Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 894451
  • *Total Topics: 15730
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Open Letter to Steorn  (Read 29317 times)

Offline argona369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #30 on: August 27, 2007, 04:25:41 PM »
>I visit this topic to read Lawrence posts

Funny, I thought you where Lawrence.
How many names do you post under here btw?


The search for free energy has been going on for years and years.
Ask Stephan, he?s been here since the old yahoo days.
Real science. Real proof.
Feel free to spew away.


I would like to see everyone posting here back up their silly claims. If you want to claim there are no free energy devices in the universe. Then you have to provide evidence of such. If you want to anonymously post on the Internet that you claim someone is a scam. Then you should deliver the evidence Mr. anonymous or you are the con artist yourself.

Meanwhile you are just a bunch of Vatican Wikipedia editors IMHO.

I visit this topic to read Lawrence posts, I'm not at all interested in reading your quick spew, menstrual moods and conspiracy theories. What made you think that stuff is interesting?

I think anonymous has oil stocks and lots of em! I don't have to prove my claim, you can disprove it for me. By your own logic everyone should be guilty until proven innocent.

So there you have it. ::)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7kKTDvFQ7M

« Last Edit: September 11, 2007, 05:02:34 AM by argona369 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #30 on: August 27, 2007, 04:25:41 PM »

Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #31 on: August 27, 2007, 06:23:57 PM »
@Humbugger,

Quote
The skeptic does not and cannot, even if he wished to, bear the burden of proving a negative.  It is the duty of those who claim to have done the impossible to provide, if not proof, some reasonable evidence at least!

I have done that. I have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that CoE can be violated. Why don't you then just shut up and discontinue your useless rant?

Quote
I'm a free energy skeptic
You, a skeptic? That's quite an overstatement. Incompetents such as you are not called skeptics, they are just incompetents.

"Shut up, you incompetent!"  Is that your contribution to scientific debate?  A skeptic would be banned for that kind of rude and vicious personal attack.  I have read your "proof" that SMOT violates CoE and I am among many who remain unconvinced.   

Can you be specific regarding anything I have stated or claimed or taught being incompetent?  What do you mean that my confession of skepticism is "an overstatement"?  That would seem to imply that I am less skeptical than I say I am.

You sound very incoherent, bitterly angry beyond all reason and extremely abrasive and rude.  Try to lighten up and have a better day!

Humbugger
« Last Edit: August 27, 2007, 06:51:17 PM by Humbugger »

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #32 on: August 27, 2007, 07:52:46 PM »
Correct. Shut up you incompetent. Don?t waste bandwidth and the time of those interested in truth and integrity in Science. Enough of you. And, if you continue with your impudent nonsense the attacks at you will escalate. Enough is enough.

As for my proof for the violation of CoE, there?s enough of it in this and other threads. Read it for Heaven?s sake before spewing complete nonsense. I?m not going to repeat it every time for some moron who hasn?t understood basic Physics yet but comes around with his arrogant opinions.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #32 on: August 27, 2007, 07:52:46 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #33 on: August 27, 2007, 08:05:59 PM »
Correct. Shut up you incompetent. Don?t waste bandwidth and the time of those interested in truth and integrity in Science. Enough of you. And, if you continue with your impudent nonsense the attacks at you will escalate. Enough is enough.

As for my proof for the violation of CoE, there?s enough of it in this and other threads. Read it for Heaven?s sake before spewing complete nonsense. I?m not going to repeat it every time for some moron who hasn?t understood basic Physics yet but comes around with his arrogant opinions.

Exactly what "impudent nonsense" are you referring to?

Threatening escalating attacks...hmmm...maybe you can construct a giant SMOT and hurl steel balls at me, huh?

Humbugger under attack  :o

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #34 on: August 27, 2007, 08:10:59 PM »
I'm under attack, you moron. You are attacking me.

The impudent nonsense is your insistence that there hasn't been arguments proving violation of CoE in the face of facts proving indisputably that violation. That's impudence to no end.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #34 on: August 27, 2007, 08:10:59 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline brnbrade

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 126
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #35 on: August 27, 2007, 08:29:08 PM »
Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!
Fight!  :o

Where is diplomacy gentlemen?

Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #36 on: August 27, 2007, 08:41:13 PM »
I have no interest in personally attacking you or anyone else. 

I have not insulted you or demanded that you do or refrain from doing anything or threatened an escalating attack against you or made any claims of having disproven basic tenets of modern physics.

You appear to be doing all of the above.  When I ask for specific reasons for your vitriolic attacks and insults, all I seem to hear is more spewing of venom.  Whether or not I personally accept your "proof" that CoE is an invalid concept does not alter any fact of the matter, now does it?

Please refrain from further threats and personal insults.  They do nothing to advance your arguments or enhance your reputation as an intelligent man of sound reason.

Humbugger will "waste no further bandwidth" responding to insults and threats

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #36 on: August 27, 2007, 08:41:13 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #37 on: August 27, 2007, 08:50:32 PM »
Continuing to spew nonsense is enough of an insult. You should know that. Stop it.

I have given enough proof here in this and in other threads and you?re insulting me by ignoring it and asking me to repeat it over and over again. Stop it.

Stop insulting me.

Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #38 on: August 27, 2007, 09:16:55 PM »
Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!
Fight!  :o

Where is diplomacy gentlemen?


It is right there in each of my posts.  Omnibus is raging and spewing insults simply because I'm skeptical and remain so.  He butted in on comments between myself and Gaby which were, as always, shared in a good-natured sense of philosophical sparring.

Out of nowhere comes Omnibus, spewing threats, insults and hate in general and then accusing me of attacking him!  Apparently, this is how he responds to anyone who does not agree with him regarding his pet theory and claims of SMOT disproving CoE.

I see no point in continuing to converse with Omnibus and I do not appreciate his personal insults and threats of escalatory personal attacks.  Were I to do that, as a skeptic, I would probably face banning.

Humbugger


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #38 on: August 27, 2007, 09:16:55 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #39 on: August 27, 2007, 09:24:59 PM »
I?m outraged not because you?re skeptical but because you?re incompetent and are spewing nonsense and big words whose meaning you don?t quite understand.

Stop insulting me. Mine is not a pet theory but is a definitive proof that CoE can be violated. You are incompetent, therefore, you cannot understand it and must not utter insults such as this. What an impudence.

You should face banning not because you are a skeptic but because you?re impudently cluttering discussions with your arrogant behavior of an incompetent pontificating what is and what isn?t. Polite arrogance, that?s the worst insult. Stop it.

Offline Hiltoa

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #40 on: August 27, 2007, 09:43:00 PM »
Omnibus - I am not a skeptic, and as such, can I ask you politely and with respect, to calm your outrage.
Those of us who believe in the fallibility of CoE should welcome any argument as an opportunity to educate or debate, not to antagonise. The best way to lose a potential ally is to attack.

Channel your energy in a creative way, and we can all benefit.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #40 on: August 27, 2007, 09:43:00 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #41 on: August 27, 2007, 09:59:05 PM »
This isn't a potential ally. This is an arrogant nobody whose only role is to belittle people's achievements. These should really be told who they really are. Enough of this diplomacy.

Offline brnbrade

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 126
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #42 on: August 28, 2007, 02:05:29 AM »
 :D
The life is only one.
Add forces, knowledge, friendships
It?s better.  Can believe.
The life is fast, and only once.


Offline Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1032
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #43 on: August 29, 2007, 03:51:48 AM »
   I would like to know how the topic of stoern broke down to about the smot?
Stoern will rebound and this is what should be discussed here. There is an area
for the smot.

thaelin

Offline dimitri

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Open Letter to Steorn
« Reply #44 on: August 30, 2007, 12:26:13 PM »
Omnibus,

Fair enough, but where has that proof been published? I looked at several threads but only found references to the proof, but never the proof itself.

Regarding bandwidth waste management: if you'd link to the proof one time in every thread you blame people that they are ignorant of understanding it, the webmaster can cut half the advertising space.

Best regards,

Dimitri
Mine is not a pet theory but is a definitive proof that CoE can be violated.

 

OneLink