Bitbo,

thanks for your explaination, so it looks you are curious about the workings of your coil combination contraption.

Its a complex process, i am sure you realize that and that not many people will have the knowledge and/or the time to explain some or all of it.
I certainly do not (the knowledge part).

If you find something special (like more out then in), try to make and present some measurements first or loop it, then i am sure you will have enough attention of
knowledgeable people who will assist in explaining / debugging.

I had lots of fun with my nano-pulser (besides the crashing of severall conputers), and don't want to get rid of it as i still use it in all kind of experiments.
Its broken at the moment, but i will fix it.

There are others which have build these nano-pulsers, so perhaps they want to borrow or sell you one.

Good luck,  regards Itsu

Ahhhhh Alien Grey finally begins where we all should begin, with the Logarithmic spiral, or is it the Egyptian spiral, or is it the Golden Ratio spiral.....find out for yourself. Refer to moloscs.png above.

Interesting patent Wesley, but I'm afraid it may be bullshit.

"Empirically established that λ Β must be around 5, 88324456243 x IO" 23 m"

Okay, so frequency equals the speed of light divided by the above wavelength.

I get approximately 5.0957e-16 cycles per second.  Sorry, I don't think I'll live that long.

hi bitbo,

I have got high efficiency broad frequency 1.1kv Nanosecond generator (~8ns) which can handle up to <2Mhz in my youtube channel:sanjev21
1.1KV High frequency Nanosecond generator
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyR4GVM99JI

Hey magpwr,


thanks a lot for sharing this!
Due to lack of time i was not able to analyse your circuit in detail,
but that MOSFET is a real killer compared to my ones....
(all the values RDSon, rise time, etc. are exactly what i need)




From your and ITSU´s published information i expect to be able to create my
own pulser, which i tried to avoid, but it seems to be be necessary...
(and for sure will make some fun too)


Another question which is currently unclear to me from
all the available information:
- Which frequency (apprx.) should the push/pull be operated at?
- Which duty makes sense? (50%/50%)


Who feels be able and willing to give some advice on this?


Thanks in advance
bitbo

Bitbo,

i was reluctant to anser your questions as i did not understand for what circuit they suppose to be.
But now i understand you are talking about the Ruslan circuit allthough you earlier mentioned you where NOT following that one.

Anyway, its all in this thread somewhere, but basically the push-pull will be in the 17-27-37Khz range depending on what other resonance frequencies
(Kacher / Grenade) you are working with.

My Push-pull (TL494) was working at its max. duty cycle around 45% (dead time), but other report better result with 33%.
Guess you need to find the optimum spot for your circuit.


Hope that helps.

Regards Itsu 

Dear overunity  readers :
Please just disregard this  post below.
I was not able to post it on Youtube to answer the question of one of respondents
It is however  set of links leading to  nano coating used by Levitronics and going in its history into straight  connections with Hubbard and Hendershot  as well as Colman.
Early Hubbard and Hendershot based on information from Levitronics have been utilizing coating with radium.
As not important but  interesting it is worth to  mention that  radium was discovered to work as  medium "amplificating " electromagnetic waves in the  resonance circuit
https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/4369672-electromagnetic-radiation-from-radium
But radioactive material was also used  in spark tubes for radar. Anyone knows why? what effect  it was  helping with?
where to find radium?
https://theaviationist.com/special-reports/radioactive-materials-in-flight-instruments/
what is radium ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium historical facts: http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/2.2.100?journalCode=radiology-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

some of 1980 concepts:
1. http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm  Dr. Paul M. Brown  e Nucell battery yielded 7500 watts per gram of strontium-90
 (Died April 7, 2001)
2.https://www.google.com/patents/US4835433 
Apparatus for direct conversion of radioactive decay energy to electrical energy US 4835433 A


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



So this is my response to this guy:


