Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM  (Read 82476 times)

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #285 on: December 07, 2022, 07:41:47 PM »
Guys, how do you tune your kacher ? With neon lamp or with scope, I'm interested in method. How do you know if kacher is tuned ?
What do you understand by tuning?
In my opinion, this thing is generally impossible to tune in principle.
Approaching  your hand to this device breaks everything dramatically.
You can see it on an oscilloscope. One can only adapt this for specific applications.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #286 on: December 07, 2022, 08:42:07 PM »
  Yes, that's right. Ruslan's field test only showed 5000 watts output.
About the same that Kapanadze showed, on several types of loads, before his passing. . Pretty limited, huh...

   NickZ

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #287 on: December 07, 2022, 08:57:19 PM »
   Forest:   The Kacher circuits can be tuned, but,  it depends what you're  trying to achieve.   Simple Kacher is tuned by adding or removing secondary windings, mainly.   But the controllable Kacher circuits have frequency and duty cycle and other controls available. For increased adjustments and tuning controls. The Kacher output in voltage can be read on a scope, or seen it's affect at an output bulb, or other load. We mostly use the Kacher as an  interuptor signal, when dealing with the yoke/grenade self running type systems.   NickZ
 

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #288 on: December 07, 2022, 09:03:20 PM »
What do you understand by tuning?
In my opinion, this thing is generally impossible to tune in principle.
Approaching  your hand to this device breaks everything dramatically.
You can see it on an oscilloscope. One can only adapt this for specific applications.


I've made kacher based on Ruslan video with 22k pot and it seems tunable.I'll try to check it on scope in spare time. btw I used small neon bulb and adjusted pot to get maximum light on top of secondary.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #289 on: December 07, 2022, 09:15:01 PM »
Colorado Spring July 2, 1899
Fig 2,3,4 - tuned circuit which do not change characteristics when hand is approached

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #290 on: December 08, 2022, 10:47:06 AM »
I tried once use shield arround coil.  It helps.


NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #291 on: December 08, 2022, 03:22:05 PM »
Colorado Spring July 2, 1899
Fig 2,3,4 - tuned circuit which do not change characteristics when hand is approached

  Forest:
Tesla did not use transistor switching.
He used a spark gap for that purpose.    Therefore the difference, as to why Tesla's hand movements did not affect the Tesla coil, in the same way.  But, his frequency was affected by placing a magnet next to the spark gap.
   However, Ruslan did show how his device was NOT affected by close by hand movements, as well. If that can be believed. 
   NickZ

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #292 on: December 08, 2022, 07:59:59 PM »
  Forest:
Tesla did not use transistor switching.
He used a spark gap for that purpose.    Therefore the difference, as to why Tesla's hand movements did not affect the Tesla coil, in the same way.  But, his frequency was affected by placing a magnet next to the spark gap.
   However, Ruslan did show how his device was NOT affected by close by hand movements, as well. If that can be believed. 
   NickZ


NickZ
Spark gap or transistor IMHO  it doesn't matter. Tuned circuits matter. Tesla described there how he make it oscillating for long time and without disturbance. One output tuned open tank circuit connected to ground, second tuned LC primary and one additional SEPARATING tuned LC circuit which pass energy without resistance (at resonance to the primary LC tank circuit, then spark gap or rather rotary interrupter.

gyvulys666

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #293 on: December 08, 2022, 08:18:49 PM »
"Spark gap or transistor IMHO  it doesn't matter.[/size]"


interesting would be to see which one is sharper transistor or rotary interrupter

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #294 on: December 08, 2022, 08:28:51 PM »
   What would interest me is, which "tuned" circuit matters, in self running? Not just ocilating.
We are after free energy, remember.  Did Tesla get to that part?
   
   NickZ

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #295 on: December 08, 2022, 08:52:40 PM »
According to Kapanadze it's Tesla method. Tesla also mentioned a method of getting energy from ambient few times. Tuned circuit makes current large by resonance which generate necessary strong magnetic field

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #296 on: December 08, 2022, 09:16:10 PM »
  Yet, Kapanadze never explained just where and how Tesla's ideas were used, to create a self runner.As Tesla never had shown anything like what Kapanadze had built. So to me that was just something conviniente to say. And the real builder of the Kapanadze devices, was not Tariel, nor his son. And that guy, may possibly still be alive and well.  But, who knows...As Dally is Vasmus, and these guys may be more than just related.  I would certainly like to know where the ideas for these self runners are really coming from.
   The Shadow knows, but, he ain't telling.
   NickZ

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #297 on: December 08, 2022, 11:57:58 PM »
NickZ
Quote
Yet, Kapanadze never explained just where and how Tesla's ideas were used, to create a self runner. As Tesla never had shown anything like what Kapanadze had built. So to me that was just something convenient to say.

The biggest problem I see is when someone is trying to replicate something based on hearsay. He said this based on that guy's opinion about this other guys work which nobody really understood anyways. It's a rats nest of second or third hand opinions often having no validity to it.

I suspect Russian trolls/oil interests are responsible for polluting the net with all these fake Kapanadze schematics. They got most chasing smoke and mirrors building useless electronics, chasing magical resonance or special coils. Rather than using there brain to work through the patent and actually think for themselves.

