Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Successful TPU-ECD replication !  (Read 1150780 times)

13thHouR

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • R-Force.org
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #900 on: August 18, 2007, 02:18:05 AM »
Proposal for a wiring schematic of CCs.
Signals/pulses would travel 720? (i.e. twice round the circle).
Collector is not shown.

Coil assembly A consists of 2 insulated coils on the same core. These coils A1 and A2 are wound in opposite direction.
Coil assemblies B and C are made up in the same way as A.

1) What happens:
Pulse Pn has just left A1. At that moment A2 could be called the secondary.
The collapsing field (BEMF of Pn) leads to induction in A2.
If A2 was wound in the same direction as A1 the induced potential would be opposed to Pn.
Since A2 is wound in the opposite direction, the resulting Voltage V in the secondary will have the same potential as pulse Pn and such add to the potential of all pulses Px.

Yes? No?

2) How can the augmented potential which in the drawing is routed to GND, be partially recycled?

3) An additional thought:
If the black coils A1, B1, and C1  (OR the orange coils) were wound from iron wire and thus became magnetic while they act as secondaries,
could this effect be called a dynamic magnetic bias?
And would that be helpful?

edit: attempt to clarify my understanding of this circuit:
- A1 and A2 act as a transformer. B and C work in the same way - but these transformers are not isolation transformers. Note:
primary and secondary of each transformer are connected in series, as the circular connection goes round twice.
So energy in the primary and secondary of each transformer
are kept in one circuit and are phase shifted in respect to each other. So they should add up.

I think this is an interesting approach, but why not break it down into single caduceus coils? Which is remarkably similar to your layout however greater care is taken in how you loop the cross over points on the opposing wind. Their resonant frequency is considered to be almost infinite. As well as being natural emitters of the solitary (Scalar /Soliton) waves. I have tested simple caduceus coils with a single Khz bandwidth square wave source, resonating almost into the 10 Mhz band.

(http://jnaudin.free.fr/images/caduceus.gif)
picture with courtesy of  J.Naudin http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/sclxmtr.htm


Interestingly Naudin was able to get away with using a normal zener diode setup in his soliton pulse experiments when driving the IF840 Mosfet from his function generator. Although I do admit the IRF7307's will give a better performance. Those things are like gold dust in the UK at the moment. 

Anybody know a good source for the 7307's in the UK? or even a source which will ship them here without having to buy 10,000...

(http://jlnlabs.imars.com/spgen/images/spgendiag.gif)


Have look how intense the spikes are using a caduceus coil with a single square wave source.

(http://jlnlabs.imars.com/spgen/images/soliton_pulse.gif)

That is with an input frequency of just 15 KHz (DTC=50%)

More info here : http://jlnlabs.imars.com/spgen/index.htm
« Last Edit: August 18, 2007, 02:46:38 AM by 13thHouR »

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #901 on: August 18, 2007, 02:47:03 AM »
I was wondering... Oh man. Your "sweet spots" are harmonic frequencies, just like nodes on a tesla coil. If you get the frequency exact.... DO ME A FAVOR. Once you know the exact frequency, figure out a couple of 1/4 wave harmonics and then inject them into your pulse circuit.... It SHOULD increse the output drastically. If that doesn't work, try full half wave harmonics, or even full wave harmonics.

Imagine the effect of a harmonic resonant tesla coil. A single resonant frequency at Q gives an awesome spark. Combined with multiple harmonic frequencies, and the coil erupts, as they combine without negation. Your "sweet spot frequencies" should be some factor of 1/4 or 1/2 wave frequencies. I am wondering whether ZP isn't harnessed by a form of "resonant trap" field effect. Just a thought.

Paul Andrulis 

13thHouR

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • R-Force.org
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #902 on: August 18, 2007, 02:56:54 AM »
You may want to read this http://www.math.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~takasaki/soliton-lab/gallery/solitons/index-e.html

It gives an interesting perspective on soliton waves.


