Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 2195025 times)

Kul_ash

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2430 on: May 09, 2008, 11:22:34 AM »

I shall talk about different ways of moving the bob (or the knot) from Position A to Position B.  The analogy is ?going from Street One to Street Ten on a hill?.  One can go by car, by bus, by bicycle or on foot.  One can move in a straight line or take a detoured route.  The work done or energy spent would be different with different scenarios.


Lol Tseung  ;D That is normal physics of this real world! In your fantasy world, you keep moving on horizontal road and gravity keeps pushing you up  ;D So your world has anti gravity! Our normal, boring world does not offer any such exciting push for us to go up. We have to waste gas or our energy to go up the hill!  :'(

Koen1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2431 on: May 09, 2008, 11:58:10 AM »
Hold on there "Top Gun"/"Tseung", I think you missed a point in your own slides...

"Tseung" showed a picture of 3 spring "scales" or actually Newtonmeters lying horizontally on
a flat surface like a wooden board, connected on one side to eachother, and pinned to the board on the other side
of each meter. He correctly showed that, when one of the three is fixed and the other two are pulled,
the total of force applied to the two pulled springs is divided equally over the three newtonmeters at the central knot.

Then Hans very rightly asks where the heck is the "Lee-Tseung Pull" and where is the "Lead Out Energy" in this
three newtonmeter example.

And in reply "Top Gun" answers with a repetition of his earlier ranting about a weight puspended vertically
on a string which receives a pulsed force "pulling" it towards one side.
We know "Tseung" a.k.a. "Top Gun" believes this silly little supended-weight-on-a-string setup somehow
magically "leads out" gravity energy when you apply a "horizontal" pull even though he has himself shown
that a true horizontal force cannot be applied in a swinging system and even though his entire analysis
shows nothing more that the mechanism for pulling a suspended weight to one side.

The fact that 3 opposing forces acting on points equally divided over a circle are equal to eachother at the
point where the scales connect does not prove that the suspended weight can magically "lead out"
gravity energy, it does not show how the "Lee-Tseung Pull" can be applied, and the horizontal
triangular force division does not equate to a moving pendulum system with a vertically
suspended weight and an impossible horizontal "pull".

Sorry, but no matter how much you want a brick feather to float, it will still fall.

Kul_ash

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2432 on: May 09, 2008, 12:35:37 PM »
Hold on there "Top Gun"/"Tseung", I think you missed a point in your own slides...

"Tseung" showed a picture of 3 spring "scales" or actually Newtonmeters lying horizontally on
a flat surface like a wooden board, connected on one side to eachother, and pinned to the board on the other side
of each meter. He correctly showed that, when one of the three is fixed and the other two are pulled,
the total of force applied to the two pulled springs is divided equally over the three newtonmeters at the central knot.

Then Hans very rightly asks where the heck is the "Lee-Tseung Pull" and where is the "Lead Out Energy" in this
three newtonmeter example.

And in reply "Top Gun" answers with a repetition of his earlier ranting about a weight puspended vertically
on a string which receives a pulsed force "pulling" it towards one side.
We know "Tseung" a.k.a. "Top Gun" believes this silly little supended-weight-on-a-string setup somehow
magically "leads out" gravity energy when you apply a "horizontal" pull even though he has himself shown
that a true horizontal force cannot be applied in a swinging system and even though his entire analysis
shows nothing more that the mechanism for pulling a suspended weight to one side.

The fact that 3 opposing forces acting on points equally divided over a circle are equal to eachother at the
point where the scales connect does not prove that the suspended weight can magically "lead out"
gravity energy, it does not show how the "Lee-Tseung Pull" can be applied, and the horizontal
triangular force division does not equate to a moving pendulum system with a vertically
suspended weight and an impossible horizontal "pull".

Sorry, but no matter how much you want a brick feather to float, it will still fall.

Koen, Chric, Pirate, Hans ........................ we are questioning and making fun of Galileo junior! :-\ The greatest scientist of 21st century, the biggest lottery winner (of Tseung's fantasy world)! Shame on us. Our names will go down in history book (of Tseung's fantasy world) as really reall bad guys, who did not understand simple parellelogram experiment and 0 level physics!  :'( :'( :'(

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2433 on: May 09, 2008, 01:42:16 PM »
Dear Mr. Tseung,

I now know the frustration in teaching over the Internet.

