@ groundloop


Basically, we had this equation in one of our EE classes, for coil design.

using 10ga insulated wire, and a  pair of caramic-ferrite rings (that we had stripped the wire off of)
we designed the coil to pick up the ambient 120v/60Hz (U.S.) EMF that was circulating throughout the building.
the rest of the circuit was just a resistor/cap to ground to balance the load and a square-wave rectifier to give us a D.C. output.

i think our final outcome was around 3.5v @ 150ma, hardly any power to speak of, but it lit the 2 led's and made the small fan turn. 

It may have nothing to do with the device in the video, his is a lot smaller than ours, it just made me think of that the way he was holding it close to the wall when its working.

I think I figure out how this thing works and why the voltage "seams" to go up. Thanks to Groundloop, the gate of the mosfet is holding a capacitance which holds, as when we touch the gate, some voltage that eventually runs out. As it runs out the drive-source current diminish and current consumption goes down and the voltage goes up (because of the battery "ghost" voltage restoration) and we don't notice anything because those LEDs seams to not change in brightness since they are very good in showing light with very little current.

As the brightness goes down very little per mili-mili volt and it is not noticeble by human eyes but the meter is very sensitive and we only notice that therefore the phenomena seams to be that the battery is recharging itself up.

Now, with all the being said, aside from the fact that I am very piss at it, but hey, that science, inst it?!!! Unless someone come up with a real voltage gain with measurement with the battery disconnected from the device I think my explanation is the final explanation. All the tests that I have been doing, duplications and trials I concluded that thats the case.

Some of my tests demonstrates that with 5 IRF510 with only 2 I was able to replicate well the device, I think there is a huge difference in those parts concerning that capacitance in the gate and its leakage. Groundloop?

Anyone?

Well, at least I am happy that I figure out how to make a device that is definetly hell of efficient in keeping low self-consumption and good light control.

Fausto.

ps: [EDIT] but because I am very persistent and I am to make sure my theory is backup by data. I am now leaving connected the amp meter in series with all the LEDs and make notes of the amperage too, so that brightness of the LEDs will be irrelevant (only for entertainment). Voltage cross battery, current going through the LEDs are now my data. Let's hope for a better future.

I think I figure out how this thing works and why the voltage "seams" to go up. Thanks to Groundloop, the gate of the mosfet is holding a capacitance which holds, as when we touch the gate, some voltage that eventually runs out. As it runs out the drive-source current diminish and current consumption goes down and the voltage goes up (because of the battery "ghost" voltage restoration) and we don't notice anything because those LEDs seams to not change in brightness since they are very good in showing light with very little current.

As the brightness goes down very little per mili-mili volt and it is not noticeble by human eyes but the meter is very sensitive and we only notice that therefore the phenomena seams to be that the battery is recharging itself up.

Now, with all the being said, aside from the fact that I am very piss at it, but hey, that science, inst it?!!! Unless someone come up with a real voltage gain with measurement with the battery disconnected from the device I think my explanation is the final explanation. All the tests that I have been doing, duplications and trials I concluded that thats the case.

Some of my tests demonstrates that with 5 IRF510 with only 2 I was able to replicate well the device, I think there is a huge difference in those parts concerning that capacitance in the gate and its leakage. Groundloop?

Anyone?

Well, at least I am happy that I figure out how to make a device that is definetly hell of efficient in keeping low self-consumption and good light control.

Fausto.

ps: [EDIT] but because I am very persistent and I am to make sure my theory is backup by data. I am now leaving connected the amp meter in series with all the LEDs and make notes of the amperage too, so that brightness of the LEDs will be irrelevant (only for entertainment). Voltage cross battery, current going through the LEDs are now my data. Let's hope for a better future.

@ Plengo

I am sorry.  This too is what I was speaking of yesterday.  No true charge of amperage.  But it was fun! 

Back to the trenches.....

Merry Christmas!

Bruce

[EDIT] Deleted.

Hi @All,

Is this project  busted?   Quote from Myth Buster.

I am about to embark on a a new project related to overunity early next year.
This time it has nothing to do with magnets,coil or electronics.

I 've discoverd this site www.glopaint.com where they recently discovered Litroenergy - a new form of light source which  doesn't require battery at all.It will produce light for 12 years without batteries as they say it's non radioactive.

My plan to purchase this early next year and stack solar cell (eg: on both side of A4 size product.
The cost as mention to light up 8 ? x 11 piece of plastic 1/8? thick is about .35 cents.

I believe this thing may have the potential to generate small amount of power to tricke charge my phone or laptop for many years .

I'm sure somebody or myself will start a new post over at overunity.com related to this project on litroenergy,no soldering or electronic experience may be required.

Quote for the day.Remember to keep information open unruled by EGO, it will benefit mankind in long run.

800 hours is better, I can wait for that, after all it has been running now for at least a full week, so 3 more to go and a little bit more than what? If it runs for 40 days what does it prove? (no pun intended).

I am still testing some more and watching the voltage and current.

Is there anyone with a battery that was dead for a long time and once on the system would go up? I am about to test that too.

I am not 100% convinced of my own findings because my first version is running pretty good and the light intensity does not seam to change at all, it is very stable. Again it is subjective the perception of light intensity but after 7 days?!!! I will let that baby run for 40 days.

Only time will tell the whole story once I collect enough data and again I will publish it without concerns for my feelings, after all we are looking for the thruth and thats what science is based upon.

Fausto.

[EDIT] Deleted.

If there was a way to make the little oscillators spin  it might be more  interesting.
at this stage the fields are going back wards and fowards....like a normal transformer...thats why you get better results with a radio antenna.

Perhaps a larger coil/transformer outside the little ring  would be a better way to pick up the timing pulse?

Of course this only would only spin up like a gyroscope if electrons had inertia......Im not sure that many could agree on that one way or the other.

Google ...cross field antenna...and bhibas...