Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 ... 592   Go Down

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3556522 times)

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2775 on: May 19, 2015, 01:07:01 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 12:22:42 AM
MarkE is now saying, the damping Factor (Zeta) is causing the Resonance shift of: %20.84

I say this is unlikely! I think more is causing this! I think 10% Damping factor might be more likely.

MarkE Plucking straws from Charles Holland Duell Air again???
It is hilarious to watch as you make a complete fool of yourself.
Logged

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2776 on: May 19, 2015, 01:07:22 AM »
Oh Look, I did have this hidden away and from memory, 1% was a damn good guess!!!
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2777 on: May 19, 2015, 01:10:00 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 12:30:53 AM

But still does not explain the 94 Degree phase shift!

Would you like to explain what this means to the Masses MarkE?
Sure: you have established a history of taking incompetent measurements.
Logged

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2778 on: May 19, 2015, 01:10:47 AM »
Quote from: MarkE on May 19, 2015, 01:07:01 AM

It is hilarious to watch as you make a complete fool of yourself.


Yep, one of us is, and MarkE, it is not me!

I have some pretty good stats on what the masses think of your confuddled ramblings!
Logged

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2779 on: May 19, 2015, 01:13:51 AM »
Quote from: MarkE on May 19, 2015, 01:10:00 AM
Sure: you have established a history of taking incompetent measurements.

Hmm - I have never, ever given you any measurements!

I cant see why you would outright Lie here?

Do we have a defensive barrier going up MarkE? You're compiling Lies to protect your misconceptions?

Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2780 on: May 19, 2015, 01:14:45 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 12:55:16 AM
TK, most importantly: I want NO Investment!!! I do not want any money from anyone! I don't want anything from anyone...

Maybe something I would like, is for proper investigation by all interested into Devices that show totally unexpected results!

E-Bay has a ton of the same probe's that I have. The reviews are very good to be honest!

Really, TK, what's the absolute Error margin: +- 1%

So your Post is really not much use to us, it is just attempting to put doubt into the minds of others that do not wish to do the research!!! Which is a very sad way to approach Real Science!!!

Please don't forget, I have an output, that is over and above this current topic!

Propagation Delay at 664Hz would be?

Hahaha TK, you're doing the same as MarkE has done, Plucking straws from the Charles Holand Duell's Air!
Logged

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2781 on: May 19, 2015, 01:15:20 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 12:44:29 AM
In my defence: "To play with Children that think they are Adults, one must play like a Child"

Yes, much of this thread has been hijacked by people that were asked to leave early on, they didn't, but that's why the Internet has such a term: "Trolls"

Feel free to join serious discussion and be helpful!!!

   EMJ

There is no defense...

If one defines a "troll" as someone who posts off topic comments purely for the sake of invoking a mostly negative emotional response, then you have by far out-trolled anyone on this thread.

And yes, I remember when you asked those requesting more details regarding your claims and measurements, or discussing how you should have been using DC coupling, to leave this thread (even though their posts were relevant to the topic and claims made).

I also remember you bombing this thread with page after page of childishly arrogant sociopathy until it earned you a warning from Stefan.  Lately, you seem to be slipping back into that habit, and yet now you want everyone to take you and this thread seriously.

For example, last night, MarkE posted a reply to TK as follows:
Quote

I have no dispute with any of that.  I only wished to point out, and it seems that you agree, that for appropriately narrow circumstances, EMJ's trivial calculator does generate correct results.  Those narrow circumstances do not include any of the waveforms that I recall EMJ posting.  And worse, as you and many others have noted: EMJ did not take his voltage measurements across the circuit branches that he took his current measurements from.


Your reply to MarkE was as follows:
Quote

Hahaha - MarkE You Goose!!!

You're rambling Utter NON-Sense for the sake of Rambling NON-Sense - Hahaha You fool!

MarkE raised two important points in his reply.  Both of those points, the limitations of your calculator and the proper selection of measurement points, made perfect sense.  It is also rather obvious that the waveforms Mark was discussing were those related to your COP=1.7 claims, not the more recent "mostly" sinusoidal I&V waveforms.

For you to consider his post to be, as you stated, "Utter non-sense", surely means that you either do not understand the points he raised or that you are just posting non-sense in some attempt to insult Mark.

If your goal was to insult Mark, well, that speaks for itself regarding you, but if you truly did not understand Mark's comments, you would have been better advised to ask him what he meant and possibly learn something from it.

PW
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2782 on: May 19, 2015, 01:18:02 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 01:13:51 AM
Hmm - I have never, ever given you any measurements!

I cant see why you would outright Lie here?

Do we have a defensive barrier going up MarkE? You're compiling Lies to protect your misconceptions?
Pathetic.
Logged

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2783 on: May 19, 2015, 01:20:27 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 01:10:47 AM
Yep, one of us is, and MarkE, it is not me!

I have some pretty good stats on what the masses think of your confuddled ramblings!
What you do not have is any data that backs up your claims, or any way to defend the incompetent measurements you have asserted support your claims, or any justification for your many sordid and vulgar attacks on others.  One can only imagine if you behave as you do here in live social situations.
Logged

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2784 on: May 19, 2015, 01:22:57 AM »
Thanks Very Much Picowatt for reposting posts MarkE and I have already Posted!!!

You know what, I think people can read already though  ;)

But hey, if you want to feel special, then go your hardest!
Logged

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2785 on: May 19, 2015, 01:25:52 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 01:07:22 AM
Oh Look, I did have this hidden away and from memory, 1% was a damn good guess!!!

Although it is probably unlikely that skew is a major source of error with sine waves below 1KHz, the data sheet you present only discusses frequency response, that is, amplitude accuracy versus frequency.  No specs regarding skew or propagation delay are provided.

So your "1% guess", your posted reply, and/or the data sheet, address nothing TK was discussing.

PW
 
Logged

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2786 on: May 19, 2015, 01:30:36 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 01:22:57 AM
Thanks Very Much Picowatt for reposting posts MarkE and I have already Posted!!!

You know what, I think people can read already though  ;)

But hey, if you want to feel special, then go your hardest!

As I said, I am just now catching up with reading what you guys posted 'til what must have been dawn.  So I apologize for being a bit behind.

But seriously, what was it in MarkE's post that you considered "Utter non-sense"?

PW
Logged

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2787 on: May 19, 2015, 01:36:45 AM »
Quote from: MarkE on May 19, 2015, 01:18:02 AM
Pathetic.

MarkE - You misspelled: True

Having a hard time back tracking? Trying to cover your backside now?
 
Logged

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2788 on: May 19, 2015, 01:41:08 AM »
Quote from: picowatt on May 19, 2015, 01:30:36 AM

But seriously, what was it in MarkE's post that you considered "Utter non-sense"?



Picowatt - Approximately 85% of all MarkE's posts = Utter Non-Sense

Need I say more?
Logged

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #2789 on: May 19, 2015, 01:47:21 AM »
Quote from: EMJunkie on May 19, 2015, 01:41:08 AM

Picowatt - Approximately 85% of all MarkE's posts = Utter Non-Sense

Need I say more?

Actually, you do.  Otherwise its just another unsupported claim.

As an example, what was it that prompted you to state MarkE's reply to TK last night was "Utter non-sense"?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 ... 592   Go Up
« previous next »