http://scitoys.com/scitoys/scitoys/magnets/suspension.html

that peckerhead is using a dozen ferrite rings for suspension.


Yeah, great design. 

(and used the same "bottom of a can" casting mold)

yes, thats the easy way, also you get a good convex surface perfect for centrifugal deflection


I have a machinist making 2 Al  CNC casting forms now.

@ TK

Sorry I don't mean to harp on, though, I am really interested to know if you're able to recreate the storm on Saturn in a lab, then you must understand how it works?

@ PW

I'd like to ask you directly, if you have access to a lab that can re-produce what TA is saying, are you willing to collaborate and help with "scientific" testing methods?
Things that are written down are meaningless. There are many ways to explain this statement, though, if you don't understand that statement then you won't understand me so there's no point. I'm sorry but everything starts and stops with the macroscopic universe for me because I can verify it.
Perspective, perspective, perspective.

@ TA

There are far more avenues this will open up rather than simple data transfer (Though I'd stay the hell away from something that's transmitting that much data; I've seen pigeons FRIED by our current technology!)

@ALL

I've asked a few times for an explanation as to why the "macroverse" works the way it does if this "Magnetic Vortex" isn't true & it's been ignored. It hasn't been answered because no-one actually knows. (There isn't a single piece of written evidence because "they're" trying to hold it back for the same reasons they stopped the space program; the Govt eventually needs to answer to the people, private companies don't!) A theory as good as this shouldn't be discussed using the very small because many don't have access to the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) or the results it's "actually" producing.  But, we all have access to large telescopes and there aren't too many "forces" acting uniformly throughout the universe.
Nature doesn't do straight lines and gamma rays are shot in a straight line. Again, I ask you to think of a bullet and then try to explain how this theory doesn't "hold up". Particles are irrelevant in this discussion because they use Math.

We live in a shooting gallery. Imagine a child 2 years old walking through a Rifle range and the shooter's don't even know the child is downrange.
That's the area of space we live in and we as a species really act like a 2yo. We cry when someone takes our toys and expect the boob when we're hungry.
If you are happy with the fact that "someone else will protect your children's way of life" then by all means give no thought to the theory and let people walk all over it.
Personally I think, if you guys are members of this forum with access to acceptable "scientific methods of verifying" then put up or don't bother being here. All I've seen (and I'm the first to admit I don't know anything) is negative responses to something quite critical. (No, I'm not talking about personality clashes)
We, as a species, didn't even realise Russia was about to be leveled. Millions of people would have been killed and the country destroyed. It isn't a stretch to see how it could have been the city you live in.
If you truly understand the "gravity" (Again, sorry about the pun but I thought I should lighten it up) of this theory then commit some time to it. If you don't, keep harping on and your intentions will be revealed.

I can't help but notice that whenever Kenny is put in an awkward position because of a statement he made or a question he can't answer he has a multiple postagasm!   (Not to be confused with the other-a-gasm.) 

@ TK

Sorry I don't mean to harp on, though, I am really interested to know if you're able to recreate the storm on Saturn in a lab, then you must understand how it works?

@ PW

I'd like to ask you directly, if you have access to a lab that can re-produce what TA is saying, are you willing to collaborate and help with "scientific" testing methods?
Things that are written down are meaningless. There are many ways to explain this statement, though, if you don't understand that statement then you won't understand me so there's no point. I'm sorry but everything starts and stops with the macroscopic universe for me because I can verify it.
Perspective, perspective, perspective.

@ TA

There are far more avenues this will open up rather than simple data transfer (Though I'd stay the hell away from something that's transmitting that much data; I've seen pigeons FRIED by our current technology!)

@ALL

I've asked a few times for an explanation as to why the "macroverse" works the way it does if this "Magnetic Vortex" isn't true & it's been ignored. It hasn't been answered because no-one actually knows. (There isn't a single piece of written evidence because "they're" trying to hold it back for the same reasons they stopped the space program; the Govt eventually needs to answer to the people, private companies don't!) A theory as good as this shouldn't be discussed using the very small because many don't have access to the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) or the results it's "actually" producing.  But, we all have access to large telescopes and there aren't too many "forces" acting uniformly throughout the universe.
Nature doesn't do straight lines and gamma rays are shot in a straight line. Again, I ask you to think of a bullet and then try to explain how this theory doesn't "hold up". Particles are irrelevant in this discussion because they use Math.

We live in a shooting gallery. Imagine a child 2 years old walking through a Rifle range and the shooter's don't even know the child is downrange.
That's the area of space we live in and we as a species really act like a 2yo. We cry when someone takes our toys and expect the boob when we're hungry.
If you are happy with the fact that "someone else will protect your children's way of life" then by all means give no thought to the theory and let people walk all over it.
Personally I think, if you guys are members of this forum with access to acceptable "scientific methods of verifying" then put up or don't bother being here. All I've seen (and I'm the first to admit I don't know anything) is negative responses to something quite critical. (No, I'm not talking about personality clashes)
We, as a species, didn't even realise Russia was about to be leveled. Millions of people would have been killed and the country destroyed. It isn't a stretch to see how it could have been the city you live in.
If you truly understand the "gravity" (Again, sorry about the pun but I thought I should lighten it up) of this theory then commit some time to it. If you don't, keep harping on and your intentions will be revealed.

Ah.... Hmm.

In answer to your direct question about the images I posted concerning the Saturn polar vortex storm: The first one is an image of a computer simulation that was performed by an academic team with access to a supercomputer. The second one is a photograph of my AnAtmoSphere Terella producing a similar pattern. It is _not_ a purposeful simulation of the polar vortex on Saturn, it is a configuration of electrically produced plasma inside an evacuated chamber that takes on the broad outlines of the Saturn group of storms. I believe that motions on a cosmic scale are influenced not only by gravity but also by electrical and magnetic forces, along the lines of the Electric Universe hypotheses of Wal Thornhill and David Talbot, and others. Many things happen in my Terella, and in Birkeland's before me, that look very  much like larger scale events in the cosmos. The plasma configuration resembling the polar vorticial storms on Saturn is an example. But in the Saturn case there is more than just electrical stuff happening, there is also a lot of gravity, Coriolis effect, vertical convection and the rest, and it is _these_ that produce the vortices, while the overall electrical field _may_ be producing the larger hexagonal  outline. Maybe.

As to the rest of your post... I won't rise to that bait, sorry. There are one or two or three genuine scientists posting on this forum and even in this thread. Respect is given where respect is due, and ditto disrespect. May I suggest that you go back to the very beginning of this thread and read the whole thing?

There are one or two or three genuine scientists posting on this forum

That certainly IS NOT YOU



This coming from the mindless fuck that posted "proof" of NOTHING,  doing what?..............


putting a Tonka truck tire on a wood STICK and rolling it around.



That video of yours still has me laughing. 

I have absolutely no problem stating "I don't know."

Since when.    Youre the same idiot that keeps referencing that dickheads videos ripe with descriptions and devoid of explanations.


Youre the same demented mental midget who has been saying there is no magnetic vortex for the past 80 pages.



I have no memory issues boy






What can you tell us about the CO-GRAVITATIONAL FIELD?



Oh, thats right, you NEVER defined the word  "FIELD"   


Here is where your HEAD is FULLY up your ASS.       Fields are not particles, are not mass, and likewise fields have NO CONCERN for the ramifications of magnitudes and measures (C squared)

TA,

Speaking of "can you tell us?"

Do you agree that in your FLIR video, at 0:20 to 0:21 and again at 1:07 to 1:09, the magnet, holding fixture, and CRT are all indicated as being at the same temperature within the resolving power of the FLIR camera?

PW