Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations  (Read 410847 times)

Pardon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #585 on: June 02, 2008, 05:47:31 AM »
I just finished winding my coil. problems forced me to rewind it like 3 times. it's uses 19 feet of wire. 16 gauge cloth insulated copper, and 14 gauge bare iron wire. it's wound about 2 inches down on a 3/8 inch bolt. wood top and bottom it has 9 coils going down and 5 layers.

no shorts so far. i tested it at .5 ohms on the 5 (copper) and .6 ohms on the 6 (iron) all voltages are 0.00.  but testing between the 5 and 6 i see a pulse of .04 going back to .00 and flashing the minus sign on the meter.

if i can figure out how to add more wire to the Iron side, i will add more length and wind it some more. i don't know what splicing it with a connector would do to the coil. but as of now it's ready to be planted. i don't think i want to try just water first. because i don't think any one has tried just planting first.

lol

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #586 on: June 02, 2008, 06:08:37 AM »



Dave

I have wondered  if the Joe cell  and  Stubblfield  battery  could be combined

I have read that the  Joe cell   makes some  kind of vortex 

I have read that    the water  starts spinning .  .......is this  true ? 

My  ideas were  in the direction of   putting  a stubblfield   coil inside a large  Joe cell .

something to think about .........   filling the   Joe cell with dirt  rather than water ........
If it  was  filled  with dirt  (  organic  matter )  it would    closely  resemble an orgon  collector .
It would be interesting to  see  how the  output of a  stubblfield coil in a Joe cell would compare   filled with  water, dirt ,  and just air .   


gary

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #587 on: June 02, 2008, 06:14:33 AM »


if i can figure out how to add more wire to the Iron side, i will add more length and wind it some more. i don't know what splicing it with a connector would do to the coil. but as of now it's ready to be planted. i don't think i want to try just water first. because i don't think any one has tried just planting first.

lol

Pardon

I don't  know of  any advantage of planting  your coil  before you take any readings ........but I guess that  doesn't  mean that there are no  advantages.   

Good luck with your  coil   

 :)

gary

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #588 on: June 02, 2008, 07:03:01 PM »

Libra Spirit,
Thanks for all that. I spent lots of yesterday on your site and then I watched those very interesting videos.......
Lots to think about and do.

@Bill,
You are right. In fact, jeanna already made one of those magnet readers before she even came to this forum.  ;)

I have not been able to see the field of the NS gen. with it , however. The compass needle shows where the lines are going better than the iron filings do.

Yesterday, I wetted a NS cell inside and held it in every way I could to see some iron filings going off the way they do with a simple magnet.

I think it is just too weak.

I will try this outside.

@Pardon,

I'm glad you thought to bury your coil first, as none of us has tried that yet.

I want to remind you about the cement pots I buried. (I did that to get separation in the soil to get a series connection.) This was way back in November, I think. It took a full week and on one of them longer to get "charged".   After that time in the earth the voltage went up and a series connection was possible.

Since NS indicates that his cells take some time in the earth to condition or charge, do keep them in the earth for a while to see.

That would be AFTER you move it around to find the best spot, leave it there to charge. Mine would lose the charge if I moved them or their alignment , or something...

good idea.

@Dr Stiffler,

Thanks for that information and those links to your work with the magnet. (It may have been on another thread -  in half baked, maybe) .

In your research you described just the same thing that I found on the voltage of those pots. The series was diminished by the set up itself but then it added a consistent amount after that first additional cell.

That means to me that this magnetic field of the earth is what is making a big effect on the cells we put into the earth. It is the same diminished series effect that you found in your lab using magnets.