The most common frequency that keeps cropping up in these TPU experiments seems to be an output in the 5Mhz band.

btw be very careful, as you can see from the previously posted references, soliton waves can easily transmit through conventional metal RF shielding. Essentially when do this you are setting up a variation of Prof.Dr Gunter Nimtz's quantum tunnelling experiments. 

Where the wave pack travels from Point A to point B by non subliminal (FTL) means. A form of magnetic space time superconductivity if you prefer. Where the electron is pushed, yet between that location and the exit location it is not subject to any resistance on our relative scale, so there is no loss of this push energy.


A----------------------------------------------------------B

In normal terms  the electron travels from A to B but is subject to resistance which slows it down.

However this spike causes the electrons density to be rapidly compressed. Meaning that physically it is two small to interact with our space time.

Mean while us and the device are subject to the normal compression of space time.

The electron now interacts on another scale version of the universe.

In doing so it is like dropping a stone in a container of water that is full, the water get displaced proportionate to the volume/density of the stone. In the same way space time on that scale expands proportionately.

Because we are now of the same scale of interaction to where the previous zero point was. We now observe this low density matter of that scale as ultra high density matter on ours , the 'electron'.

However to us the electron has jumped from point A to point B and it still has the same velocity and acceleration as was first induced.

A                                                                                 B

A to B With nothing  in between.

Which explains how two soliton pulses can converge into a single packet then exit as the two soliton waves with the same velocity as they had before. Again this seems to be around this 5Mhz carrier bandwidth.

However if we introduce other harmonics we increase the compression, forcing the electron to interact with ever higher density ranges of the universe. for each scale range it steps through on the resultant expansion the amount of energy increases by 1.

So 10 scale ranges down (less the original range) return 9 times greater energy than the input.

This is the basic principle of how ZPE works.

It is kind of scary when you consider that each multiple is technically the sum of the entire energy of another scales finite universe. So what seems like a tiny increase in output to us is effectively multiples of the energy required to start the big bang.

A less technical explanation of soliton waves that I found on google http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~davia/mbc/8start.html

This part in reference:

Quote
Soliton waves (originally identified by J. Scott Russell in 1884) are non-dissipative waves that occur at the boundary between differing tendencies of waves. Thus, in water, the mathematics used to describe low amplitude waves are relatively simple -- linear in fact. Low amplitude waves have a tendency to dissipate, as when we drop a pebble in a pond and observe the waves spreading out. Also, the various frequencies that might comprise a low amplitude wave will gradually separate as a result of the different speeds at which they travel. High amplitude waves, on the other hand, behave non-linearly. They have a tendency to compress and cause criticality, white water, turbulence. However, just like low amplitude waves, the result is a rapid dissipation of energy and structure.

Right at the boundary between these two tendencies we find soliton waves. Examples of soliton waves include tsunami and certain types of vortices; Jupiter's Red Spot may well be a soliton wave. What makes these waves so interesting is their robustness. A tsunami may travel the length of the Pacific Ocean with relatively little dissipation. Soliton waves are practically frictionless. It seems that at the boundary the non-dissipative (or compressive) tendency of high amplitude waves exactly cancels out the dissipative tendency of low amplitude waves. Also, solitons can be found in a number of mediums. If physicists exactly balance two properties of light - refraction and diffraction, for example, solitons may be formed.

The wires that we are using are the perfect medium for non dissipation of the soliton waves as they follow a relatively uniform structure.

The exactly balanced refraction and defraction of light would be the opposite windings if the caduceus coil and yes you can create optical based caduceus transmitters.

They are what sci-fi would refer to as sub space emitters and collectors.

