Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations  (Read 410853 times)

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #135 on: April 22, 2008, 09:28:29 PM »
Jeanna


I  think what   the  image shows is   what is called  ring down
 can  you  post the  URL for it ?


gary   
here is the calculator page. see you in a week. ;D ;D the whole site is fun,

but please first, tell me again , what do you think?

 there is a continuing frequency with 1.7R but to move to 17.7R there is only one peak? Please explain this ring down again.

 Is that the thing / combo that we are looking for?  I figured not.

Ringing is what I think we are looking for, isn't it?

please explain this , or give it a go anyway?

thanks

jeanna

http://www.coilgun.info/mark2/rlcsim.htm

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #136 on: April 22, 2008, 09:59:49 PM »
@ Jeanna:

I copied and pasted this from your coilgun site in case you didn't see it.  It speaks of ringing.  I ran the simulator a few times.  Very cool.  Thanks for sharing it with us.


"Role of Resistance

The graph's shape is very sensitive to resistance. At rather high resistance it is the main limiting factor on the current in the inductor, and you see the capacitor merely discharges slowly. At medium resistance you will see one lump of coil current which quickly dies out. At very low resistance it will ring (oscillate) as the energy sloshes from capacitor to inductor and back again.

One goal during construction is to minimize the resistance. Don't be too worried about ringing in a coilgun, because the projectile should absorb most of the coil's energy, leaving only a small amount for ringing. If you use an SCR to switch the coil then it will cut off after the first half cycle leaving the excess energy stored in the capacitor again, helping to prepare it for the next firing."


Bill

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #137 on: April 22, 2008, 10:28:55 PM »
@Bill,
good addition, thanks. Yes, it is a good place to spend an afternoon.

The thing we really cannot do much about is resistance. We can use fat wire and that is all. Using fat wire does nothing for resistance between the 2 different wires, or the wire to bolt resistance or the earth resistance for that matter.

I think this is where I started wanting to know if there could be a way to tweek the magnetism and not have to deal with the resistance, hence I asked myself what role the thickness of the iron wire played in our coils. Also, I used a hollow steel pipe.

BTW that hollow steel pipe produces the best readings. It is the one that gave a steady 18.9 mA inside. That reading went down with the addition of the secondary as they all do, but it is still the best.

Who knows if it is the hollow-ness or the larger diameter that is doing this?

I am not finished with the triplet of coils that looks at the thickness of the wires vs. magnetism  question. So, there is more to come.  :D

jeanna

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #138 on: April 22, 2008, 10:43:36 PM »
@ Jeanna:

I just now tried a trick I used on the electrode set-up in the very beginning. I stuck a very powerful neo magnet on the top of my core and took readings.  NO changes of any kind were observed in volts or amps.  In the electrode experiment, the volts went up a bit.

This, as you know, is over my head with the concept of ringing/oscillating.  Were you suggesting that, assuming this concept does apply to our coils, this wave form peaks at the beginning and would peak again IF it had the chance to get to zero? (or equally below the baseline as it was at the peak)  I have been thinking about that.  It almost sounds to me like we could use, 1. a capacitor, and 2. possibly a transistor to accomplish this?  What do you think?  I was thinking along the Bedini line of thought.

Bill

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #139 on: April 22, 2008, 11:07:00 PM »
neo magnet on the top of my core and took readings.  NO changes of any kind
well I think a steady magnet won't do anything to this cuz i dunno.

Over your head? I guess we are all getting taller fast around here!  ;D

Quote
concept of ringing/oscillating. 

I need to understand this more. no, I wasn't talking about that because I don't know enough... yet.

Quote
this wave form peaks at the beginning and would peak again IF it had the chance to get to zero?
But on the pic with the higher resistance, it stops oscillating all together. You can see that it was oscillating by looking at the other pic. and gradually the osc changed until it hit that higher resistance and it stopped. At the same time, the amperage goes down which is the bummer.

Quote
1. a capacitor
I have played with caps but I don't really know how to make a circuit with the RLC. I keep going back to those sites so some day I will get it. I think the spark gap thing folks were talking about is the result of the cap, but i dunno. ???

 
Quote
2. possibly a transistor to accomplish this?  What do you think?  I was thinking along the Bedini line of thought
.
I love transistors. I think the earth is going to see a lot of charge in the coming years. Sunspots etc. They could blast a transistor, esp one in the open air so, I want to avoid them only for that reason.

jeanna

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #140 on: April 23, 2008, 02:13:47 AM »

here is the calculator page. see you in a week. ;D ;D the whole site is fun,

but please first, tell me again , what do you think?

 there is a continuing frequency with 1.7R but to move to 17.7R there is only one peak? Please explain this ring down again.