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To be clear in it. It activated my curiosity to go deeper to nano-coating and nano materials.   I do study effects of nanomaterials coated to wire. By that  I have got to  number of  previous known art in this area. It goes deep to  Hendershot  time, than Levitronics was going this way , number of students in ..... university  have been involved in active study of that phenomena. there was claim that one of them  made successful replication but later on  the  coating was removed  and new one was applied and no luck.. It was about semiconducting material used to coat the copper wire. I do  not know you and I will not go to details here.  See it as  undocumented unverified claims.
however number of articles could be analyzed  here:
http://folk.uio.no/yurig/Nanotechnology/Superconductivity/Superconductivity_nano.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16007692
http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/self-resonant_frequency_of_inductors.htm#Distributed_Capacitance_and_Self-Resonant_Frequency ( here look only at negative inductance)
http://levitronics.blogspot.com/ this is just history fact not much more.
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=457.0
http://www.tandfonline.com/author/Edwards%2C+S+F this one is good to  understand a lot in this area.
http://rexresearch.com/barbat/barbat.htm this one is worth curiosity only at the present time.
Quote from article:
"In 1928, Lester Hendershot of Pittsburgh duplicated Hubbard's generator and flew a model airplane (11), which impressed William B Stout, designer of the Ford Trimotor airplane. Col. Chas. A. Lindbergh of the U.S. Air Corps was also convinced of this fuelless generator (12), but the technology was abandoned again because it was too expensive. Later, when the price of radium dropped, copper wire was produced shiny without the CuO coating. Since no one realized that CuO had been essential to the energy magnification, attempts in 1963 to replicate the generator were doomed to failure."
 so now we have two more names
1.Lester Hendershot
2. Hubbard with his generator
that in turn as far as phenomena goes down the road to 1956 Harold COLMAN & Ronald GILLESPIE : Power Generator  that also goes to 1901 pencil battery of Thomas Edison used by Hendershot.
https://youtu.be/0xXZT7YQDE8?t=888 can give you some specifics.
factor of Radium being used by  Hubbard can not  be dismissed  and  Levitronics was trying to replace  it with nano-conding  using some  sulfides.
Colman seetup is explained here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpBpk1Cg7ns
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.linux-host.org/energy/sahmedov.htm this  one is side kick of  but worth study
https://phys.org/news/2015-04-energy-usage-nano-coatings.html  it is some application of nanocoating.
http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2390697?journalCode=jcp& this one IS IMPORTANT!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_plasmon IMPORTANT!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adsorption  IMPORTANT!!
http://www.sciencealert.com/wonder-material-graphene-has-been-turned-into-a-superconductor INTERESTING
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology IMPORTANT!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_plasmon_resonance   VERY IMPORTANT!! wen it goes with https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16007692
http://g3ynh.info/zdocs/magnetics/appendix/self_res/self-res.pdf   - informational   but helpful in logical course.
https://phys.org/news/2016-07-nano-switches-superconductivity.html   - informational only
 You need to  make from it  logically connected set of  basic knowledge to   be able to  communicate with  me on this  issue.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The interesting part of all that brought me to analyze nanocoating of coper wires was effect that is noticed  in junction of nanocoating and copper wire.
This one is promising.
Simple to say  longitudinal electron response. Once we deal with it  it gives us partial explanation of FE (= energy we do not have to pay for ). Longitudinal behavior of particles is- dealing with  mass inertia and by that it goes along with my theory  of : electrostatic pump.
https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/5820986-longitudinal-transverse-response-functions-quasielastic-electron-scattering
two interesting moments here is conservation of momentum and ability to analyze it as  mechanical wave that is present along with transverse wave.

 https://nanohybrids.net/pages/plasmonics -this is only informational and not  so important
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  dear Jon Bigman  One more time I stress . DO NOT GIVE ME BS!!!. In Keshe - Scam device I did not notice anything dangerous by various methods not shown in video.
I will respond to your questions  however  please show me your respect and  level of your questions.

summary:
I will not give to the stranger my present  achievement in this area.
I do not know you and that should explain
Wesley
 

http://realstrannik.com/media/kunena/attachments/991/radium-antenna.pdf
*****
Two lightning rod with one common ground
one ordinary lightning rod.
One lightning rod coated with a radioactive substance
lightning strikes only in it
****
radioactive substance is very hard to find, I use another method which is available and is effective at least ..
*****
iron 56 is possible to obtain a simple and accessible method also..
****
Strange things happen here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQE9DAkP3eo

thank you boonk for your  help. It was what I was looking for in  regards electromagnetic waves and radium

Wesley