Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)  (Read 340837 times)

mercurymmm

  • TPU-Elite
  • Newbie
  • *******
  • Posts: 3
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #285 on: May 14, 2008, 05:23:22 AM »
Nicely done.

Someone asked eariler about SM whereabouts.  I know his family in OC.

I know about UEC and where it's incorporated...not in U.S.

I just stumbled upon this site and... intrigued to read what people are saying.

Mercury
mercurymmm@yahoo.com

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #286 on: May 14, 2008, 05:55:28 AM »
  cool mercman

   Maybe you can persuade Steven to come forward and take credit for all the work he did back in 98.

nickc44

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #287 on: May 15, 2008, 03:28:26 PM »
@ Otto and All

There is no harm in tyring tubes as there is no harm in tyring any of the combonations, the more
combonations we use the better chance we will find an answer.

If these threads are about anything they're about SM's words and one of the things he said
is...  you will find the answer easier by using tubes. Transistors are dirty things..

Tubes helped him to find the combonation that worked and then.. Even with the correct answer
it took him a long time to get the answer in SS.

This may be the same reason musicians use tube amps
They like the smooth sound that comes form them. That clean sound
and signal may be what is needed..

So OTTO good work keep it up and thanks for your time

Nick


Hello all,

@AM

I have to be honest: I promised a nice man here in the forum to build my tube oscillators.....

35 years ago I learned everything about tubes. I was really good. Tube radios, tube TVs. In the times of tubes I learned in school how to repair tube TVs and in the same time had a lot of TVs to repair!! And I earned a good money as a very joung guy.Then came the time with transistors, ICs.......and as it happens, I forgot everything about tubes....

How I see the development of a TPU:

- SM was a TV repair man, he knew about the TV story and wanted to know what happened when the TV got out of frequencies.
- I think he was playing around with a deflection coil
- as a TV had tubes, SM used them also in his work
- the voltage on tubes plates is say 300V more or less
- with such signals he was pulsing his TPU and got it work
- later he had to use SS because tubes are a little big, ha,ha.
- with SS devices, to say MOSFETs, he had nice signals but at a low voltage level and so he had to think about how to rise the voltage of the signals - to get biiiig signals, like with tubes
- the solution is well seen: additional coil(s) sitting in the center of the TPU

In this way he got an easier acceleration of the particles, he didnt had to use a soooo high frequency to accelerate the tornado and at an unknown (?) frequency mix the tornado accelerates for itself so....
He got nice clean signals
and he got biiiig signals

This all I see with my setup.
I only need to rise a little the voltage from my power supply and then......I can again repair my equipment.

I think its enough crap from me this week.

Otto

PS: AM, maybe you know something about the AlMn alloy???



otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #288 on: May 16, 2008, 06:44:07 AM »
Hello all,

@Nick44 and all

Without a discussion: TUBES!!

I saw it in my 2 years: MOSFETs are really dirty. A lot of hash, a lot of heat, a lot of s..t.
When Im mixing my frequencies I see a lot of times that my bulb "wants" but the SS oscillators shuts OFF!!
Then I see when my signals are clear, without hash, my bulb shines like a champ.

Of course there are a lot of other reasons to use tubes:

1. SS oscillators

signals on the output = 5V - 12V or a little more - this is the "start" point - this signal is feeded into the TPU
from the power supply 12V - 50V/ 2 - 5A

5A when you totally missed the frequency mix, or you have a short in your coils or....

2. tube oscillators

signals on the output - plate - say, from 200V and much more - THIS is the new "start" point
from the power supply you can have any voltage you want!! Higher voltage, less current.

I really dont want to teach people here. They are really good!! But....

If there is a little Tesla in our forum I want to ask because I dont know and I didnt see it:

How can I build SS oscillators that can gives me signals in hundreds of volts?? Hmmm....maybe wrong question.

We all have signals swirling in out TPUs from say 400V and up - I have 1200V! just with coils.

This signals we got from our SS oscillators that gave us 5 - 15V signals and MOSFETs.

As Marco is quiet, not posting his results, Im asking myself:

Whats the level of the voltage  IN THE TPU when I use tubes?? We all know that the coils rises our signals. Yes, I know, it depends also on the voltage from the power supply. THIS IS THE GOOD NEWS!!!!

Im not hanging anymore on the voltages from 12V - 50V DC from my power supply!!! Im free to try voltages that I WANT!! In this way I can play, I hope not forever, ha,ha.

What Im talking about??

Didnt "dfro" say: rise the voltage from your battery?? Ooooo, I have a "special battery". But I can use it only with tubes!!

The people here in the forum have luck: if my English would be better I wou much more post but...

Otto

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #289 on: May 16, 2008, 01:53:21 PM »
   This circuit uses a # of tubes to replace spark gaps.  The television needs to be plugged in but which bulbs will be brighter.  Power feedback via a solar panel and inverter would work but I'm getting low on rescources.

