I have also made tests with like poles and a pancake in between, it was very dissapointing, no voltage or any microamps.

Dieter, note that when testing like poles facing each other you have to provide two unphased signals to the electromagnets (for creating the swing back and forth of the collision plane between both fields) and you have to provide room for the movement of the magnetic lines in order to cut the induced wires. A pancake coil between two close electromagnets will not let the wire be cut by the movement of the magnetic lines.

Please read this file:
http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/dlattach/attach/131133/

Regards

dieter




It's simple....
About Columbus egg : he did that by hit egg on tabletop damaging the tip.Another way is by fast rotating it. However the most natural way is to hold egg using two fingers and I think Figuera could thought about two equal and opposite forces : one on top and one on bottom...
Now you tell me if there is any other way to keep egg standing ?

hanon


I wish I could but commutator is black magic for me. My brain is working first on impressions and not matter how silly it looks it never failed. Flat pancake output coils in parallel makes required amplification factor by rising output current. To do that as you described exact and opposite poles are needed and output coils placed in the middle (exactly!) . Then imagine how commutator connects/disconnects coils on one side to lower field strength while the other side is stable connection (that solve strange commutator one side only while second is simple pass). Changing need to be discovered yet , maybe it is such : one coil then 2 coils then 3 coils and so on up to the final amount to make field strength then same (but opposite) as on other side , then flip sides.


The best would be to check having 4 coils only : 2+2 and trying to see how field can be moved

Marathonman

 MWS Wire Industries
 31200 Cedar Valley Drive
 Westlake Village Cal.
 818 991 8553
 Catalog= TechBook 082011 Pdf.
 If you can find the catalog online there is information in there you didn't even know you wanted to know. They make stuff you haven't even dreamed of yet. I will try to upload the catalog as an attachment but I dont have very good luck with it. If it is there good if not it didn't work.

Marathonman

 MWS Wire Industries
 31200 Cedar Valley Drive
 Westlake Village Cal.
 818 991 8553
 Catalog= TechBook 082011 Pdf.
 If you can find the catalog online there is information in there you didn't even know you wanted to know. They make stuff you haven't even dreamed of yet. I will try to upload the catalog as an attachment but I dont have very good luck with it. If it is there good if not it didn't work.

Doug;

 I have a MWS catalog already in my possession but i didn't know whether the copper foil roll was coated or not. MWS is very expensive also and they don't sell partial rolls. i priced 18 awg wire at almost two thousand Dollars. OUCH !

Here is copper roll but i don't think it is coated so i will have to coat it myself.  http://basiccopper.com/10-mil-010-inch-.html

Robert Adams used a type of opened end magnetic path and got massive efficiency in the 800% range so there has to be something to it.

Sorry I didn't see the question before.

Hi Doug:

I have to admit that I have not used a resistor in between the coils in my tests while using low voltage and high amperage currents. If it works it is fine as it can cut down on the amount of wire and can reduce the cost significantly.

What is the kind of resistance that you would advise to be used for a 12 volts and 16 amps current source. It is a pretty decent 192 watts and the amperage is also significant.

12 watts or 12v one amp.
 


Assume we have two inductors and one induced.

Should we use the resistors between the transformer output wires and the inductors if the inductors are in parallel.

Should we use the 3 resistors if the inductors are in series. one from transformer to primary 1 beginning, one between primary 1 end to primary 2 beginneing and one between primary 2 end to transformer.

Now what is the kind of resistance that you would advise to be used in these places for the current source of 16 amps and 12 volts. Please advise and let me test. I will post results after testing.

Like the picture,I added the switch according to the text.
"Here what it is constantly changing is the intensity of the excitatory current which drives the electromagnets and this is accomplished using a resistance,through which circulates a proper current, which is taken from one foreign origin into one or more electromagnets, magnetize one or more electromagnets and while the current is >higher or lower<(not on or off) the magnetization of the electromagnets is decreasing or increasing and varying (not off), >therefore the intensity of the magnetic field is the flow which crosses the induced circuit<.
 As seen in the patent drawing the current, once that has made its function, returns to the generator where taken;(no it doesn't really show that) naturally in every revolution of the brush will be a change of sign in the induced current(? does that imply the induced circuit is returned to the same connections of the source) but a switch will do it continuous if wanted( what switch? A switch instead of the resister aray? Or it is switched from the original source to a self acting mode). From this current is derived a small part to excite the machine converting it in self-exciting and to operate the small motor which moves the brush and the switch( and? not or?); the external current supply, this is the feeding current, is removed and the machine continue working without any help indefinitely.

First. Give completely for free, electrical currents continuous or alternate of any voltage and applicable to:

 Take some consideration that in Tesla's patent Method of obtaining direct currents from alternating currents #413,353. A stationary magnetic field can be used to block half the wave form of an alternating current to produce dc current. The inducers if provided with low current continuously and alternately given impulses of higher current still maintains the requirement of acting like a diode while shifting the field strength between the inducers. So long as the magnetic poles do not reverse. The only way to keep all this activity is to keep the inducers fields apart. NN or SS with induced in between.

There was a time in early history when people made their own resisters actually not that far back. Made from common and handy junk they had laying around, graphite makes a nice resister if you can get it. I like pencil refills. If it goes poof so what cut another one a little longer or use a small diameter wire it also acts as a fuse and can be used to build a carbon light in a pinch. I doubt they had radio shack or nicrome wire in the late 1800's.If they did it wasnt easy to get. You could build a very nice rotating resister distributor that is adjustable in the resistance at each segment with it;s own sliding contact so the contacts can be moved up and down the resister material.