For the ideal voltage source, that's your 150th bait and switch.  You should get a trophy for that or something.  You fought the idea that an ideal voltage source can vary in time repeatedly, and you pulled up the textbook definition as "proof" that an ideal voltage source cannot vary in time.  The fact that you are denying that fact with a bait and switch based around the choice of words is laughable.  We all know, your brain would sizzle and crackle and spit out hot embers if you simply said, "Sorry guys, I was way off on the ideal voltage source business and I wasted a lot of time."  What a joke.  Step up to the plate and be a man once in a while.

Do you remember perhaps about six or eight months ago some guy was on here for less than two weeks.  He taunted you, he mocked you, he demeaned you repeatedly.  He called you nasty names and insulted you.  He did it every single day he was on the forum.  Did you like it?  How would you like it if he stuck around for a full year and did it to you every single day?

But within two weeks he was gone.  And before he left he apologized to you and acknowledged what he did was wrong.  He was a complete jackass, but in the end owned up to his behaviour and acted like a man.  How about them apples?

And the reality for you on the technical side of things is we found out that you are not the equivalent of six months through an Electronics 001 course, it's more like you are 2 1/2 weeks through an Electronics 001 course and you have barely opened up your book.  So you can do nothing about that because it's "just a hobby," it's your choice.  But if I am involved with a thread that you are on you are not going to get special treatment from me and if you say daft nonsensical junk then you are going to be told that it's daft nonsensical junk.  We have had truckloads of that from you and I hope you go up the learning curve and get more out of your hobby.  "Ideal CEMF" is nonsensical junk, period.  "An ideal voltage source cannot vary with time" is nonsensical junk.

MileHigh

Your full of crap MH,and you know it.
As per usual,you leave half of everything out,because your to much of a coward  to admit when your wrong.
As i stated,an ideal voltage dose not change over time-regardless of the load. It only changes when the user determines that change. 300 post ago i stated this,but apparently you missed it--how convenient.

As far as my skills go-being very limited according to you,then stop being a coward,and take me up on my challenge. Of course,you wont-some horse shit excuse about--oh i dont build.

You just keep on taunting people until they bite back,and then you have one of your little baby tantrums,and start demanding apologies,and garenties that they will leave you alone--just like your doing with Mags now.

The only skill you have,can be anyone's,as the net has all that you know.
My skills are hands on,and can only be obtained in that manner.
Any time you want to take me on in actually building a device,you let me know. Until you can do so,then your words of wisdom mean nothing.

How about we see who can convert a universal motor to be the most efficient?,where we measure P/in ,and mechanical and ''electrical'' P/out.
You want to tell everyone here my electrical skills are basic--then take me on.
You want to say that past power measurements on such a device were wrong or 'some how'fake--then take me on.
When were both finished our modified motors,we will ship them to Poynt,and let him do the power measurements.
Give it your best shot MH ,and we'll see who has just basic 001 skills when it comes to electromagnetic/mechanical devices.

Lets get this show on the road MH,as i am no longer bound by restrictions.
Time for you to prove that you know more than me.

But i will even give you the edge MH--you may team up with anyone you like,get them to build your converted universal motor,and help you out as much as you need.

Lets discuss terms MH.
Lets see who can build the most efficient Rotary Transfomer


Brad

Specifying clearly and unambiguously what the conditions
of the problem are?

Unless of course, the alleged "problem" is really naught more
than a "head game" of trickery.

What a bunch of crap your posting is.  I can't believe you would post nonsense like that.  The question is straightforward and clearly expressed and unambiguous.  There were never any head games or trickery intended.

Here you are supposedly the guy that is "fighting to warn us of the NWO and the End Times" and what is implicit in that is "we have all been deceived" and "the truth will come out" and "all will be resolved in the battle between the forces of truth and good and the evil deceptive forces of trickery and deceit" BLA BLA BLA....

Right?