On the Kapanadze device, most have no idea that his first working device was actually a motor/generator setup. Nobody who actually wants to succeed builds the most complex and advanced devices first. All the real FE inventors started with simple setups so they could learn the basics then make progress.

AC


h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #298 on: December 09, 2022, 01:02:41 AM »
NickZ
The biggest problem I see is when someone is trying to replicate something based on hearsay. He said this based on that guy's opinion about this other guys work which nobody really understood anyways. It's a rats nest of second or third hand opinions often having no validity to it.

I suspect Russian trolls/oil interests are responsible for polluting the net with all these fake Kapanadze schematics. They got most chasing smoke and mirrors building useless electronics, chasing magical resonance or special coils. Rather than using there brain to work through the patent and actually think for themselves.

On the Kapanadze device, most have no idea that his first working device was actually a motor/generator setup. Nobody who actually wants to succeed builds the most complex and advanced devices first. All the real FE inventors started with simple setups so they could learn the basics then make progress.

AC


I find that it's much worse than that as for reasons I can't fully understand people would much rather look like complete fools than stupid when it comes to thinking for themselves. You know I'm all about Dr. Dingle/Meyer's technology and I have went out of my way to paint a very clear picture of the science behind the technology. No one ever gives the information I provided or free a try and move to instead to do as you just described in going out of their way to listen to miss information and duplicate that instead of what I have posted freely for everyone to have. In great detail I went over the needed tools one would need to get when moving to work on this technology and people simply refuse to get the tools needed to do the job and instead make complete fools of themselves titling videos saying "Hho high voltage" with this technology and they have no means to actually measure the voltage being applied to the water fuel cell.


I recently posted a video where I added a MOT to the 8xa circuit showing the technology breaking the bonds of pure distilled water with nothing being added to the water. I had and idea and moved to actually do it and shared the results. What I learned is the 8xa circuit is a current driven circuit which operates very differently that the voltage intensifier circuit which is an induction driven circuit. In my findings the only way to get the voltages up in the 8xa circuit is to make a much larger bifilar choke set and get a SCR switch that is rated to handle the increased voltages. In that 8xa circuit you have to also get a far larger resistor to keep the SCR switch voltage within the limits of the SCR switch which for mines is 10 volts maximum voltage. The cell has a gas output of around 1-3 LPM depending on how high I take the voltage up too. A few people complained to me that the gas output wasn't that high but haven't a video showing any better results with the 8xa circuit to show me they are actually doing any better.


On another video of someone telling everyone he is getting high gas output with high voltage that he can't actually measure you can actually count the bubbles coming out of the tubes he is using the gas output is so low. In sharp contrast try counting the gas bubbles in my video as that would be a impossible task. How is it that I am looked so down upon when others are out there making complete fools of themselves? But perhaps that's the plan of these people in that they just might be being paid by those that sell energy to make this technology look like it simply doesn't work at all, what to you guys think?


Why is it so hard for people to think for themselves in today's world? Why does it seem like people totally reject the scientific method but want to appear to sound as what they are doing is scientific? Why hasn't there been a single person to make the VIC transformer with the turn counts I gave that came from Meyer himself that gives all the specs to go about building that transformer?


Right now I shouldn't be the only one getting some success with this technology but like you pointed out people seem to like looking like fools for some reason rather than appearing stupid. But I fear it's just as you pointed out in that those that don't want technologies like these to see the light of day just push out massive amounts of misinformation on these technologies for people to attempt and fail and then bad mouth the technology knowing full well they didn't do things correctly or worse as they do so knowing full well they don't have the proper equipment to take readings of this technology in a provable manor. I watched a video very thoroughly of someone attempting to recreate Meyer's work only to see they aren't doing anything right. They don't make cells that can be pressurized. Don't have the proper tools for taking measurements with this technology, or have the proper machines and tools to make this technology if they aren't going to pay someone with the proper skills to make this technology for them. This generation kinda makes me feel sad in that they just seem to enjoy not thinking for themselves.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Reply #299 on: December 10, 2022, 11:32:07 PM »
h2opower
Quote
Why is it so hard for people to think for themselves in today's world? Why does it seem like people totally reject the scientific method but want to appear to sound as what they are doing is scientific? Why hasn't there been a single person to make the VIC transformer with the turn counts I gave that came from Meyer himself that gives all the specs to go about building that transformer?

Many have rejected science because of far right extremists and communists like China and Russia spreading lies and fake news. They want people to be uneducated and basically helpless so they can be duped easier. Read the news, the moment most right wing politicians get elected the first thing they do is slash health care, education and start firing teachers. They want the population stupid and sick because there's little money to be made from a smart and healthy population.

Here's a good example...
https://foodrevolution.org/blog/how-bad-is-mcdonalds-food/
The Real Cost of McDonald’s Fast Food
Quote
The annual health insurance premiums paid by the average American family now exceed the gross yearly income of a full-time minimum wage worker. Every 30 seconds, someone in the U.S. files for bankruptcy due to healthcare costs. Starbucks spends more on the health insurance of its workers than it does on coffee.

AC