Mercury and fluoride are both dangerous in large quantities. you shouldn't handle it, you should not have mercury amalgam fillings either, they emit mercury vapor in the presence of moisture
i didn't have a choice but, I wouldn't have gotten the mercury/thymarisol vaccine, I have looked at the actual mercury content in the shots its very very low but, for example, what if there were trace bits of shit in your food, I don't want shit in my food-even if its just a tiny tiny little bit of shit you'd never notice....same goes for mercury....
In 1939 a dentist named H. Trendley Dean, working for the U.S. Public Health Service, examined water from 345 communities inTexas. Dean determined that high concentrations of fluoride in the water in these areas corresponded to a high incidence of mottled teeth. This explained why dentists in the area found mottled teeth in so many of their patients. Dean also claimed that there was a lower incidence of dental cavities in communities having about 1 ppm fluoride in the water supply. Among the native residents of these areas about 10 percent developed the very mildest forms of mottled enamel ("dental fluorosis"), which Dean and others described as "beautiful white teeth."
Dean's report led to the initiation of artificial fluoridation of drinking water at 1part-per-million (ppm) in order to supply the "optimal dose" of 1mg fluoride per day--assuming that drinking four glasses of water every day would duplicate Dean's "optimal" intake for most people. Now, according to the American Dental Association, all people, rich or poor, could have "beautiful white teeth" and be free of caries at the same time. After all, the benefits of water fluoridation had been documented "beyond any doubt."13
When other scientists investigated Dean's data, they did not reach the same conclusions. In fact, Dean had engaged in "selective use of data," using findings from 21 cities that supported his case while completely disregarding data from 272 other locations that did not show a correlation.14 In court cases Dean was forced to admit under oath that his data were invalid.15 In 1957 he had to admit at AMA hearings that even waters containing a mere 0.1ppm (0.1 mg/l) could cause dental fluorosis, the first visible sign of fluoride overdose.16 Moreover, there is not one single double-blind study to indicate that fluoridation is effective in reducing cavities.17
Ingesting fluoride can cause flourosis that turns your bones brittle, for teeth its ok on the outside because it causes a little crystallization and protects them but ingesting it causes a lot and not just in your teeth, also i have read that both mercury and fluoride can have mental effects, mercury reduces I.Q. and fluoride i think makes people more docile and does other stuff I'm sure...
I know also that sodium flouride is a byproduct of uranium enrichment, and i remember reading an article about how it got into the water supply by accident....
here's a article on fluoride
http://www.consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=19990817225011and here's a (propaganda) article refuting most of that one, says fluoride is naturally occurring in water and sodium fluoride is just helping nature along....right, and helping nature could never go wrong right... lol
http://www.quackwatch.com/03HealthPromotion/fluoride.htmlThere are people who constantly believe only the things they want to, and disregard facts. we all do this to some degree but.....
Personally I think you would be best to avoid, and how much do you trust what one person says as opposed to another anyways, is it worth getting cancer or something because of what somebody says is not dangerous?
do your research and remember people do stupid things all the time, but that does not mean you should too...