Thank you,

jeanna

Pardon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #589 on: June 03, 2008, 07:09:50 AM »
I didn't find a good way to add more wire so i just planted the coil. after a half hour the voltages were .31 VDC
.0 VAC and .0 MA. after the half hour i wet the ground to set the earth and rechecked the voltages this time they were .86 VDC 1.3 VAC and .15 Ma. an hour later they were .73 VDC .9 VAC and .19 MA then with a short 5 seconds of shock treatment of 12 VDC .25 MA they were .83 VDC 1.2 VAC and .48 Ma that dropped off to .77 VDC .9 VAC and .26 MA so it's making good progress. i will know more tomarrow when i check it again.

also when it was just in air I added my APM's output to it and I could light an LED for a very short time. doing that is real progress. I am a happy camper now.

I was thinking of wiring a few cells in series with the coil. but only if the coil will come up in Ma's a bit. i know that i can add to the voltage. using series wiring. but i still can't figure out how to get more Amp's the problem with series wiring is that i have 2 sides to think about (the 5 and 6) I think i have to run 2 sets of series wired cells. one being a plus voltage and one being a minus voltage. then if i can wire this coil in series i can add more cells for more voltage and hopefully Amp's. i think only testing will tell.

LOL 

storre

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
    • F11 Music
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #590 on: June 03, 2008, 06:36:10 PM »
@libra_spirit:

Great suggestions! I will have to look back here when I finish receiving my parts. I think some here are forgetting the importance of turning it on and off very quickly with some sort of switching (nc reed switch is what I will try). I think we just have to get the size of the battery up to the point that it will create a strong enough magnetic field to open the switch and collapse the field. I think at that collapsing point something happens to open a window to the radiant energy. Without that, it's just a weak battery that will just go down in voltage.

I see this the same as the water hammer effect, when flowing water is suddenly stopped by an inline valve and reopened. Resonance of the opening and closing might be important also to create a resonant wave going through the coil. Maybe connected to the length of the wire the same as the length of a tube effects it's frequency. A type of electron slap back effect.

jeanna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3546
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #591 on: June 03, 2008, 08:28:39 PM »


also when it was just in air I added my APM's output to it and I could light an LED for a very short time. doing that is real progress. I am a happy camper now.

What does that mean. adding APM's output to it?

Quote
one being a plus voltage and one being a minus voltage.

It does boost the reading of everything as I recall. I used a carbon-rods bunch  and connected it to the + side and a Zn rod to the - side and the overall voltage was the summed amount. Go for it let's see!!

Quote
i think only testing will tell.

 indeed!  ;)

thank you,

jeanna

libra_spirit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #592 on: June 03, 2008, 09:28:23 PM »
storre,

As the knowledge base grows it becomes easier to forget things, but I guarentee each one will remember their own experiments, so this exchange of perceptions is invaluable. It is good to be reminded that OU and pulsing seem to go together. I think if the two systems are both radiant light resonant there is a better chance of them oscillating back and forth in a harmony of some kind. I believe I may be able to come up with some exact wire lengths to test this at some point.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Earth nodes:
I spent about 6 months charting the telluric voltages in one area where I lived. I used a copper clad ground rod 4' long and a long 5/8" diameter threaded rod, and two very long meter leads. The results were a polar chart of a system of nodal points on the surface.

Main voltage is consistently rising from East to West, and on the North South exact line some higher voltages will pop up also.
Trees also create a voltage node on the ground plane and particularly near a root you will get standing nodes of positive charge.

There is a basic pattern of negative charge everywhere, with single nodal points of + appearing along a grid pattern, that increase + to the West, and shift - to the East. These telluric currents I assumed at the time are responsible for the earths North pole at 90 degrees to the current flow.

The charting took two steps
1- locating the first node - I used a simple T pattern and logged voltages at each 6" step outwards
2- charting between nodes to see the overall larger pattern - I used a circle pattern to locate these

Here is the 2nd chart


libra_spirit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #593 on: June 03, 2008, 09:50:09 PM »
Going further we noticed these unique + points on the earth grid were somehow different then a normal electric field. I had current charging things backwards through small diodes. I recall using a 2200 mfd cap and a high frequency diode, and wondering if it was marked wrong, so I tried several other diodes and discovered they were charging the cap backwards, Also a ground rod set about 1 foot deep at one of these + points could be "felt" and often I would go out and just hold the end of one of these with my left palm. It felt electric and good, a healing and rising feeling.