Now for something completely different:

http://www.youtube.com/v/BiUlqecQKUo.swf

Oh well,I thought it was a cool hack of a tesla coil  ;D
« Last Edit: August 18, 2007, 05:27:02 AM by 13thHouR »

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #903 on: August 18, 2007, 06:40:27 AM »
If you are familiar with bill beaty (excellant site) http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/weird.html he does some quite interesting experiments. Check out this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGGbCuf2-2I

This is a classic, but why I bring it up, is the important reason. No matter how I visualize particle interaction with the ZP or Quantum flux, it looks pretty much like the floating dry ice experiment. Every particle (dry ice) comes from the quantum flux (the vapors).  Anything penetrating the vapor will have to "shove it aside" to pass through (inertia). I wonder if "quantum tunneling" isn't in fact the Flux absorbing the particle, then re-emitting another like particle elsewhere.

Understand that there is nothing else truly in the universe than the Quantum Flux....... The particles are some form of lower frequency of the flux itself, in a stabilized format. Everything is energy, and what we like to conceptualize as solid... there is no such critter. Sometimes it can be difficult to express or convey mental imagry with such a flawed and fallable device as language, so I apologize if I have done poorly.

That is why any properly high enough frequency in any medium or energy could therefore be assumed to interact directly with the flux.

What I meant by a resonant trap earlier, is something I envision in my mind. We know that in a truly resonant form, the voltage no longer leads the amperage, but is in fact of the same period. If two waves of sufficient difference of cycle are interposed upon the same path, and at all places along the path of the longest wave where the potential crosses 0v, that the shorter or higher frequency waves also cross 0v at exactly the same point, the two waves should travel simultaneously without interference, they should in fact strengthen each other.

Another byproduct is the time gaps between the peaks of the resonant waves. It is no longer filled with current lag, but is at higher or zero excitation.  At the points, my mind shows what I refer to as a "resonant trap", or a dead space where the ZP Flux is forced by the inertia of the moving electrons to flow in the same direction as the path of the current.

This may be just BS, as I am using my mental chalkboard to envision the event, but that is what I am perceiving as what is happening. Your thoughts on this are welcomed.

Paul Andrulis

13thHouR

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • R-Force.org
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #904 on: August 18, 2007, 07:12:32 AM »
Another thing I should point out that is important, the need for a choke coil to stop feed back into the PSU, be it a battery or a Regulated mains unit, these TPU's are subject to similar stresses to that of Tesla coil circuits.

Without choke, you may experience a pumping effect which trashes your hardware.

I guess I should explain a bit more of what you are tapping into with TPU's

These are frequency induced Ionosphere resonators. To be precise the most desirable side band resonating frequency is 8 Khz.

Up to this point I like Nikola Tesla have been reluctant make this information public. As the capability of Ionosphere resonators in firmly in the Yottawatt territory. However with so many of you getting close to this in your research, the dangers need to be explained.

Our ionosphere, animals, plant life, even the very earth has a specific frequency of 8Khz. It also can have extremely disruptive effects on brain wave activity.

If you create to large enough 8Khz field you will trigger an ionosphere discharge. What goes up will be a streamer of about 15 to 20 feet, like that seen with conventional Tesla coils, However what comes back will create a bang that will be heard up to 50 miles away and quite simply you will be toast. So be very careful, if your hair suddenly stands on end, shut everything down very quickly. As standard safety triggers will not be tripped by this discharge, well not until it is too late.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2007, 05:17:00 PM by 13thHouR »

13thHouR

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • R-Force.org
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #905 on: August 18, 2007, 07:39:25 AM »
If you are familiar with bill beaty (excellant site) http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/weird.html he does some quite interesting experiments. Check out this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGGbCuf2-2I

This is a classic, but why I bring it up, is the important reason. No matter how I visualize particle interaction with the ZP or Quantum flux, it looks pretty much like the floating dry ice experiment. Every particle (dry ice) comes from the quantum flux (the vapors).  Anything penetrating the vapor will have to "shove it aside" to pass through (inertia). I wonder if "quantum tunneling" isn't in fact the Flux absorbing the particle, then re-emitting another like particle elsewhere.

