Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 2195009 times)

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2415 on: May 09, 2008, 02:20:15 AM »
G'day Lawrence,

Which one of your spring scales provides the Lee-Tseung Pull and where is the surplus energy?

Hans von Lieven  ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2416 on: May 09, 2008, 02:50:00 AM »
G'day Lawrence,

Which one of your spring scales provides the Lee-Tseung Pull and where is the surplus energy?

Hans von Lieven  ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

Dear Hans,

You probably missed the last 200 posts while you were away.  I am reproducing the corrected pendulum08.jpg for you.

In this pendulum08.jpg, we placed the board vertical. We replaced one of the Scales with the 60-unit weight.  The Physics still applies.  The Lee-Tseung Pull is applied via Scale B. The Bob is moved from Position A to Position B.

If we assume that the string and the scales as inextensible, the displacement of the knot will be the same as that of the Bob.

I shall talk about different ways of moving the bob (or the knot) from Position A to Position B.  The analogy is ?going from Street One to Street Ten on a hill?.  One can go by car, by bus, by bicycle or on foot.  One can move in a straight line or take a detoured route.  The work done or energy spent would be different with different scenarios.

The Physics and Mathematics involved in applying different Force Functions and/or Displacement Functions to move the knot from Position A to Position B can be different.  Some will use exactly the external energy  for the move.  Some will use more  (and waste energy).  Some will Lead Out  gravitational energy.

Hopefully, you are one of those who can understand the Parallelogram of Forces and the calculations involved.  Can you follow me so far???

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2417 on: May 09, 2008, 03:26:04 AM »
G"day Lawrence alias top gun alias whatever fits.

 ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

I think your elucidation on lead out energy suffered somewhat in the translation from Chinese into English.

Hans

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2418 on: May 09, 2008, 03:43:09 AM »
@ Hans:

Maybe Forever can explain it?

Bill

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2419 on: May 09, 2008, 03:51:28 AM »
G"day Lawrence alias top gun alias whatever fits.

 ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

I think your elucidation on lead out energy suffered somewhat in the translation from Chinese into English.

Hans

The first way of moving the bob (or knot) from Position A to Position B involves zero tension on Scale A.  Scale B is placed in the vertical position and take up the 60-unit weight totally.  It is moved up through the vertical displacement dH.  It is then moved horizontally.  The final movement is to swing it to the final horizontal Position B.  This is shown in Pendulum10.jpg.

In this particular way of moving, note the following:
(1)   Scale A has no tension until the final position.  The Pendulum string does no work most of the time.
(2)   The increase in potential energy of the 60-unit weight is totally supplied by Scale B.  The horizontal movement of Scale B does not contribute to the vertical increase in potential energy of the 60-unit weight.
(3)   There is no tension on Scale A until the end.  However, at the end there is no movement of the bob or knot, hence no work was done.

This particular way of moving obeys the classic understanding of Conservation of Energy.  The increase in potential energy of the bob comes totally from the external source via Scale B.  There is little or no loss.

Hans, do you have any comments or doubts on this part so far???

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2420 on: May 09, 2008, 04:13:27 AM »
G"day Lawrence alias top gun alias whatever fits.

 ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

I think your elucidation on lead out energy suffered somewhat in the translation from Chinese into English.

Hans

Hahaha! Good one. That's why this thread will never end!

cheers
chrisC

ps: You've missed the correct answer whilst you were away. Now Lawrence will have to go over 2000 plus posts to educate you in the finer details of 'O' level Physics!  See what've done Hans! Now we have to start the loop again!

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2421 on: May 09, 2008, 05:31:06 AM »
OK:

The results are now in.  The fellow on the right takes first prize.  At first, they thought he was actually Professor Whoflungdung and almost disqualified him.  After further review, it was revealed that he was just a very good imitation.  the votes were counted, and re-counted.  And now, Jimmy "Egg" Fooyung has taken first place.  He said he was honored to have such a prize conferred upon him.  He also said he has always respected the work of Professor Whoflungdung and will always remember this moment as a highlight of his career. We should all offer our congratulations for this great achievement.

Bill.

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2422 on: May 09, 2008, 07:37:35 AM »
Dear Hans,

I hope that you are not distracted by other posts.

Pendulum27.jpg shows an erratic path.  The work done or energy spent can be much higher than the increase in potential energy of the bob.

In the case of the simple pendulum, the path can be restricted by the string to form an arc.  However, the Force F can be in any direction and with any magnitude.  That would affect the work done or energy spent.

Is the explanation clear so far???

Kul_ash

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2423 on: May 09, 2008, 08:27:38 AM »
Dear Hans,

I hope that you are not distracted by other posts.

Pendulum27.jpg shows an erratic path.  The work done or energy spent can be much higher than the increase in potential energy of the bob.

In the case of the simple pendulum, the path can be restricted by the string to form an arc.  However, the Force F can be in any direction and with any magnitude.  That would affect the work done or energy spent.

Is the explanation clear so far???