And you have the bloody nerve to come on and make a posting that makes you into a force of deception and trickery by falsely trying to suggest that some "evil trickery" is going on here.  Ironically, you are the purveyor of "deceit and evil trickery" by the totally disingenuous nonsensical posting that you just made.  Not only are you "out there" with many strange views, arguably someone with their "head screwed on backwards" but you come here and make a posting where you act exactly like the "bad guys" that you despise.  It's like you have your head "doubly screwed on backwards" with that posting.  You are acting exactly like the "shadowy guys" that you "warn" us about and despise.  Talk about "out of this world" irony.

Did I ruin your pulsations of pleasure?  Perhaps you need to read some Trotsky to reestablish some equilibrium.

Here, I stumbled across a YouTube guy that you will love.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX9977Q36-GvegkIt-3N5Ew/videos

I think you should "talk shop" with Rudolph of Germany, he comes from another galaxy.  He is waiting for the End Times.  The two of you will probably really hit it off.

MileHigh

MileHigh

No, I am not full of crap at all.  One of the many ridiculous "problem student in the class" arguments that had to be made with you and others is that an ideal voltage source can do whatever you want it to do.  You had this ridiculous notion that is must be fixed and so that had to be argued out with you.  When you saw others agreeing with me you clammed right up and stopped forcing that nonsensical issue.  Instead of having the guts to say that you realized that you were wrong you just "magically reappeared" on the right side of the argument much later.

The endless stream of garbage you post is unbelievable . We were talking about your question,where the voltages are fixed per time periods given,and the voltage dose !!not!!change within those time periods--regardless of the load. You know full well that this is what was meant by all those referring to your question,and now-still,you try your old !switcheroony! crap to try and make us look like we were wrong. The voltage dose not change over time-->unless you change it,as in your question. Once again-->the voltage will not change over time unless you change it.
You set the voltage at 4 volt's for 3 second's--that voltage will not change if it is an ideal voltage. You set the voltage at 0 volts for two seconds--that voltage will not change over time. You set the voltage to minus/negative 3 volt's-->that voltage will not change over time. You set the voltage to 500mV for 6 seconds-->that voltage will not change over time. You then set the voltage to 0 volts-->that voltage will not change over time.
The voltage dose not change over time-->unless you change it,and once you have done this,it once again will not change,until once again, you change it.
What part of this are you having trouble with?.

Talking tech with you has been a near-endless stream of irrational arguments because of your ignorance.  You hear something new and "make up your own rule" about that new thing and then it's another stupid battle with you to talk some sense into you.  This thread from the very get-go was like that, an endless stream of battling basic electronics vs. the electronics nonsense that you made up in your head.  This was all stuff that you should have been learning on your own starting six years ago, not to mention the six years worth of valuable and correct information that has been covered endless times on this forum that apparently made no impression on you at all and almost none of it sunk in.  Next time hopefully you will do better and not make up nonsense in your head first, but rather you will undertake to do the research yourself and inform and educate yourself properly.

You are no different MH,and you are the pot calling the kettle black.
How much did i have to do to show you that resonant systems exist in and around the ICE before you accepted that they do indeed exist?. And it was not just me that was trying to explain and show you this,but blindly you went on and on about how resonance had nothing to do with the ICE what so ever. Only after i posted proof ,you then come forward and say that the ICE was not your strong point.

You think i know nothing about electromagnetic machines,then take me up on my bloody challenge--show everyone here that you can put all your knowledge to use,and beat the bench hack.
It's all well and good to sit up there on your throne,and belittle people like myself,Mag's,EMJ,wattsup--the list go's on,but when it comes to the crunch,you have nothing--nothing but words that mean just as much in the real world. Your Indoctrination is your downfall,always has been,and always will be.

Surly you can find an old vacuum cleaner motor,or one from an old washing machine--any type of brushed universal motor,floating around some where?--it's not that hard.
The test is very simple--measure P/in,then measure electrical P/out,and mechanical P/out-->thats it,and you can modify the motor how ever you want.

So let's start a thread--lets get the show on the road.
I am offering to send my finished motor to Poynt,where there can be no !so called! fake ass shit going on that he wont find--no hidden wire's,no hidden batteries,no hidden radiant !what ever you like! power of any sort that i have been accused of in the past,by those i thought were friends--non of that bullshit.
You want to know the truth?,would you believe it if it came from Poynt?,well time to put up or shut up,and stop with your 001 basic crap until you can show us that your knowledge is far superior than mine,and there is only one way to find out--you have to build MH.