Understand that there is nothing else truly in the universe than the Quantum Flux....... The particles are some form of lower frequency of the flux itself, in a stabilized format. Everything is energy, and what we like to conceptualize as solid... there is no such critter. Sometimes it can be difficult to express or convey mental imagry with such a flawed and fallable device as language, so I apologize if I have done poorly.

That is why any properly high enough frequency in any medium or energy could therefore be assumed to interact directly with the flux.

What I meant by a resonant trap earlier, is something I envision in my mind. We know that in a truly resonant form, the voltage no longer leads the amperage, but is in fact of the same period. If two waves of sufficient difference of cycle are interposed upon the same path, and at all places along the path of the longest wave where the potential crosses 0v, that the shorter or higher frequency waves also cross 0v at exactly the same point, the two waves should travel simultaneously without interference, they should in fact strengthen each other.

Another byproduct is the time gaps between the peaks of the resonant waves. It is no longer filled with current lag, but is at higher or zero excitation.  At the points, my mind shows what I refer to as a "resonant trap", or a dead space where the ZP Flux is forced by the inertia of the moving electrons to flow in the same direction as the path of the current.

This may be just BS, as I am using my mental chalkboard to envision the event, but that is what I am perceiving as what is happening. Your thoughts on this are welcomed.

Paul Andrulis

Although you are thinking in the right territory, I avoid quantum mechanics and string theory like the plague. It's a personal preference thing, I prefer my science to deal with reversible processes, not theology and philosophy  ;D

I only mention Quantum Electron tunnelling, as that is the name modern science has given to simple density shifts.

Despite this I do like how your thinking (even if it is limited to a finite range, with TDM I can show infinite scale  versions of what you are addressing, I do not mean any disrespect by this, it's just putting into perspective classical physics interpretation when compared to the real scale of things) however it's still good to see others pushing the boundaries of what a singular finite universe can define.

Go have read of this thread http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2816.0.html

Then have think of the wording. Try to break out of the String theory and Quantum mechanics terminology (it's just people with blinkers on trying to describe what's on the other side of the horizon without defining anything that can be measured)

Imagine you two frequencies as being seconds on the hands of two old watches. When you are relative to each scale of each watch, you see each second tick by. But as an external observer you can see for every two ticks of the larger scale watch the smaller watch ticks just second. However it is the smaller watches second hand that is the faster of the the two. As technically it is tunnelling through space time to every second tick of the larger one. So time slows down for it when compared to the larger scale of the bigger watch.

It's all about what you are relative to. As to what you can observe and measure. Classical physics forgets this and tries to describe both watches interaction yet describes no method to allow this interactions to be compared.

Putting it simply classical physics stops at zero,  Classical Physics + TDM defines infinite possible relative scale zero points.

One is finite, the other is infinite possibilities of that finite range.

Now you know why I detest String Theory and Quantum Physics. I have no need for the vague answers they produce ;D

Although essentially in certain parts we are saying exactly the same thing, your is the description of a tear drop, where as mine encompasses an infinite ocean.

Which is the same as saying you are not wrong, I just use a bigger model for the purposes of a more defined description.

I mention all this too you, as I can see real genius in the way you are thinking, you just need a good enough model to use to describe what you are visualising.

Despite what people who adhere blindly to letter of predefined finite classical physics will tell you. There is no right or wrong when you cross the zero point, only the probable and less probable with current levels of understanding.

« Last Edit: August 19, 2007, 03:47:22 AM by 13thHouR »

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #906 on: August 19, 2007, 06:57:58 PM »
Hi,
    Roberto & Otto you guy's still around, I know you went on vacation Otto, Kinda quiet around here without you, hows it going?

 

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #907 on: August 20, 2007, 09:32:06 PM »
.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2007, 02:05:55 PM by acerzw »

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #908 on: August 21, 2007, 06:52:01 AM »
@ otto (or all)

I hope things are well and that ECD efforts are moving forward.

