Marathonman..No problem..I'm a teetotaler vegetarian and conservative and peaceful Hindu who respects all religions and all faiths and go to Churches, Mosques and Temples all to pray. There are families where one is hindu and one is christian and Tamil Muslims are very peaceful people and had converted to Islam on their own more than 1000 years back.

I do not smoke, do not drink alchohol and do not eat meat. So No Hallucinations.

I would humbly request you to replicate the experiments that I did. It will take another 12 to 15000 dollars for this to be done and we are in recession and from a staff strength of 19 people I'm down to just four. I cannot invest more in this and I have disclosed all.

Why do not you do the experiment as described by me for a start and verify yourself. There are people who have verified part of the device and found my description to match. But they are not willing to come forward for they are afraid.

I started with humble beginnings and came to Madras with just Rs.750 Rupees and a degree in Law and struggled enormously. I know the pain of loss of employment for many families for lack of power. So I asked what is the status of research only to find that my rich clients owning wind turbine mills have no idea on technology. No research and funding and so I spent my own money and produced some results and some friends then came forward to support me and this is how I have done these things. I have tried technical advice and they are wrong. So I used observation and then followed Figuera and applied commonsense and the result came.

I suggest that you take a large solenoid and put 14 filar coils of 4 sq mm wire that can transport 24 amps to 27 amps electricity at 220 volts and give the power to it just as a single primary..See what is the output at the end of the primary.. See what is the input consumed. See what is the magnetic field strength developed. That single experiment has been replicated by some one here and he confirmed that I'm 1000% accurate.

With due respect and in all my humility you please accept this single experiment as a challenge. A single electromagnet. 18 inch long and 4 to 6 inches dia and fill it iron rods and then wind over it a 14 filar 4 sq mm wire. Give 220 volt AC input. see what is the input amperage that goes in and see what is the output that comes out of the solenoid. See what is the magnetic field strength. you would instantly know what I'm saying.

Though I'm a patent attorney I have elected not to file any patents and put it in open source and so no one can get any patent and cannot harass people who want to build these devices and sell them. As for me, I'm physically very weak and instead of being greedy and thinking about millions of dollars let me put in my small part so humanity can benefit out of this knowlege given to me.

See I'm a Lawyer. No training in this domain and i'm able to do this. How and why? I also ended up spending a lot of money Why..Some invisible force has forced me to do this and made me disclose this..

This is a humble challenge. Please accept it. Do the experiment and verify the results yourself and if you have doubts ask me and I will happily guide you. I do not deceive people on principle.

No hallucination.

People are ridiculed..

People are opposed

People are then accepted is the rule for inventors. Here I'm not the Inventor. The inventor is Figuera and Buforn. I have added an earth connection. I could have applied for a patent and then I would have come under threats to sell the patent and it would have gone to dust. But I sacrificed this aspect of greed and has disclosed so it can be done in hundreds of places and verified.

 
If the device of solenoid as described does not produce high magnetic field for a low input electrical field you can come here and you can beat me like a child as you stated in your earlier posts. I'm just joking and not offended by that and Please do not take any offence. The device works. period. Test it and without that please do not think for a moment I'm making false claims. I do not do that.

Regards,

Ramaswami

Lenz's law /ˈlɛnts/ is a common way of understanding how electromagnetic circuits obey Newton's third law and the conservation of energy. Lenz's law is named after Heinrich Lenz, and it says: If an induced current flows, its direction is always such that it will oppose the change which produced it.

Formally stated, Newton's third law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object.

  Was having a thought about this since it keeps getting thrown around. Wrongly applied to a different set of conditions even an internal combustion engine would be up for argument. Just exclude the fact that the detonation is confined to only allow the piston to travel without blowing the heads of the engine. Exclude the piston acting on a crankshaft in a circular motion to contain the travel of the piston so it does not fly out of the bottom of the cylinder. You could argue all day long for eternity just apply unconfined singular straight line effects to something which is not. Lenz law implies there is something being acted on which has a resistance to that action. Certainly you could imagine that a increase in load will require an increase in force to move that load.Resistance to that change could never go away except for it to never happen. Since it is going to happen instead of trying to say it is mitigated and does not exist why not think of it as being part of the back board used to constrain the force being used to move the object. Like the way the cylinder heads confine the combustion so the piston can only travel inside a confined space. Lenz law does not have to be broken just controlled.

Yeah,that's not about Newton third law, or Lenz law - it's all about wrong usage. It is common knowledge for example that every object falling in Earth gravity would not jump again higher then to the place it was at first.However it does not mean we cannot do that !

Yeah,that's not about Newton third law, or Lenz law - it's all about wrong usage. It is common knowledge for example that every object falling in Earth gravity would not jump again higher then to the place it was at first.However it does not mean we cannot do that !

i more think it's about spamming the page so people don't see these pictures ha ha

: D

Some users with apparently good results tell that the coils have to be adjusted or moved in order to get the effect.


I do not understand why (if we are already moving the field), but, anyway I post here a link to an old post which shows how the distance may change the induced filed. I guess this is what marathonman is referring with his proposal of a variable inductance device:


http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg437608/#msg437608


Lastly I want to recall that it is very important to read in deepth the 1908 patent a few times. Many doubts will be clear if read it and digested it.

YES SIR Mr Hanon this is "exactly" what i have been talking about as was passed to me. once the adjustments are made between the Primary and Secondaries the center support thickness of that exact distance can be cut and assembled. no other measurement is needed because the thickness is all ready set for all other Electromagnet bobbins whether it is round or square.
the distance will change as core, Bobbins size, Voltage, ect.. change.

i just named it Variable Inductance Cascade Amplifier because "The Figueras" sounds kinda dorky.

#1  it's currant is varied up and down which varies the Inductance.
#2  it is Cascaded to get your desired Voltage.
#3  it Amplifies the incoming signal.

thus you have the Variable Inductance Cascade Amplifier.

If he named the Rectangles and the Y core X, Y, Z would it be less confusing to every one. "NO WHERE" in his patents does it say North and South.
That was  fatal mistake in which through EVERYONE OFF for a long time and is still throwing you people off.

i just notice you guys filling the pages with repetitive and redundant data - so in that same sense my images might add a new vector to the fact that you are going over the principals of a transformer.

this image attached particularly highlights the the simplicity in which the original device was conceived.

it would be my advice to try building the 'Resistor' just as is displayed instead of trying to use modern  components or if you do you modern components then use a mix to compensate.

i think this is relevant and new info does anyone disagree?

Why do you keep posting the same thing over and over?  Are you desperate for someone to comment on what you are posting?  OK,  You have several things wrong with what you posted.  The resistor bank that is shown is just a resistor bank.  The windings are so far apart any inductance will be so small it probably can't even be measured.  And the same thing as far as capacitance.  With the windings spread out like in the drawing there would be no measurable capacitance.  Then you have a small capacitor that is so small it wouldn't have any inductance.  Then you show a small inductor that is too small to have any capacitance.  And then you show a carbon film resistor that has no capacitance or inductance.  And lastly there is no such thing as inductive capacitance.  An inductor can have capacitance and a capacitor can have inductance.  But inductive capacitance  is just a buzz word that means nothing.

Now will you please stop posting the same thing over and over?