But i feel this all falls on deaf ears with you ,as you avoided all this in your last post.
You will be the man standing at ground zero,while the rest travel the stars,and you will be saying to your self-->nah,that shit is fake--it's not in the book's.
Those that are here,are not looking for what is in the books that you get to see MH,there looking for the stuff in the books you dont get to see.

Take me up on my challenge MH,instead of this endless garbage you post.


Brad

Brad:


 







MileHigh

1-An ideal voltage is one that dose not change in selected value.Your voltage is ideal-an ideal voltage dose not change in value over time,and when talking ideal inductors,3 seconds is an extremely long time to have a fixed voltage across it of 4 volt's.
 An ideal voltage dose not vary in time-regardless of the load it is placed across.

And there you go MH,as plain as day,it can be seen in your own quote's,that i was referring to the stipulated time frames per your question,and the fact that the voltage will not change.regardless of load. It only changes when the user sets it to change-period--so get off my back,as everything i said was correct.-->again MH-1-An ideal voltage is one that dose not change in selected value.
You do see that i clearly said !!selected value!! dont you?.And you do know your question clearly explains the changes in !!selected value!! dont you?

The part that you were having trouble with is someone saying, "There is an ideal voltage that changes in time by method 'x'."  That blew your mind and caused needless foolishness, nonsense and trouble.

The only one that had problems understanding what i said MH,is you--no one else.

Read this thread from the beginning and look at how difficult you make it, and how crazy and irrational your statements are with respect to electronics.  Get your act together next time.

It would be far easier if you took up some refresher courses on english.

I am not going to rip apart a bloody vacuum cleaner.  And if you truly think about it, your silly challenge doesn't even make sense.  But that simple exercise in rational thought escapes you, which is no surprise at all.

What part makes no sense to you MH?(should i ask )
It dose not come much simpler.
Modify the motor to deliver an electrical output as well as a mechanical output--the best your knowledge will allow for.
The input is simply a 12 or 24 volt battery.
P/in=VxI---P/out =VxI + mechanical HP or watts.
How hard is that?. What part do you find irrational ?.
Why will you not take up my challenge?--we all know why.


Brad

   MH, why not take up the challenge?
   On planet tinman you can make up the rules!
   The books are no use.
   You can have 90 degrees shift when and where you need it.
   This reminds me of AC/DC,they were from Australia, and very
   good they are too!
        John.
   You are not getting your hands on my Fisher and Paykel, I use it
   for laundry and I love it!

So what SeaMonkey?  You make a totally stupid posting that is supposedly to criticize me and my motivations, and for what?  The posting remains totally stupid and untrue.  So what, this is an exercise in "agitating me?"

You are left with nothing but a totally senseless posting.  A useless piece of "performance art" from SeaMonkey that means nothing and says nothing.  It was just you intentionally going through the motions as a "provocateur," a hollow vapid exercise in nothingness - an aimless pseudo provocateur that has run out of ideas.  You can think that you did a little "social experiment" to "get a rise" out of me, but as far as I am concerned it backfired on you, and you yourself ended up being the "experiment."

So what SeaMonkey?  You make a totally stupid posting that is supposedly to criticize me and my motivations, and for what?  The posting remains totally stupid and untrue.  So what, this is an exercise in "agitating me?"

You are left with nothing but a totally senseless posting.  A useless piece of "performance art" from SeaMonkey that means nothing and says nothing.  It was just you intentionally going through the motions as a "provocateur," a hollow vapid exercise in nothingness - an aimless pseudo provocateur that has run out of ideas.  You can think that you did a little "social experiment" to "get a rise" out of me, but as far as I am concerned it backfired on you, and you yourself ended up being the "experiment."

It would seem that the "social experiment" goes on.

It has gotten legs.

You never disappoint Miles - you devote much time and
effort to constructing your verbose responses.

It is always a pleasure to read your unorthodox views.