I later identified this energy as a torsion field.

The chart supplied above is in millivolts, and the greatest voltage I could get accross the property was around 300 mv from the earth currents alone. I never figured out any way to get "current" enough for an LED without using active battery elements, like you all are experimenting with here.

Here is the first chart:

You do one line first, then at the highest positive point you do another one at 90 degrees, until you start to locate the positive earth nodes.

Dave L


Pardon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #594 on: June 03, 2008, 10:40:45 PM »
What does that mean. adding APM's output to it?

jeanna

Sorry jeanna  APM's = Ambient Power Module (crystal radio circuit) i just used that circuit as a quick test to see if voltages would pass through the coil. and it did plus i got to light an led from it. but only for a short time.

i am trying different setup's today using cell's connected to the coil. i will post more on that later today.

libra_spirit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #595 on: June 03, 2008, 11:09:10 PM »
Results to date
My greatest achievment during that time was to go right next to one of the + points and beat a 2 foot by 1.5 foot plastic barrier plate into the ground. This set up an insulator just off one of the hot spots. I then pounded one rod into the hot spot and one right up against the plastic plate and got a glorious .087 volts from the ground currents! All within a one foot area. I was elated. This voltage now added to the rods active battery with iron on the negative side as I recall.

I designed a few battery systems using spherical hemispheres of Zinc and copper, but never actually built one. The Zinc would be on the East side and the Copper on the West side and the earth currents would add to the system if placed just off a hot spot. The capacitors would be inside the sphere with one contact to each hemisphere.

Series cells
The worst realization or discovery was when doing series cells. The earth will short them all out basically. The only way to make a series cell is from a large circle to a central point, then a section of the ground will charge up form outside to inside, and since you are always fighting the underground short this gets frustrating.

To harness and use the torsion fields of the earth grid, you need to be inside them, but to raise the voltage in one location you need to work a "node point" and push it more positive using concentric circular elements. This gets expensive fast! LOL! So I moved on.

I never tried the large plastic insulators in a hole idea and working two node points, a lot of digging for sure would be involved to get the area needed. Consider you want to spread out 6 feet, now you have 6 foot of hole to get a good spherical system isolated for a good conductance of the earth. Its the underground part where using insulators becomes hard to achieve. Charge will spread out as a sphere however so this would be the best way to achieve the highest possible charge without loosing it. An earth capacitor, using a torsion field, could also have layers with insulation between them and actually become the capacitor as well. If built and buried around a hot spot it would now have a power source.

I also read somewhere that the earth batteries were seeded with a copper sulphate in the soil to reactivate them. They would spread it over the ground then water it in.

Ground resistance:
Consider that ground rods of 6 foot are used by the phone companies, and they are always placed 6 foot apart in a large ground field. Any closer is considered wasting them. This is because at 6 foot down you have grabbed the entire "hemisphere" of electric potiential in that section of ground. A ground field of 100 rods set up like this will easilly sink 15 amps and more of current that moves along the cable sheaths that run under power lines. I have personally measured 15 amps flowing in one, while this is not a normal effect, they are normally allways flowing an amp or two. To get a strong EM current moving into the ground requires covering more area if the ground is to carry a load current.

Torsion
If you had two strong ground systems placed a distance apart along the east west line you can expect to get some really strong telluric currents, and I think a lot of the old telegraph systems in the US ran East to West. They would start to power each other as the system grew larger, and the earth batteries would appear to be generating some very real power, enough to pull up telegraphs anyway even long after the cells were dried up and half corroded. This is of little use to us wanting the same 15 amps from our 150 foot lot, so if we go with the conventional EM stuff, the numbers do not add up well for a pure EM system. This is where one may choose to entertain the notion that the torsion field may hold some key to greater EM outputs then a simple earth current, as the two systems appear to be linked. The positive nodes on the earth appear to have an energy we do not understand, and to me it feels quite strong. I have no proof as of yet that the torsion systems can power anything however to the degree we presently use in our homes, but I do have a sense about how to propagate them, and their conscious effects.

