is posting here. :)
I am happy to all of you bro. hope you got the best.  ;) :)


i will remain silent with the secret to make excitement to everyone and make the forest in virgin mode. ;)


don't loose hope the secret is very easy. and that is truth. :)


The sucking action in the environment is happening in the spark gap, you need to modify it. :)
or else the source will die quickly.  :)

Next time if i'm in good mood, i will share one of my best discovery : "The Power of Two"
This is very easy, very practical and absolutely can be done by everyone.
There is no switching in this tech.  ;)   8)

merry Christmas
God Bless  :)


otits :P  why tongue?, nothing, just want to irritate you. That's who i am  ;D  hehehehehehe


Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3816 on: December 07, 2013, 01:18:12 PM »
Merry Christmas everyone  :)
I really enjoy these discussions and everyone's opinions maybe someday we will find the answer.
 
So if classical science has it right and there are only negative electrons moving through a system then by the model we have been investigating bemf creates a low negative potential that would mean a coil creates a sucking action when transferring energy to another coil.

Spark Gap
 When the sun releases a solar flare (spark gap) the earths magnetic field carry's the energy into the core so placement of the spark gap or multiple spark gaps in relation to the device your playing with may be important. 

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3817 on: December 07, 2013, 01:26:17 PM »
a tip from Tariel Kapanadze : don't let the impulse die
I think it must work like two-stroke engine

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3818 on: December 07, 2013, 01:32:33 PM »
Iv been thinking about Tesla's ozone patent and the Kapanadze device, if the first winding on the coil former were of thin wire, like a Tesla coil, you could strip the wire and run inside the air core one end on one side and the other end on the other side the full length of the core,  this would ionize the core, might get a pos effect.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3819 on: December 07, 2013, 01:49:09 PM »
Something like this  ;)
You might even get some plasma action going on, plasma core I like the sound of that  ;D

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3820 on: December 07, 2013, 02:06:11 PM »
This is a bifilar wound center taped coil run with the Mazzili circuit, Im actually getting pretty good light output for air core.
Im going to wind a small gauge coil under it to ionize the core and see if it helps.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3821 on: December 07, 2013, 02:08:02 PM »
Kapanadze does not need a spark gap. I think Tito's playing with us cos we're getting too close.
Tesla, however sometimes uses a spark gap, but in a different way.
It's in the Colorado spring notes.
Everything is there including the bifilar winding.
Benitez in his 1914 to 1918 patents shows the use of a spark gap as an energy
amplifier.
I call it  stochastic mixing.
We'll get there Tito.

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3822 on: December 07, 2013, 02:25:47 PM »
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/Carlos_Benitez_-_Abstracts_and_redraws.pdf


There, Tito, I've taught you something.


I've had the Benitez system working for some time.


FROM TITO'S OLD POSTS:



ok! in my latest experiment and that is experiment #12, I just use 3 blanks, 2 diodes, 2 caps and i got succeed in a controllable voltage i want.
 
note in this setup there is : no coil, no extra coil, no pulsing, no transformer.


This is very simple but dangerous in nature.   


in experiment #11 i made use of 1 primary 2 extra coil, 12 diodes  a computer fan  a lot of coils. bulky in nature thats why i'm not satisfied. so i made an improvement. but no spark gap, with silent explosion tech.


in exp #10 i used 4 zeners, 5 electrolytic caps, 2 diodes, alternate switching tech, with improved spark gap tech. with lots of bulky transformer


in exp #9 input is signal from atmosphere then amplified using 3 coils and 4
       caps. its like a tpu.


and the other previous experiments are just an improvement of different inventions of our fellow experimenters, i'm not interested with those. just made them for fun.


note in all: no free energy to all designs if the tesla energy amplifier is missing!
               I think the right term for it is "Controllable Uncontrolled Spontaneous action"
               



Merry Christmas.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3823 on: December 07, 2013, 02:53:47 PM »
So if bemf causes a low neg potential on the cap maybe we can give it something to pull from besides the power source, either an antenna or ground wire.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #3824 on: December 07, 2013, 02:56:34 PM »
                                                            Times goes slowly....
                                           http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatikuhr                                         small
                        http://www.rexresearch.com/constantinesco2/constantinesco.htm                      greater


Bom Appetite
                    OCWL