 Is that the thing / combo that we are looking for?  I figured not.

Ringing is what I think we are looking for, isn't it?


please explain this , or give it a go anyway?

thanks

jeanna

http://www.coilgun.info/mark2/rlcsim.htm

Jeanna

I think it is a pretty  good example of  ring down and how   resistance affects  resonant ciruuits .

think  of the top   chart as   ringing a  large bell

Now ............think of the   second  chart as  ringing  the same bell while holding   your hand  on the bell



thanks for the URL   I  will look at it later .


I ended up working on my  new coil  rather than going  out earlier today

The   readings are  not  very  good  .

I  can't  remember  the dry  readings .......I took some but didn't write them down .....   I wasn't  very impressed .

Wet it is  at   .369   V    DC 
The  first   current  reading  was  .194 mA    I will  wait a few minutes and see what it  goes down to .


gary





resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #141 on: April 23, 2008, 02:25:21 AM »




I love transistors. I think the earth is going to see a lot of charge in the coming years. Sunspots etc. They could blast a transistor, esp one in the open air so, I want to avoid them only for that reason.

jeanna


I am trying to  avoid  transisters too .   


gary
« Last Edit: April 23, 2008, 02:46:07 AM by resonanceman »

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #142 on: April 23, 2008, 02:32:13 AM »

The  first   current  reading  was  .194 mA    I will  wait a few minutes and see what it  goes down to .


gary



Isn't the current  supposed to drop  after  the  first  surge ?     

my  pancake is  at   .274  mA  after  about  20 min  ......   it  has been wet  over an hour


gary 

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #143 on: April 23, 2008, 03:06:42 AM »
I think it is a pretty  good example of  ring down and how   resistance affects  resonant ciruuits
think  of the top   chart as   ringing a  large bell

Now ............think of the   second  chart as  ringing  the same bell while holding   your hand  on the bell

So, does this mean that the magic of the ringing is to find the combo of all the parts that allows a coil to resonate?

At all?

 It isn't that there are regular resonances and then there are those that ring?

learned another new thing today.

please confirm for me if this is right. thanks.

jeanna

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #144 on: April 23, 2008, 03:26:19 AM »


So, does this mean that the magic of the ringing is to find the combo of all the parts that allows a coil to resonate?

At all?

 It isn't that there are regular resonances and then there are those that ring?

learned another new thing today.

please confirm for me if this is right. thanks.

jeanna


Jeanna

There are different kinds of resonance ...........but  resonance is resonance ........it is all about ringing

Another  way I have  heard  resonance described  ........it is like  electrons " sloshing " back and forth  between  the cap and the coil  .      anything that can affect  the sloshing  will  effect the  resonance, but in general   resistance is   usually a big factor 


HHHhhhhmmmm  I have been watching the current on my pancake   for a little over an hour ..........it is  .714 mA now .
and still going  up 

gary

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #145 on: April 23, 2008, 03:29:30 AM »
@ Gary:

Up is the right direction, I hope it keeps going.

Bill

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #146 on: April 23, 2008, 03:33:30 AM »

HHHhhhhmmmm  I have been watching the current on my pancake   for a little over an hour ..........it is  .714 mA now .
and still going  up 

gary


Nice.

How are you doing this? just probes on either end?
And it is growing with the help of nothing?

did I miss the whole circuit here? just the pancake?

jeanna

serveradministrator

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #147 on: April 23, 2008, 05:45:05 AM »
i guess i posted in the wrong thead for this topic

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #148 on: April 23, 2008, 06:51:12 AM »

HHHhhhhmmmm  I have been watching the current on my pancake   for a little over an hour ..........it is  .714 mA now .
and still going  up 

gary


Nice.

How are you doing this? just probes on either end?
And it is growing with the help of nothing?

did I miss the whole circuit here? just the pancake?

jeanna

Jeanna     

I don't  have any core at all .......I am just measuring  between the copper and iron .
doesn't seem to matter  what end .

The only thing I did  is  get it wet   



The  reading for the current  isn't  changing much anymore .   It is on  1.124  mA
If I leave it  set for  voltage  it starts  around  .340  and  slowly  goes up  to  around .505  V   DC       


There doesn't seem to be any AC   .....  that is  strange  because   when I was  winding  it  there was more  AC than  DC



I  will  try to get a picture online tomorow   


gary

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #149 on: April 24, 2008, 02:52:49 AM »
@ Gary:

More ac than dc?  Yes, I would like to know more about this.  This was while winding?  I wonder what might have changed? I look forward to your pictures.

Bill