ATOM1 where r u I'm now very very ready to collect that prize

  A charge distribution on a charged capacitor plate won't have
an associated magnetic field, reason, the electron spins will
be randomly oriented.
                    J.

Electron particles dont exist.  Its nonsense.    Tesla said this, so did countless others.


its a brain fart and a phantasm.




NOW youre going to have to figure out why theres no such (also) BS as a "negative charge"


Negative charge is as senseless BS as saying "dry water" 

You are literally surrounded by engineered electrical, electronic, electromechanical and mechanical devices that refute you. I suppose you think that electron spin resonance machines are fictitious, and that landing a robot lander on Titan was pure luck. Meanwhile,  you cannot engineer anything using your "theory" that contradicts the conventional physics of matter and energy. Negative charge doesn't exist? I laugh at you, sitting there typing your obscenities on your computer keyboard.

There is not ONE SINGLE evidence by anyone anywhere of an electron particle, you brain dead mental midget 


You make me laugh little boy.   


Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science.
“To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble! Just to mention another improbability...” - Nikola Tesla


Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)

“My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large entity carrying a surface charge and is not an elementary unit (particle). When the ‘electron’ leaves an electrode of high potential and in a high vacuum it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than normal.” – N. Tesla 

     

“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to give an account of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.” - Einstein on electrons; “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916

   

 “To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.” – W. Russell

     

JJ Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit.

One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard

   


 “There is no rest mass to an ‘electron’. It is given here the ‘electron’ is no more than a broken loose “hold fast” under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.” – E. Dollard

   

 “Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the ‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

   


 The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings

   

Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.

     


“Electrons as a separate, distinct entity…doesn’t really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a ‘field’.” - Dr. Steve Biller

     
You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their “force lines” is the “flow of electrons”; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance.  There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; ‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.   



Anyone who thinks particles are flowing thru a wire has a mental DEFECT. 

This Electron = Particle bullshit is nothing more than Greek ATOMISM.      The universe is NOT a giant sea of tiny pool balls rolling and banging and spinning.



The presumed SEM:
"Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses ‘electrons’ to form an image, specialpreparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the vacuum.

All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material. This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater”. The sputter coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum.

Argon gas and an electric field cause an ‘electron’ to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating ”

Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for “electron” microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he’s “shooting his electron gun”. A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it. This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor “lenses” of dielectric flux lines.




Youre a fool son.

"here are no discrete
particles in the universe and certainly none that
mediate charges, discharges, magnetism,
electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields,
all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’
are not particles,"


So what is a field then..a disturbance? A disturbance of what... Put the answer to this in one word apophasis,one word not a tirade

"One word? Sure,   Inertia
Ether"

You give me a fucking word that has no meaning? Cmon apophasis,inertia requires force against resistance.what is resisting and what is forcing

"Im not responsible for your ignorances."

You leave me with the word 'inertia' and then throw it on me?I must now figure it all out alone?(Sighhh,I must just remember you're not god)


"poor child, youre confusing CURRENT
CONNOTATION with the ORIGINAL DENOTATION of
said word.   
Your ignorance is no issue with myself, ......rather the
guy in your mirror."

Thats not fair man.I'm an einsteinian adherant with an open mind but you leave me here with more questions than I began with and felt safe and secure with. So you're saying that EXISTANCE is inertia-ing on itself or something else? ITSELF or SOMETHING ELSE which is it?

"too bad. I see you were brainwashed by crap"

Yeah well I don't wana be brainwashed by crap anymore and you're not helping.you left this building on half an elvis-note: you said that all matter/energy is a wobbling vibes now I wana know where this see-saw's centre is and you won't tell me.it can only be located at one of two places: either ontop the matter/energy itself OR ontop of non-existance.which is it,which is it

"Like most, you confuse "NOTHING" (in the literal
sense of nihilistic oblivion, .......which cannot exist
anyway, all things are relational  X is empty of
Y  .....etc)..........with NO-THING (not phenomenal)"

Woooooo you're sounding like a classic relativist here.I'm tired of relativism buddy I want the nothing here and I want the something there.I want them seperated.seperated.I'm going to seperate them and you can't stop me.


"why dont you ask how it is that at the dielectric
inertial plane of a magnet, there is NO MAGNETIC
GAUSSIAN reading possible (no magnetism)
or at the CENTRE of the earth one would measure
ZERO GRAVITATION
why is it at the CENTRE of all X (field modalities) there
is  NO "X" FIELD TO BE FOUND OR MEASURED"

So help me here,all these PLACES/LOCATIONS/CENTRES are devoid of measurement because the forces cancel out right here right?where does the ether come into play here at these pivot-points.