Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead  (Read 153563 times)

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #330 on: September 12, 2007, 09:05:11 AM »
After watching that vid I figger I could try a different field.

I put this together and got an excellent stable arc, albeit with near saturation baking soda solution.

Still working on gittin' the amps down.

Turtle

Robb077

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #331 on: September 12, 2007, 12:30:29 PM »
Turtle:
Looks great. Maybe you need a variac and something to pulse and reverse polarity of the current like Ironhead.


IRONHEAD:
It is possible to have a device like reverse induction, which makes electricity from heat. This could work with the tungsten plasma or the hho-ceramic heater. Check this out.

http://www.howstuffworks.com/question136.htm

Robb077

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #332 on: September 12, 2007, 12:39:28 PM »
Turtle:
You have a good idea there. What if you tried just an eclipse shape that could be adjusted for closeness to the tungsten....think you might be too far and using more amps...possible. Experimenting with distance from rod might be worthwhile.

Robb077

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #333 on: September 12, 2007, 02:10:16 PM »
Turtle:
Maybe I meant a parabolic shape. If you used smaller and adjusted the distance, maybe less current. Look at the one Warlock made.

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #334 on: September 13, 2007, 05:42:31 AM »
IH was of the opinion that the partial field would disintegrate rather quickly at the rod contact.   I'm gonna work with 2 feeds on the field.

Also, warlock's arc was anything but stable, and mine was rock steady.

Methinks the relationship of rod to field, applied voltage, and width of field have much to do with performance.   This was the first of a skinny-pipe design that proved the perf-plate field will work, at least initially.  Much more ahead.

I gotta review all these pages, cuz anomalies I seen need some explaining.   Much of study ahead, and yes, the variac is a must.   Jes didn't have it at the lab.  Step-up tx as well.

At least I be a-headin' in the right direction, uh huh.

More later.

Turtle

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #335 on: September 13, 2007, 05:45:08 AM »
think you might be too far and using more amps...possible. Experimenting with distance from rod might be worthwhile.

Voltage and field gap are first on the study list.

The ceramic glaze had micro-cracks... the rod was squirtin' H2 out all over... had to sleeve it.

Turtle

Robb077

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #336 on: September 15, 2007, 07:27:30 PM »
Turtle:
I think you have a good point on the partial field argument but not sure of actual mechanics. For example, does a bigger rod make more h2? True, you would have burning just on one side of the rod with partial field, but it should last as long.
Anyway, look forward to more developments.  Its getting colder and need to refine the h2 heater :)

Robb077

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #337 on: September 16, 2007, 04:02:59 PM »
Turtle:
It is getting colder so I need to get busy on the heater, lol.
I think if you can replicate what IH made and run it on 10-20 watts with pulsating and reversing current, you will have created an efficient heater. The graco screen works so this is what I am going to use.
My engineer friend is not sure how to pulse and reverse the current as IronHead did. First is the pulsing which might be able to be done with a power transister.
Maybe IH can explain the setup. It would be nice to be able to run on mineral water also instead of great amounts of electrolites.

aussepom

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #338 on: October 22, 2007, 04:24:26 PM »
Hi just some info that may help

An RF signal at 13.56megs into an RF amp with a 250v DC supply will give you a chance to done what you want. You will need the high voltage mosfets with a  rating of 1500v and able to run on 6 to 8 amps   the RF amp will peek to peek at 1200v with low amps to start the arc then it will drop and the current will rise.
 
 I am working on two projects in and around this.
I have seen the reports from the japs doing this stuff and they had all the gear and the technology but still failed to get any real output of gas.
DO NOT USE ANY FORM OF SALT IN THE WATER AS YOU WILL GENERATE CHLORINE IN THE WATER AND SOME CHLORINE GAS
The water can get up to 1200ppm of chlorine just from a small amount of salt
I have had years of experience with electrolysis in water treatment.
aussepom

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #339 on: October 23, 2007, 05:34:35 AM »
13.56 mHz?   Can a mosfet switch that fast?

Also, in the plasma application I'm working on, I want the gas burned, recombined to give off heat , thenceforth extract the heat to a thermal application.

If you've done well with RF HHO production, what for heat were you getting?

Thanks,

Turtle

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #340 on: October 23, 2007, 05:36:05 AM »
BTW,AP, you into desalination?

I do the dirty water thing, wastewater treatment.

Turtle

aussepom

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #341 on: October 23, 2007, 09:17:31 AM »
Hi keithTurtle
 Yes they can
 But you run an RF oscillator this is fed into an RF amp the Rf Amp output switches the mosfet the VDD is 250v DC the rf amp is about 4 to 1 so 4x250 around  950V if you use 300v VDD you can get just under 1200V I do not know if it would work in your application but once the arc is formed you need to keep is sustained this has been the main problem using the system you are trying to replicate, most touch the electrodes together then open up the gap a mechanical operation.
The voltage will fall and the current rise, this could be done with carbon rods as well for electrodes.
DC arcs are harder to sustain, the high frequency RF is easier. BUT BE VERY CAREFUL  WITH HIGH FREQUENCY HIGH POWER RF it will cook you from the inside 3degree burns from the inside of you.
Advanced power technology has a range of them, cheep for you guys over there I am trying to get some from them myself.
aussepom

aussepom

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #342 on: October 23, 2007, 02:29:57 PM »
Hi keithturtle
 This is a follow up
 The mosfet does not actually turn and off it's used as a c or a d class amp preferable as push pull.
The signal RF input into the amp is then amplified usually just short of 4 to 1 ratio.
Just like your amp at home that plays music
You can apply this to the standard electrolysis as well but take care.
I am putting together at the moment a demonstration unit for a meeting that I am speaking at, this is a high voltage pulsed power three cell units. I am not sure how it will turn out but I am experimenting again after a few years. I will be talking and showing the break down of the Myers electrolysers there were some interesting things that have come from this, it also has show up some possible flaws.
My main interest is developing my OZ Injector this has got to the build stage and some parts should be ready soon. Mean time I am looking at a few new approaches and explaining things to our followers at Climate Technology Solutions,     
climtechsolutions.com 
aussepom

passion1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #343 on: October 23, 2007, 04:03:10 PM »
Hi Guys

I just came across this thread and find it very interesting.
I suspect this site is related to what you are doing:

http://www.hopecell.com

What's your opinion on this?

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Plasma Electrolysis by IronHead
« Reply #344 on: October 24, 2007, 03:36:02 AM »
Once again, the HOPE cell is concerned with the creation of gas in addition to heat production.   What I'm after, at least initially, is the heat.   The more gas I can burn (reconbine) in hte plasma process, the better the efficiency, I think.

Still working on it.

aussepom, thanks for the RF info.   I'm about as ignorant as a turtle's plastron when it comes to RF, so there's a lot of homework I must do to grasp yer concepts.   I believe there is a way to use RF in direct HHO production, and I've aleady started fabricating a cell to drive, once I figger out what to drive it with.

It uses 2" long 1/4" rods on a 1/8 core rod.   Many of these in a cylindrical configuration, surrounding a solid 1/2" sq rod as neutral.  All contained in an acrylic tube, water injected at end, gas out the other.

Coil wraps the whole thing, RF applied there.

That's my thought; whether or not it has any basis in reality remains to be seen.

It's a long path, and time is not my friend.

I'll follow yer lead.   Mebbe that oughta be another thread, though.

Thanks again,

Turtle