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #290 on: May 16, 2008, 09:24:47 PM »
@all

Like I said before... If you want to use tubes, USE tubes! SM in the videos wasn't so I am not......

@Sparks

 If you are silly enough to do what you propose in your "schematic", then you better do some research on X-Ray production, as you may leave a nice picture of your bones on the wall! (I post this for safety)

@Otto

You had better research the same. (concerning X-Rays) Too high of voltage and tubes don't necessarily mix.

@all again

Radio fields and electromagnetic shielding are the least of our worries!

Nobody building TPUS needs to flop like a fish due to electrical shock, die unnecessarily from cancer due to an X-Ray bath, etc., etc., etc.

Be safe people.

In my various hobbies, I HAVE been subject to dangerous levels of electrical shock, and it is NOT fun. I have awakened laying behind a couch, because my arm brushed both a frame ground and the wrong wire at the same time. I have had to check to see if someone needs CPR, because they bumped a primary of a working Oudin coil. (Thank goodness it was a tiny one. Probably only 80 or 90 joules, instead of 600 or 1000....) A man I knew is dying from cancer due to X-ray production because of a laser he was building.


I have designed and built everything from quarter million volt tesla coils, to higher amperage lower voltage oudin coils, to 5000volt much higher amperage D'Arsonval high frequency autotransformers. I have built Van De Graff, and Wimhurst electrostatic machines. ALL OF THEM ARE LETHAL. There is no such thing as SAFE electricity.

Concerning High Frequency Electricity...... this stuff is particularly deadly. Not necessarily from the direct shock, but the induced fields and unwanted particle emission. The person whom thinks otherwise will end up taking a dirt nap sooner or later, just a matter of time.


Consider anything with high voltage lethal, and anything with caps even though battery powered as dangerous. When working with voltages above 110, USE ONE HAND, with the other in your back pocket to keep it completely out of the way.

Safety is no joke, and what we are working with here can be dangerous if not lethal. Assume lethal, to minimize it's danger.

Sorry, but this needs to be stated.

Paul Andrulis
« Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 10:17:58 PM by pauldude000 »

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #291 on: May 16, 2008, 10:13:44 PM »
@all

Sorry for the lack of posts lately. I have been building and testing. I will post more when I have more relevant ideas, news, or data. At this moment I am VERY busy.

Paul Andrulis


sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #292 on: May 17, 2008, 04:07:13 AM »
 
@Pauldude


      The first thing I did after taking the tv back panel off was to check for a shield around the flyback.
No shield.  It's a small set.  I place a small flurescent there that lights up.  Trying to grab some of the xrays there.  Then I series fed the crt through a small  flurescent and it lights up.  I'm up to about 10 watts cold electricity at this point..  Then I wound a 4 turn bifilar around a 40 watt 18" down placed one end near the flyback and fed the coil on one end from the flyback output,  it lights up between the flyback and the coil pretty darn bright. Now I think I'm up to about 15 watts illumination. Plus the crt and all the other goodies the flyback drives. 
    What did I learn from all of this?  High voltage stressed space gets cold. Bulbs are lit but they are colder than the surrounding air. There is plazma inside the flurescents so they should be getting hot.
Cold plazma.  Maybe the aether is a cold plazma and the electric field keeps it dispersed enough so you don't see any temperature rise. There is a shitload of energy in the plazma but it is not relavent to anything until we mess with it's stratification. hmmmm

mdmiller

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #293 on: May 17, 2008, 06:02:40 AM »
here's an interesting claim from this page:
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread13162.html


...... "I cracked the Steven Mark device and it is to dangerous to give out. Half the homes in the country would have gone up in flames if I had handed that out. I'll crack this one too. If it is the best after I crack Meyers's invention you will see it on the net. So, I'm working on it like I said. "......

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #294 on: May 17, 2008, 06:17:37 AM »
If this person had cracked the TPU - he would know how to contain the energy - the field.

turbo

  • Guest
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #295 on: May 17, 2008, 01:57:37 PM »
Most of the people think that nobody has still replicated a working TPU.
This is not so.
The TPU has been replicated many times in many diffrent configurations but all with the same needed set of parameters to make it work.
Some people ask where are all the answers? did we miss them??
The answers are right under there noses but they are too busy discussing other things like who is gay and who is not or where the energy is comming from...

M.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #296 on: May 17, 2008, 02:04:45 PM »
@ Marco

     When they get working right does the collector get cold while the emitter gets warm or vice versa?

turbo

  • Guest
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #297 on: May 17, 2008, 02:25:14 PM »
If you mean the heating problem this has been solved.

M.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #298 on: May 17, 2008, 02:40:48 PM »
   @Marco

    I'm referring to  normal dynamic operation of the tpu.     

turbo

  • Guest
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #299 on: May 17, 2008, 02:49:04 PM »
If you load it heavier it will heat up more the main output winding which is to be expected, but not like in the old days where the units heated up to a point of self destruction with or without load.
You can think of it as improvement.
There are a lot of other factors that directly influence it's operating characteristics.

M.