Dave L

Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #596 on: June 03, 2008, 11:50:49 PM »

Series cells
The worst realization or discovery was when doing series cells. The earth will short them all out basically. The only way to make a series cell is from a large circle to a central point, then a section of the ground will charge up form outside to inside, and since you are always fighting the underground short this gets frustrating.

I think to harness the power, you need high voltage, and not necessarily amps.  Even within Stubblefield's patent, he notes that it is a "voltaic pile."  I think this possibly relates to Stiffler's excitation principle, except in this case the trick is to excite the ground space.  I was thinking maybe try building the rings of wire around a bolt in a voltaic pile fashion, with cotton or other material being the separation.

(http://www.theautomd.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/batteries-3.gif)

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #597 on: June 04, 2008, 01:14:10 AM »
I think to harness the power, you need high voltage, and not necessarily amps.  Even within Stubblefield's patent, he notes that it is a "voltaic pile."  I think this possibly relates to Stiffler's excitation principle, except in this case the trick is to excite the ground space.  I was thinking maybe try building the rings of wire around a bolt in a voltaic pile fashion, with cotton or other material being the separation.



Freezer

Interesting  idea .

I was working in that genreral  direction   on the other  thread ..... I never did get  my pancake  coils to  work together .

I never tried  making   them  all copper   and  all iron and  making a  voltaic  pile with them .   


I agree that  high  voltage is probably important . 
In  my opinion   the keys to radiant  energy   are  short  pulses  and high  voltage 




@ pardon

I am waiting  to hear  how your  shock  treatment   works . 
I read that Stubblfield   did  something to draw the   energy up through the coil .
It  would be  great if it was as simple as a few jolts from a battery .


gary
« Last Edit: June 04, 2008, 01:36:05 AM by resonanceman »

Pardon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #598 on: June 04, 2008, 05:07:41 AM »
here is how i shock a cell or coil i have a pv panel 12 V .25 ma or so it's just a battery maintainer from harbor freight. cost about 12 dollars on sale.  it's used to keep my car and truck battery's up to charge. i don't drive either of them much.

i take the pv panel and make sure it's getting bright light, then take the clips and clip them on to what i want to shock.
note this panel with bright light on it puts out over 20 volts. i just keep it attached for a set amount of time.  thats all their is to it.

i didn't have much luck wiring in series today. i need to have more cells. so i started making cells again. this time i am using real good wire and connectors. but then it started raining so I was unable to complete this part of the project. I am not going to mess around with anything electric in the rain. my body is just to good of a ground. and i really don't like shock treatments.

resonanceman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Re: Stubblefield coils (bifilar) and speculations
« Reply #599 on: June 04, 2008, 07:27:00 AM »
here is how i shock a cell or coil i have a pv panel 12 V .25 ma or so it's just a battery maintainer from harbor freight. cost about 12 dollars on sale.  it's used to keep my car and truck battery's up to charge. i don't drive either of them much.

i take the pv panel and make sure it's getting bright light, then take the clips and clip them on to what i want to shock.
note this panel with bright light on it puts out over 20 volts. i just keep it attached for a set amount of time.  thats all their is to it.

i didn't have much luck wiring in series today. i need to have more cells. so i started making cells again. this time i am using real good wire and connectors. but then it started raining so I was unable to complete this part of the project. I am not going to mess around with anything electric in the rain. my body is just to good of a ground. and i really don't like shock treatments.

Pardon

how did   the voltage and current  hold up  after the shock treatment ?

did  you  hook  the  positive up to copper and  negative  to iron  when you  shocked it?


gary