Some have no background.  Teaching Physics and Mathematics to those without foundation is a thankless task.

Some do not care about the information.  They just want to have fun.  There is no point in explaining serious stuff.

Some are from the CIA or the Like.  They are paid to disrupt.  We have to pity their hopeless task.

Sow seeds as taught in the Bible.  Some will bear fruit.  The information will be recorded as history.

Kul_ash

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2434 on: May 09, 2008, 02:25:35 PM »
Dear Mr. Tseung,

I now know the frustration in teaching over the Internet.

Some have no background.  Teaching Physics and Mathematics to those without foundation is a thankless task.

Some do not care about the information.  They just want to have fun.  There is no point in explaining serious stuff.

Some are from the CIA or the Like.  They are paid to disrupt.  We have to pity their hopeless task.

Sow seeds as taught in the Bible.  Some will bear fruit.  The information will be recorded as history.

Talking to yourself again?? ;D
We did not ask you to teach us physics and mathematics. We just asked you to "enlighten" us on your theory and asked you questions. You failed miserably. You can not even draw correct figures. You tried, tried and tried and finally gave up all your wonderful "diagrams" and came to your basic argument "slide 3 can not be wrong!"  ;D Now we can not go in circles like you again and again! So we decided to have fun rather.
And please, CIA have lots of real issues  ;D You call yourself Galileo, greatest scientist of 21st century and claim CIA and likes are behind you! In our world it is simply called as a mental disorder  :D
Ands ya, till today you have never told me how you pull that pendulum? Or do you think as I am CIA, you should not tell me the secret pull?  ;D

Ben Waballs

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2435 on: May 09, 2008, 02:31:24 PM »
Well Larry, I guess with that its back to 1135!!!

Koen1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2436 on: May 09, 2008, 02:57:27 PM »
Well Larry, I guess with that its back to 1135!!!
??? London Bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down.... ;) ;D :D

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2437 on: May 09, 2008, 11:54:09 PM »
Dear Hans,

The figure pendulum28.jpg shows a possible movement of the Scale B.  It tries to share half of the work with Scale A.  If the external supplied energy is via Scale B, then Gravity must be doing the remaining work via Scale A.

Many forum members do not understand that the work can be done via the Pendulum String.  In Physics, if there is a force and a displacement, we can resolve both into vertical and horizontal components.  We can then calculate the vertical work and the horizontal work done.

Pendulum28.jpg clearly shows that the work done is not by the external force via Scale B only.  Gravitational energy is Lead Out via Scale A.


hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2438 on: May 10, 2008, 04:31:31 AM »

Ands ya, till today you have never told me how you pull that pendulum? Or do you think as I am CIA, you should not tell me the secret pull?  ;D

The secret pull is the two or more fingered reciprocating pull on a male appendage. If you keep this up long enough you will have an indisputable lead out of energy and matter. Try the experiment. It cannot be wrong!

This confirms the validity of the Lee-Tseung theory.

Hans von Lieven

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2439 on: May 10, 2008, 05:54:34 AM »
you know, i have witnessed similar behavior from small groups of males in elementary/jr. high school

you guys need to grow up. you are not accomplishing anything with your petty insults of tseung. point in fact you are demonstrating exactly how immature you can be. and those of you who think its "fun"... fuck i can't begin to express how pathetic that is.

oh yeah...  enlighten

Main Entry:
    en·light·en
Pronunciation:
    \in-ˈlÄ«-tÉ™n, en-\
Function:
    transitive verb
Inflected Form(s):
    en·light·ened; en·light·en·ing \-ˈlÄ«t-niÅ‹, -tÉ™n-iÅ‹\
Date:
    1587

1archaic : illuminate
2 a: to furnish knowledge to : instruct <enlightened us about the problem> b: to give spiritual insight to

last time i checked instruct was a synonym for teach
http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/teach

so are you talking circles kul? sounds like you have become the thing you despise...