I have a question if possible.

I saw this device on ebay. Was too late to grab it but please take a look and give me your comment on suitability to be used on my ECD testing.

It says high voltage 100K volts but very small amperage. Does this mean very fast voltage speed but fine thread like current with pulsing up to 69 pps.

What I am thinking is the 12 volts DC with 4-6 amps is not the answer. I think what is required is power that has the same speed as the frequency range. 12 vdc is too slow compared to the frenquencies that are too fast from my freqency generator. I think matching these both is the key. It's not only the frequency. Power type is the key also.

Tesla liked high voltage. Speed creates movement, movement creates field, field creates power. Frequency/resonance can then concentrate or expand the power.

Here is the link. It is a very simple component.

http://cgi.ebay.ca/High-Voltage-Pulse-Module-DC-to-DC-6vdc-to-100KVDC-LQQK_W0QQitemZ150150308360QQihZ005QQcategoryZ11737QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Warlock Weary

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #909 on: August 23, 2007, 12:26:02 AM »
Bull Or ??
THIS UNIT MAKES APPROXIMATELY

120VOLT 4MAMP
http://www.ncbookz.com/

OUR FAMOUS INVENTION

WE ARE GIVING THIS TO THE WORLD FOR  PRACTICALLY FREE BELOW
IF YOU WANT TO BUY THIS FREE ENERGY SET OF PLANS, JUST FOLLOW THE GOOGLE CHECK OUT RIGHT HERE. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THIS, I HAVE DELAYED MY EXPERIMENTING WITH THIS UNIT BECAUSE I KNOW IT WORKS BUT I CAN BUILD THIS IN MY SPARE TIME THE AVERAGE TURN AROUND TIME IS 3-4 WEEKS. TO BUY THE WHOLE UNIT BUILT FROM SCRATCH IT IS $295.00(EMAIL ME FOR DETAILS) BUT THE PLANS ARE HERE IF YOU WANT TO TRY YOURSELF. THANKS AGAIN, I AM JUST PAYING FOR THE SERVER COST AND ALSO EBAY COST. I HOPE EVERYONE GETS OFF GRID SOON SO WE DON'T SUPPORT THE SAVAGES WHO ARE MAKING MILLIONS THE COST FOR PLAN IS  $52.00


FREE ENERGY DEVICE     $52.00  includes shipping

HERE IS THE CHECKOUT FOR THE ACTUAL BUILD ($295.00)

Sent a email will see if he responds :/


innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #910 on: August 23, 2007, 02:33:57 AM »
THIS IS A JOKE !!!!


WHAT YOU CANT SELL THEM ON EBAY ANY MORE??

LOL!!

YOU KNOW YOU GOT  SOMTHING  WHEN ....... IT DOES WHAT SM SAYS IT DOES!!!!

ISTEAM!!

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #911 on: August 23, 2007, 03:53:22 AM »
Bull Or ??
THIS UNIT MAKES APPROXIMATELY

120VOLT 4MAMP
http://www.ncbookz.com/

OUR FAMOUS INVENTION

WE ARE GIVING THIS TO THE WORLD FOR  PRACTICALLY FREE BELOW
IF YOU WANT TO BUY THIS FREE ENERGY SET OF PLANS, JUST FOLLOW THE GOOGLE CHECK OUT RIGHT HERE. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THIS, I HAVE DELAYED MY EXPERIMENTING WITH THIS UNIT BECAUSE I KNOW IT WORKS BUT I CAN BUILD THIS IN MY SPARE TIME THE AVERAGE TURN AROUND TIME IS 3-4 WEEKS. TO BUY THE WHOLE UNIT BUILT FROM SCRATCH IT IS $295.00(EMAIL ME FOR DETAILS) BUT THE PLANS ARE HERE IF YOU WANT TO TRY YOURSELF. THANKS AGAIN, I AM JUST PAYING FOR THE SERVER COST AND ALSO EBAY COST. I HOPE EVERYONE GETS OFF GRID SOON SO WE DON'T SUPPORT THE SAVAGES WHO ARE MAKING MILLIONS THE COST FOR PLAN IS  $52.00