Ha ha ha ha!!!! So after hiding for few days, you are now back with same bullshit diagrams and making Hans von as your new customer!!!  ;D ;D ;D
You are presenting same flawed diagrams all over again. Tseung is claiming he is energy expert and good at theory!!  ;D ;D ;D  I can't imagine what will happen to you if you really go to America with these diagrams!!  ;D Or will it be just you telling to us that you went to US with Tseung, Forever, friend, devil etc. had a meeting, many "reporters" came and all easily understood the theory and they confirmed you have won the lottery, and you post all the details on the forum?:)
There are many fantasy places in US any way, you can occupy one.
You still seem to not even opened a real physics book ever!
Hans just don;t reply to those 1000s of obvious mistakes you see in those diagrams. They are from Tseung's fantasy land where he is the king! :) He finds new customer every day to show his tricks! But they are so bad that he won't even get a penny for all his tricks! he he he ;)

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2424 on: May 09, 2008, 08:38:36 AM »

Ha ha ha ha!!!! So after hiding for few days, you are now back with same bullshit diagrams and making Hans von as your new customer!!!  ;D ;D ;D
You are presenting same flawed diagrams all over again. Tseung is claiming he is energy expert and good at theory!!  ;D ;D ;D  I can't imagine what will happen to you if you really go to America with these diagrams!!  ;D Or will it be just you telling to us that you went to US with Tseung, Forever, friend, devil etc. had a meeting, many "reporters" came and all easily understood the theory and they confirmed you have won the lottery, and you post all the details on the forum?:)
There are many fantasy places in US any way, you can occupy one.
You still seem to not even opened a real physics book ever!
Hans just don;t reply to those 1000s of obvious mistakes you see in those diagrams. They are from Tseung's fantasy land where he is the king! :) He finds new customer every day to show his tricks! But they are so bad that he won't even get a penny for all his tricks! he he he ;)

I can suggest Tseung takes Forever to Disneyland. You see, Mickey Mouse is real! So is Donald Duck!
If that's not enough fantasy, there's Michael Jackson's Neverland down the road. Tseung might get some more ideas for his screwed-up Physics, such as these pathetic diagrams that Kul-ash has already easily demonstrated as a bunch of nonsense!

cheers
chrisC

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2425 on: May 09, 2008, 09:37:23 AM »
The important point about pendulum27.jpg is that - that are many Force and Displacement Functions that allow the bob or knot to go from Position A to Position B.

So long as these Force and Displacement Functions obey the Laws of physics, they are possible paths.

If the Lee-Tseung Pulls do not violate the Laws of Physics, they are possible paths.  Thus Leading Out energy is definitely possible.

Unless someone can prove that the Lee-Tseung Pulls violate the Laws of Physics, New Energy Machines using Lead Out gravitational or electron motion energy are possible.  There are already over 300 known OU inventions Worldwide.

The Earth is round.  There were some diehards denying that fact for Centuries.

Who cares about insults???  Tseung should thank them for drawing in the crowd.  There are over 75,000 hits on this thread already.

Kul_ash

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2426 on: May 09, 2008, 09:51:09 AM »
The important point about pendulum27.jpg is that - that are many Force and Displacement Functions that allow the bob or knot to go from Position A to Position B.

So long as these Force and Displacement Functions obey the Laws of physics, they are possible paths.

If the Lee-Tseung Pulls do not violate the Laws of Physics, they are possible paths.  Thus Leading Out energy is definitely possible.

Unless someone can prove that the Lee-Tseung Pulls violate the Laws of Physics, New Energy Machines using Lead Out gravitational or electron motion energy are possible.  There are already over 300 known OU inventions Worldwide.

The Earth is round.  There were some diehards denying that fact for Centuries.

Who cares about insults???  Tseung should thank them for drawing in the crowd.  There are over 75,000 hits on this thread already.

So now the old Tseung is coming out of Top_gun!  ;D You are lifting pendulum yourself and calling it a possible path of lead out gravity  ;D ;D ;D ;D
None of those 300 OU machines are working! They will never :)
Forget about them, you first fix how you pull that pendulum cause till today you have no clue about it!
Those 74,999 hits are to see how comical you can be and to have a daily dose of laughter!  ;D
So should we call you Galileo junior now?
And yes, I again urge you, please go to high school again and learn basic physics. That is the first step for you  :D

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2427 on: May 09, 2008, 09:51:14 AM »
.....  There are over 75,000 hits on this thread already.


They may be 75,000 hits and most are from internet "spiders" from Google or Yahoo. But there is only one miserably stubborn old man who cannot prove what he is dreaming about! That's how sad it has been.

cheers
chrisC

Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2428 on: May 09, 2008, 10:42:57 AM »
Dear Hans,

I better state my points before other posts drown the thread

In the first Lee-Tseung Pull, a horizontal force F is applied.  At equilibrium, the following relations hold as demanded by the Law of Parallelogram of Forces.

(1)   T1sin(a) = F    ;so that there is no net force in the horizontal direction
(2)   T1cos(a) = Mg  ;so that there is no net force in the vertical direction

(3) The horizontal work done is F x dX or F x Lsin(a). 
(4) The vertical work done is Mg x dH or Mg x L(1-cos(a))

The value of (3) and (4) are different.  (3) is done by the externally applied horizontal force F.  (4) is done by gravity via the tension of the string.

If the relationship between Mg and T is 6 to 1, the angle a is 9.46 degrees.  The horizontal energy / vertical energy is roughly 2.  This means 2 units of horizontal energy can lead out 1 unit of gravitational energy.

See the previous posts or the presentation slides for the calculation details.

Kul_ash

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #2429 on: May 09, 2008, 11:19:17 AM »

I shall talk about different ways of moving the bob (or the knot) from Position A to Position B.  The analogy is ?going from Street One to Street Ten on a hill?.  One can go by car, by bus, by bicycle or on foot.  One can move in a straight line or take a detoured route.  The work done or energy spent would be different with different scenarios.


Lol Tseung  ;D That is normal physics of this real world! In your fantasy world, you keep moving on horizontal road and gravity keeps pushing you up  ;D So your world has anti gravity! Our normal, boring world does not offer any such exciting push for us to go up. We have to waste gas or our energy to go up the hill!  :'(