and the 75,000+ hits... googlebot and spiders?  LMFAO ok lets say the googlebot hits this site every 30 minutes (thats about how often it hits the sites i admin, perhaps stephan would tell us how often googlebot hits this site). this thread has been active for almost a year...
365 days * 24 hours a day = 8760 hours in a year...divided by 2 since the bot hits every half hour and you have? 4380 google bot hits in a year. now, lets be generous and give the same to yahoo and a couple other search bots. 4380 * 5 = 21900.   still 50,000+ hits short of the 75,000+ mark... and you guys talk about tseung talking out his ass..... am i to to assume that you are gonna attribute the remaining 50,000+ hits coming from tseung and his allegedly multiple persona's hitting the refresh button?  LOLZ

and yes, i urge you, please go to KINDERGARTEN again and learn basic social skills. that is the first step for you
« Last Edit: May 10, 2008, 07:02:18 AM by WilbyInebriated »

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2440 on: May 10, 2008, 07:05:18 AM »
you know, i have witnessed similar behavior from small groups of males in jr. high school

you guys need to grow up. you are not accomplishing anything with your petty insults of tseung. point in fact you are demonstrating exactly how immature you can be. and those of you who think its "fun"... fuck i can't begin to express how pathetic that is.

oh yeah...  enlighten

Main Entry:
    en?light?en
Pronunciation:
    \in-ˈlÄ«-tÉ™n, en-\
Function:
    transitive verb
Inflected Form(s):
    en?light?ened; en?light?en?ing \-ˈlÄ«t-niÅ‹, -tÉ™n-iÅ‹\
Date:
    1587

1archaic : illuminate
2 a: to furnish knowledge to : instruct <enlightened us about the problem> b: to give spiritual insight to

last time i checked instruct was a synonym for teach
http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/teach

so are you talking circles kul? sounds like you have become the thing you despise...

and the 75,000+ hits... googlebot and spiders?  LMFAO ok lets say the googlebot hits this site every 30 minutes (thats about how often it hits the sites i admin, perhaps stephan would tell us how often googlebot hits this site). this thread has been active for almost a year...
365 days * 24 hours a day = 8760 hours in a year...divided by 2 since the bot hits every half hour and you have? 4380 google bot hits in a year. now, lets be generous and give the same to yahoo and a couple other search bots. 4380 * 5 = 21900.   still 50,000+ hits short of the 75,000+ mark... and you guys talk about tseung talking out his ass..... am i to to assume that you are gonna attribute the remaining 50,000+ hits coming from tseung and his allegedly multiple persona's hitting the refresh button?  LOLZ

and yes, i urge you, please go to KINDERGARTEN again and learn basic social skills. that is the first step for you

Hey Wilby or whatever your name is:

Tseung really needs your sympathy and support. Maybe you can help him solve his muddled up Physics or prove he's 'O' level Physics is correct?
Then come back and tell us so we can all learn this magnificient free crap-out energy?

cheers
chrisC

utilitarian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 816
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2441 on: May 10, 2008, 07:07:22 AM »
you know, i have witnessed similar behavior from small groups of males in elementary/jr. high school

I believe if you count correctly, Tseung's many personas actually outnumber his critics, so he is really ganging up on us.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2442 on: May 10, 2008, 07:16:47 AM »
Hey Wilby or whatever your name is:

Tseung really needs your sympathy and support. Maybe you can help him solve his muddled up Physics or prove he's 'O' level Physics is correct?
Then come back and tell us so we can all learn this magnificient free crap-out energy?

cheers
chrisC

no he doesn't need my sympathy or support. as you FAILED to notice, i spoke nothing of his physics ideas. that was not the point of my post. as far as "telling" you anything i have told you what you NEED to learn...basic social skills.
so i will  i urge you AGAIN, please go to KINDERGARTEN again and learn basic social skills. that is the first step for you.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2443 on: May 10, 2008, 07:18:42 AM »
you know, i have witnessed similar behavior from small groups of males in elementary/jr. high school

I believe if you count correctly, Tseung's many personas actually outnumber his critics, so he is really ganging up on us.

ltseung, top gun, miss forever, and one more i can't recall... that would be 4. and the immature gang? more than 4... where did you learn math? are you making up your own definition of "correctly"?

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2444 on: May 10, 2008, 07:27:33 AM »
Wilby:

The day I take social skills lessons from the likes of you is probably the same day Lawrence gets the Nobel Peace Prize in physics.  I appreciate your advice and noble intentions but, you can cram both of them where the sun don't shine.  Am I not being clear enough?  If not, I will post again in "kindergarten" language so you may perhaps understand.  Thanks for playing.

Bill