FREE ENERGY DEVICE     $52.00  includes shipping

HERE IS THE CHECKOUT FOR THE ACTUAL BUILD ($295.00)

Sent a email will see if he responds :/



I spoke with the inventor some weeks ago.  He is a first year EE student and believes he has something.  I believe it is simply an induction coil.  He has no scope at this time, and claims the device runs on "waste energy".  I asked him if he ever ran it away from any electrical or magnetic fields to see if it still worked.  He said no. 

It is interesting for two reasons:
1.  He uses iron ferrite, and winds it almost like an antenna.  He gets 1 volt per wind.
2.  It does seem to have some amperage to it.
3.  There are NO ELECTRONICS hooked to his coil.  It is simply a pickup coil.

Hope this helps!   ;)

Bruce

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #912 on: August 23, 2007, 04:35:33 AM »
@btenzer

If you speak to him again, please explain that selling his thing for 52$ is pointless as he will sell a few and then what. Ask him to put it up on the forum for review. If it is what he says it is, he'll get more out of it.

Also, could you please take a look at a post I put on page 91.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2535.msg45336.html#msg45336

I am really curious if someone with better ECD understanding can advise me if this may be good.

I also looked in this ebay sellers' store and he has neo powder, magnets at really cheap prices to liquidate. Also, aluminium powder, and other powders that can be used by some to make special forms. I am in no way linked to this seller.

Keep well.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2007, 04:59:02 AM by wattsup »

kames

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #913 on: August 23, 2007, 04:48:46 AM »
Bull Or ??
THIS UNIT MAKES APPROXIMATELY

120VOLT 4MAMP
http://www.ncbookz.com/

OUR FAMOUS INVENTION

WE ARE GIVING THIS TO THE WORLD FOR  PRACTICALLY FREE BELOW
IF YOU WANT TO BUY THIS FREE ENERGY SET OF PLANS, JUST FOLLOW THE GOOGLE CHECK OUT RIGHT HERE. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THIS, I HAVE DELAYED MY EXPERIMENTING WITH THIS UNIT BECAUSE I KNOW IT WORKS BUT I CAN BUILD THIS IN MY SPARE TIME THE AVERAGE TURN AROUND TIME IS 3-4 WEEKS. TO BUY THE WHOLE UNIT BUILT FROM SCRATCH IT IS $295.00(EMAIL ME FOR DETAILS) BUT THE PLANS ARE HERE IF YOU WANT TO TRY YOURSELF. THANKS AGAIN, I AM JUST PAYING FOR THE SERVER COST AND ALSO EBAY COST. I HOPE EVERYONE GETS OFF GRID SOON SO WE DON'T SUPPORT THE SAVAGES WHO ARE MAKING MILLIONS THE COST FOR PLAN IS  $52.00


FREE ENERGY DEVICE     $52.00  includes shipping

HERE IS THE CHECKOUT FOR THE ACTUAL BUILD ($295.00)

Sent a email will see if he responds :/




Sometimes I feel very tired. Have a shame and read more. Not again.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1933.0.html


13thHouR

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • R-Force.org
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #914 on: August 23, 2007, 04:57:45 AM »
These scammers always come out of the woodwork, what makes is worse is that peeps pay them money for an item that is freely available.

Nobody has any problems with others selling pre-built 'functional' devices for cost plus a few hours work. But $295, that was just crazy. That guy must be the slowest coiler on the planet if it takes him weeks to wind them.  ;D

I guess that was just more of the spiel for the gullible.

I do wonder if he actually had a functional version, or was just selling a load of junk? Or even not even selling any physical object at all.